Optimal Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) Cut-Offs: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Czech Population.

Background and Objectives: The key pathogenetic mechanism of glucose metabolism disorders, insulin resistance (IR), can be assessed using the Homeostasis Model Assessment of IR (HOMA-IR). However, its application in clinical practice is limited due to the absence of cut-offs. In this study, we aimed to define the cut-offs for the Czech population. Methods: After undergoing anthropometric and biochemical studies, the sample of 3539 individuals was divided into either nondiabetics, including both subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT, n = 1947) and prediabetics (n = 1459), or diabetics (n = 133). The optimal HOMA-IR cut-offs between subgroups were determined to maximize the sum of the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or prediabetes. The predictive accuracy was illustrated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Logistic regression was performed to assess the association between a target variable (presence/absence of T2DM) depending on the HOMA-IR score as well as on the age and sex. Results: The HOMA-IR cut-off between nondiabetics and diabetics for both sexes together was 3.63, with a sensitivity of 0.56 and a specificity of 0.86. The area under the ROC curve was 0.73 for T2DM diagnosing in both sexes. The HOMA-IR cut-off between the NGT subjects and prediabetics was 1.82, with a sensitivity of 0.60 and a specificity of 0.66. Logistic regression showed that increased HOMA-IR is a risk factor for the presence of T2DM (odds ratio (OR) 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-1.28, p < 0.0001). The predictive ability of HOMA-IR in diagnosing T2DM is statistically significantly lower in females (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.44-0.98). The results are valid for middle-aged European adults. Conclusions: The results suggest the existence of HOMA-IR cut-offs signaling established IR. Introduction of the instrument into common clinical practice, together with the known cut-offs, may contribute to preventing T2DM.

Accidental deep hypothermia with cardiac arrest. Prompt complete recovery after rewarming by extracorporeal circulation. Case report.

BACKGROUND: Deep accidental hypothermia (core temperature <28 degrees C) is an uncommon medical emergency requiring rapid active core rewarming. Extracorporeal circulation has become the treatment of choice for deep hypothermic patients with cardiac arrest. CASE REPORT: We report on a 30-year-old patient who suffered from deep accidental hypothermia (core temperature 24.8 degrees C) and cardiac arrest by prolonged exposure to a cold urban environment as a consequence of severe ethylalcohol intoxication. The rewarming with the aid of extracorporeal circulation was initiated shortly after his arrival at the hospital. External cardiac massage was maintained until full ECC fl ow was established. The patient was weaned from extracorporeal circulation after 157 min, awaked 4 hours later and consequently extubated within 16 hours after rewarming with no neurological impairment. At 3-week follow-up, the patient was fully re-integrated in his work and personal life. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates the excellent prognosis of a young victim in the case of deep accidental hypothermia with cardiac arrest, provided that deep hypothermia precedes the cardiac arrest and rewarming by extracorporeal circulation is immediately applied. Simultaneous ethyl alcohol intoxication can be considered a protective factor improving the patient's outcome. Complete recovery was achieved within 24 hours after the accident.

Addition of spironolactone in patients with resistant arterial hypertension (ASPIRANT): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

There is currently limited data on which drug should be used to improve blood pressure (BP) control in patients with resistant hypertension. This study was designed to assess the effect of the addition of 25 mg of spironolactone on BP in patients with resistant arterial hypertension. Patients with office systolic BP >140 mm Hg or diastolic BP >90 mm Hg despite treatment with at least 3 antihypertensive drugs, including a diuretic, were enrolled in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. One hundred seventeen patients were randomly assigned to receive spironolactone (n=59) or a placebo (n=58) as an add-on to their antihypertensive medication, by the method of simple randomization. Analyses were done with 111 patients (55 in the spironolactone and 56 in the placebo groups). At 8 weeks, the primary end points, a difference in mean fall of BP on daytime ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), between the groups was -5.4 mm Hg (95%CI -10.0; -0.8) for systolic BP (P=0.024) and -1.0 mm Hg (95% CI -4.0; 2.0) for diastolic BP (P=0.358). The APBM nighttime systolic, 24-hour ABPM systolic, and office systolic BP values were significantly decreased by spironolactone (difference of -8.6, -6.6, and -6.5 mm Hg; P=0=0.011, 0.004, and 0.011 [corrected]), whereas the fall of the respective diastolic BP values was not significant (-3.0, -1.0, and -2.5 mm Hg; P=0.079, 0.405, and 0.079). The adverse events in both groups were comparable. In conclusion, spironolactone is an effective drug for lowering systolic BP in patients with resistant arterial hypertension.

Addition of spironolactone in patients with resistant arterial hypertension (ASPIRANT)--study protocol.

BACKGROUND: There is currently limited data on which drug should be used to improve blood pressure control in patients with resistant hypertension. Recent observational trials reported spironolactone as having good effects. This study is designed to assess the effect of the addition of 25 mg of spironolactone on blood pressure (BP) in patients with resistant arterial hypertension. METHODS: Patients with office systolic BP > 140 mmHg or diastolic BP > 90 mmHg despite treatment with at least 3 antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic, are enrolled in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Patients are randomly assigned to receive spironolactone or a placebo at a ratio of 1:1 by the method of simple randomisation. Our primary endpoints are to show a statistically significant difference in the fall of mean day-time systolic and diastolic BP by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), between the spironolactone and placebo groups, after 8 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes are changes of serum potassium, natrium, creatinine, body weight, casual blood pressure in office, difference in the fall of mean night-time and 24-hour ABPM BP and treatment response depending on different baseline levels of aldosterone and aldosterone/PRA ratio. DISCUSSION: If spironolactone proves effective, it might become the standard of treatment in patients with resistant arterial hypertension.