Survey of Canadian Physician Use of Botulinum Toxin A (BoNT-A) for Paratonia: Real World Insights.

Paratonia is a form of hypertonia characterized by an inability to relax muscles in the setting of cognitive impairment. Paratonia results in pain, refusal of care, and caregiver burden. We sent surveys to 67 Canadian physiatrists and neurologists regarding their experience treating paratonia with botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A). Twenty-seven survey respondents were included in the analysis. Thirteen percent of survey respondents treating paratonia with BoNT-A reported a significant clinically relevant improvement; 74% endorsed a moderately clinically relevant improvement; 13% endorsed a slight clinically relevant improvement. Ninety percent of survey respondents endorsed significant barriers in treating paratonia with BoNT-A.

Spasticity Management Teams, Evaluations, and Tools: A Canadian Cross-Sectional Survey.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to determine the physical evaluations and assessment tools used by a group of Canadian healthcare professionals treating adults with spasticity. METHODS: A cross-sectional web-based 19-question survey was developed to determine the types of physical evaluations, tone-related impairment measurements, and assessment tools used in the management of adults with spasticity. The survey was distributed to healthcare professionals from the Canadian Advances in Neuro-Orthopedics for Spasticity Congress database. RESULTS: Eighty study participants (61 physiatrists and 19 other healthcare professionals) completed the survey and were included. Nearly half (46.3%, 37/80) of the participants reported having an inter- or trans-disciplinary team managing individuals with spasticity. Visual observation of movement, available range of motion determination, tone during velocity-dependent passive range of motion looking for a spastic catch, spasticity, and clonus, and evaluation of gait were the most frequently used physical evaluations. The most frequently used spasticity tools were the Modified Ashworth Scale, goniometer, and Goal Attainment Scale. Results were similar in brain- and spinal cord-predominant etiologies. To evaluate goals, qualitative description was used most (37.5%). CONCLUSION: Our findings provide a better understanding of the spasticity management landscape in Canada with respect to staffing, physical evaluations, and outcome measurements used in clinical practice. For all etiologies of spasticity, visual observation of patient movement, Modified Ashworth Scale, and qualitative goal outcomes descriptions were most commonly used to guide treatment and optimize outcomes. Understanding the current practice of spasticity assessment will help provide guidance for clinical evaluation and management of spasticity.

Long-term Safety and Dosing of OnabotulinumtoxinA: A Prospective, Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Although therapeutic treatments are intended to help alleviate symptoms associated with disease, safety must be carefully considered and monitored to confirm continued positive benefit/risk balance. The objective of MOBILITY was to study the long-term safety of onabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of various therapeutic indications. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, observational, Phase IV Canadian study in patients treated with onabotulinumtoxinA for a therapeutic indication. Dosing was determined by the participating physician. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: Patients (n = 1372) with adult focal spasticity, blepharospasm, cerebral palsy, cervical dystonia, hemifacial spasm, hyperhidrosis, or "other" diagnoses were enrolled into the safety cohort. Eighty-three patients (6%) reported 209 AEs; 44 AEs in 24 patients (2%) were considered treatment-related AEs. Seventy-two serious AEs were reported by 38 patients (3%); 10 serious AEs in 5 patients (0.4%) were considered treatment related. Most commonly reported treatment-related AEs were muscular weakness (n = 7/44) and dysphagia (n = 6/44). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with follow-up for up to six treatments with onabotulinumtoxinA, treatment-related AEs were reported in <2% of the safety population over the course of nearly 5 years. Our findings from MOBILITY provide further evidence that onabotulinumtoxinA treatment is safe for long-term use across a variety of therapeutic indications.

Dosage et sécurité à long terme de l'onabotulinumtoxinA : une étude prospective et observationnelle. Contexte : Bien que les traitements thérapeutiques soient destinés à soulager les symptômes associés à une maladie, il importe d'examiner avec grand soin leur sécurité et d'en assurer un suivi afin de maintenir un rapport bénéfice/risque qui soit positif. L'objectif de MOBILITY a donc été d'étudier la sécurité à long terme de l'onabotulinumtoxinA dans le traitement de plusieurs indications thérapeutiques. Méthodes : Nous avons ainsi fait appel à une étude canadienne prospective et observationnelle menée dans plusieurs centres de santé. Dans cette étude de phase IV, des patients ont été traités avec l'onabotulinumtoxinA en vertu d'indications thérapeutiques. Ce sont des médecins participants qui en avaient déterminé le dosage. De plus, tout événement indésirable a été noté en cours d'étude. Résultats : Au total 1372 patients ont été inclus dans cette cohorte (n = 1372). Ces patients étaient atteints des troubles suivants : spasticité focale chez l'adulte, blépharospasme, infirmité motrice cérébrale, dystonie cervicale, spasmes hémifaciaux, hyperhidrose, etc. On a signalé chez 83 patients, soit 6 % d'entre eux, des événements indésirables. On a aussi estimé que 44 événements indésirables ayant affecté 24 patients (2 %) étaient reliés au traitement proprement dit. Ajoutons que 38 patients (3 %) ont signalé avoir été victimes d'événements indésirables et que 10 événements indésirables ont été reliés au traitement chez 5 patients (0,4 %). Enfin, les événements indésirables les plus communément signalés ont été la faiblesse musculaire (n = 7/44) et la dysphagie (n = 6/44). Conclusions : Dans le cas de patients ayant bénéficié de six traitements ou moins avec l'onabotulinumtoxinA, des événements indésirables ont été signalés chez < 2 % d'entre eux au cours des presque cinq prochaines années. Tirés de MOBILITY, nos résultats apportent une preuve additionnelle que les traitements avec l'onabotulinumtoxinA sont à long terme sécuritaires dans le cas de nombreuses indications thérapeutiques.

A Delphi-Based Consensus Statement on the Management of Anticoagulated Patients With Botulinum Toxin for Limb Spasticity.

OBJECTIVE: To create a consensus statement on the considerations for treatment of anticoagulated patients with botulinum toxin A (BoNTA) intramuscular injections for limb spasticity. DESIGN: We used the Delphi method. SETTING: A multiquestion electronic survey. PARTICIPANTS: Canadian physicians (N=39) who use BoNTA injections for spasticity management in their practice. INTERVENTIONS: After the survey was sent, there were e-mail discussions to facilitate an understanding of the issues underlying the responses. Consensus for each question was reached when agreement level was ≥75%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Not applicable. RESULTS: When injecting BoNTA in anticoagulated patients: (1) BoNTA injections should not be withheld regardless of muscles injected; (2) a 25G or smaller size needle should be used when injecting into the deep leg compartment muscles; (3) international normalized ratio (INR) level should be ≤3.5 when injecting the deep leg compartment muscles; (4) if there are clinical concerns such as history of a fluctuating INR, recent bleeding, excessive or new bruising, then an INR value on the day of injection with point-of-care testing or within the preceding 2-3 days should be taken into consideration when injecting deep compartment muscles; (5) the concern regarding bleeding when using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) should be the same as with warfarin (when INR is in the therapeutic range); (6) the dose and scheduling of DOACs should not be altered for the purpose of minimizing the risk of bleeding prior to BoNTA injections. CONCLUSIONS: These consensus statements provide a framework for physicians to consider when injecting BoNTA for spasticity in anticoagulated patients. These consensus statements are not strict guidelines or decision-making steps, but rather an effort to generate common understanding in the absence of evidence in the literature.

Effect of Botulinum Toxin on Clonus: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the literature that examined the effect of botulinum toxin type A on clonus. DATA SOURCES: A literature search of multiple databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Embase) was performed to identify articles published in English in the past 30 years (1986-2016). STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers independently applied the following inclusion criteria: (1) any adult patients older than 18 years with upper motor lesion; (2) any location and duration of clonus; and (3) subjective and objective measurements of clonus tested at least 2 weeks after botulinum toxin injection. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed the methodological quality. A consensus method was used to solve disagreements. DATA SYNTHESIS: The systematic review resulted in 164 articles, of which 14 met the inclusion criteria: 3 were randomized controlled trials, 1 was nonrandomized, and 6 were case series and 3 case studies. All studies (181 patients) showed improvement in clonus: 6 of 14 results were statistically significant. Different scales were used for clonus measurement, such as clonus score, patient diaries, clonus spasm score, and electromyogram duration. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was preliminary evidence indicating improvement in clonus after botulinum injection. The major drawback with studies reviewed here was a large variation in the type of clonus assessment tools, which also lacked validity, reliability, and sensitivity to small changes in clonus.

Relationship Between Botulinum Toxin, Spasticity, and Pain: a Survey of Patient Perception.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of pain in adults with spasticity and to assess the association between the subjective experience of pain and spasticity. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: outpatient spasticity management clinic of a rehabilitation centre. PATIENTS: Patients with upper motor neuron lesions and spasticity (n=131) were recruited. METHODS: We assessed pain intensity and location, relationship between spasticity and pain perception, and perception of pain relief from botulinum toxin type-A (BoNTA) injections. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain perception rated on a 10-point numerical rating scale and pain quality. RESULTS: 65% of the patients with spasticity reported presence of pain and 60% described it as an aching pain. More patients reported pain with movement (34%) compared to rest (21%). There was a statistically poor correlation between the severity of pain and spasticity (r=0.16; p>0.05). Most patients (80%) believed that their pain was related to spasticity and 62% reported that BoNTA injections decreased their pain. CONCLUSIONS: The high incidence of pain noted within our sample suggests that physicians may have to consider pain management as part of spasticity treatment. Participants reported that their pain was related to their spasticity, and that it decreased after BoNTA treatment. Further study is needed to explore the relationships between objective measures of spasticity and pain.

Physician Preferences for Botulinum Toxin Injections in Anticoagulated Patients with Spasticity.

To understand physician preferences and bleeding complication rates of intramuscular botulinum neurotoxin type A injections for spasticity management in anticoagulated patients, questionnaires were mailed to 138 physicians across Canada. The international normalized ratio comfort range for injections was <2.0 in 10%, 2.0 to 2.5 in 35%, 2.6 to 3.0 in 25%, and 3.1 to 3.5 in 20% of physicians. Only 23% injected outside their comfort value and 57% did not; 72% did not normalize the international normalized ratio value before injections. Only one injector reported the development of compartment syndrome. As expected, high variability exists in physician preferences in botulinum neurotoxin type A injection in anticoagulated patients.

Real-World, Long-Term Quality of Life Following Therapeutic OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment.

BACKGROUND: OnabotulinumtoxinA is an efficacious treatment option for patients with various conditions. Although studies have reported on the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA, quality of life (QoL) data are limited. This study evaluated QoL in patients treated with onabotulinumtoxinA across various therapeutic indications. METHODS: MDs on BOTOX Utility (MOBILITY) was a prospective, multicenter, observational Canadian study in patients initiating (naïve) or receiving ongoing (maintenance) onabotulinumtoxinA treatment. Health utility was the primary outcome measure and was obtained from the Short Form-12 Health Survey using the Short Form-6D at baseline, week 4 posttreatment, and up to five subsequent treatment visits. The safety cohort included patients who received ≥1 onabotulinumtoxinA treatment. RESULTS: The efficacy cohort included 1062 patients; the majority were Caucasian, female, and on maintenance onabotulinumtoxinA treatment. Adult focal spasticity (n=398), blepharospasm (n=81), cerebral palsy (n=22), cervical dystonia (n=234), hemifacial spasm (n=116), and hyperhidrosis (n=211) patients were included. Baseline health utility was generally higher in maintenance versus naïve patients; however, naïve patients showed the greatest improvements over time. Health utility was generally maintained or trended toward improvement across all cohorts, including maintenance patients who had been treated for up to 22 years before study entry. Eighteen of 1222 patients (2%) in the safety cohort reported 28 treatment-related adverse events; eight were serious in four patients. CONCLUSION: MOBILITY is the largest prospective study to date to provide QoL data over a variety of therapeutic indications following treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA. Although the QoL burden varies by disease, data suggest that long-term treatment may help improve or maintain QoL over time.

Adverse Clinical Effects of Botulinum Toxin Intramuscular Injections for Spasticity.

OBJECTIVE: The adverse events (AEs) with botulinum toxin type-A (BoNTA), used for indications other than spasticity, are widely reported in the literature. However, the site, dose, and frequency of injections are different for spasticity when compared to the treatment for other conditions and hence the AEs may be different as well. The objective of this study was to summarize the AEs reported in Canada and systematically review the AEs with intramuscular botulinum toxin injections to treat focal spasticity. METHODS: Data were gathered from Health Canada (2009-2013) and major electronic databases. RESULTS: In a 4 year period, 285 AEs were reported. OnabotulinumtoxinA (n=272 events): 68% females, 53% serious, 18% hospitalization, and 8% fatalities. The type of AEs reported were - muscle weakness (19%), oropharyngeal (14%), respiratory (14%), eye related (8%), bowel/bladder related (8%), and infection (5%). IncobotulinumtoxinA (n=13): 38% females, 62% serious, and 54% hospitalization. The type of AEs reported were - muscle weakness (15%), oropharyngeal (15%), respiratory (38%), eye related (23%), bowel/bladder related (15%), and infection (15%). Commonly reported AEs in the literature were muscle weakness, pain, oropharyngeal, bowel/bladder, blood circulation, neurological, gait, and respiratory problems. CONCLUSION: While BoNTA is useful in managing spasticity, future studies need to investigate the factors that can minimize AEs. A better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of the AEs can also improve guidelines for BoNTA administration and enhance outcomes.

The influence of a concurrent cognitive task on lower limb reaction time among stroke survivors with right- or left-hemiplegia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of cognitive interference on foot pedal reaction time among stroke survivors with right- (RH) or left-hemiplegia (LH). DESIGN: Cross-sectional comparison without randomization. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: 10 patients post-stroke with RH, 10 with LH; 10 age-matched controls. METHODS: Foot pedal response times were measured using three different reaction time (RT) paradigms: simple RT, dual-task RT (counting backward by serial 3 seconds), and choice RT (correct response contingent on stimuli to eliminate pre-programing). RH and LH used the non-paretic leg for all trials. Three 3 (RT task) × 3 (group) mixed-model factorial ANOVAs were used to compare RT, movement time (MT), total response time (TRT). RESULTS: Overall controls demonstrated faster RT than RH (332 ± 73 versus 474 ± 144 ms, P < 0.001) or LH (402 ± 127 ms, P < 0.05); LH group demonstrated faster RT than those with RH (P < 0.05). Control subjects demonstrated significantly faster RT than RH for all RT conditions (P < 0.05 for all). In contrast, controls achieved significantly faster RT than LH for the choice RT condition only (P < 0.05), but not for the simple (P = 0.12) or dual-task RT conditions (P = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to controls, response time was significantly impaired among LH and RH when the response could not be pre-programmed. While current simple RT testing commonly employed by driver rehab specialists may be sufficient for detecting RT deficits in patients with RH, simple or dual-task RT tests alone may fail to detect RT deficiencies among LH, even when testing the non-paretic limb. Choice RT should be added to post-stroke driver fitness assessment, particularly for patients with LH.

Neuromuscular partitioning of subscapularis based on intramuscular nerve distribution patterns: implications for botulinum toxin injections.

Subscapularis muscle spasticity is commonly treated with botulinum toxin injections; however, there are challenges in determining optimal injection sites within the muscle. The purpose of this study was to document the intramuscular innervation patterns of the subscapularis (1) to determine how the muscle is neuromuscularly partitioned and (2) to identify a strategy for botulinum toxin injection based on neuromuscular partitioning. In 50 formalin-embalmed cadaveric specimens, the extramuscular and intramuscular innervation was (1) serially dissected, digitized, and reconstructed in 3 dimensions (n=7); or (2) serially dissected and photographed (n=43). Intramuscular innervation patterns were compared among specimens to identify neuromuscular partitions. Variation was observed in the number (2-5) and origin of extramuscular nerve branches to the subscapularis. Despite variation in extramuscular innervation, the intramuscular innervation was consistent. Based on intramuscular innervation patterns, the subscapularis had 3 neuromuscular partitions (superior, middle, inferior) in 78% of specimens, and 2 partitions (superior, inferior) in 22% of specimens. The superior and middle partitions were most commonly innervated by branch(es) from the posterior cord, and the inferior partition by branch(es) from the axillary nerve. Injection of botulinum toxin into each partition may help to optimize results in the treatment of shoulder spasticity, and may be achieved by a combination of medial and inferior approaches. Clinical studies are required to determine whether the combination approach is more effective than any single approach and whether the number of partitions injected correlates with clinical outcomes.

Comparison of foot pedal reaction time among patients with right or left hemiplegia and able-bodied controls.

BACKGROUND: Although inpatient stroke rehabilitation provides clinicians with the opportunity to prepare patients for continuation of prestroke activities, little is known about the patients' ability to safely resume driving at the point of discharge to the community. OBJECTIVE: To compare foot pedal response times of 20 stroke patients with right hemiplegia (RH) or left hemiplegia (LH) and 10 controls. METHODS: A cross-sectional design was used. Response times were measured using 3 foot pedal operation techniques: (1) right-sided accelerator with right leg operating accelerator and brake, (2) right-sided accelerator with left leg operating accelerator and brake, and (3) left-sided accelerator with left leg operating accelerator and brake. Outcomes included reaction time (RT), movement time (MT), and total response time (TRT). RESULTS: Controls demonstrated faster RT than patients with RH (263 vs 348 ms; P < .001) or LH (316 ms; P < .05) for all conditions, as well as faster MT than patients with RH (P < .05 for all) but not LH when using the right leg (258 vs 251 ms; P = .82). Controls demonstrated faster TRT than patients with RH (P < .001 for all) but not LH when using the right leg (515 vs 553 ms; P = .44). CONCLUSIONS: When using the nonparetic leg, patients with LH had braking response times comparable to controls, but patients with RH demonstrated significant impairment of both the paretic and nonparetic legs.

Effect of topical anesthetics on needle insertion pain during botulinum toxin type A injections for limb spasticity.

OBJECTIVE: To compare pain perception using 3 anesthetics (eutectic mixture of local anesthetics [EMLA], vapocoolant spray, and ice) compared with a control (no anesthetic) during botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injections for lower limb spasticity. DESIGN: A placebo-controlled, single-blinded study where each study patient served as their own control. SETTING: Spasticity clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects (N=30) with ankle spasticity who visited the clinic for BTX-A injections in the gastrocnemius muscle were consecutively sampled. INTERVENTION: The gastrocnemius muscle was divided into 4 quadrants and 1 of the 3 different anesthetic agents was applied to each quadrant with 1 quadrant using no anesthetic, control. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the Wong-Baker FACES scale. RESULTS: Pain perception using the NRS and FACES scale was significantly lower using ice and EMLA compared with control and spray conditions (P<.05). Pain perception using EMLA and ice was similar. These results indicate that patients experience minimal to moderate pain during BTX-A injections. CONCLUSIONS: Pain relief offered by EMLA and ice was comparable, suggesting that ice is a more convenient option because of brief application time (compared with EMLA). Spray may have made the patients more sensitive to pain and alternative approaches for using vapocoolant should be considered.

Acute neurophysiologic effects of botulinum toxin type A intramuscular injection on extensor digitorum brevis muscle in healthy adults.

INTRODUCTION: Anecdotal clinical experience shows that patients often indicate that their spasticity improves on the day of treatment with intramuscular botulinum injection. Previous research shows that compound motor action potentials (CMAPs) decrease 48 h post-injection. However, no studies to date have assessed the neurophysiological changes less than 48 h post-injection. METHODS: Fifteen healthy control subjects (10 F; mean age 41 ± 11 years) participated in this randomized double-blind study. We injected 10 units of either onabotulinumtoxinA or incobotulinumtoxinA in the extensor digitorum brevis (EDB) muscle, one in each foot. We performed serial CMAP assessments using nerve conduction study of the peroneal nerve at following time intervals after botulinum injection - 2, 4, 6, 24, 26, 28, 30, 48, 72 h and 6 days post-injection. We used an ANOVA with repeated measures separately for each type of toxin. RESULTS: Post-hoc tests using the Bonferroni correction revealed that there was a statistically significant decrease in the mean EDB CMAP amplitude from baseline starting at 24 h post-injection in the incobotulinumtoxinA group (p < 0.05) and 4 h post-injection in the onabotulinumtoxinA group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We conclude that both toxin formulations tested in this study exert a significant decrease in EDB CMAP amplitude in the period of <48 h post-injection.

Botulinum toxin injections for low-back pain and sciatica.

BACKGROUND: Adequate relief from low-back pain (LBP) is not always possible. Emerging evidence suggests a role for botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections in treating pain disorders. Proponents of BoNT suggest its properties can decrease muscle spasms, ischemia and inflammatory markers, thereby reducing pain. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of botulinum toxin injections in adults with LBP. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2009, issue 3) and MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL to August 2009; screened references from included studies; consulted with content experts and Allergan. We included published and unpublished randomised controlled trials without language restrictions SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised trials that evaluated BoNT serotypes versus other treatments in patients with non-specific LBP of any duration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors selected the studies, assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Back Review Group criteria, and extracted the data using standardized forms. We performed a qualitative analysis due to lack of data. MAIN RESULTS: We excluded evidence from nineteen studies due to non-randomisation, incomplete or unpublished data. We included three randomised trials (N =123 patients). Only one study included patients with chronic non-specific LBP; the other two examined unique subpopulations. Only one of the three trials had a low risk of bias and demonstrated that BoNT injections reduced pain at three and eight weeks and improved function at eight weeks better than saline injections. The second trial showed that BoNT injections were better than injections of corticosteroid plus lidocaine or placebo in patients with sciatica attributed to piriformis syndrome. The third trial concluded that BoNT injections were better than traditional acupuncture in patients with third lumbar transverse process syndrome. Both studies with high risk of bias had several key limitations. Heterogeneity of the studies prevented meta-analysis. There is low quality evidence that BoNT injections improved pain, function, or both better than saline injections and very low quality evidence that they were better than acupuncture or steroid injections. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We identified three studies that investigated the merits of BoNT for LBP, but only one had a low risk of bias and evaluated patients with non-specific LBP (N = 31). Further research is very likely to have an important impact on the estimate of effect and our confidence in it. Future trials should standardize patient populations, treatment protocols and comparison groups, enlist more participants and include long-term outcomes, cost-benefit analysis and clinical relevance of findings.

Practice Patterns of Physicians Using Adjunct Therapies with Botulinum Toxin Injection for Spasticity: A Canadian Multicenter Cross-Sectional Survey.

BACKGROUND: Adjunct therapies are nonpharmacological treatments used with botulinum toxin (BoNT) injection that may improve spasticity outcomes. It has been suggested that physicians consider adjunct therapies as a part of comprehensive spasticity management. It is unclear which adjunct therapies are used by physicians in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To determine physician practice patterns and perceptions of use of adjunct therapies following BoNT injection for limb spasticity. DESIGN: Cross-sectional national survey of current clinical practice using a 22-item questionnaire developed by the authors. SETTING: Not applicable. PARTICIPANTS: Survey respondents were physicians actively administering BoNT injections for limb spasticity management across Canada (N = 48). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Types of adjunct therapies used by physicians; physician opinions on barriers to adjunct therapy use, patient preferences, and future research priorities. RESULTS: Most physicians prescribe home stretching programs, home active exercise programs, and splinting; however, many physicians perceive that these same adjunct therapies are unwanted by patients. A minority of physicians prescribe electrical stimulation (ES), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), casting, and extracorporeal shockwave therapy; financial limitations and perceived lack of evidence were identified as barriers to their use. Significantly more physicians practicing in academic settings compared with nonacademic, community, and private practice settings used functional ES (59% vs 11%) and TENS (41% vs 0%) as adjunct therapies (P < .05). Research priorities included determining the effectiveness of immediate postinjection application of adjunct therapies (eg, injected muscle activation with ES or stretching) and nutraceuticals. CONCLUSIONS: Canadian physicians frequently use adjunct therapies in combination with BoNT injection to treat spasticity. Financial and time constraints are identified as barriers to implementation of adjunct therapies that are currently supported by research, and patient preferences may also affect compliance. Future research should focus on adjunct therapies that overcome these barriers.