Variation in the rates of operative delivery in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to examine the national and regional rates of operative delivery among almost one quarter million births in a single year in the nation's largest healthcare delivery system, using variation as an arbiter of the quality of decision making. STUDY DESIGN: We compared the variation in rates of primary cesarean and operative vaginal delivery in facilities of the Hospital Corporation of America during the year 2004. RESULTS: In 124 facilities representing almost 220,000 births during a 1-year period, the primary cesarean and operative vaginal delivery rates were 19% +/- 5% (range 9-37) and 7% +/- 4% (range 1-23). Within individual geographic regions, we consistently found variations of 200-300% in rates of primary cesarean delivery and variations approximating an order of magnitude for operative vaginal delivery. CONCLUSION: Within broad upper and lower limits, rates of operative delivery in the United States are highly variable and suggest a pattern of almost random decision making. This reflects a lack of sufficient reliable, outcomes-based data to guide clinical decision making.

Cardiovascular centers of excellence program: a system approach for improving the care and outcomes of cardiovascular patients at HCA hospitals.

BACKGROUND: A voluntary continuous quality improvement (CQI) effort, the cardiovascular Centers of Excellence (COE) program was implemented by HCA, Inc., to improve cardiovascular care in its hospital system. METHODS: The cardiovascular COE program targeted 165 hospitals that provide cardiovascular services in at least one major service area. Awards (unrestricted grants) provided hospitals with an incentive to participate. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-eight hospitals (95.8%) completed the entire 2005 cardiovascular COE program; five were identified as cardiovascular COE. The program developed three key CQI activities: (1) an ongoing Web-based survey to inventory, track, and verify evidence-based practices across all aspects of patient care, including clinical practices, leadership, communications, patient safety, and patient education; (2) quarterly benchmark reports tracking risk-adjusted outcomes and evidence-based practices; and (3) regularly scheduled educational programs presented by an interdisciplinary team in which lessons learned from an institution's successful, evidence-based, best-practice implementation were discussed. DISCUSSION: The COE program successfully encouraged facilities to proacrively investigate their evidence-based clinical standards and outcomes.

On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in a matched sample of women: a comparison of outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Women have consistently higher mortality and morbidity than men after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Whether elimination of cardiopulmonary bypass and performance of coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump (OPCAB) have a beneficial effect specifically in women has not been defined. METHODS AND RESULTS: From January 1998 through March 2002, 21 902 consecutive female patients at 82 hospitals underwent isolated CABG, as reported in an administrative database. Propensity score computer matching was performed based on 13 variables representing patient characteristics and preoperative risk factors to correct for and minimize selection bias. A total of 7376 (3688 pairs) women undergoing CABG surgery were able to be successfully matched. In a propensity score computer-matched cohort, multivariate logistic regression (odds ratio) revealed that women undergoing on-pump surgery had a 73.3% higher mortality (P=0.002) and a 47.2% higher risk of bleeding complications (P=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective analysis of women undergoing CABG, computer-matched to minimize selection bias, off-pump surgery led to decreased mortality and morbidity including bleeding complications.

Practice and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in the community before drug-eluting stents: a report from the HCA database.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using balloon angioplasty and/or intracoronary stents has increasingly become the treatment choice for myocardial revascularization. While acute clinical outcomes of the community-based PCI procedures have been examined, much less is known about long-term revascularization rates, disease progression and other adverse outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Information on patient demographics, coronary risk factors, lesion characteristics, procedures and outcomes were derived from an HCA, Inc. database on all patients undergoing a PCI procedure in one of four community cardiac catheterization laboratories. A total of 3,192 consecutive patients were enrolled from July 1, 1999 through September 30, 2000. Analysis was limited to those patients undergoing PCI of native vessels with stents or conventional balloon angioplasty; target lesions in bypass grafts or those treated with atherectomy were excluded. Approximately one-third of enrolled patients were surveyed concerning their utilization of cardiovascular services 1 year following their initial procedure. The 1-year target lesion revascularization (TLR) was 9.9% while target vessel revascularization was 13.5%. Overall, 27.6% of patients underwent repeat revascularization within 1 year; 24.7% underwent at least 1 additional PCI and 5.6% underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A total of 4.5% of patients reported an interval acute myocardial infarction with a major adverse cardiac event rate of 30.3% at 1 year. CONCLUSION: While clinically significant restenosis remains a problem for 10 15% of patients undergoing PCI, progression of coronary artery disease elsewhere appears to be an equally powerful driver in the need for recurrent revascularization. This analysis of contemporary PCI practice prior to drug-eluting stent utilization suggests that while these novel devices will likely reduce the incidence of TLR, many patients with coronary artery disease will still require additional revascularization for disease progression.

The influence of diabetes mellitus on the practice and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in the community: a report from the HCA database.

BACKGROUND: Diabetics remain a high-risk group for those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using balloon angioplasty and/or intracoronary stents for myocardial revascularization. The objective of this study is to compare clinical characteristics, demographics, procedure indications, lesion characteristics, and acute and long-term outcomes between diabetic patients and non-diabetic patients in a community based PCI registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: Information on patient demographics, coronary risk factors, lesion characteristics, procedures, and outcomes were derived from an HCA, Inc. database on all patients undergoing a PCI procedure in one of four community cardiac catheterization laboratories (CCL). A total of 3,139 patients who underwent PCI procedures from July 1, 1999 through September 30, 2000 were enrolled in this study. Approximately one-third of these patients completed a follow-up survey one year after their initial encounter. Analysis was limited to those patients undergoing PCI of native vessels with stents or conventional balloon angioplasty; patients with target lesions in bypass grafts or those treated with atherectomy were excluded. Approximately 23.5% of the patients enrolled in the study were diabetic. This study found no significant difference in any acute outcome between diabetic and non-diabetic patients in the hospital episode associated with the index PCI procedure. However, data from the 1-year follow-up survey indicates diabetic patients tended to have more target lesion revascularization (TLR) (13.6% versus 8.9%; p = 0.07) and more target vessel revascularization (TVR) (17.6% versus 12.7%; p = 0.058) than non-diabetic patients. In addition, adjusted odds ratios indicate that diabetic patients were 1.6 times more likely to have a second PCI procedure in another vessel (p = 0.013), 2.4 times more likely to undergo bypass surgery (p = 0.003), 1.9 times more likely to undergo an additional revascularization procedure (p < 0.001) and 1.8 times more likely to experience any major adverse cardiac events (p < 0.001) than non-diabetic patients during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that selected diabetic patients can be treated for myocardial revascularization using PCI procedures with acceptable acute outcomes. However, diabetic patients undergoing PCIs have significantly more disease progression and are more likely to experience the need for recurrent revascularization.

Reducing acquired infections in the NICU: observing and implementing meaningful differences in process between high and low acquired infection rate centers.

BACKGROUND: Acquired infection is one of the most prevalent sources of concern in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Center-to-center variation has been noted by both the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System and the Vermont Oxford Network suggesting that site of care influences outcomes including acquired infection. OBJECTIVE: To reduce the acquired infection rate by isolating and then implementing meaningful process differences between high and low infection rate centers. DESIGN/METHOD: A multistaged observation and intervention study. The primary outcome measure was defined as a positive blood culture, collected more than 3 days after birth. Hospital patient days along with infection episodes were collected for all NICU admissions in the network during the baseline and post-implementation periods. A detailed observation guide was used during site visits to high and low infection rate centers. The observations recorded in the guide allowed the team to isolate meaningful differences, which were shared with the network. Individual NICUs decided which of the meaningful differences, if any, to implement. To estimate the impact on costs, additional data were gathered in a case-matched series of infants in one demonstration site. RESULTS: In all, 15 meaningful differences were isolated and shared with the network. The network rate for acquired infection dropped from 3.8 to 2.9 episodes per 1000 patient days. In the demonstration site, the infection rate dropped from 7.4 to 4.0 per 1000 patient days. CONCLUSION: Isolation of process level differences between high and low performing centers followed by implementation of these meaningful differences may reduce acquired infections. Other targeted areas of care may benefit from this quality improvement methodology.