Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 40
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Infect Chemother ; 27(4): 585-591, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33454214

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to identify factors affecting presepsin levels and to determine their diagnostic utility. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at an outpatient clinic and emergency department at an acute care hospital in Japan between January 2015 and December 2017. We enrolled 1,840 consecutive outpatients with at least one measurement of serum presepsin, who were suspected of having bacterial infection. The outcome variables were bacterial infection, lower respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, cholangitis, and other infections diagnoses, based on the chart review. We collected blood analysis data on the patients' presepsin levels. RESULTS: There was a significant association between presepsin level and the diagnosis of bacterial infection even when adjusted for age, sex, renal function, and biliary enzyme levels. An increase of 1 unit in the log of presepsin values resulted in a relative risk ratio of 1.71 (1.09-2.66), 2.1 (1.58-2.79), 2.93 (2.05-4.19), 4.7(2.90-7.61), and 2.41(1.70-3.43), for bacterial infection, lower respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, cholangitis, and other infections, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Presepsin showed a statistically significant increase in the diagnosis of bacterial infections (lower respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, cholangitis, and non-severe patients) in a community hospital setting. However, in patients with renal dysfunction, presepsin levels should be interpreted with caution.


Asunto(s)
Receptores de Lipopolisacáridos , Sepsis , Biomarcadores , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Calcitonina , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Fragmentos de Péptidos
4.
BMC Fam Pract ; 16: 161, 2015 Nov 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26526728

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite an increase in research devoted to primary care attributes, the patient benefits and educational aspects of broad scope practice of primary care physicians (PCPs) have not been well studied, due to a lack of validated measurement in each country. The objective of this study was to develop and validate the Scope of Practice Inventory (SPI) to measure physicians' scope of practice within the Japanese primary care setting. METHODS: The questionnaire was developed in seven phases: 1) item generation, 2) consensus method for necessity of each item, 3) Delphi process for the importance of each item, 4) pilot tests to limit the number of items, 5) preliminary cross-sectional study to examine factor structure and to validate the construct validity, 6) evaluation of internal consistency and intra-class reliability, and 7) evaluation of external validity. To confirm the interpretability of the SPI, the determinants of the SPI using a generalized linear model were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 359 items generated by a focus group, 180 reached a defined consensus on face and content validity after the Delphi process. After deletion of items with Kappa values less than 0.6, 120 items were selected for the preliminary study. The principle component analysis using responses from 451 PCPs eliminated 52 items. The final 68-point SPI had three subdomains: Inpatient care, 25 items; Urgent care and minor procedures, 27 items; and Ambulatory care, 16 items. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability for total SPI and each subdomain revealed acceptable reliability. Male sex, less years since graduation, working in a hospital, sub-urban or rural setting, having remote experience, and having board certification as a PCP were positively associated with higher SPI. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a self-administered 68-point scale, the SPI, which had satisfactory validity and reliability. Primary care quality and educational research using SPI are expected to contribute to comprehensive and efficient health care systems in the future.


Asunto(s)
Médicos de Atención Primaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Técnica Delphi , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
5.
Clin Case Rep ; 12(6): e9022, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38855086

RESUMEN

Key Clinical Message: A whirl sign on contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scan is indicative of intestine twisted around the mesenteric vessels, and is observed in cases of strangulated obstruction, signaling compromised intestinal circulation. In cases of intestinal volvulus, surgery is necessary to untwist the affected bowel, and resection is necessary if necrosis is present. Abstract: A 31-year-old Japanese man presented with acute lower abdominal pain and vomiting. Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a 1440-degree clockwise torsion of superior mesenteric artery and a whirl sign. Intestinal volvulus in adulthood with a background of malrotation is extremely rare. Contrast-enhanced CT is effective for diagnosis.

6.
BMC Prim Care ; 25(1): 219, 2024 Jun 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38890610

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is unclear how primary care physicians manage insomnia after the introduction of novel hypnotics such as orexin receptor antagonists and melatonin receptor agonists. This Web-based questionnaire survey aimed to examine treatment strategies for insomnia in Japanese primary care practice. METHODS: One-hundred-and-seventeen primary care physicians were surveyed on the familiarity of each management option for insomnia on a binary response scale (0 = "unfamiliar"; 1 = "familiar") and how they managed insomnia using a nine-point Likert scale (1 = "I never prescribe/perform it"; 9 = "I often prescribe/perform it"). Physicians who were unfamiliar with a management option were deemed to have never prescribed or performed it. RESULTS: Regarding medication, most physicians were familiar with novel hypnotics. Suvorexant was the most used hypnotic, followed by lemborexant and ramelteon. These novel hypnotics averaged 4.8-5.4 points and 4.0-4.7 points for sleep onset and sleep maintenance insomnia, respectively. By contrast, most benzodiazepines were seldom used below two points. Regarding psychotherapy, only approximately 40% of the physicians were familiar with cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) and they rarely implemented it, at an average of 1.5-1.6 points. More physicians were familiar with single-component psychotherapies (i.e., relaxation, sleep restriction therapy, and stimulus control) compared to CBT-I, and 48-74% of them implemented it slightly more often, with scores ranging from 2.6 to 3.4 points. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that Japanese primary care physicians seldom use CBT-I to treat insomnia. In addition, they use novel sleep medications more frequently than benzodiazepines in terms of pharmacotherapy. The use and availability of CBT-I in Japanese primary care might be facilitated by: educating primary care physicians, implementing brief or digital CBT-I, and/or developing collaborations between primary care physicians and CBT-I specialists.


Asunto(s)
Hipnóticos y Sedantes , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Pueblos del Este de Asia , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Internet , Japón , Antagonistas de los Receptores de Orexina/uso terapéutico , Médicos de Atención Primaria , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(7): e2423544, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39078632

RESUMEN

Importance: There is currently no consensus on clinically effective interventions for polypharmacy among older inpatients. Objective: To evaluate the effect of multidisciplinary team-based medication optimization on survival, unscheduled hospital visits, and rehospitalization in older inpatients with polypharmacy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted at 8 internal medicine inpatient wards within a community hospital in Japan. Participants included medical inpatients 65 years or older who were receiving 5 or more regular medications. Enrollment took place between May 21, 2019, and March 14, 2022. Statistical analysis was performed from September 2023 to May 2024. Intervention: The participants were randomly assigned to receive either an intervention for medication optimization or usual care including medication reconciliation. The intervention consisted of a medication review using the STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions)/START (Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment) criteria, followed by a medication optimization proposal for participants and their attending physicians developed by a multidisciplinary team. On discharge, the medication optimization summary was sent to patients' primary care physicians and community pharmacists. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of death, unscheduled hospital visits, and rehospitalization within 12 months. Secondary outcomes included the number of prescribed medications, falls, and adverse events. Results: Between May 21, 2019, and March 14, 2022, 442 participants (mean [SD] age, 81.8 [7.1] years; 223 [50.5%] women) were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 215) and usual care (n = 227). The intervention group had a significantly lower percentage of patients with 1 or more potentially inappropriate medications than the usual care group at discharge (26.2% vs 33.0%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.56 [95% CI, 0.33-0.94]; P = .03), at 6 months (27.7% vs 37.5%; adjusted OR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.29-0.86]; P = .01), and at 12 months (26.7% vs 37.4%; adjusted OR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.25-0.80]; P = .007). The primary composite outcome occurred in 106 participants (49.3%) in the intervention group and 117 (51.5%) in the usual care group (stratified hazard ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.75-1.27]). Adverse events were similar between each group (123 [57.2%] in the intervention group and 135 [59.5%] in the usual care group). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of older inpatients with polypharmacy, the multidisciplinary deprescribing intervention did not reduce death, unscheduled hospital visits, or rehospitalization within 12 months. The intervention was effective in reducing the number of medications with no significant adverse effects on clinical outcomes, even among older inpatients with polypharmacy. Trial Registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000035265.


Asunto(s)
Polifarmacia , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Japón , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Conciliación de Medicamentos/métodos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente
8.
Am Fam Physician ; 97(12): Online, 2018 06 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30216006
9.
Eur J Case Rep Intern Med ; 10(1): 003735, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36819651

RESUMEN

A 32-year-old woman presented to the outpatient clinic with persistent fever, anterior neck pain, and palpitations over the past week which developed 2 days after she had received the first dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. On examination, the patient's heart rate was 140 beats per minute and the thyroid gland was tender on palpation. Laboratory studies showed a low serum TSH level with elevated free thyroxine. Thyroid ultrasound revealed low-echoic lesions compatible with the site of tenderness. The patient was diagnosed with subacute thyroiditis and treatment was initiated with acetaminophen and propranolol, which resulted in symptom resolution within 2 weeks. Clinicians should be aware that subacute thyroiditis may occur within a few days following COVID-19 vaccination, especially in patients with anterior cervical pain with no significant abnormal pharyngeal findings and/or severe palpitations, because differentiating them from early non-specific adverse reactions can be challenging. LEARNING POINTS: Cases of subacute thyroiditis after vaccination, including against COVID-19, have been increasingly reported.Subacute thyroiditis should be considered in patients with anterior cervical pain with no significant abnormal pharyngeal findings and/or severe palpitations after COVID-19 vaccination because these can be diagnostic clues.It is important to note that this condition can occur as early as a few days after vaccination, in order to avoid diagnostic pitfalls.

10.
J Gen Fam Med ; 24(2): 63-71, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36909792

RESUMEN

Integration of mental health into primary care has become a global trend, and many countries have developed mental health training in primary care. However, systematic mental health training for family physicians is insufficient in Japan. The newly established Japan Primary Care Association Mental Health Committee surveyed the current status of mental health training curricula in family medicine residency internationally. Participants were individuals involved in family medicine residency programs who were from Australia, Brazil, Hong Kong, the Philippines, Taiwan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The results revealed that many academic societies have created competency lists and curriculum guidelines for mental health training; however, the implementation varied. This study is novel as it examined and compared different countries' curriculum; the findings of which can be used as a reference to develop future mental health training curriculum in Japan.

11.
J Gen Fam Med ; 24(4): 215-222, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37484125

RESUMEN

Background: Studies have shown that a usual source of care increases the receipt of child preventive care; however, the relationship between having a usual source of primary care and COVID-19 parental vaccine hesitancy has not been fully investigated. The aims of this study were to elucidate the characteristics of mothers with a primary care physician, and to explore the relationship between having a usual source of primary care and COVID-19 parental vaccine hesitancy among mothers in Japan. Method: This cross-sectional survey-based study included 4516 mothers. Using a chi-square test, the characteristics of mothers with and without a primary care physician were compared. Poisson regression was applied to evaluate the relationship between having a usual source of primary care and parental COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Results: Mothers with a usual source of primary care had higher education, lower mental distress, had younger children, and were less hesitant toward the child's COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccine hesitancy was observed in 39.8% of mothers with a usual source of primary care and 45.5% of those without. Poisson regression analysis showed that mothers with a primary care physician were less vaccine-hesitant (IRR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.84-0.96) after adjusting for potential confounders. Conclusion: This study suggested that having a usual source of primary care may contribute to lower parental COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. However, the high vaccine hesitancy rate, even among mothers with a usual source of primary care, warrants healthcare providers to be equipped to help parents make informed decisions about vaccination through the continuity of care.

12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36834238

RESUMEN

Deprescribing has recently been applied to address polypharmacy, particularly among older adults. However, the characteristics of deprescribing that are likely to improve health outcomes have not been well studied. This study explored the experiences and perspectives of general practitioners and pharmacists with regard to deprescribing in older adults with multimorbidity. A qualitative study was conducted involving eight semi-structured focus group interviews with 35 physicians and pharmacists from hospitals, clinics, and community pharmacies. Thematic analysis was applied to identify themes using the theory of planned behavior as a guide. The results illustrated a metacognitive process, as well as influencing factors, through which healthcare providers commit to shared decision making for deprescribing. Healthcare providers acted on the basis of their attitudes and beliefs on deprescribing, the influence of subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control for deprescribing. These processes are influenced by factors such as drug class, prescribers, patients, deprescribing experience, and environment/education. Healthcare providers' attitudes, beliefs, and behavioral control (along with deprescribing strategies) evolve in a dynamic interplay with experience, environment, and education. Our results can serve as a foundation for the development of effective patient-centered deprescribing to improve the safety of pharmaceutical care for older adults.


Asunto(s)
Deprescripciones , Médicos Generales , Humanos , Anciano , Médicos Generales/psicología , Farmacéuticos , Japón , Atención Dirigida al Paciente
13.
Front Psychiatry ; 14: 1071962, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36865069

RESUMEN

Introduction: Benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepines are still widely prescribed despite safety concerns and the introduction of novel hypnotics (orexin receptor antagonists [ORA] and melatonin receptor agonists [MRA]), which may be influenced by physicians' attitudes toward hypnotics. Methods: A questionnaire survey was administered to 962 physicians between October 2021 and February 2022, investigating frequently prescribed hypnotics and the reasons for their selection. Results: ORA were the most frequently prescribed at 84.3%, followed by non-benzodiazepines (75.4%), MRA (57.1%), and benzodiazepines (54.3%). Compared to non-frequent prescribers of hypnotics, a logistic regression analysis showed that frequent ORA prescribers were more concerned with efficacy (odds ratio [OR]: 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-2.54, p = 0.044) and safety (OR: 4.52, 95% CI: 2.99-6.84, p < 0.001), frequent MRA prescribers were more concerned with safety (OR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.77-3.46, p < 0.001), frequent non-benzodiazepine prescribers were more concerned with efficacy (OR: 4.19, 95% CI: 2.91-6.04, p < 0.001), and frequent benzodiazepine prescribers were more concerned with efficacy (OR: 4.19, 95% CI: 2.91-6.04, p < 0.001) but less concerned with safety (OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.16-0.39, p < 0.001). Discussion: This study suggested that physicians believed ORA to be an effective and safe hypnotic and were compelled to prescribe benzodiazepine and non-benzodiazepine frequently, choosing efficacy over safety.

14.
Cureus ; 15(2): e35433, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36994257

RESUMEN

A 48-year-old man visited our emergency room after experiencing sudden left back pain, diaphoresis, and nausea. The patient underwent physical and laboratory examinations. Physical examination revealed tenderness in the left costovertebral angle. Laboratory examination revealed a slight elevation in D-dimer levels. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a bilateral pulmonary embolism and left renal infarction. Back pain was resolved following anticoagulation therapy with heparin. Transesophageal echocardiography revealed a patent foramen ovale (PFO). The patient was discharged on an anticoagulant, apixaban. Identifying the cause of paradoxical embolisms, such as an atrial septal defect or PFO, in cases with an arterial embolism in a young patient with no underlying disease is important.

15.
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep ; 43(2): 188-194, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36811273

RESUMEN

AIMS: Treatment guidelines with respect to unspecified anxiety disorder have not been published. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus among field experts on the management of unspecified anxiety disorder. METHODS: Experts were asked to evaluate treatment choices based on eight clinical questions concerning unspecified anxiety disorder using a nine-point Likert scale (1 = "disagree" to 9 = "agree"). According to the responses from 119 experts, the choices were categorized into first-, second-, and third-line recommendations. RESULTS: Benzodiazepine anxiolytic use was not categorized as a first-line recommendation for the primary treatment of unspecified anxiety disorder, whereas multiple nonpharmacological treatment strategies, including coping strategies (7.9 ± 1.4), psychoeducation for anxiety (7.9 ± 1.4), lifestyle changes (7.8 ± 1.5), and relaxation techniques (7.4 ± 1.8), were categorized as first-line recommendations. Various treatment strategies were categorized as first-line recommendations when a benzodiazepine anxiolytic drug did not improve anxiety symptoms, that is, differential diagnosis (8.2 ± 1.4), psychoeducation for anxiety (8.0 ± 1.5), coping strategies (7.8 ± 1.5), lifestyle changes (7.8 ± 1.5), relaxation techniques (7.2 ± 1.9), and switching to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (7.0 ± 1.8). These strategies were also highly endorsed when tapering the dosage of or discontinuing benzodiazepine anxiolytic drugs. There was no first-line recommendation regarding excusable reasons for continuing benzodiazepine anxiolytics. CONCLUSIONS: The field experts recommend that benzodiazepine anxiolytics should not be used as a first-line option for patients with unspecified anxiety disorder. Instead, several nonpharmacological interventions and switching to SSRIs were endorsed for the primary treatment of unspecified anxiety disorder and as alternatives to benzodiazepine anxiolytics.


Asunto(s)
Ansiolíticos , Humanos , Ansiolíticos/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Consenso , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico
16.
Front Psychiatry ; 14: 1168100, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37229388

RESUMEN

Purpose: There is a lack of evidence regarding answers for clinical questions about treating insomnia disorder. This study aimed to answer the following clinical questions: (1) how to use each hypnotic and non-pharmacological treatment differently depending on clinical situations and (2) how to reduce or stop benzodiazepine hypnotics using alternative pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. Methods: Experts were asked to evaluate treatment choices based on 10 clinical questions about insomnia disorder using a nine-point Likert scale (1 = "disagree" to 9 = "agree"). The responses of 196 experts were collected, and the answers were categorized into first-, second-, and third-line recommendations. Results: The primary pharmacological treatment, lemborexant (7.3 ± 2.0), was categorized as a first-line recommendation for sleep initiation insomnia, and lemborexant (7.3 ± 1.8) and suvorexant (6.8 ± 1.8) were categorized as the first-line recommendations for sleep maintenance insomnia. Regarding non-pharmacological treatments for primary treatment, sleep hygiene education was categorized as the first-line recommendation for both sleep initiation (8.4 ± 1.1) and maintenance insomnia (8.1 ± 1.5), while multicomponent cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia was categorized as the second-line treatment for both sleep initiation (5.6 ± 2.3) and maintenance insomnia (5.7 ± 2.4). When reducing or discontinuing benzodiazepine hypnotics by switching to other medications, lemborexant (7.5 ± 1.8) and suvorexant (6.9 ± 1.9) were categorized as first-line recommendations. Conclusion: Expert consensus indicates that orexin receptor antagonists and sleep hygiene education are recommended as first-line treatments in most clinical situations to treat insomnia disorder.

17.
PCN Rep ; 2(3): e118, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38867823

RESUMEN

Aim: Clinicians face difficulties in making treatment decisions for unspecified anxiety disorder due to the absence of any treatment guidelines. The objective of this study was to investigate how familiar and how often primary care physicians use pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches to manage the disorder. Methods: A survey was conducted among 117 primary care physicians in Japan who were asked to assess the familiarity of using each treatment option for unspecified anxiety disorder on a binary response scale (0 = "unfamiliar," 1 = "familiar") and the frequency on a nine-point Likert scale (1 = "never used," 9 = "frequently used"). Results: While several benzodiazepine anxiolytics were familiar to primary care physicians, the frequencies of prescribing them, including alprazolam (4.6 ± 2.6), ethyl loflazepate (3.6 ± 2.4), and clotiazepam (3.5 ± 2.3), were low. In contrast, certain nonpharmacological options, including lifestyle changes (5.4 ± 2.3), coping strategies (5.1 ± 2.7), and psychoeducation for anxiety (5.1 ± 2.7), were more commonly utilized, but to a modest extent. When a benzodiazepine anxiolytic drug failed to be effective, primary care physicians selected the following management strategies to a relatively high degree: differential diagnosis (6.4 ± 2.4), referral to a specialist hospital (5.9 ± 2.5), lifestyle changes (5.2 ± 2.5), and switching to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (5.1 ± 2.4). Conclusion: Primary care physicians exercise caution when prescribing benzodiazepine anxiolytics for unspecified anxiety disorder. Nonpharmacological interventions and switching to SSRI are modestly employed as primary treatment options and alternatives to benzodiazepine anxiolytics. To ensure the safe and effective treatment of unspecified anxiety disorder in primary care, more information should be provided from field experts.

19.
Intern Med ; 61(3): 357-360, 2022 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34334568

RESUMEN

We herein report a case of large-vessel vasculitis in a 57-year-old woman who developed an intermittent fever and weight loss. While contrast-enhanced computed tomography was noncontributory, positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) revealed the diffuse, intense uptake of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in the aorta and its branches. Although she had no signs of relapse after successful oral corticosteroid therapy, PET-CT at 30 months revealed a persistent FDG uptake in the large vessels, which warranted regular follow-up imaging for vascular complications. In cases with an intense FDG uptake at the diagnosis, PET-CT follow-up after clinical remission may help predict the risk of relapse and vascular complications.


Asunto(s)
Arteritis , Arteritis de Células Gigantes , Aorta , Femenino , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Radiofármacos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36498061

RESUMEN

Long-term use of benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZDs) may depend on clinicians' BZD discontinuation strategies. We aimed to explore differences in strategies and difficulties with BZD discontinuation between psychiatrists and non-psychiatrists and to identify factors related to difficulties with BZD discontinuation. Japanese physicians affiliated with the Japan Primary Care Association, All Japan Hospital Association, and Japanese Association of Neuro-Psychiatric Clinics were surveyed on the following items: age group, specialty (psychiatric or otherwise), preferred time to start BZD reduction after improvement in symptoms, methods used to discontinue, difficulties regarding BZD discontinuation, and reasons for the difficulties. We obtained 962 responses from physicians (390 from non-psychiatrists and 572 from psychiatrists), of which 94.0% reported difficulty discontinuing BZDs. Non-psychiatrists had more difficulty with BZD discontinuation strategies, while psychiatrists had more difficulty with symptom recurrence/relapse and withdrawal symptoms. Psychiatrists used more candidate strategies in BZD reduction than non-psychiatrists but initiated BZD discontinuation after symptom improvement. Logistic regression analysis showed that psychosocial therapy was associated with less difficulty in BZD discontinuation (odds ratio, 0.438; 95% confidence interval, 0.204-0.942; p = 0.035). Educating physicians about psychosocial therapy may alleviate physicians' difficulty in discontinuing BZDs and reduce long-term BZD prescriptions.


Asunto(s)
Médicos , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias , Humanos , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/tratamiento farmacológico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Oportunidad Relativa
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA