RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Current consensus guidelines suggest direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are interrupted periprocedurally for catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, this may predispose patients to thromboembolic complications. This study investigates the safety of CA for AF on uninterrupted DOACs compared to uninterrupted warfarin. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing CA for AF. All patients were heparinized prior to transseptal puncture with a target-activated clotting time (ACT) of 300-350 seconds. Patients who had procedures performed on continuous DOAC were compared to those on continuous warfarin. Clinical, procedural data, and complications occurring up to 3 months were analyzed from a prospective registry with additional review of electronic health records. RESULTS: A total of 1,884 procedures were performed over 28 months: 761 (609 patients) on uninterrupted warfarin and 1,123 (900 patients) on uninterrupted DOAC (rivaroxaban 64%, apixaban 32%, and dabigatran 4%). There was no difference in the composite endpoint of death, thromboembolism, or major bleeding complication (2.2% vs 1.4%, P = 0.20). There was no difference in the complications comprising this, including tamponade, hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, and transfusion (P-values 0.28, 0.13, 0.45, and 0.36). There were no strokes, transient ischemic attacks, or other thromboembolic complications. There was no difference between groups in the proportion of tamponades requiring reversal of oral anticoagulation, the volume of blood lost, the proportion transfused, or the proportion drained percutaneously (P-values 0.50, 0.51, 0.36, and 0.38). CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation for AF can be performed safely and effectively in patients anticoagulated with DOACs and heparinized with a therapeutic ACT. There is no increased risk of periprocedural bleeding when compared to uninterrupted warfarin.
RESUMEN
Type-2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). It is unclear whether DM is a risk factor for arrhythmia recurrence following catheter ablation of AF. We performed a nonrandomised, observational study in 7 high-volume European centres. A total of 2,504 patients who underwent catheter ablation of AF were included, and procedural outcomes were compared among patients with or without DM. Patients with DM (234) accounted for 9.3% of the sample, and were significantly older, had a higher BMI and suffered more frequently from persistent AF. Arrhythmia relapses at 12 months after AF ablation occurred more frequently in the DM group (32.0% vs 25.3%, pâ¯=â¯0.031). After adjusting for type of AF (i.e., paroxysmal vs persistent), during a median follow-up of 17 ± 16 months, atrial arrhythmia free-survival was lower in the diabetics with persistent AF (log-rank pâ¯=â¯0.003), and comparable for paroxysmal AF (log-rank pâ¯=â¯0.554). These results were confirmed in a propensity-matched analysis, and DM was also an independent predictor of AF recurrence on the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 1.39; 95% confidence interval 95%1.07 to 1.88; pâ¯=â¯0.016). There was no significant difference in the rate of periprocedural complications among DM and non-DM patients (3.8% vs 6.3%, pâ¯=â¯0.128). Efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation were comparable to radiofrequency ablation in both DM and no-DM groups. In conclusion, catheter ablation of AF appears to be safe in patients with DM. However, DM is associated with higher rate of atrial arrhythmia relapse, particularly for patients with persistent AF.