Complex Transitions from Skilled Nursing Facility to Home: Patient and Caregiver Perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Patients who undergo the complex series of transitions from the hospital to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) back to home represent a unique patient population with multiple comorbidities and impaired functional abilities. The needs and outcomes of patients who are discharged from the hospital to SNF before returning home are understudied in care transitions scholarship. OBJECTIVE: To study the patient and caregiver challenges and perspectives on transitions from the hospital to the SNF and back to home. DESIGN: Between 48 h and 1 week after discharge from the SNF, semi-structured interviews were performed with a convenience sample of patients and caregivers in their homes. Within 1 to 2 weeks after the baseline interview, follow-up interviews were performed over the phone. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 39 interviewees comprised older adults undergoing the series of transitions from hospital to skilled nursing facility to home and their informal caregivers. MAIN MEASURES: A constructionist, grounded-theory approach was used to code the interviews, identify major themes and subthemes, and develop a theoretical model explaining the outcomes of the SNF to home transition. KEY RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 76.6 years and 64.8 years for the caregivers. Four major themes were identified: comforts of home, information needs, post-SNF care, and independence. Patients noted an extended time away from home and were motivated to return to and remain in the home. Information needs were variably met and affected post-SNF care, including medication management, appointments, and therapy gains and setbacks. Interviewees identified independent function at home as the most important outcome of the transition home. CONCLUSIONS: Post-SNF in home support is needed rapidly after discharge from the SNF to prevent adverse outcomes. In-home support needs to be highly individualized based on a patient's and caregiver's unique situation and needs.

Implementation of a compulsory clinical pharmacist-led medication deprescribing intervention in high-risk seniors in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of an emergency department (ED) deprescribing intervention for geriatric adults. We hypothesized that pharmacist-led medication reconciliation for at-risk aging patients would increase the 60-day case rate of primary care provider (PCP) deprescribing of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). METHODS: This was a retrospective, before-and-after intervention pilot study conducted at an urban Veterans Affairs ED. In November 2020, a protocol utilizing pharmacists to perform medication reconciliations for patients 75 years or older who screened positive using an Identification of Seniors at Risk tool at triage was implemented. Reconciliations focused on identifying PIMs and providing deprescribing recommendations to patients' PCPs. A preintervention group was collected between October 2019 and October 2020, and a postintervention group was collected between February 2021 to February 2022. The primary outcome compared case rates of PIM deprescribing in the preintervention group to the postintervention group. Secondary outcomes include per-medication PIM deprescribing rate, 30-day PCP follow-up visits, 7- and 30-day ED visits, 7- and 30-day hospitalizations, and 60-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 149 patients were analyzed in each group. Both groups were similar in age and sex, with an average age of 82 years and 98% male. The case rate of PIM deprescribing at 60 days was 11.1% preintervention compared to 57.1% postintervention (p < 0.001). Preintervention, 91% of PIMs remained unchanged at 60 days compared to 49% (p < 0.05) postintervention. Regardless of PIM identification, the 30-day primary care follow-up rate increased postintervention: 31.5% and 55.7% (p < 0.0001), respectively. There was no improvement in 7- or 30-day subsequent ED visits, hospitalization, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation in high-risk geriatric patients was associated with an increase both in the rate of PIM deprescribing and in post-ED primary care engagement.

Risk factors for early hospital readmission in low-income elderly adults.

OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors for early hospital readmission in low-income community-dwelling older adults. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University-affiliated urban safety-net healthcare system in Indianapolis, Indiana. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older with annual income less than 200% of the federal poverty level and enrolled in the Geriatric Resources for Assessment and Care of Elders (GRACE) randomized controlled trial (N = 951). MEASUREMENTS: Participant health and functional status at baseline and 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Early readmission was defined as a repeat hospitalization occurring within 30 days of a prior hospital discharge. Candidate risk factors included sociodemographic characteristics, health and functional status, prior care, lifestyle, and satisfaction with care. RESULTS: Of 457 index admissions in 328 participants, 85 (19%) were followed by an early readmission. The independent risk factors for early readmission identified according to regression analysis were living alone (odds ratio (OR) = 1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.02-2.87), fair or poor satisfaction with primary care physician (OR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.01-4.46), not having Medicaid (OR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.05-3.11), receiving a new assistive device in the past 6 months (OR = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.26-4.05), and staying in a nursing home in the past 6 months (OR = 5.08, 95% CI = 1.56-16.53). Age, race, sex, education, and chronic diseases were not associated with early readmission. CONCLUSION: A broad range of nonmedical risk factors played a greater role than previously recognized in early hospital readmission of low-income seniors.