Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Neurocrit Care ; 27(2): 220-228, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28324261

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prophylactic anticonvulsants are routinely prescribed in the acute setting for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients, but some studies have reported an association with worse outcomes. We sought to characterize the prevalence and predictors of prophylactic anticonvulsant administration after ICH as well as guideline adherence. We also sought to determine whether prophylactic anticonvulsants were independently associated with poor outcome. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of primary ICH in our two academic centers. We used a propensity matching approach to make treated and non-treated groups comparable. We conducted multiple logistic regression analysis to identify independent predictors of prophylactic anticonvulsant initiation and its association with poor outcome as measured by modified Rankin score. RESULTS: We identified 610 patients with primary ICH, of whom 98 were started on prophylactic anticonvulsants. Levetiracetam (97%) was most commonly prescribed. Age (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99, p < .001), lobar location (OR 2.94, 95% CI 1.76-4.91, p < .001), higher initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.40-3.79, p = .001), craniotomy (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.51-6.20, p = .002), and prior ICH (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.10-5.07, p = .028) were independently associated with prophylactic anticonvulsant initiation. Prophylactic anticonvulsant use was not associated with worse functional outcome [modified Rankin score (mRS) 4-6] at hospital discharge or with increased case-fatality. There was no difference in prescribing patterns after 2010 guideline publication. DISCUSSION: Levetiracetam was routinely prescribed following ICH and was not associated with worse outcomes. Future investigations should examine the effect of prophylactic levetiracetam on cost and neuropsychological outcomes as well as the role of continuous EEG in identifying subclinical seizures.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia Cerebral/terapia , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Adhesión a Directriz , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Piracetam/análogos & derivados , Convulsiones/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Hemorragia Cerebral/complicaciones , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Levetiracetam , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Piracetam/efectos adversos , Piracetam/uso terapéutico , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Convulsiones/etiología
2.
Neurology ; 88(3): 252-258, 2017 Jan 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27927933

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the pattern of urine drug screening in a cohort of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients at our academic centers. METHODS: We identified cases of primary ICH occurring from 2009 to 2011 in our academic centers. Demographic data, imaging characteristics, processes of care, and short-term outcomes were ascertained. We performed logistic regression to identify predictors for screening and evaluated preguideline and postguideline reiteration screening patterns. RESULTS: We identified 610 patients with primary ICH in 2009-2011; 379 (62.1%) were initially evaluated at an outside hospital. Overall, 142/610 (23.3%) patients were screened, with 21 positive for cocaine and 3 for amphetamine. Of patients <55 years of age, only 65/140 (46.4%) were screened. Black patients <55 years of age were screened more than nonblack patients <55 years of age (38/61 [62.3%] vs 27/79 [34.2%]; p = 0.0009). In the best multivariable model, age group (p = 0.0001), black race (p = 0.4529), first Glasgow Coma Scale score (p = 0.0492), current smoking (p < 0.0001), and age group × black race (p = 0.0097) were associated with screening. Guideline reiteration in 2010 did not improve the proportion <55 years of age who were screened: 42/74 (56.8%) were screened before and 23/66 (34.9%) after (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We found disparities in drugs of abuse (DOA) screening and suboptimal guideline adherence. Systematic efforts to improve screening for DOA are warranted. Improved identification of sympathomimetic exposure may improve etiologic classification and influence decision-making and prognosis counseling.


Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Cerebral/epidemiología , Hemorragia Cerebral/psicología , Adhesión a Directriz , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Detección de Abuso de Sustancias , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Hemorragia Cerebral/orina , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Drogas Ilícitas/orina , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA