Efficacy and safety of tegoprazan for duodenal ulcers in Chinese patients: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority, phase III study.

OBJECTIVE: Tegoprazan represents a newly developed potassium-competitive acid blocker utilized for the treatment of acid-related disorders. The present study aimed to explore the therapeutic effectiveness of tegoprazan in Chinese individuals with duodenal ulcers (DU). METHODS: In the current multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, non-inferiority, phase III clinical trial, individuals with DU underwent randomization 1:1 to be administered tegoprazan 50 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg once daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was the 6-week cumulative endoscopic ulcer healing rate. Secondary endpoints included 4-week endoscopic ulcer healing rate and relief of DU-related gastrointestinal symptoms at weeks 2, 4, and 6. Safety analysis encompassed adverse events (AEs) and laboratory indexes. RESULTS: The 6-week cumulative endoscopic ulcer healing rates were 96.9% (188/194) and 99.0% (189/191) in the tegoprazan and lansoprazole groups, respectively, indicating a difference of -2.0% (95% confidence interval (CI), -4.9 to 0.8) in the full analysis set (FAS). The corresponding healing rates were 98.4% (185/188) and 99.5% (183/184) in the per-protocol set, respectively, indicating a difference of -1.1% (95% CI -3.1 to 1.0). The 4-week healing rates in the tegoprazan and lansoprazole groups were 89.2% (173/194) and 88.5% (169/191) in the FAS, respectively, with a difference of 0.7% (95% CI -5.6 to 7.0). Treatment-related AEs, all mild to moderate, were reported in 38.2% (78/204) and 48.2% (94/195) of participants in the tegoprazan and lansoprazole groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Tegoprazan 50 mg once daily is effective and non-inferior to lansoprazole 30 mg once daily in Chinese patients with DU, showing a promising safety and tolerability profile. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05010954.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions and Tolerability of Rosuvastatin and Ezetimibe: A Randomized, Phase 1, Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Participants.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The combination of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe has promising clinical benefits with a significant safety and tolerability profile. However, there is a lack of clinical data supporting the drug-drug interaction (DDI) in Chinese population. Thus, the aim of this study is to assess the potential pharmacokinetic DDI between rosuvastatin and ezetimibe in a Chinese population. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, phase 1 study, 12 healthy volunteers were randomized to three treatment groups: 10 mg rosuvastatin plus 10 mg ezetimibe, 10 mg rosuvastatin alone, and 10 mg ezetimibe alone under fasting conditions. The plasma concentrations of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe were determined, and the pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. Primary endpoints were peak plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the curve from zero to last measurement (AUC0-t), and area under the curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) that were log-transformed, and co-administration was compared with monotherapy to evaluate the DDI. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of rosuvastatin with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were 0.94 (0.80-1.12) for Cmax, 0.96 (0.85-1.08) for AUC0-t, and 0.96 (0.86-1.07) for AUC0-∞ when administered in combination with ezetimibe versus administered alone. The GMRs of unconjugated ezetimibe and total ezetimibe with 90% CIs were 1.15 (1.00-1.32) and 0.93 (0.80-1.07) for Cmax, 0.96 (0.84-1.10) and 0.95 (0.83-1.08) for AUC0-t, and 1.06 (0.96-1.18) and 0.94 (0.80-1.11) for AUC0-∞, respectively, when administered in combination with rosuvastatin versus administered alone. CONCLUSION: Co-administration of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe showed no clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions in a healthy Chinese population.

A Bioequivalence Study of Ezetimibe/Rosuvastatin Fixed Dose Combination (10 mg/10 mg) Versus the Individual Formulations Taken Concomitantly.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the bioequivalence of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin fixed dose combination compared to the concomitant administration of individual formulations (ezetimibe and rosuvastatin) in Chinese healthy subjects under fasting conditions. METHODS: This was a phase I, randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, crossover study conducted in healthy Chinese participants under fasting conditions. Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ from test and individual reference formulations were evaluated to assess bioequivalence. The safety assessments included adverse events (AEs)/treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), potential clinically significant abnormalities (PCSAs) in vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiogram (12-ECG), and clinical laboratory parameters. RESULTS: Of the 68 subjects enrolled, 67 were treated. Systemic exposure to rosuvastatin based on Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ was similar in both treatments, with respective arithmetic values 12.4 ng/ml, 117 ng·h/mL, and 120 ng·h/mL for test formulation and 12.7 ng/ml, 120 ng·h/mL, and 123 ng·h/mL for reference formulations. Similarly, systemic exposure to unconjugated ezetimibe was 4.14 ng/ml, 89.7 ng·h/mL, and 102 ng·h/mL for the test formulation and 3.80 ng/ml, 89.7 ng·h/mL, and 102 ng·h/mL for reference formulations. Systemic exposure to total ezetimibe was 70.5 ng/ml, 664 ng·h/mL, and 718 ng·h/mL for test formulation and 60.2 ng/ml, 648 ng·h/mL, and 702 ng·h/mL for reference formulations. The point estimates for rosuvastatin unconjugated ezetimibe and total ezetimibe were in the acceptable range of 0.80-1.25. No deaths or serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Fixed dose combination of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin (10 mg/10 mg) achieved bioequivalence with reference to commercial tablets. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTR20202108.