Forum for debate: Safety of allogeneic blood transfusion alternatives in the surgical/critically ill patient.

In recent years, several safety alerts have questioned or restricted the use of some pharmacological alternatives to allogeneic blood transfusion in established indications. In contrast, there seems to be a promotion of other alternatives, based on blood products and/or antifibrinolytic drugs, which lack a solid scientific basis. The Multidisciplinary Autotransfusion Study Group and the Anemia Working Group España convened a multidisciplinary panel of 23 experts belonging to different healthcare areas in a forum for debate to: 1) analyze the different safety alerts referred to certain transfusion alternatives; 2) study the background leading to such alternatives, the evidence supporting them, and their consequences for everyday clinical practice, and 3) issue a weighted statement on the safety of each questioned transfusion alternative, according to its clinical use. The members of the forum maintained telematics contact for the exchange of information and the distribution of tasks, and a joint meeting was held where the conclusions on each of the items examined were presented and discussed. A first version of the document was drafted, and subjected to 4 rounds of review and updating until consensus was reached (unanimously in most cases). We present the final version of the document, approved by all panel members, and hope it will be useful for our colleagues.

[Quality of home medication collection in the Emergency Department: reconciliation discrepancies]. / Calidad de la recogida de la medicación domiciliaria en urgencias: discrepancias en la conciliación.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of the study was to assess home medication data collected at the Emergency Department in a tertiary hospital. It also aimed to identify whether any possible deficiencies in this collection were translated as reconciliation errors on admission, to analyse and classify these data and identify the pharmacological groups involved. METHOD: A prospective observational study was carried out which analysed the pharmacotherapeutic data collected at the Emergency Department. Patients who were admitted to the Pneumology and Internal Medicine wards at the Miguel Servet University Hospital in Zaragoza were included. A list of the home drugs taken before the hospital stay was compiled, assessing whether the quality deficiencies in data collected in the emergency department translated as reconciliation errors at admission. Unjustified discrepancies were considered and classified in line with the criteria of the consensus document on terminology, classification and assessment of the drug reconciliation programmes for 2009. RESULTS: We included 136 patients, finding reconciliation errors in 86.8%. The total number of reconciliation errors found was 519. The most frequent types were: omitting a drug, missing dose information, missing administration frequency information. Almost 40% of the reconciliation errors found in the Internal Medicine ward were not resolved, which was double that of the Pneumology ward. Most discrepancies were found for the Digestive System and Metabolism group (24%). CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of patients that experienced reconciliation errors was high (86%), observing an important opportunity to improve at patient admission to the Emergency Department.

[Perioperative anaemia in geriatric patients with hip fracture]. / Efectividad de distintas pautas de tratamiento de la anemia perioperatoria en pacientes ancianos con fractura de cadera.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and study the effectiveness of the perioperative anaemia treatment patterns for patients older than 64 with hip fracture. METHOD: Three groups of patients were compared: Group 1: Oral iron or without iron therapy. Group 2: low doses of intravenous iron. Group 3: treated according to a blood saving programme including intravenous iron, alpha epoetin and restrictive transfusional criteria. The homogeneity of gender, age, type of fracture, ASA, preoperative period and perisurgical bleeding affecting drug consumption within the groups was analyzed. The effectiveness of the treatments was determined by means of transfusional rate, postoperative haemoglobin levels, and postoperative length of stay and infection rate. RESULTS: 329 patients were checked. Patients were comparable. Patients included in Group 3 were transfused less than the rest (36.5 of patients in group 3 vs. 52.0% in group 1 and 67.6% in group 3, p = 0.002). Decreases in the infection rate and mean postoperative stay in group 3 were not significant. Haemoglobin levels at 48 hours post surgery were higher in group 1 but haemoglobin levels at the seventh day post surgery were similar for the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: The above mentioned blood saving programme has been observed to be effective in decreasing transfusional requirements without increasing morbidity. However, further prospective studies are needed in order to define the cost-effectiveness of this programme and to determine its role in the reduction of posttransfusional infections and postoperative length of stay.

[Cross-hypersensitivity syndrome between antiepileptic drugs: report of a case]. / Síndrome de hipersensibilidad cruzado entre antiepilépticos: a propósito de un caso.

Antiepileptic hypersensitivity syndrome (SHA) is a rare (1/1.000 to 1/10.000 in new exposures) but potentially life-threatening syndrome that occurs after exposure to an anticonvulsant, most commonly the aromatic ones such as phenytoin, carbamazepine or phenobarbital. Clinical features of this syndrome include cutaneous reactions, fever, lymphadenopaties, eosinophilia and internal organ involvement (mainly liver, but also kidney, CNS, heart or lung). We present a case report of a 61-year-old woman treated with phenobarbital who developed a cutaneous eruption attributed to this drug. Treatment was changed to phenytoin and after 17 days the patient developed cutaneous rash, eosinophilia and an increase in transaminase levels. The high rate of cross-sensitivity between aromatic anticonvulsants (40-80%) suggests a link between a hypersensitivity reaction to phenytoin and the previous reaction to phenobarbital.

[Influence of gender on clinical research]. / Influencia del género en investigación ckínica.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze clinical trials performed in our setting for the past three years from a gender-related standpoint. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 101 trials in which the pharmacy department of a 1,240-bed university hospital took part. DATA SOURCES: protocols and summary reports by the pharmacy department, Gecos software program, trial follow-up cards, reception records, sample dispensation and returns, and yearly reports. RESULTS: 17 trials included women only, 13 trials included men only, and 71 trials included patients of both genders. In female-only trials the most commonly studied condition was breast cancer (70.6%), the most common phases were phase III (47.1%) and II (41.2%) and the most commonly studied drugs were docetaxel (17.7%) and trastuzumab (11.8%). In male-only trials the most commonly studied condition was erectile dysfunction (92.3%), the most common phase was phase III (76.9%) and the most commonly studied drugs were tadalafil (38.5%) and vardenafil (30.8%). In trials without gender-related inclusion criteria the most commonly studied conditions included colon cancer (11.3%), lung cancer (11.3%), and renal failure (9.9%); the most common phase was phase III (57.7%) and the most frequently assayed drugs were interferon alpha-2a, gemcitabine and ribavirin. Overall participation rate was 62.3% for males and 37.7% for females. CONCLUSIONS: a) Regardless of gender, the most commonly studied condition was cancer, with breast cancer being most common in female-only trials and erectile dysfunction in male-only trials; b) male and female participation followed a 2:1 ratio in trials without gender-related inclusion criteria; and c) phase III was most common amongst all trials considered, with phase II having a relevant role in women-only trials as per guidelines favoring inclusion in early trials.

[Use of specific drugs for Alzheimer's disease]. / Utilización de fármacos específicos para la enfermedad de Alzheimer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the consumption evolution and financial impact of specific treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in Aragon (Spain), analyzing consumption patterns and trends, and to estimate the proportion of AD patients treated with these drugs. METHODS: Descriptive study of outpatient utilization of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine (1996-2004), obtained from the drug packages dispensed by community pharmacists through prescriptions charged to the National Health Service. According to the defined daily doses (DDD) and expenditure data available, data were expressed in DDD per 1,000 inhabitants per day (DHD), DDD per 1,000 inhabitants older than 64 (DHD65), first-last year increase (%), drug consumption pattern, annual cost per inhabitant and daily treatment cost (DTC). To estimate the proportion of treated patients we compared the DHD65 data with the estimated AD prevalence. RESULTS: Overall consumption of these drugs has increased from 0.026 DHD (1996) to 3.235 DHD (2004). Donepezil remains as the most prescribed, though it is proportionally decreasing as a result of the quick introduction of newer alternatives. Overall cost of the DHD dispensed in 2004 reached nearly 6 million euros. DTC decreased about 30% over the study period, but the total cost increased ninety-fold (sixty-fold when non-variable euros from 2004 were considered). According to our estimates, 34% of people with AD were receiving specific treatment. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant increase in the consumption and economical burden of these drugs, whose cost-effectiveness has been questioned in some studies. More studies including specific patient data are needed in order to identify individual characteristics and evaluate treatment appropriateness.