RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Classically, cerebral autoregulation (CA) entails cerebral blood flow (CBF) remaining constant by cerebrovascular tone adapting to fluctuations in mean arterial pressure (MAP) between â¼60 and â¼150âmmHg. However, this is not an on-off mechanism; previous work has suggested that vasomotor tone is proportionally related to CA function. During propofol-based anaesthesia, there is cerebrovascular vasoconstriction, and static CA remains intact. Sevoflurane-based anaesthesia induces cerebral vasodilation and attenuates CA dose-dependently. It is unclear how this translates to dynamic CA across a range of blood pressures in the autoregulatory range. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of step-wise increases in MAP between 60 and 100âmmHg, using phenylephrine, on dynamic CA during propofol- and sevoflurane-based anaesthesia. DESIGN: A nonrandomised interventional trial. SETTING: Single centre enrolment started on 11 January 2019 and ended on 23 September 2019. PATIENTS: We studied American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I/II patients undergoing noncardiothoracic, nonneurosurgical and nonlaparoscopic surgery under general anaesthesia. INTERVENTION: In this study, cerebrovascular tone was manipulated in the autoregulatory range by increasing MAP step-wise using phenylephrine in patients receiving either propofol- or sevoflurane-based anaesthesia. MAP and mean middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCA Vmean ) were measured in ASA I and II patients, anaesthetised with either propofol ( n â=â26) or sevoflurane ( n â=â28), during 10âmmHg step-wise increments of MAP between 60 and 100âmmHg. Static CA was determined by plotting 2-min averaged MCA Vmean versus MAP. Dynamic CA was determined using transfer function analysis and expressed as the phase lead (°) between MAP and MCA Vmean oscillations, created with positive pressure ventilation with a frequency of 6 min -1 . MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcome of this study was the response of dynamic CA during step-wise increases in MAP during propofol- and sevoflurane-based anaesthesia. RESULTS: MAP levels achieved per step-wise increments were comparable between anaesthesia regiment (63â±â3, 72â±â2, 80â±â2, 90â±â2, 100â±â3âmmHg, and 61â±â4, 71â±â2, 80â±â2, 89â±â2, 98â±â4âmmHg for propofol and sevoflurane, respectively). MCA Vmean increased more during step-wise MAP increments for sevoflurane compared to propofol ( P ≤0.001). Dynamic CA improved during propofol (0.73° mmHg -1 , 95% CI 0.51 to 0.95; P â≤â0.001)) and less pronounced during sevoflurane-based anaesthesia (0.21°âmmHg -1 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.42, P â=â0.04). CONCLUSIONS: During general anaesthesia, dynamic CA is dependent on MAP, also within the autoregulatory range. This phenomenon was more pronounced during propofol anaesthesia than during sevoflurane. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03816072 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03816072 ).
Asunto(s)
Éteres Metílicos , Propofol , Humanos , Sevoflurano , Presión Sanguínea , Propofol/farmacología , Anestesia General , Homeostasis/fisiología , Fenilefrina/farmacologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The introduction of clot removement by endovascular treatment (EVT) in 2015 has improved the clinical outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to a large vessel occlusion (LVO). Anesthetic strategies during EVT vary widely between hospitals, with some departments employing local anesthesia (LA), others performing conscious sedation (CS) or general anesthesia (GA). The optimal anesthetic strategy remains debated. This review will describe the effects of anesthetic strategy on clinical and radiological outcomes and hemodynamic parameters in patients with AIS undergoing EVT. RECENT FINDINGS: Small single-center randomized controlled trails (RCTs) found either no difference or favored GA, while large observational cohort studies favored CS or LA. RCTs using LA as separate comparator arm are still lacking and a meta-analysis of observational studies failed to show differences in functional outcome between LA vs. other anesthetic strategies. Advantages of LA were shorter door-to-groin time in patients and less intraprocedural hypotension, which are both variables that are known to impact functional outcome. SUMMARY: The optimal anesthetic approach in patients undergoing EVT for stroke therapy is still unclear, but based on logistics and peri-procedural hemodynamics, LA may be the optimal choice. Multicenter RCTs are warranted comparing LA, CS and GS with strict blood pressure targets and use of the same anesthetic agents to minimize confounding variables.
Asunto(s)
Anestésicos , Isquemia Encefálica , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anestesia General , Sedación Consciente , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative and postoperative hypotension are associated with morbidity and mortality. The Hypotension Prediction (HYPE) trial showed that the Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) reduced the depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension (IOH), without excess use of intravenous fluid, vasopressor, and/or inotropic therapies. We hypothesised that intraoperative HPI-guided haemodynamic care would reduce the severity of postoperative hypotension in the PACU. METHODS: This was a sub-study of the HYPE study, in which 60 adults undergoing elective noncardiac surgery were allocated randomly to intraoperative HPI-guided or standard haemodynamic care. Blood pressure was measured using a radial intra-arterial catheter, which was connected to a FloTracIQ sensor. Hypotension was defined as MAP <65 mm Hg, and a hypotensive event was defined as MAP <65 mm Hg for at least 1 min. The primary outcome was the time-weighted average (TWA) of postoperative hypotension. Secondary outcomes were absolute incidence, area under threshold for hypotension, and percentage of time spent with MAP <65 mm Hg. RESULTS: Overall, 54/60 (90%) subjects (age 64 (8) yr; 44% female) completed the protocol, owing to failure of the FloTracIQ device in 6/60 (10%) patients. Intraoperative HPI-guided care was used in 28 subjects; 26 subjects were randomised to the control group. Postoperative hypotension occurred in 37/54 (68%) subjects. HPI-guided care did not reduce the median duration (TWA) of postoperative hypotension (adjusted median difference, vs standard of care: 0.118; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0-0.332; P=0.112). HPI-guidance reduced the percentage of time with MAP <65 mm Hg by 4.9% (adjusted median difference: -4.9; 95% CI, -11.7 to -0.01; P=0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative HPI-guided haemodynamic care did not reduce the TWA of postoperative hypotension.
Asunto(s)
Hemodinámica , Hipotensión/prevención & control , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Anciano , Presión Sanguínea , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Hipotensión/epidemiología , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Thyroid storm is a feared complication in patients with hyperthyroidism undergoing surgery. We assessed the risk of thyroid storm for different preoperative treatment options for patients with primary hyperthyroidism undergoing surgery. METHODS: Pubmed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were searched systematically for all studies reporting on adult hyperthyroid patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Selected studies were categorised based on preoperative treatment: no treatment, antithyroid medication (thionamides), iodine, ß-blocking medication, or a combination thereof. Treatment effect, that is restoring euthyroidism, was extracted from the publications if available. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) or the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomised studies. RESULTS: The search yielded 7009 articles, of which 26 studies published between 1975 and 2020 were selected for critical appraisal. All studies had moderate to critical risk of bias, mainly attributable to risk of confounding, classification of intervention status, and definition of the outcome. All studies reported on thyroidectomy patients. We found no randomised studies comparing the risk of thyroid storm between treated and untreated patients. Cases of thyroid storm were reported in all treatment groups with incidences described ranging from 0% to 14%. CONCLUSION: Evidence assessing the risk of perioperative thyroid storm is of insufficient quality. Given the seriousness of this complication and the impossibility of identifying patients at increased risk, preoperative treatment of these patients remains warranted.
Asunto(s)
Hipertiroidismo/complicaciones , Hipertiroidismo/fisiopatología , Periodo Perioperatorio , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Crisis Tiroidea/complicaciones , Crisis Tiroidea/fisiopatología , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos OperativosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Low central venous pressure (low-CVP) is the clinical standard for fluid therapy during major liver surgery. Although goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) has been associated with reduced morbidity and mortality in major abdominal surgery, concerns remain on blood loss when applying GDFT in liver surgery. This randomized trial compared outcomes of low-CVP and GDFT during major liver resections. METHODS: In this surgeon- and patient-blinded RCT, patients undergoing major open liver resections (≥3 segments) were randomized between low-CVP (n = 20) or GDFT (n = 20). Primary outcome was intraoperative blood loss. Secondary outcomes included the quality of the surgical field (VAS scale 0 (worst)-100 (best)) and major morbidity (≥grade 3 Clavien-Dindo). RESULTS: During surgery, CVP was 3 ± 2 mmHg in the low-CVP group vs. 7 ± 3 mmHg in the GDFT group (P < 0.001). Blood loss (1425 vs. 1275 mL; P = 0.640) and the rate of major morbidity (40% vs. 50%, P = 0.751), did not differ between low-CVP and GDFT, respectively. The quality of the surgical field was comparable between groups (low-CVP 83% vs. GDFT 80%, P = 0.955). CONCLUSION: In major open liver resections, GDFT was not associated with differences in intraoperative blood loss, major morbidity or quality of the surgical field, compared to low-CVP. Larger RCTs are needed to confirm this finding. Registration number: NTR5821 (www.trialregister.nl).
Asunto(s)
Objetivos , Cirujanos , Presión Venosa Central , Fluidoterapia , Humanos , HígadoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Intra-operative transcranial Doppler (TCD) is the gold standard for prediction of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) in patients after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) under general anaesthesia. However, post-operative cerebral perfusion patterns may result in a shift in risk assessment for CHS. This is a study of the predictive value of additional post-operative TCD measurements for prediction of CHS after CEA. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in patients undergoing CEA with available intra- and post-operative TCD measurements between 2011 and 2016. The mean blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery (MCAVmean) was measured pre-operatively, intra-operatively, and post-operatively at two and 24 h. Intra-operative MCAVmean increase was compared with MCAVmean increase two and 24 h post-operatively in relation to CHS. Cerebral hyperperfusion (CH) was defined as MCAVmean increase ≥ 100%, and CHS as CH with the presence of headache or neurological symptoms. Positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of TCD measurements were calculated to predict CHS. RESULTS: Of 257 CEA patients, 25 (9.7%) had CH intra-operatively, 45 (17.5%) 2 h post-operatively, and 34 (13.2%) 24 h post-operatively. Of nine patients (3.5%) who developed CHS, intra-operative CH was diagnosed in two and post-operative CH in eight (after 2 h [n = 5] or after 24 h [n = 6]). This resulted in a PPV of 8%, 11%, and 18%, and a NPV of 97%, 98%, and 99% for intra-operative, 2 h and 24 h post-operative TCD, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TCD measurement of the MCAVmean 24 h after CEA under general anaesthesia is most accurate to identify patients who are not at risk of CHS.
Asunto(s)
Circulación Cerebrovascular/fisiología , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/diagnóstico , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Arteria Cerebral Media/diagnóstico por imagen , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Ultrasonografía Doppler Transcraneal/métodos , Anciano , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/etiología , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/fisiopatología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndrome , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Short-acting vasopressor agents like phenylephrine or ephedrine can be used during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) to achieve adequate blood pressure (BP) to prevent periprocedural stroke by preserving the cerebral perfusion. Previous studies in healthy subjects showed that these vasopressors also affected the frontal lobe cerebral tissue oxygenation (rSO2) with a decrease after administration of phenylephrine. This decrease is unwarranted in patients with jeopardized cerebral perfusion, like CEA patients. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of both phenylephrine and ephedrine on the rSO2 during CEA. METHODS: In this double-blinded randomized controlled trial, 29 patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis underwent CEA under volatile general anesthesia in a tertiary referral medical center. Patients were preoperative allocated randomly (1:1) for receiving either phenylephrine (50 µg; n = 14) or ephedrine (5 mg; n = 15) in case intraoperative hypotension occurred, defined as a decreased mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥ 20% compared to (awake) baseline. Intraoperative MAP was measured by an intra-arterial cannula placed in the radial artery. After administration, the MAP, cardiac output (CO), heart rate (HR), stroke volume, and rSO2 both ipsilateral and contralateral were measured. The timeframe for data analysis was 120 s before, until 600 s after administration. RESULTS: Both phenylephrine (70 ± 9 to 101 ± 22 mmHg; p < 0.001; mean ± SD) and ephedrine (75 ± 11 mmHg to 122 ± 22 mmHg; p < 0.001) adequately restored MAP. After administration, HR did not change significantly over time, and CO increased 19% for both phenylephrine and ephedrine. rSO2 ipsilateral and contralateral did not change significantly after administration at 300 and 600 s for either phenylephrine or ephedrine (phenylephrine 73%, 73%, 73% and 73%, 73%, 74%; ephedrine 72%, 73%, 73% and 75%, 74%, 74%). CONCLUSIONS: Within this randomized prospective study, MAP correction by either phenylephrine or ephedrine showed to be equally effective in maintaining rSO2 in patients who underwent CEA. Clinical Trial Registration ClincalTrials.gov, NCT01451294.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/metabolismo , Endarterectomía Carotidea/métodos , Efedrina/uso terapéutico , Hipotensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico , Oxígeno/metabolismo , Fenilefrina/uso terapéutico , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Presión Arterial , Encéfalo/irrigación sanguínea , Estenosis Carotídea , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Espectroscopía Infrarroja CortaAsunto(s)
Ventilación Unipulmonar , Bronquios , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Toracoscopía , TráqueaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cerebral autoregulation (CA) continuously adjusts cerebrovascular resistance to maintain cerebral blood flow (CBF) constant despite changes in blood pressure. Also, CBF is proportional to changes in arterial carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) (cerebrovascular CO 2 reactivity). Hypercapnia elicits cerebral vasodilation that attenuates CA efficacy, while hypocapnia produces cerebral vasoconstriction that enhances CA efficacy. In this study, we quantified the influence of sevoflurane anesthesia on CO 2 reactivity and the CA-CO 2 relationship. METHODS: We studied patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), prone to cerebrovascular disease, and compared them to control subjects. In 33 patients (19 DM, 14 control), end-tidal CO 2 , blood pressure, and CBF velocity were monitored awake and during sevoflurane-based anesthesia. CA, calculated with transfer function analysis assessing phase lead (degrees) between low-frequency oscillations in CBF velocity and mean arterial blood pressure, was quantified during hypocapnia, normocapnia, and hypercapnia. RESULTS: In both control and DM patients, awake CO 2 reactivity was smaller (2.8%/mm Hg CO 2 ) than during sevoflurane anesthesia (3.9%/mm Hg; P <0.005). Hyperventilation increased CA efficacy more (3 deg./mm Hg CO 2 ) in controls than in DM patients (1.8 deg./mm Hg CO 2 ; P <0.001) in both awake and sevoflurane-anesthetized states. CONCLUSIONS: The CA-CO 2 relationship is impaired in awake patients with type 2 DM. Sevoflurane-based anesthesia does not further impair this relationship. In patients with DM, hypocapnia induces cerebral vasoconstriction, but CA efficacy does not improve as observed in healthy subjects.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Anestésicos por Inhalación , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Humanos , Sevoflurano/farmacología , Dióxido de Carbono , Hipercapnia , Hipocapnia , Anestésicos por Inhalación/farmacología , Homeostasis/fisiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: If invasive measurement of arterial blood pressure is not warranted, finger cuff technology can provide continuous and noninvasive monitoring. Finger and radial artery pressures differ; Nexfin® (BMEYE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) measures finger arterial pressure and uses physiologic reconstruction methodologies to obtain values comparable to invasive pressures. METHODS: Intra-arterial pressure (IAP) and noninvasive Nexfin arterial pressure (NAP) were measured in cardiothoracic surgery patients, because invasive pressures are available. NAP-IAP differences were analyzed during 30 min. Tracking was quantified by within-subject precision (SD of individual NAP-IAP differences) and correlation coefficients. The ranges of pressure change were quantified by within-subject variability (SD of individual averages of NAP and IAP). Accuracy and precision were expressed as group average ± SD of the differences and considered acceptable when smaller than 5 ± 8 mmHg, the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation criteria. RESULTS: NAP and IAP were obtained in 50 (34-83 yr, 40 men) patients. For systolic, diastolic, mean arterial, and pulse pressure, median (25-75 percentiles) correlation coefficients were 0.96 (0.91-0.98), 0.93 (0.87-0.96), 0.96 (0.90-0.97), and 0.94 (0.85-0.98), respectively. Within-subject precisions were 4 ± 2, 3 ± 1, 3 ± 2, and 3 ± 2 mmHg, and within-subject variations 13 ± 6, 6 ± 3, 9 ± 4, and 7 ± 4 mmHg, indicating precision over a wide range of pressures. Group average ± SD of the NAP-IAP differences were -1 ± 7, 3 ± 6, 2 ± 6, and -3 ± 4 mmHg, meeting criteria. Differences were not related to mean arterial pressure or heart rate. CONCLUSION: Arterial blood pressure can be measured noninvasively and continuously using physiologic pressure reconstruction. Changes in pressure can be followed and values are comparable to invasive monitoring.
Asunto(s)
Arterias/fisiología , Monitores de Presión Sanguínea , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/instrumentación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Dedos/irrigación sanguínea , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional/fisiología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos TorácicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The majority of postoperative events in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are of hemodynamic origin, requiring preventive strict postoperative arterial blood pressure (BP) control. This study aimed to assess whether BP monitoring with noninvasive beat-to-beat ClearSight finger BP (BPCS) can replace invasive beat-to-beat radial artery BP (BPRAD) in the postoperative phase. METHODS: This study was a single-center clinical validation study using a prespecified study protocol. In 48 patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, BPCS and BPRAD were monitored ipsilateral in a simultaneous manner during a 6-hour period on the recovery unit following CEA. Primary endpoints were accuracy and precision of BP derived by ClearSight (Edward Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) vs. the reference standard (Arbocath 20 G, Hospira, Lake Forest, IL) to investigate if BPCS is a reliable noninvasive alternative for BP monitoring postoperatively in CEA patients. Validation was guided by the standard set by the Association for Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI), considering a BP-monitor adequate when bias (precision) is <5 (8) mm Hg. Secondary endpoint was percentage under- and overtreatment, defined as exceedance of individual postoperative systolic BP threshold by BPRAD or BPCS in contrast to BPCS or BPRAD, respectively. RESULTS: The bias (precision) of BPCS compared to BPRAD was -10 (13.6), 8 (7.2) and 4 (7.8) mm Hg for systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure (MAP), respectively. Based on BPCS, undertreatment was 5.6% and overtreatment was 2.4%; however, percentages of undertreatment quadrupled for lower systolic BP thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive MAP, but not systolic and diastolic BP, was similar to invasive BPRAD during postoperative observation following CEA, based on AAMI criteria. However, as systolic BP is currently leading in postoperative monitoring to adjust BP therapy on, BPCS is not a reliable alternative for BPRAD.
Asunto(s)
Presión Arterial , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Presión Arterial/fisiología , Presión Sanguínea , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/métodos , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , HumanosRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: A new algorithm was developed that transforms the non-invasive finger blood pressure (BP) into a radial artery BP (BÌPRad), whereas the original algorithm estimated brachial BP (BÌPBra). In this study we determined whether this new algorithm shows better agreement with invasive radial BP than the original one and whether in the operating room this algorithm can be used safely. DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: This observational study was conducted on thirty-three non-cardiac surgery patients. INTERVENTION AND MEASUREMENTS: Invasive radial and non-invasive finger BP were measured, of the latter BÌPRad and BÌPBra were transformed. Agreement of systolic, mean, and diastolic arterial BP (SAP, MAP, and DAP, respectively) was assessed traditionally with Bland-Altman and trend analysis and clinically safety was quantified with error grid analyses. A bias (precision) of 5 (8) mmHg or less was considered adequate. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were included with an average of 676 (314) 20 s segments. For both comparisons, bias (precision) of MAP was within specified criteria, whereas for SAP, precision was higher than 8 mmHg. BÌPRad showed a better agreement than BÌPBra with BPRad for DAP values (bias (precision): 0.7 (6.0) and - 6.4 (4.3) mmHg, respectively). BÌPRad and BÌPBra both showed good concordance in following changes in BPRad (for all parameters overall degree was <7°). There were slightly more measurement pairs of MAP within the no-risk zone for BÌPRad than for BÌPBra (96 vs 77%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of non-cardiac surgery patients, we found good agreement between BPRad and BÌPRad. Compared to BÌPBra, BÌPRad shows better agreement although clinical implications are small. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03795831).
Asunto(s)
Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea , Arteria Radial , Humanos , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Presión Arterial/fisiología , AlgoritmosRESUMEN
Static cerebral autoregulation (CA) maintains cerebral blood flow (CBF) relatively constant above a mean arterial blood pressure (BPmean) of 60-65 mmHg. Below this lower limit of CA (LLCA), CBF declines along with BPmean. Data are lacking in describing how CA reacts to sustained hypotension since hypotension is usually avoided. In this study, we took advantage of a procedure requiring sustained hypotension. We assessed static CA for LLCA determination, and a more continuous CA, which counters short-term blood pressure variations. With these data, we analyzed CA during longstanding hypotension. Continuous arterial blood pressure and middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (MCAVmean) were monitored in 23 patients that required deep intraoperative hypotension. The LLCA was determined for every patient, and BPmean below this LLCA was classified as the patient-specific hypotension. With the mean flow index (Mxa), continuous CA (Mxa-CA) was quantified. Mxa was calculated and averaged after induction of general anesthesia (baseline), every 15 min during, and 15 min after 1 h of hypotension. Functioning CA was defined as Mxa < 0.4. Data are expressed as median (25th-75th percentile). The LLCA was located at 56 (47-74) mmHg. At baseline, Mxa was 0.21 (0.14-0.32) and 0.61 (0.48-0.78) during hypotension (P < 0.01), with no appreciable change over time, n = 12. After blood pressure restoration, Mxa improved, 0.25 (0.06-0.35, n = 9). Mxa-CA became and remained disturbed during the 1 h of hypotension, and improved after blood pressure restoration. This completely reversible situation suggests no ischemic hyperemia occurs and renders an adaptation mechanism during sustained hypotension unlikely.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Intraoperative hypotension is normally avoided by anesthesiologists. However, for the Personalized External Aortic Root Support (PEARS) procedure, deep-induced hypotension is an essential requirement for the surgeon to be able to manipulate the aortic root. In this procedure, blood pressure and middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity were monitored. In this study, we assessed cerebral autoregulation during sustained hypotension, to give an insight into its behavior during hypotension.
Asunto(s)
Circulación Cerebrovascular , Hipotensión , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Circulación Cerebrovascular/fisiología , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Arteria Cerebral MediaRESUMEN
Background: TAVI has shown to result in immediate and sustained hemodynamic alterations and improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), but previous studies have been suboptimal to predict who might benefit from TAVI. The relationship between immediate hemodynamic changes and outcome has not been studied before. This study sought to assess whether an immediate hemodynamic change, reflecting myocardial contractile reserve, following TAVI is associated with improved HRQoL. Furthermore, it assessed whether pre-procedural cardiac power index (CPI) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) could predict these changes. Methods: During the TAVI procedure, blood pressure and systemic hemodynamics were prospectively collected with a Nexfin® non-invasive monitor. HRQoL was evaluated pre-procedurally and 12 weeks after the procedure, using the EQ-5D-5L classification tool. Results: Overall, 97/114 (85%) of the included patients were eligible for analyses. Systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and stroke volume increased immediately after TAVI (all p < 0.005), and left ventricular ejection time (LVET) immediately decreased with 10 ms (95%CI = -4 to -16, p < 0.001). Overall HRQoLindex increased from 0.810 [0.662-0.914] before to 0.887 [0.718-0.953] after TAVI (p = 0.016). An immediate decrease in LVET was associated with an increase in HRQoLindex (0.02 index points per 10 ms LVET decrease, p = 0.041). Pre-procedural CPI and LVEF did not predict hemodynamic changes or change in HRQoL. Conclusion: TAVI resulted in an immediate hemodynamic response and increase in HRQoL. Immediate reduction in LVET, suggesting unloading of the ventricle, was associated with an increase in HRQoL, but neither pre-procedural CPI nor LVEF predicted these changes. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03088787.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To minimize the incidence of intraoperative stroke following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) under general anesthesia, blood pressure (BP) is suggested to be maintained between "awake baseline" BP and 20% above. However, there is neither a widely accepted protocol nor a definition to determine this awake BP. In this study, we analyzed the BP during hospital admission in the days before CEA and propose a definition of how to determine awake BP. METHODS: In our cohort of 1180 CEA-patients, all noninvasive BP measurements were retrospectively analyzed. BP was measured during preoperative outpatient screening (POS), the last three days before surgery at the ward and in the operating room (OR) directly before anesthesia. Primary outcome was the comparability of all these preoperative BP measurements. Secondary outcome was the comparability of preoperative BP measurements stratified for postoperative stroke within 30 days. RESULTS: POS BP (148±22/80±12 mmHg [mean arterial pressure, MAP: 103±14 mmHg]) and the BP measured on the ward 3, 2, 1 days before surgery and on the day of surgery (146±25/77±13 [MAP: 100±15]), (142±23/76±13 [MAP: 98±15]), (145±23/76±12 [MAP: 99±14]) and (144±22/75±12 mmHg [MAP: 98±14]) were comparable (all P=NS). However, BP in the OR directly before anesthesia was higher, (163±27/88±15 mmHg [MAP: 117±18mmHg]) (P<0.01 vs. all other preoperative moments). A significant higher preinduction systolic BP and MAP was observed in patients suffering a stroke within 30 days compared to patients without (P=0.03 and 0.04 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Awake BP should be determined by averaging available BP values collected preoperatively on the ward and POS. BP measured in the OR directly before induction of anesthesia overestimates "awake" BP; and therefore, it should not be used.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Presión Sanguínea , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , VigiliaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of blood pressure (BP) as mediator of the effect of conscious sedation (CS) compared to local anesthesia (LA) on functional outcome after endovascular treatment (EVT). METHODS: Patients treated in the Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN) Registry centers with CS or LA as preferred anesthetic approach during EVT for ischemic stroke were analyzed. First, we evaluated the effect of CS on area under the threshold (AUT), relative difference between baseline and lowest procedural mean arterial pressure (∆LMAP), and procedural BP trend, compared to LA. Second, we assessed the association between BP and functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS]) with multivariable regression. Lastly, we evaluated whether BP explained the effect of CS on mRS. RESULTS: In 440 patients with available BP data, patients treated under CS (n = 262) had larger AUTs (median 228 vs 23 mm Hg*min), larger ∆LMAP (median 16% vs 6%), and a more negative BP trend (-0.22 vs -0.08 mm Hg/min) compared to LA (n = 178). Larger ∆LMAP and AUTs were associated with worse mRS (adjusted common odds ratio [acOR] per 10% drop 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.97, and acOR per 300 mm Hg*min 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.97). Patients treated under CS had worse mRS compared to LA (acOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.87) and this association remained when adjusting for ∆LMAP and AUT (acOR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Large BP drops are associated with worse functional outcome. However, BP drops do not explain the worse outcomes in the CS group.