RESUMEN
We report a retrospective review of all paediatric trauma patients managed with an external fixator admitted to our institution over a 7-year period. We identified 30 fractures in 28 children. The fractures included 20 tibiae, 5 femurs, 2 humerii, 2 radii and 1âphalanx. The indications were 23 open fractures, 4 comminuted fractures and 3 closed fractures in poly-traumatised patients. It was the definitive treatment in 13 fractures. The mean length of total time with an external fixator was 9.6 weeks (range 1-38 weeks.) Difficulties encountered were eight problems, one obstacle and two true complications. There were no cases of re-fracture following removal of the external fixator. This review confirms that there is a role for the use of external fixation in selected paediatric fractures with a low complication rate.
Asunto(s)
Fijadores Externos , Fijación de Fractura/instrumentación , Fracturas Cerradas/cirugía , Fracturas Conminutas/cirugía , Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This retrospective case series reports the reoperation rate, survival rate and mobility status in patients with diabetes mellitus who had undergone a trans-metatarsal amputation (TMA) managed within a diabetic foot care service. METHODS: Forty-one consecutive patients (37 men, 4 women) underwent a TMA with primary wound closure between January 2008 and December 2017. Eighty-eight per cent (36/41) of the patients were followed-up for a mean of 2.3 years. The outcomes were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Four (11%) of the 36 patients required reoperation, including three (8%) major amputations. All of the patients requiring a reoperation had peripheral vascular disease. Eleven patients died giving a four-year survival rate of 69% (25/36). Of the surviving patients who had not required revision to a major amputation 96% (21/22) were fully mobile in bespoke orthoses. A third used a walking cane. CONCLUSION: This study shows that a TMA with primary wound closure in patients with diabetes mellitus, is effective for limb salvage with low reoperation and major amputation rates. A well healed TMA stump provides independent mobility in the majority of patients. The failures occurred in patients with peripheral vascular disease who, even after percutaneous trans-luminal angioplasty, had a 19% major amputation rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica/métodos , Pie Diabético/cirugía , Huesos Metatarsianos/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pie Diabético/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Limitación de la Movilidad , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The non-arthroplasty hip registry (NAHR) is a United Kingdom national register that monitors the efficacy of hip preservation surgery. We aim to highlight early experiences of incorporating the NAHR into our practice at a tertiary centre. METHODS: Between December 2013 and February 2015, 381 patients were identified on the NAHR database that had undergone non-arthroplasty hip surgery. Patient-related outcome measures EuroQuol 5D-5L (EQ-5D) and the International Hip Outcome Tool 12 (iHOT-12) were recorded at baseline and 6 months. RESULTS: The 289 arthroscopic surgeries showed a statistical significant difference (p<0.05) in iHOT-12 for both males (45.21-65.07) and females (34.57 to 55.53), and in EQ-5D for both males (0.59-0.75) and females (0.56-0.65). The 92 open procedures showed a statistical significant difference (p<0.05) in both iHOT-12 (31.71-62.42) and EQ-5D (0.54-0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Overall our results from the NAHR indicate hip preservation surgery is effective at relieving pain and improving quality of life in the short term.
Asunto(s)
Artroscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Articulación de la Cadera/cirugía , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reino Unido , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
AIM: To determine the preferred mode of travel to the operating theatre for elective orthopaedic patients. METHODS: Data was collected prospectively over a 2-wk period at an elective Orthopaedic Treatment Centre. Patients were asked to complete a patient satisfaction questionnaire following their surgery on their experience and subsequent preferred mode of transport to theatre. The data was then recorded in a tabulated format and analysed with percentages. Fisher's exact test was used to determine if there was any statistical association between patients' preference to walk and various groups; in-patient or day case procedures, and whether patients were < 60 years or > 60 years of age. RESULTS: Seventy patients (40 females and 30 males) fully completed the questionnaire. In total there were 33 d-cases and 37 in-patients. The spectrum of orthopaedic sub-specialties included was knee (41%), hip (17%), foot and ankle (24%), spine (13%) and upper limb (4%). Patient satisfaction for overall experience of travelling to theatre was either excellent (77%) or good (23%). Following their experience of travelling to theatre, 87% (95%CI: 79%-95%) of the total cohort would have preferred to walk to the operating theatre. There was a statistically significant association (P = 0.003) between patients' preference to walk and whether they were day-case or in-patients. Similarly, there was a statistically significance association (P = 0.028) between patients' preference to walk and whether they were < 60 years or > 60 years of age. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the majority of Orthopaedic elective patients would prefer to walk to theatre, when given the choice and if practically possible.