RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare post-discharge outcomes and healthcare utilization between English-speaking non-Hispanic White (NHW), English-speaking Hispanic/Latinx (ESHL), and Spanish-speaking Hispanic/Latinx (SSHL) survivors of traumatic injury. BACKGROUND: While there is evidence of racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare utilization and post-discharge outcomes after injury, the role of English language proficiency in these disparities remains unclear. METHODS: Moderate to severely injured adults from three level-1 trauma centers completed an interview in English or Spanish between 6-12 months post-injury to assess physical health-related quality of life (SF-12-PCS), return to work, and post-discharge healthcare utilization. The language used in the interview was used as a proxy for English-language proficiency, and participants were categorized as either NHW (reference), ESHL, or SSHL. Multivariable regression models estimated independent associations between language and race/ethnicity with SF-12-PCS, return to work, and post-discharge healthcare utilization outcomes. RESULTS: 3,304 injury survivors were followed: 2,977 (90%) NHW, 203 (6%) ESHL, and 124 (4%) SSHL. In adjusted analyses, no significant differences were observed between ESHL and NHW injury survivors for any outcomes at 6-12 months post-injury. However, SSHL injury survivors exhibited a lower mean SF-12-PCS (41.6 vs. 38.5), -3.07 (95% CI=-5.47, -0.66; P=0.012), decreased odds of returning to work (OR=0.47; CI=0.27 to 0.81; P=0.007), and were less likely to engage in non-injury related outpatient visits, such as primary care visits (OR=0.45; 95% CI 0.28, 0.73; P=0.001), compared to NHW patients. CONCLUSION: Hispanic/Latinx injury survivors have worse post-discharge outcomes and lower non-injury-related healthcare utilization than NHW if they have limited English-language proficiency. Addressing LEP-related barriers to care could help mitigate outcome and healthcare utilization disparities among Hispanic/Latinx injury survivors.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the relationship between body mass index (BMI), a function of mass and height (masskg/height2m) and long-term outcomes among traumatic injury survivors. In this prospective cohort study, we investigate the relationship between BMI and long-term health outcomes in the trauma population. METHODS: Adult trauma survivors with an injury severity score ≥9 admitted to one of three level 1 trauma centers, from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2022, were surveyed via telephone between 6 and 12 mo postinjury. Participants were stratified into one of five groups by BMI at the time of trauma: L-BMI (BMI <18.5), N-BMI (BMI 18.5-24.9), H1-BMI (BMI 25-29.9), H2-BMI (BMI 30-34.9), and H3-BMI (BMI ≥35); N-BMI was used as the referent. Mental and physical health-related quality of life scores, pain, new functional limitations, and hospital readmissions were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare outcomes between study groups. RESULTS: 3830 patients were included. Of those, 124 were L-BMI (3.2%), 1495 N-BMI (39%), 1318 H1-BMI (34.4%), 541 H2-BMI (14.1%), and 352 H3-BMI (9.2%). L-BMI was associated with adverse physical (b = -3.13, CI = -5.71 to -0.55, P = 0.017) and mental health (b = -3.17, CI = -5.87 to -0.46, P = 0.022) outcomes 6-12 mo postinjury compared to the referent. H1-BMI and H2-BMI had higher odds of wo`rse physical outcomes (b = -1.47, CI = -2.42 to -0.52, P = 0.002; b = -3.11, CI = - 4.33 to -1.88, P ≤ 0.001, respectively) and chronic pain (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.24, CI = 1.04-1.47, P = 0.016; aOR = 1.52, CI = 1.21-1.90, P ≤ 0.001, respectively). Patients with H3-BMI had higher odds of worse physical outcomes compared to N-BMI (b = -4.82, CI = -6.28 to -3.37, P ≤ 0.001), chronic pain (aOR = 2.11, CI = 1.61-2.78, P ≤ 0.001), all-cause hospital readmissions (aOR = 1.62, CI = 1.10-2.34, P = 0.013), and new functional limitations (aOR = 1.39, CI = 1.08-1.79, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: BMI variance above or below N-BMI is associated with worse long-term outcomes following traumatic injury.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Obesity is increasingly prevalent both nationwide and in the emergency general surgery (EGS) population. While previous studies have shown that obesity may be protective against mortality following EGS procedures, the association between body mass index (BMI) and postoperative outcomes, as well as intraoperative decision-making, remains understudied. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2015-2019 database was used to identify all adult patients undergoing an open abdominal or abdominal wall procedure for EGS conditions. Our outcomes included 30-d postoperative mortality, composite 30-d morbidity, delayed fascial closure, reoperation, operative time, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to explore the association between BMI and each outcome of interest while adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, laboratory tests, preoperative and intraoperative variables. RESULTS: We identified 78,578 patients, of which 3121 (4%) were categorized as underweight, 23,661 (30.1%) as normal weight, 22,072 (28.1%) as overweight, 14,287 (18.2%) with class I obesity, 7370 (9.4%) with class II obesity, and 8067 (10.3%) with class III obesity. Class III obesity was identified as a risk factor for 30-d postoperative morbidity (adjusted odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI, 1.03-1.26, P < 0.01). An increase in obesity class was also associated with a stepwise increase in the risk of undergoing delayed fascial closure, experiencing a prolonged operative time, and having an extended LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity class was associated with an increase in delayed fascial closure, longer operative time, higher reoperation rates, and extended hospital LOS. Further studies are needed to explore how a patient's BMI impacts intraoperative factors, influences surgical decision-making, and contributes to hospital costs.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Racial and ethnic disparities in emergency general surgery (EGS) patients have been well described in the literature. Nonetheless, the burden of these disparities, specifically within the more vulnerable older adult population, is relatively unknown. This study aims to investigate racial and ethnic disparities in clinical outcomes among older adult patients undergoing EGS. METHODS: This retrospective analysis used data from 2013 to 2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database. EGS patients aged 65 y or older were included. Patients were categorized based on their self-reported race and ethnicity. The primary outcomes evaluated were in-hospital mortality, 30-d mortality, and overall morbidity. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the relationship between race/ethnicity and postoperative outcomes while adjusting for relevant factors including age, comorbidities, functional status, preoperative conditions, and surgical procedure. RESULTS: A total of 54,132 patients were included, of whom 79.8% identified as non-Hispanic White, 9.5% as non-Hispanic Black (NHB), 5.8% as Hispanic, and 4.2% as non-Hispanic Asian. After risk adjustment, compared to non-Hispanic White patients, NHB, non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic patients had decreased odds of 30-d mortality. For 30-d readmission and reoperation, differences among groups were comparable. However, NHB patients had significantly increased odds of overall morbidity (adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval: 1.10-1.26; P < 0.001) and postoperative complications including sepsis, venous thromboembolism, and unplanned intubation. Hispanic ethnicity was associated with lower odds of postoperative myocardial infarction and stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Among older adult patients undergoing emergency general surgery, minority patients experienced higher morbidity rates, but paradoxical disparities in mortality were detected. Further research is necessary to identify the cause of these disparities and develop targeted interventions to eliminate them.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: General surgery procedures place stress on geriatric patients, and postdischarge care options should be evaluated. We compared the association of discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) versus home on patient readmission. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the Nationwide Readmission Database (2016-2019) and included patients ≥65 y who underwent a general surgery procedure between January and September. Our primary outcome was 30-d readmissions. Our secondary outcome was predictors of readmission after discharge to an SNF. We performed a 1:1 propensity-matched analysis adjusting for patient demographics and hospital course to compare patients discharged to an SNF with patients discharged home. We performed a sensitivity analysis on patients undergoing emergency procedures and a stepwise regression to identify predictors of readmission. RESULTS: Among 140,056 included patients, 33,916 (24.2%) were discharged to an SNF. In the matched population of 19,763 pairs, 30-d readmission was higher in patients discharged to an SNF. The most common diagnosis at readmission was sepsis, and a greater proportion of patients discharged to an SNF were readmitted for sepsis. In the sensitivity analysis, emergency surgery patients discharged to an SNF had higher 30-d readmission. Higher illness severity during the index admission and living in a small or fringe county of a large metropolitan area were among the predictors of readmission in patients discharged to an SNF, while high household income was protective. CONCLUSIONS: Discharge to an SNF compared to patients discharged home was associated with a higher readmission. Future studies need to identify the patient and facility factors responsible for this disparity.
Asunto(s)
Alta del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente , Puntaje de Propensión , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería , Humanos , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Delayed fascial closure (DFC) is an increasingly utilized technique in emergency general surgery (EGS), despite a lack of data regarding its benefits. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of DFC versus immediate fascial closure (IFC) in EGS patients with intra-abdominal contamination. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted using the 2013-2020 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Adult EGS patients who underwent an exploratory laparotomy with intra-abdominal contamination [wound classification III (contaminated) or IV (dirty)] were included. Patients with agreed upon indications for DFC were excluded. A propensity-matched analysis was performed. The primary outcome was 30-d mortality. RESULTS: We identified 36,974 eligible patients. 16.8% underwent DFC, of which 51.7% were female, and the median age was 64 y. After matching, there were 6213 pairs. DFC was associated with a higher risk of mortality (15.8% versus 14.2%, P = 0.016), pneumonia (11.7% versus 10.1%, P = 0.007), pulmonary embolism (1.9% versus 1.6%, P = 0.03), and longer hospital stay (11 versus 10 d, P < 0.001). No significant differences in postoperative sepsis and deep surgical site infection rates between the two groups were observed. Subgroup analyses by preoperative diagnosis (diverticulitis, perforation, and undifferentiated sepsis) showed that DFC was associated with longer hospital stay in all subgroups, with a higher mortality rate in patients with diverticulitis (8.1% versus 6.1%, P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of intra-abdominal contamination, DFC is associated with longer hospital stay and higher rates of mortality and morbidity. DFC was not associated with decreased risk of infectious complications. Further studies are needed to clearly define the indications of DFC.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In Massachusetts, US, medical cannabis legalisation was associated with increased paediatric cannabis exposure cases, including emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations. The impact of recreational cannabis legalisation (RCL) on paediatric exposures in Massachusetts has yet to be studied. METHODS: To compare the incidences before and after RCL in Massachusetts, US, we queried the data on paediatric cannabis exposure cases in 2016-2021 from the Centre for Healthcare and Analysis and Injury Surveillance Programme at the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. The pre-and post-legalisation phases comprised the periods between 2016-2018 and 2019-2021, respectively. Cannabis-related exposure cases included ED visits and hospitalizations among children and young adolescents of 0-19 years old. RESULTS: During the 6-year period (2016-2021), 2357 ED visits and 538 hospitalizations related to cannabis exposure among children and teenagers (0-19 years) were reported in Massachusetts. The incidence of ED visits for all age groups increased from 18.5 per 100 000 population before RCL to 31.0 per 100 000 population (incidence rate ratio (IRR), 1.6; 95% CI, 1.5 to 1.8). Children in the age groups of 0-5 and 6-12 years experienced the highest increase in cannabis-related ED visits. Additionally, the incidence of hospitalisation due to cannabis intoxication substantially increased following RCL (IRR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.8 to 2.7), a 126% increase. CONCLUSIONS: Cannabis-related ED visits and hospitalizations among children and teenagers increased after recreational cannabis became legal in Massachusetts, US. Further efforts are warranted to prevent the unintentional impact of RCL, especially considering substantial increases in cannabis exposure cases among young children.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Spontaneous bowel perforation is associated with high morbidity and mortality. This entity remains understudied in the geriatric patient. We sought to use a national surgical sample to uncover independent predictors of mortality in elderly patients undergoing emergent operation for perforated bowel. METHODS: Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement database, years 2007 to 2017, all geriatric patients (age ≥65 y) who underwent emergency surgery and who had a postoperative diagnosis of bowel perforation were included. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to identify independent predictors of 30-d mortality. RESULTS: A total of 8981 patients were included. The median (interquartile range) age was 75 y (69, 82), and 59.0% were female. Twenty-one percent of patients were partially or totally dependent, and 25.2% were admitted from sources other than home. Overall, 30-d mortality rate was 22.1%. Independent predictors of mortality included the following: age 70-79 y (odds ratio [OR]: 1.59, P < 0.001), age ≥80 y (OR: 3.23, P < 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists ≥3 (OR: 4.74, P < 0.001), admission from chronic care facility (OR: 1.61, P < 0.001), being partially or totally dependent (OR: 1.50, P < 0.001), chronic steroid use (OR: 1.36, P < 0.001), and preoperative septic shock (OR: 3.74, P < 0.001). Having immediate fascial closure was protective against mortality (immediate fascial closure only, OR: 0.55, P < 0.001; -immediate closure of all surgical site layers, OR: 0.44, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In geriatric patients, functional status and chronic steroid therapy play an important role in determining survival following surgery for bowel perforation. These factors should be considered during preoperative counseling and decision-making.
Asunto(s)
Perforación Intestinal , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Esteroides , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Management of hemorrhage from pelvic fractures is complex and requires multidisciplinary attention. Pelvic angioembolization (AE) has become a key intervention to aid in obtaining definitive hemorrhage control. We hypothesized that pelvic AE would be associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). METHODS: All adults (age >16) with a severe pelvic fracture (Abbreviated Injury Scale ≥ 4) secondary to a blunt traumatic mechanism in the 2017-2019 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database were included. Patients who did not receive VTE prophylaxis during their admission were excluded. Patients who underwent pelvic AE during the first 24 h of admission were compared to those who did not using propensity score matching. Matching was performed based on patient demographics, admission physiology, comorbidities, injury severity, associated injuries, other hemorrhage control procedures, and VTE prophylaxis type, and time to initiation of VTE prophylaxis. The rates of VTE (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) were compared between the matched groups. RESULTS: Of 72,985 patients with a severe blunt pelvic fracture, 1887 (2.6%) underwent pelvic AE during the first 24 h of admission versus 71,098 (97.4%) who did not. Pelvic AE patients had a higher median Injury Severity Score and more often required other hemorrhage control procedures, with laparotomy being most common (24.7%). The median time to initiation of VTE prophylaxis in pelvic AE versus no pelvic AE patients was 60.1 h (interquartile range = 36.6-98.6) versus 27.7 h (interquartile range = 13.9-52.4), respectively. After propensity score matching, pelvic AE patients were more likely to develop VTE compared to no pelvic AE patients (11.8% versus 9.5%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic AE for control of hemorrhage from severe pelvic fractures is associated with an increased risk of in-hospital VTE. Patients who undergo pelvic AE are especially high risk for VTE and should be started as early as safely possible on VTE prophylaxis.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas , Embolia Pulmonar , Tromboembolia Venosa , Adulto , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Embolia Pulmonar/prevención & control , Fracturas Óseas/complicaciones , Escala Resumida de Traumatismos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Elderly patients are frequently presenting with emergency surgical conditions. The open abdomen technique is widely used in abdominal emergencies needing rapid control of intrabdominal contamination. However, specific predictors of mortality identifying candidates for comfort care are understudied. METHODS: The 2013-2017 the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for emergent laparotomies performed in geriatric patients with sepsis or septic shock in whom fascial closure was delayed. Patients with acute mesenteric ischemia were excluded. The primary outcome was 30-d mortality. Univariable analysis, followed by multivariable logistic regression, was performed. Mortality was computed for combinations of the five predictors with the highest odds ratios (OR). RESULTS: A total of 1399 patients were identified. The median age was 73 (69-79) y, and 54.7% were female. 30-d mortality was 50.6%. In the multivariable analysis, the most important predictors were as follows: American Society of Anesthesiologists status 5 (OR = 4.80, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.85-12.49 P = 0.002), dialysis dependence (OR = 2.65, 95% CI 1.54-4.57, P < 0.001), congestive hearth failure (OR = 2.53, 95% CI 1.52-4.21, P < 0.001), disseminated cancer (OR = 2.61, 95% CI 1.55-4.38, P < 0.001), and preoperative platelet count of <100,000 cells/µL (OR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.15-3.04, P = 0.011). The presence of two or more of these factors resulted in over 80% mortality. The absence of all these risk factors results in a survival rate of 62.1%. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients, surgical sepsis or septic shock requiring an open abdomen for surgical management is highly lethal. The presence of several combinations of preoperative comorbidities is associated with a poor prognosis and can identify patients who can benefit from timely initiation of palliative care.
Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Choque Séptico , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Choque Séptico/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Sepsis/cirugía , Abdomen/cirugía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The usage of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in trauma patients has increased significantly within the past decade. Despite increased research on ECMO application in trauma patients, there remains limited data on factors predicting morbidity and mortality outcome. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to describe patient characteristics that are independently associated with mortality in ECMO therapy in trauma patients, to further guide future research. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from 2010 to 2019. All adult (age ≥ 16 y) trauma patients that utilized ECMO were included. A Significant differences (P < 0.05) in demographic and clinical characteristics between groups were calculated using an independent t-test for normal distributed continuous values, a Mann-Whitney U test for non-normal distributed values, and a Pearson chi-square test for categorical values. A multivariable regression model was used to identify independent predictors for mortality. A survival flow chart was constructed by using the strongest predictive value for mortality and using the optimal cut-off point calculated by the Youden index. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-two patients were included of whom 205 died. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the female gender, ECMO within 4 h after presentation, a decreased Glasgow Coma Scale, increased age, units of blood in the first 4 h, and abbreviated injury score for external injuries were independently associated with mortality in ECMO trauma patients. It was found that an external abbreviated injury score of ≥3 had the strongest predictive value for mortality, as patients with this criterion had an overall 29.5% increased risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: There is an ongoing increasing trend in the usage of ECMO in trauma patients. This study has identified multiple factors that are individually associated with mortality. However, more research must be done on the association between mortality and noninjury characteristics like Pao2/Fio2 ratio, acute respiratory distress syndrome classification, etc. that reflect the internal state of the patient.
RESUMEN
AIMS: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been recognised as a predominantly respiratory tract infection, but some patients manifest severe systemic symptoms/coagulation abnormalities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of severe COVID-19 infection on the gastrointestinal tract. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined clinicopathological findings in 28 resected ischaemic bowels from 22 patients with severe COVID-19. Most patients required intubation preoperatively and presented with acute decompensation shortly before surgery. D-dimer levels were markedly elevated in all measured cases (mean, 5394 ng/ml). Histologically, 25 cases (19 patients) showed evidence of acute ischaemia with necrosis. In this group, the most characteristic finding was the presence of small vessel fibrin thrombi (24 of 25 cases, 96%), which were numerous in 64% of cases. Patients with COVID-19 were significantly more likely than a control cohort of 35 non-COVID-19-associated acute ischaemic bowels to show isolated small intestine involvement (32% versus 6%, P < 0.001), small vessel fibrin thrombi (100% versus 43%, P < 0.001), submucosal vessels with fibrinous degeneration and perivascular neutrophils (90% versus 54%, P < 0.001), fibrin strands within submucosal vessels (58% versus 20%, P = 0.007), and histological evidence of pneumatosis (74% versus 34%, P = 0.010). Three cases in this cohort had histopathological findings normally seen in the setting of chronic ischaemia, notably prominent fibroblastic proliferation affecting the outer layer of the muscularis propria. CONCLUSIONS: Herein, we describe the histopathological findings in COVID-19-associated ischaemic bowels and postulate a relationship with the hypercoagulable state seen in patients with severe COVID-19 infection. Additional experience with these cases may further elucidate specific features or mechanisms of COVID-19-associated ischaemic enterocolitis.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Colitis Isquémica/patología , Colitis Isquémica/virología , Enterocolitis/patología , Enterocolitis/virología , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are sparse data on the association between age and mortality in hemorrhagic shock (HS). We examined this association in this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Glue Grant database was analyzed. Patients aged ≥16 y with blunt traumatic HS were stratified into eight age groups (16-24, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75-84, and ≥85 y) to identify the mortality inflection point. Subsequently, patients were restratified into young age (16-44 y), middle age (45-64 y), and elderly (≥65 y). Multivariate analysis was used to determine predictors of mortality by group. RESULTS: A total of 1976 patients were included, with mortality of 16%. Mortality by initial age group is as follows: 16-24 (13.0%), 25-34 (11.9%), 35-44 (11.9%), 45-54 (15.6%), 55-64 (15.7%), 65-74 (20.3%), 75-84 (38.2%), and ≥85 y (51.6%), delineating 65 y as the mortality inflection point. Overall, 55% were young, 30% middle age, and 15% elderly. Predictors of mortality in the young include multiple-organ dysfunction score (MODS; odds ratio [OR]: 1.93, confidence interval [CI]: 1.62-2.30), emergency room lactate (OR: 1.14, CI: 1.02-1.27), injury severity score (OR: 1.06, CI: 1.03-1.09), and cardiac arrest (OR: 10.60, CI: 3.05-36.86). Predictors of mortality in the middle age include MODS (OR: 1.38, CI: 1.24-1.53), cardiac arrest (OR: 12.24, CI: 5.38-27.81), craniotomy (OR: 5.62, CI: 1.93-16.37), and thoracotomy (OR: 2.76, CI: 1.28-5.98). In the elderly, predictors of mortality were age (OR: 1.07, CI: 1.02-1.13), MODS (OR: 1.47, CI: 1.26-1.72), laparotomy (OR: 2.04, CI: 1.02-4.08), and cardiac arrest (OR: 11.61, CI: 4.35-30.98). Open fixation of nonfemoral fractures was protective against mortality in all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: In blunt HS, mortality parallels increasing age, with the inflection point at 65 y. MODS and cardiac arrest uniformly predict mortality across all age groups. Craniotomy and thoracotomy are associated with mortality in the middle age, whereas laparotomy is associated with mortality in the elderly.
Asunto(s)
Choque Hemorrágico/mortalidad , Choque Traumático/mortalidad , Heridas no Penetrantes/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/etiología , Pandemias , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaAsunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Enfermedad Crítica , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/etiología , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Anciano , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Femenino , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Massachusetts , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Anciano , Boston , COVID-19 , Comorbilidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Generales , Humanos , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Valproic acid (VPA) has been shown to improve survival in animal models of hemorrhagic shock at a dose of 300 mg/kg. Our aim was to identify the ideal dose through dose-escalation, split-dosing, and dose de-escalation regimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rats were subjected to sublethal 40% hemorrhage and treated with vehicle or VPA (dose of 300, 400, or 450 mg/kg) after 30 min of shock. Acetylated histones and activated proteins from the PI3K-Akt-GSK-3ß survival pathway at different time points were quantified by Western blot analysis. In a similar model, a VPA dose of 200 mg/kg followed 2 h later by another dose of 100 mg/kg was administered. Finally, animals were subjected to a lethal 50% hemorrhage and VPA was administered in a dose de-escalation manner (starting at dose of 300 mg/kg) until a significant drop in percent survival was observed. RESULTS: Larger doses of VPA resulted in greater acetylation of histone 3 and increased activation of PI3K pathway proteins. Dose-dependent differences were significant in histone acetylation but not in the activation of the survival pathway proteins. Split-dose administration of VPA resulted in similar results to a single full dose. Survival was as follows: 87.5% with 300 and 250 mg/kg of VPA, 50% with 200 mg/kg of VPA, and 14% with vehicle-treated animals. CONCLUSIONS: Although higher doses of VPA result in greater histone acetylation and activation of prosurvival protein signaling, doses as low as 250 mg/kg of VPA confer the same survival advantage in lethal hemorrhagic shock. Also, VPA can be given in a split-dose fashion without a reduction in its cytoprotective effectiveness.
Asunto(s)
Choque Hemorrágico/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéutico , Acetilación , Animales , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Glucógeno Sintasa Quinasa 3/fisiología , Glucógeno Sintasa Quinasa 3 beta , Histonas/metabolismo , Masculino , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasas/fisiología , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-akt/fisiología , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Choque Hemorrágico/mortalidad , Ácido Valproico/sangreRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of sternal fractures (SFs) after blunt trauma is heavily debated. We aimed to test the hypothesis that isolated SF is not associated with significant morbidity or mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) sets for 2007-2010 were retrospectively examined. Adult subjects with SF were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnostic codes. Data collected included demographics, mechanisms of injury, clinical variables, and in-hospital mortality. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcome measures included hospital length of stay, intensive care unit days, and ventilator days. RESULTS: A total of 32,746 subjects with SF were included. Motor vehicle crash (MVC) was the most common mechanism (84%) in this group and SF was present in 3.7% of all patients admitted after MVC. The mean age was 51 y, 66% were males, and most were white (74%). Overall in-hospital mortality was 8.8% and mortality with isolated SF was 3.5%. Increasing thoracic fracture burden (rib fracture, clavicular fracture, and scapular fracture) was associated with increasing hospital length of stay, intensive care unit days, ventilator days, and mortality. On multivariate regression analysis, other significant predictors of mortality were cardiac arrest, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary embolism, blunt cardiac injury, pulmonary contusion, increasing age, and lack of insurance. CONCLUSIONS: SFs occur in 3.7% of victims after MVC. With isolated SF, the mortality rate is low (3.5%); the tendency for poorer outcomes is most heavily influenced by associated injuries (pulmonary contusions, other thoracic fractures), complications (cardiac arrest, pulmonary embolism, acute respiratory distress syndrome), comorbidities (currently on or requiring dialysis, residual neurologic deficit from stroke), and lack of insurance.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Tiempo de Internación , Esternón/lesiones , Accidentes de Tránsito , Adulto , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pancreaticoduodenectomy for trauma (PDT) is a rare procedure, reserved for severe pancreaticoduodenal injuries. Using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), our aim was to compare outcomes of PDT patients to similarly injured patients who did not undergo a PDT. METHODS: Patients with pancreatic or duodenal injuries treated with PDT (ICD-9-CM 52.7) were identified in the NTDB 20082010 Research Data Sets. We excluded those who underwent delayed PDT (>4 days). The PDT group (n = 39) was compared to patients with severe combined pancreaticoduodenal injuries (grade 4 or 5) who did not undergo PDT (non-PDT group, n = 38). Patients who died in the emergency department or did not undergo a laparotomy were excluded. Our primary outcome was death. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and total ventilator days. A multivariate model was used to determine predictors of in-hospital mortality within each group and in the overall cohort. RESULTS: The non-PDT group had a significantly lower systolic blood pressure and Glasgow Coma Scale values at baseline and more severe duodenal, pancreatic, and liver injuries. There were no significant differences in outcomes between the two groups. The Injury Severity Score was the only independent predictor of mortality among PDT patients [odds ratio (OR) 1.12, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.011.24] and in the entire cohort (OR 1.06, 95 % CI 1.011.12). The operative technique did not influence any of the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to non-PDT, PDT did not result in improved outcomes despite a lower physiologic burden among PDT patients. More conservative procedures for high-grade injuries of the pancreaticoduodenal complex may be appropriate.
Asunto(s)
Duodeno/lesiones , Páncreas/lesiones , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Escala Resumida de Traumatismos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Vesícula Biliar/lesiones , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Hígado/lesiones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismo Múltiple/cirugía , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in the regionalization of surgical procedures. However, evidence on the volume-outcome relationship for emergency intra-abdominal surgery is not well-synthesized. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarize evidence regarding the impact of hospital and surgeon volume on complications. METHODS: We identified cohort studies assessing the impact of hospital/surgeon volume on postoperative complications after emergency intra-abdominal procedures, with data collected after the year 2000 through a literature search without language restriction in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. A weighted overall complication rate was calculated, and a random effect regression model was used for a summary odds ratio. A sensitivity analysis with the removal of studies contributing to heterogeneity was performed (PROSPERO: CRD42022358879). RESULTS: The search yielded 2,153 articles, of which 9 cohort studies were included and determined to be good quality according to the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. These studies reported outcomes for the following procedures: cholecystectomy, colectomy, appendectomy, small bowel resection, peptic ulcer repair, adhesiolysis, laparotomy, and hernia repair. Eight studies (2,358,093 patients) with available data were included in the meta-analysis. Low hospital volume was not significantly associated with higher complications. In the sensitivity analysis, low hospital volume was significantly associated with higher complications when appropriate heterogeneity was achieved. Low surgeon volume was associated with higher complications, and these findings remained consistent in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: We found that hospital and surgeon volume was significantly associated with higher complications in patients undergoing emergency intra-abdominal surgery when appropriate heterogeneity was achieved.