What makes men leak? An investigation of objective and self-report measures of urinary incontinence early after radical prostatectomy.

AIMS: Pelvic floor muscle training for patients having radical prostatectomy promotes contraction of these muscles in anticipation of activities that may provoke urine leakage. The aims of this study were: to determine the contribution of the individual activities comprising a standardised 1-hour pad test (1HPT) to overall urine leakage early after radical prostatectomy; and to investigate relationships between the 1HPT, 24-hour pad test (24HPT) and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) early after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: A prospective analysis of patients having radical prostatectomy and receiving pelvic floor muscle training (n = 33). Participants completed the 1HPT, 24HPT and ICIQ-SF at 3 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Participants wore a separate, pre-weighed continence pad for each of the seven activities comprising the 1HPT; pads were weighed separately and together to calculate activity-related and overall urine leakage. RESULTS: Walking at a comfortable speed and drinking while sitting were the two activities contributing most to overall urine leakage, albeit these activities also comprised 75% of 1HPT time. All component activities contributed a minimum 7 ± 5% of overall urine leakage. There were significant and strong to very strong correlations between all of the 1HPT, 24HPT, and ICIQ-SF at 3 weeks postoperatively. There were significant decreases in 24HPT (P = 0.032) and ICIQ-SF (P = 0.001) but no significant change in 1HPT from 3 to 6 weeks postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic floor muscle training should include contraction of these muscles in sedentary and walking postures. The 1HPT correlates well with the 24HPT, but may not be sensitive to early postoperative improvements in urinary leakage.

Relationships between perioperative physical activity and urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Higher physical activity levels are continence-protective in non-prostate cancer populations. Primary aims of this study were to investigate changes in physical activity levels over the perioperative period in patients having radical prostatectomy, and relationships between perioperative physical activity levels and post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence. METHODS: A prospective analysis of patients having radical prostatectomy and receiving perioperative physiotherapy including pelvic floor muscle training and physical activity prescription (n = 33). Physical activity levels were measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and/or the SenseWear Pro3 Armband at four timepoints: before preoperative physiotherapy, the week before surgery, and 3 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Urinary incontinence was measured at 3 and 6 weeks postoperatively using a 24-hour pad test and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ). RESULTS: Physical activity levels changed significantly over the perioperative period (p < 0.001). At 6 weeks postoperatively, physical activity levels did not differ significantly from baseline (p = 0.181), but remained significantly lower than the week before surgery (p = 0.002). There was no significant interaction effect between preoperative physical activity category and time on the 24-hour pad test (p = 0.726) or ICIQ (p = 0.608). Nor were there any significant correlations between physical activity levels and the 24-hour pad test and ICIQ at 3 or 6 weeks postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides novel data on perioperative physical activity levels for patients having radical prostatectomy. There was no relationship between perioperative physical activity levels and post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence, although participants had high overall preoperative physical activity levels and low overall urinary incontinence.

Minimally invasive and computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Both minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and computer-assisted surgery (CAS) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) have gained popularity in recent years. We conducted a qualitative and systematic review to assess the effectiveness of MIS, CAS and computer-assisted MIS for THA. METHODS: An extensive computerised literature search of PubMed, Medline, Embase and OVIDSP was conducted. Both randomised clinical trials and controlled clinical trials on the effectiveness of MIS, CAS and computer-assisted MIS for THA were included. Methodological quality was independently assessed by two reviewers. Effect estimates were calculated and a best-evidence synthesis was performed. RESULTS: Four high-quality and 14 medium-quality studies with MIS THA as study contrast, and three high-quality and four medium-quality studies with CAS THA as study contrast were included. No studies with computer-assisted MIS for THA as study contrast were identified. Strong evidence was found for a decrease in operative time and intraoperative blood loss for MIS THA, with no difference in complication rates and risk for acetabular outliers. Strong evidence exists that there is no difference in physical functioning, measured either by questionnaires or by gait analysis. Moderate evidence was found for a shorter length of hospital stay after MIS THA. Conflicting evidence was found for a positive effect of MIS THA on pain in the early postoperative period, but that effect diminished after three months postoperatively. Strong evidence was found for an increase in operative time for CAS THA, and limited evidence was found for a decrease in intraoperative blood loss. Furthermore, strong evidence was found for no difference in complication rates, as well as for a significantly lower risk for acetabular outliers. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that MIS THA is a safe surgical procedure, without increases in operative time, blood loss, operative complication rates and component malposition rates. However, the beneficial effect of MIS THA on functional recovery has to be proven. The results also indicate that CAS THA, though resulting in an increase in operative time, may have a positive effect on operative blood loss and operative complication rates. More importantly, the use of CAS results in better positioning of acetabular component of the prosthesis.