RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite the recognized importance of human milk (HM) use, breastfeeding is often discouraged for infants with cleft lip and/or palate because of their anatomical abnormalities. Poor weight gain may require formula for calorie supplementation. Stresses associated with caring for infants with cleft lip/palate may decrease rates of HM provision to these infants. PURPOSE: This study investigates the experiences of mothers of infants with cleft lip/palate (CL/P) to determine choices and factors associated with providing HM to their infants. METHODS: A retrospective telephone survey was administered to a cohort of mothers of infants with CL/P. RESULTS: Fifty mothers agreed to participate in the survey. Most (78%) initiated use of HM for a median duration of 4 months, 32% provided HM for 6 months or more, and 79% exclusively expressed their HM. Poor supply was the most frequent challenge to providing HM and led to cessation in 46% of the mothers. Formula was used to supplement for poor supply or poor infant weight gain in 90% of the mothers. The best predictors of a mother's use of HM were child not in day care, genetic diagnosis, and gestational age at birth. Only 36% of mothers reported individual encouragement to provide HM, and 18% reported they were specifically discouraged from providing HM for their infants. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Although initiation rates were high, there are opportunities to improve support for mothers to increase duration of HM provision in children with CL/P. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: This study establishes a baseline for future prospective studies looking at the impact of active encouragement and provision of lactation support within the cleft team setting.
Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna , Extracción de Leche Materna , Labio Leporino , Fisura del Paladar , Madres , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Fórmulas Infantiles , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aumento de PesoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess and quantify cleft team practices with regard to nutritional support in the neonatal period Design : Retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary pediatric hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred consecutive newborn patients with a diagnosis of cleft lip and/or cleft palate between 2009 and 2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Birth weight, cleft type, initial cleft team weight measurements, initial feeding practices, recommended nutritional interventions, and follow-up nutritional assessments. RESULTS: All patients in the study were evaluated by a registered dietitian and an occupational feeding therapist. Average birth weight and average age at the first cleft team visit were similar for each cleft type: cleft lip (CL), cleft lip and palate (CLP), and cleft palate (CP). The calculated age (in days) for return to birth weight was significantly different between cleft types: CL = 13.58 days, CLP = 15.88 days, and CP = 21.93 days. Exclusive use of breast milk was 50% for patients with CL, 30.3% for patients with CLP, and 21.4% for patients with CP. Detailed nutritional interventions were made for 31 patients at the first visit: two with CL, 14 with CLP, and 15 with CP. CONCLUSIONS: Distinct differences were seen in neonatal weight gain between cleft types. There was significantly greater total weight gain for patients with CL at their first visit and significantly slower return to birth weight for patients with isolated CP. Patients with CL required far fewer interventions at the initial assessment and were more likely to be provided breast milk exclusively or in combination with formula. Infants with CP were far less likely to receive any breast milk. Patients with CLP and CP required frequent nutritional interventions.