RESUMEN
Judgement, as one of the core tenets of medicine, relies upon the integration of multilayered data with nuanced decision making. Cancer offers a unique context for medical decisions given not only its variegated forms with evolution of disease but also the need to take into account the individual condition of patients, their ability to receive treatment, and their responses to treatment. Challenges remain in the accurate detection, characterization, and monitoring of cancers despite improved technologies. Radiographic assessment of disease most commonly relies upon visual evaluations, the interpretations of which may be augmented by advanced computational analyses. In particular, artificial intelligence (AI) promises to make great strides in the qualitative interpretation of cancer imaging by expert clinicians, including volumetric delineation of tumors over time, extrapolation of the tumor genotype and biological course from its radiographic phenotype, prediction of clinical outcome, and assessment of the impact of disease and treatment on adjacent organs. AI may automate processes in the initial interpretation of images and shift the clinical workflow of radiographic detection, management decisions on whether or not to administer an intervention, and subsequent observation to a yet to be envisioned paradigm. Here, the authors review the current state of AI as applied to medical imaging of cancer and describe advances in 4 tumor types (lung, brain, breast, and prostate) to illustrate how common clinical problems are being addressed. Although most studies evaluating AI applications in oncology to date have not been vigorously validated for reproducibility and generalizability, the results do highlight increasingly concerted efforts in pushing AI technology to clinical use and to impact future directions in cancer care.
Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Diagnóstico por Imagen/métodos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico por imagen , HumanosRESUMEN
Immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) have failed in all phase III glioblastoma trials. Here, we found that ICBs induce cerebral edema in some patients and mice with glioblastoma. Through single-cell RNA sequencing, intravital imaging, and CD8+ T cell blocking studies in mice, we demonstrated that this edema results from an inflammatory response following antiprogrammed death 1 (PD1) antibody treatment that disrupts the blood-tumor barrier. Used in lieu of immunosuppressive corticosteroids, the angiotensin receptor blocker losartan prevented this ICB-induced edema and reprogrammed the tumor microenvironment, curing 20% of mice which increased to 40% in combination with standard of care treatment. Using a bihemispheric tumor model, we identified a "hot" tumor immune signature prior to losartan+anti-PD1 therapy that predicted long-term survival. Our findings provide the rationale and associated biomarkers to test losartan with ICBs in glioblastoma patients.
Asunto(s)
Glioblastoma , Animales , Ratones , Glioblastoma/patología , Losartán/farmacología , Losartán/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos , Edema , Microambiente TumoralRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To provide practice guideline/procedure standards for diagnostics and therapy (theranostics) of meningiomas using radiolabeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands. METHODS: This joint practice guideline/procedure standard was collaboratively developed by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), the European Association of Neurooncology (EANO), and the PET task force of the Response Assessment in Neurooncology Working Group (PET/RANO). RESULTS: Positron emission tomography (PET) using somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands can detect meningioma tissue with high sensitivity and specificity and may provide clinically relevant information beyond that obtained from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) imaging alone. SSTR-directed PET imaging can be particularly useful for differential diagnosis, delineation of meningioma extent, detection of osseous involvement, and the differentiation between posttherapeutic scar tissue and tumour recurrence. Moreover, SSTR-peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an emerging investigational treatment approach for meningioma. CONCLUSION: These practice guidelines will define procedure standards for the application of PET imaging in patients with meningiomas and related SSTR-targeted PRRTs in routine practice and clinical trials and will help to harmonize data acquisition and interpretation across centers, facilitate comparability of studies, and to collect larger databases. The current document provides additional information to the evidence-based recommendations from the PET/RANO Working Group regarding the utilization of PET imaging in meningiomas Galldiks (Neuro Oncol. 2017;19(12):1576-87). The information provided should be considered in the context of local conditions and regulations.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study describes an innovative optic nerve MRI protocol for better delineating optic nerve anatomy from neighboring pathology. METHODS: Twenty-two patients undergoing MRI examination of the optic nerve with the dedicated protocol were identified and included for analysis of imaging, surgical strategy, and outcomes. T2-weighted and fat-suppressed T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced images were acquired perpendicular and parallel to the long axis of the optic nerve to achieve en face and in-line views along the course of the nerve. RESULTS: Dedicated optic nerve MRI sequences provided enhanced visualization of the nerve, CSF within the nerve sheath, and local pathology. Optic nerve sequences leveraged the "CSF ring" within the optic nerve sheath to create contrast between pathology and normal tissue, highlighting areas of compression. Tumor was readily tracked along the longitudinal axis of the nerve by images obtained parallel to the nerve. The findings augmented treatment planning. CONCLUSIONS: The authors present a dedicated optic nerve MRI protocol that is simple to use and affords improved cross-sectional and longitudinal visualization of the nerve, surrounding CSF, and pathology. This improved visualization enhances radiological evaluation and treatment planning for optic nerve lesions.
Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Nervio Óptico , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Nervio Óptico/diagnóstico por imagen , Nervio Óptico/cirugía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodosRESUMEN
Surgical resection represents the standard of care for people with newly diagnosed diffuse gliomas, and the neuropathological and molecular profile of the resected tissue guides clinical management and forms the basis for research. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) consortium is an international, multidisciplinary effort that aims to standardise research practice in neuro-oncology. These recommendations represent a multidisciplinary consensus from the four RANO groups: RANO resect, RANO recurrent glioblastoma, RANO radiotherapy, and RANO/PET for a standardised workflow to achieve a representative tumour evaluation in a disease characterised by intratumoural heterogeneity, including recommendations on which tumour regions should be surgically sampled, how to define those regions on the basis of preoperative imaging, and the optimal sample volume. Practical recommendations for tissue sampling are given for people with low-grade and high-grade gliomas, as well as for people with newly diagnosed and recurrent disease. Sampling of liquid biopsies is also addressed. A standardised workflow for subsequent handling of the resected tissue is proposed to avoid information loss due to decreasing tissue quality or insufficient clinical information. The recommendations offer a framework for prospective biobanking studies.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioma , Humanos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Bancos de Muestras Biológicas , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Glioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Glioma/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an updated overview of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in neuro-oncologic imaging and discuss current barriers to wider clinical adoption. RECENT FINDINGS: A wide variety of AI applications in neuro-oncologic imaging have been developed and researched, spanning tasks from pretreatment brain tumor classification and segmentation, preoperative planning, radiogenomics, prognostication and survival prediction, posttreatment surveillance, and differentiating between pseudoprogression and true disease progression. While earlier studies were largely based on data from a single institution, more recent studies have demonstrated that the performance of these algorithms are also effective on external data from other institutions. Nevertheless, most of these algorithms have yet to see widespread clinical adoption, given the lack of prospective studies demonstrating their efficacy and the logistical difficulties involved in clinical implementation. SUMMARY: While there has been significant progress in AI and neuro-oncologic imaging, clinical utility remains to be demonstrated. The next wave of progress in this area will be driven by prospective studies measuring outcomes relevant to clinical practice and go beyond retrospective studies which primarily aim to demonstrate high performance.
Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Neoplasias Encefálicas , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neuroimagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapiaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We hypothesized that the time-dependent diffusivity at short diffusion times, as measured by oscillating gradient spin echo (OGSE) diffusion MRI, can characterize tissue microstructures in glioma patients. THEORY AND METHODS: Five adult patients with known diffuse glioma, including two pre-surgical and three with new enhancing lesions after treatment for high-grade glioma, were scanned in an ultra-high-performance gradient 3.0T MRI system. OGSE diffusion MRI at 30-100 Hz and pulsed gradient spin echo diffusion imaging (approximated as 0 Hz) were obtained. The ADC and trace-diffusion-weighted image at each acquired frequency were calculated, that is, ADC (f) and TraceDWI (f). RESULTS: In pre-surgical patients, biopsy-confirmed solid enhancing tumor in a high-grade glioblastoma showed higher ADC ( f ) ADC ( 0 Hz ) $$ \frac{\mathrm{ADC}\ (f)}{\mathrm{ADC}\ \left(0\ \mathrm{Hz}\right)} $$ and lower TraceDWI ( f ) TraceDWI ( 0 Hz ) $$ \frac{\mathrm{TraceDWI}\ (f)}{\mathrm{TraceDWI}\ \left(0\ \mathrm{Hz}\right)} $$ , compared to that at same OGSE frequency in a low-grade astrocytoma. In post-treatment patients, the enhancing lesions of two patients who were diagnosed with tumor progression contained more voxels with high ADC ( f ) ADC ( 0 Hz ) $$ \frac{\mathrm{ADC}\ (f)}{\mathrm{ADC}\ \left(0\ \mathrm{Hz}\right)} $$ and low TraceDWI ( f ) TraceDWI ( 0 Hz ) $$ \frac{\mathrm{TraceDWI}\left(\mathrm{f}\right)}{\mathrm{TraceDWI}\left(0\ \mathrm{Hz}\right)} $$ , compared to the enhancing lesions of a patient who was diagnosed with treatment effect. Non-enhancing T2 signal abnormality lesions in both the pre-surgical high-grade glioblastoma and post-treatment tumor progressions showed regions with high ADC ( f ) ADC ( 0 Hz ) $$ \frac{\mathrm{ADC}\ (f)}{\mathrm{ADC}\ \left(0\ \mathrm{Hz}\right)} $$ and low TraceDWI ( f ) TraceDWI ( 0 Hz ) $$ \frac{\mathrm{TraceDWI}\ \left(\mathrm{f}\right)}{\mathrm{TraceDWI}\ \left(0\ \mathrm{Hz}\right)} $$ , consistent with infiltrative tumor. The solid tumor of the glioblastoma, the enhancing lesions of post-treatment tumor progressions, and the suspected infiltrative tumors showed high diffusion time-dependency from 30 to 100 Hz, consistent with high intra-tumoral volume fraction (cellular density). CONCLUSION: Different characteristics of OGSE-based time-dependent diffusivity can reveal heterogenous tissue microstructures that indicate cellular density in glioma patients.
Asunto(s)
Glioblastoma , Glioma , Adulto , Humanos , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Glioblastoma/cirugía , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Glioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/métodos , DifusiónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Determination of H3 K27M mutation in diffuse midline glioma (DMG) is key for prognostic assessment and stratifying patient subgroups for clinical trials. MRI can noninvasively depict morphological and metabolic characteristics of H3 K27M mutant DMG. PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a deep learning (DL) approach to noninvasively predict H3 K27M mutation in DMG using T2-weighted images. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective and prospective. POPULATION: For diffuse midline brain gliomas, 341 patients from Center-1 (27 ± 19 years, 184 males), 42 patients from Center-2 (33 ± 19 years, 27 males) and 35 patients (37 ± 18 years, 24 males). For diffuse spinal cord gliomas, 133 patients from Center-1 (30 ± 15 years, 80 males). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 5T and 3T, T2-weighted turbo spin echo imaging. ASSESSMENT: Conventional radiological features were independently reviewed by two neuroradiologists. H3 K27M status was determined by histopathological examination. The Dice coefficient was used to evaluate segmentation performance. Classification performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve. STATISTICAL TESTS: Pearson's Chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, two-sample Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. A two-sided P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In the testing cohort, Dice coefficients of tumor segmentation using DL were 0.87 for diffuse midline brain and 0.81 for spinal cord gliomas. In the internal prospective testing dataset, the predictive accuracies, sensitivities, and specificities of H3 K27M mutation status were 92.1%, 98.2%, 82.9% in diffuse midline brain gliomas and 85.4%, 88.9%, 82.6% in spinal cord gliomas. Furthermore, this study showed that the performance generalizes to external institutions, with predictive accuracies of 85.7%-90.5%, sensitivities of 90.9%-96.0%, and specificities of 82.4%-83.3%. DATA CONCLUSION: In this study, an automatic DL framework was developed and validated for accurately predicting H3 K27M mutation using T2-weighted images, which could contribute to the noninvasive determination of H3 K27M status for clinical decision-making. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Aprendizaje Profundo , Glioma , Neoplasias de la Médula Espinal , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Histonas/genética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Mutación , Glioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Glioma/genética , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neoplasias de la Médula Espinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Médula Espinal/genéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Accurate pre-treatment imaging determination of extranodal extension (ENE) could facilitate the selection of appropriate initial therapy for HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV + OPSCC). Small studies have associated 7 CT features with ENE with varied results and agreement. This article seeks to determine the replicable diagnostic performance of these CT features for ENE. METHODS: Five expert academic head/neck neuroradiologists from 5 institutions evaluate a single academic cancer center cohort of 75 consecutive HPV + OPSCC patients. In a web-based virtual laboratory for imaging research and education, the experts performed training on 7 published CT features associated with ENE and then independently identified the "single most (if any) suspicious" lymph node and presence/absence of each of the features. Inter-rater agreement was assessed using percentage agreement, Gwet's AC1, and Fleiss' kappa. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for each CT feature based on histologic ENE. RESULTS: All 5 raters identified the same node in 52 cases (69%). In 15 cases (20%), at least one rater selected a node and at least one rater did not. In 8 cases (11%), all raters selected a node, but at least one rater selected a different node. Percentage agreement and Gwet's AC1 coefficients were > 0.80 for lesion identification, matted/conglomerated nodes, and central necrosis. Fleiss' kappa was always < 0.6. CT sensitivity for histologically confirmed ENE ranged 0.18-0.94, specificity 0.41-0.88, PPV 0.26-0.36, and NPV 0.78-0.96. CONCLUSIONS: Previously described CT features appear to have poor reproducibility among expert head/neck neuroradiologists and poor predictive value for histologic ENE. KEY POINTS: ⢠Previously described CT imaging features appear to have poor reproducibility among expert head and neck subspecialized neuroradiologists as well as poor predictive value for histologic ENE. ⢠Although it may still be appropriate to comment on the presence or absence of these CT features in imaging reports, the evidence indicates that caution is warranted when incorporating these features into clinical decision-making regarding the likelihood of ENE.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/patología , Extensión Extranodal , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estadificación de NeoplasiasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Early recognition of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity can guide patient management. However, it is challenging to predict when COVID-19 patients will progress to critical illness. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence system to predict future deterioration to critical illness in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: An artificial intelligence (AI) system in a time-to-event analysis framework was developed to integrate chest CT and clinical data for risk prediction of future deterioration to critical illness in patients with COVID-19. RESULTS: A multi-institutional international cohort of 1,051 patients with RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 and chest CT was included in this study. Of them, 282 patients developed critical illness, which was defined as requiring ICU admission and/or mechanical ventilation and/or reaching death during their hospital stay. The AI system achieved a C-index of 0.80 for predicting individual COVID-19 patients' to critical illness. The AI system successfully stratified the patients into high-risk and low-risk groups with distinct progression risks (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Using CT imaging and clinical data, the AI system successfully predicted time to critical illness for individual patients and identified patients with high risk. AI has the potential to accurately triage patients and facilitate personalized treatment. KEY POINT: ⢠AI system can predict time to critical illness for patients with COVID-19 by using CT imaging and clinical data.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Inteligencia Artificial , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous cholecystostomy tubes (PCT) are utilized in the management of acute cholecystitis in patients deemed unsuitable for surgery. However, the drive for these decisions and the outcomes remain understudied. We sought to characterize the practices and utilization of PCT and evaluate associated outcomes at an urban medical center. METHODS: Patients undergoing PCT placement over a 12-y study period ending May 2019 were reviewed. Demographics, clinical presentation, labs, imaging studies, and outcomes were abstracted. The primary and secondary outcomes were 30-d mortality and interval cholecystectomy, respectively. RESULTS: Two hundred and four patients met inclusion criteria: 59.3% were male with a median age of 67.5 y and a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) risk of serious complication of 8.0%. Overall, 57.8% of patients were located in an intensive care unit setting. The majority (80.9%) had an ultrasound and 48.5% had a hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid scan. The overall 30-d mortality was 31.9%: 41.5% for intensive care unit and 18.6% for ward patients (P < 0.01). Of patients surviving beyond 30 d (n = 139), the PCT was removed from 106 (76.3%), and a cholecystectomy was performed in 55 (39.6%) at a median interval of 58.0 d. A forward logistic regression identified total bilirubin (Adjusted Odds Ratio: 1.12, adjusted P < 0.01) and NSQIP risk of serious complication (Adjusted Odds Ratio: 1.16, adjusted P < 0.01) as the only predictors for 30-d mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients selected for PCT placement have a high mortality risk. Despite subsequent removal of the PCT, the majority of surviving patients did not undergo an interval cholecystectomy. Total bilirubin and NSQIP risk of serious complication are useful adjuncts in predicting 30-d mortality in these patients.
Asunto(s)
Colecistitis Aguda , Colecistostomía , Colecistitis Aguda/diagnóstico , Colecistitis Aguda/cirugía , Colecistostomía/efectos adversos , Colecistostomía/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) is often diagnosed in critically ill patients. Percutaneous cholecystostomy tube (PCT) placement facilitates less invasive gallbladder decompression in patients who are poor surgical candidates. Specific guidelines for optimal management of AAC patients following PCT placement remain to be defined. We hypothesize that AAC patients are at lower risk of recurrent cholecystitis than acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) patients and do not require cholecystectomy after PCT placement. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent PCT placement for AAC or ACC between 6/1/2007 and 5/31/2019 was performed. Primary outcome was recurrent cholecystitis and interval cholecystectomy for patients surviving 30 days after PCT placement. Secondary outcome was 30 day mortality. A cox regression model calculated the adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) for the outcomes. RESULTS: Eighty-four AAC and 85 ACC patients underwent PCT placement. Compared to ACC patients, more AAC patients were male (72.6 vs. 48.2%; p < 0.01), younger (median age 62 vs. 73 years; p < 0.01), and required intensive care (69.0 vs. 52.9%; p = 0.04), with lower median Charlson Comorbidity Index (4.0 vs. 6.0; p < 0.01). 30 day mortality was higher among AAC patients than ACC patients (45.2 vs. 21.2%; p < 0.01). 2/24 (8.3%) AAC patients and 5/31 (16.1%) ACC patients developed recurrent cholecystitis at a median 208.0 days (IQR:64.0-417.0) after PCT placement and 115.0 days (IQR:7.0-403.0) following PCT removal. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that AAC patients had lower likelihood of interval cholecystectomy compared to ACC patients (AHR 2.35; 95% CI:1.11,4.96). CONCLUSION: Recurrent cholecystitis is rare in patients surviving 30 days following PCT placement. When compared with ACC patients, fewer AAC patients require cholecystectomy.
Asunto(s)
Colecistitis Aguda , Colecistitis , Colecistostomía , Colecistectomía , Colecistitis/cirugía , Colecistitis Aguda/complicaciones , Colecistitis Aguda/cirugía , Colecistostomía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign for prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant, 1p/19q-noncodeleted lower-grade gliomas (LGGs) and review studies with false positive results. METHODS: The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched up to March 13, 2020, to identify articles reporting the diagnostic performance of the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign for prediction of IDH-mutant, 1p/19q-noncodeleted LGGs (IDHmut-Noncodel) using the search terms (T2 FLAIR mismatch). Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and correlation coefficient for interobserver agreement were calculated. RESULTS: Twelve studies including a total of 1053 patients were included. The median age was 43 (median; range, 14-56). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 42% (95% CI, 28-58%) and 100% (95% CI, 88-100%), respectively. According to the HSROC curve, the area under the curve was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.73-0.80). Considerable heterogeneity was possible among the studies in terms of both sensitivity and specificity. A threshold effect was suggested and was considered to explain most of the heterogeneity. Four studies reported false positive results for the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign, including dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor, pediatric-type gliomas, and non-neoplastic lesions. The 2 original articles with false positive results showed the highest sensitivities among the 10 studies included in the quantitative analysis, supporting the probability of the threshold effect. The pooled correlation coefficient was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.73-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign had a high specificity and interobserver agreement for the prediction of IDHmut-Noncodel. However, the sign demonstrated low sensitivity, and a few studies with false positive cases were also reported. KEY POINTS: ⢠The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign for prediction of IDH-mutant, 1p/19q-noncodeleted lower-grade gliomas were 42% and 100%, respectively. ⢠Four studies reported false positive results. ⢠The pooled correlation coefficient was 0.87, suggesting almost perfect interobserver agreement.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioma , Adulto , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Niño , Glioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Glioma/genética , Humanos , Isocitrato Deshidrogenasa/genética , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Mutación , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of treatment-related necrosis between combination SRS+ICI therapy and SRS therapy alone in patients with brain metastases from melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A systematic literature search of Ovid-MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed up to August 10, 2020. The difference in the pooled incidence of treatment-related necrosis after SRS+ICI or SRS alone was evaluated. The cumulative incidence of treatment-related necrosis at the specific time point after the treatment was calculated and plotted. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were additionally performed. RESULTS: Sixteen studies (14 on melanoma, 2 on NSCLC) were included. In NSCLC brain metastasis, the reported incidences of treatment-related necrosis in SRS+ICI and SRS alone ranged 2.9-3.4% and 0-2.9%, respectively. Meta-analysis was conducted including 14 studies on melanoma brain metastasis. The incidence of treatment-related necrosis was higher in SRS+ICI than SRS alone (16.0% vs. 6.5%; p = 0.065; OR, 2.35). The incidence showed rapid increase until 12 months after the SRS when combined with ICI therapy (14%; 95% CI, 8-22%) and its pace of increase slowed thereafter. Histopathologic diagnosis as the reference standard for treatment-related necrosis and inclusion of only symptomatic cases were the source of heterogeneity in SRS+ICI. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment-related necrosis tended to occur 2.4 times more frequently in the setting of combination SRS+ICI therapy compared with SRS alone in melanoma brain metastasis showing high cumulative incidence within the first year. Treatment-related necrosis should be considered when SRS+ICI combination therapy is used for melanoma brain metastasis, especially in the first year. KEY POINTS: ⢠Treatment-related necrosis occurred 2.4 times more frequently in the setting of combination SRS+ICI therapy compared with SRS alone in melanoma brain metastasis. ⢠Treatment-related necrosis more frequently occurred in brain metastases from melanoma than NSCLC. ⢠Reference standard for treatment-related necrosis and inclusion of only symptomatic treatment-related necrosis were a significant source of heterogeneity, indicating varying definitions of treatment-related necrosis in the literature need to be unified.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Radiocirugia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Incidencia , Necrosis , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: There currently lacks a noninvasive and accurate method to distinguish benign and malignant ovarian lesion prior to treatment. This study developed a deep learning algorithm that distinguishes benign from malignant ovarian lesion by applying a convolutional neural network on routine MR imaging. METHODS: Five hundred forty-five lesions (379 benign and 166 malignant) from 451 patients from a single institution were divided into training, validation, and testing set in a 7:2:1 ratio. Model performance was compared with four junior and three senior radiologists on the test set. RESULTS: Compared with junior radiologists averaged, the final ensemble model combining MR imaging and clinical variables had a higher test accuracy (0.87 vs 0.64, p < 0.001) and specificity (0.92 vs 0.64, p < 0.001) with comparable sensitivity (0.75 vs 0.63, p = 0.407). Against the senior radiologists averaged, the final ensemble model also had a higher test accuracy (0.87 vs 0.74, p = 0.033) and specificity (0.92 vs 0.70, p < 0.001) with comparable sensitivity (0.75 vs 0.83, p = 0.557). Assisted by the model's probabilities, the junior radiologists achieved a higher average test accuracy (0.77 vs 0.64, Δ = 0.13, p < 0.001) and specificity (0.81 vs 0.64, Δ = 0.17, p < 0.001) with unchanged sensitivity (0.69 vs 0.63, Δ = 0.06, p = 0.302). With the AI probabilities, the junior radiologists had higher specificity (0.81 vs 0.70, Δ = 0.11, p = 0.005) but similar accuracy (0.77 vs 0.74, Δ = 0.03, p = 0.409) and sensitivity (0.69 vs 0.83, Δ = -0.146, p = 0.097) when compared with the senior radiologists. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that artificial intelligence based on deep learning can assist radiologists in assessing the nature of ovarian lesions and improve their performance. KEY POINTS: ⢠Artificial Intelligence based on deep learning can assess the nature of ovarian lesions on routine MRI with higher accuracy and specificity than radiologists. ⢠Assisted by the deep learning model's probabilities, junior radiologists achieved better performance that matched those of senior radiologists.
Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Profundo , Quistes Ováricos , Neoplasias Ováricas , Inteligencia Artificial , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Redes Neurales de la Computación , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND. Several guidelines recommend body imaging for the initial work-up of patients with suspected primary CNS lymphoma, to exclude subclinical systemic involvement. However, to our knowledge, the diagnostic yield of body CT (contrast-enhanced CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis) and whole-body FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of subclinical systemic lymphoma has not yet been systematically evaluated. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the diagnostic yield of body CT and whole-body FDG PET/CT in detecting subclinical systemic lymphoma in patients with suspected primary CNS lymphoma. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION. A systematic search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through July 5, 2020, was conducted to identify studies evaluating the diagnostic yield of body CT or whole-body FDG PET/CT in detecting subclinical systemic lymphoma in patients with suspected primary CNS lymphoma. Pooled estimates of the diagnostic yield of both imaging modalities were calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. The false referral rate and the rate of incidental secondary malignancy were also pooled. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS. Nine original articles on studies evaluating a total of 1040 patients were included. In detecting subclinical systemic lymphoma, the pooled diagnostic yields of body CT and whole-body FDG PET/CT were 2.5% (95% CI, 1.5-3.9%) and 4.9% (95% CI, 2.8-8.5%), respectively. In the subgroup analysis, the diagnostic yield of whole-body FDG PET/CT was significantly higher than that of body CT (p = .03). Four studies reported changes in the management plan: the R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) regimen with or without radiation therapy was added if extracranial lymphoma involvement was detected by body CT or whole-body FDG PET/CT. The pooled false referral rate of whole-body FDG PET/CT was 5.3% (95% CI, 2.2-12.0%). The pooled rate of incidental secondary malignancy detected on whole-body FDG PET/CT was 3.1% (95% CI, 1.7-5.6%). CONCLUSION. Body imaging should be used in the initial workup of patients with suspected primary CNS lymphoma, to exclude systemic involvement. Whole-body FDG PET/CT may be a better alternative to body CT. CLINICAL IMPACT. Our results support current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for the use of body imaging to exclude subclinical systemic involvement in patients with suspected primary CNS lymphoma.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/diagnóstico por imagen , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Linfoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Imagen de Cuerpo Entero/métodos , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/patología , Humanos , Linfoma/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Radiofármacos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND. Although established guidelines give indications for performing staging brain MRI at initial diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), guidelines are lacking for performing surveillance brain MRI for patients without brain metastases at presentation. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to estimate the cumulative incidence of and risk factors for brain metastasis development in patients with NSCLC without brain metastases at initial presentation. METHODS. This retrospective study included 1495 patients with NSCLC (mean [± SD] age, 65 ± 10 years; 920 men and 575 women) without brain metastases at initial evaluation that included brain MRI. Follow-up brain MRI was ordered at the discretion of the referring physicians. MRI examinations were reviewed in combination with clinical records for brain metastasis development; patients not undergoing MRI were deemed to have not had metastases develop through last clinical follow-up. The cumulative incidence of brain metastases was determined, with death considered a competing risk, and was stratified by clinical stage group, cell type, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation status. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed. RESULTS. A total of 258 of 1495 patients (17.3%) underwent follow-up brain MRI, and 72 (4.8%) had brain metastases develop at a median of 12.3 months after initial diagnosis of NSCLC. Of the 72 patients who had metastases develop, 44.4% had no neurologic symptoms, and 58.3% had stable primary thoracic disease. The cumulative incidence of brain metastases at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after initial evaluation was 0.6%, 2.1%, 4.2%, and 6.8%, respectively. Cumulative incidence at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was higher (p < .001) in patients with clinical stage III-IV disease (1.3%, 3.9%, 7.7%, and 10.9%, respectively) than in those with clinical stage I-II disease (0.0%, 0.8%, 1.2%, and 2.6%, respectively), and it was higher (p < .001) in patients with EGFR mutation-positive adenocarcinoma (0.7%, 2.5%, 6.3%, and 12.3%, respectively) than in those with EGFR mutation-negative adenocarcinoma (0.4%, 1.8%, 2.9%, and 4.4%, respectively). Among 1109 patients with adenocarcinoma, independent risk factors for the development of brain metastasis were clinical stage III-IV (hazard ratio [HR], 9.39; p < .001) and EGFR mutation-positive status (HR, 1.78; p = .04). The incidence of brain metastasis over the study interval was 8.7% among patients with clinical stage III-IV disease and 17.4% among those with EGFR mutation-positive adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION. Clinical stage III-IV and EGFR mutation-positive adenocarcinoma are independent risk factors for brain metastasis development. CLINICAL IMPACT. For patients with clinical stage III-IV disease or EGFR mutation-positive adenocarcinoma, surveillance brain MRI performed 12 months after initial evaluation may be warranted.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/secundario , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Anciano , Neoplasias Encefálicas/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/epidemiología , Receptores ErbB/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Background Existing guidelines are inconsistent regarding the indications for staging brain MRI in patients with newly diagnosed, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic yield of staging brain MRI in the initial evaluation of lung cancer. Materials and Methods This retrospective, observational, single-institution study included patients with newly diagnosed NSCLC who underwent staging chest CT and staging brain MRI from November 2017 to October 2018. Diagnostic yield was defined as the proportion of patients with brain metastases among all patients. Yield was stratified into clinical stage groups per the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging guidelines, based on staging chest CT and in adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement. Subgroup analyses were performed on the basis of cell types and molecular markers. The χ2 test was performed to compare the diagnostic yields, and Bonferroni correction was used to account for multiple testing between stage groups. Results A total of 1712 patients (mean age, 64 years ± 10 [standard deviation]; 1035 men) were included. The diagnostic yield of staging brain MRI in newly diagnosed NSCLC was 11.9% (203 of 1712; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.4%, 13.5%). In clinical stage IA, IB, and II disease, the diagnostic yields were 0.3% (two of 615; 95% CI: 0.0%, 1.2%), 3.8% (seven of 186; 95% CI: 1.5%, 7.6%), and 4.7% (eight of 171; 95% CI: 2.0%, 9.0%), respectively. The diagnostic yield was higher in patients with adenocarcinoma (13.6%; 176 of 1297; 95% CI: 11.8%, 15.6%) than squamous cell carcinoma (5.9%; 21 of 354; 95% CI: 3.7%, 8.9%) and in patients with EGFR mutation-positive adenocarcinoma (17.5%; 85 of 487; 95% CI: 14.2%, 21.1%) than with EGFR mutation-negative adenocarcinoma (10.6%; 68 of 639; 95% CI: 8.4%, 13.3%) (P < .001 for both). Conclusion The diagnostic yield of staging brain MRI in clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer was low, but staging brain MRI had a higher diagnostic yield in clinical stage IB and epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive adenocarcinoma. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Anciano , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Medios de Contraste , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pneumonia of other diseases share similar CT characteristics, which contributes to the challenges in differentiating them with high accuracy. Purpose To establish and evaluate an artificial intelligence (AI) system for differentiating COVID-19 and other pneumonia at chest CT and assessing radiologist performance without and with AI assistance. Materials and Methods A total of 521 patients with positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction results for COVID-19 and abnormal chest CT findings were retrospectively identified from 10 hospitals from January 2020 to April 2020. A total of 665 patients with non-COVID-19 pneumonia and definite evidence of pneumonia at chest CT were retrospectively selected from three hospitals between 2017 and 2019. To classify COVID-19 versus other pneumonia for each patient, abnormal CT slices were input into the EfficientNet B4 deep neural network architecture after lung segmentation, followed by a two-layer fully connected neural network to pool slices together. The final cohort of 1186 patients (132 583 CT slices) was divided into training, validation, and test sets in a 7:2:1 and equal ratio. Independent testing was performed by evaluating model performance in separate hospitals. Studies were blindly reviewed by six radiologists without and then with AI assistance. Results The final model achieved a test accuracy of 96% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 90%, 98%), a sensitivity of 95% (95% CI: 83%, 100%), and a specificity of 96% (95% CI: 88%, 99%) with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.95 and area under the precision-recall curve of 0.90. On independent testing, this model achieved an accuracy of 87% (95% CI: 82%, 90%), a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI: 81%, 94%), and a specificity of 86% (95% CI: 80%, 90%) with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90 and area under the precision-recall curve of 0.87. Assisted by the probabilities of the model, the radiologists achieved a higher average test accuracy (90% vs 85%, Δ = 5, P < .001), sensitivity (88% vs 79%, Δ = 9, P < .001), and specificity (91% vs 88%, Δ = 3, P = .001). Conclusion Artificial intelligence assistance improved radiologists' performance in distinguishing coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia from non-coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia at chest CT. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiólogos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Niño , Preescolar , China , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Philadelphia , Neumonía/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Torácica , Radiólogos/normas , Radiólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rhode Island , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Pretreatment determination of renal cell carcinoma aggressiveness may help to guide clinical decision-making. PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of residual convolutional neural network using routine MRI in differentiating low-grade (grade I-II) from high-grade (grade III-IV) in stage I and II renal cell carcinoma. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: In all, 376 patients with 430 renal cell carcinoma lesions from 2008-2019 in a multicenter cohort were acquired. The 353 Fuhrman-graded renal cell carcinomas were divided into a training, validation, and test set with a 7:2:1 split. The 77 WHO/ISUP graded renal cell carcinomas were used as a separate WHO/ISUP test set. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5T and 3.0T/T2 -weighted and T1 contrast-enhanced sequences. ASSESSMENT: The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the final model were assessed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and precision-recall curve were plotted to measure the performance of the binary classifier. A confusion matrix was drawn to show the true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative of the model. STATISTICAL TESTS: Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous data and the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical data were used to compare the difference of clinicopathologic characteristics between the low- and high-grade groups. The adjusted Wald method was used to calculate the 95% confidence interval (CI) of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS: The final deep-learning model achieved a test accuracy of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.73-0.96), sensitivity of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.74-0.96), and specificity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.73-0.96) in the Fuhrman test set and a test accuracy of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.73-0.90), sensitivity of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.84-0.97), and specificity of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.68-0.86) in the WHO/ISUP test set. DATA CONCLUSION: Deep learning can noninvasively predict the histological grade of stage I and II renal cell carcinoma using conventional MRI in a multiinstitutional dataset with high accuracy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.