The Hartford Consensus IV: A Call for Increased National Resilience.

Despite advances in the response to active shooter and intentional mass casualty events, a gap remains in our national preparedness and resilience. Drawing from experiences at myriad mass casualty events, the immediate responder (volunteer responder) represents an underutilized resource, yet one capable of dramatically increasing our all-hazards (injuries from all natural and man-made causes) national resilience. The overarching principle of the Hartford Consensus, outlined in previous reports, is that no one should die from uncontrolled bleeding. We have championed the following acronym to summarize what we have determined are appropriate steps to ensure that the maximum number of victims of these tragic events can be saved: THREAT: Threat suppression. Hemorrhage control. Rapid Extrication to safety. Assessment by medical providers. Transport to definitive care.

Use of a Tourniquet by LIFE STAR Air Medical Crew: A Case Report.

For many years tourniquets were perceived as dangerous due to the belief that they led to loss of limb because of ischemia. Their use in civilian and military environments was discouraged. Emergency medical responders were not taught about tourniquets and commercial tourniquets were not available. However, research by the United States military during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan has demonstrated that tourniquets are safe life-saving devices. As a consequence, they have been widely deployed in combat situations and there are now calls for the use of tourniquets in the civilian prehospital setting. This article presents a report of the successful application of a tourniquet by the LIFE STAR crew to control bleeding that local emergency medical services (EMS) personnel could not control with direct pressure. Tourniquets should be readily available in public places and carried by all EMS.

Stop the Bleed® in medical schools: Early advocacy and promising results.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that medical students would be empowered by hemorrhage-control training and would support efforts to include Stop the Bleed® (STB) in medical education. DESIGN: This is a multi-institution survey study. Surveys were administered immediately following and 6 months after the course. SETTING: This study took place at the Association of American Medical Colleges-accredited medical schools in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were first-year medical students at participating institutions. A total of 442 students completed post-course surveys, and 213 students (48.2 percent) also completed 6-month follow-up surveys. INTERVENTION: An 1-hour, in-person STB course. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Student empowerment was measured by Likert-scale scoring, 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). The usage of hemorrhage-control skills was also measured. RESULTS: A total of 419 students (95.9 percent) affirmed that the course taught the basics of bleeding control, and 169 (79.3 percent) responded positively at follow-up, with a significant decrease in Likert response (4.65, 3.87, p < 0.001). Four hundred and twenty-three students (97.0 percent) affirmed that they would apply bleeding control skills to a patient, and 192 (90.1 percent) responded positively at follow-up (4.61, 4.19, p < 0.001). Three hundred and sixty-one students (82.8 percent) believed that they were able to save a life, and 109 (51.2 percent) responded positively at follow-up (4.14, 3.56, p < 0.001). Four hundred and twenty-five students (97.0 percent) would recommend the course to another medical student, and 196 (92.0 percent) responded positively at follow-up (4.68, 4.31, p < 0.001). Six students (2.8 percent) used skills on live patients, with success in five of the six instances. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students were empowered by STB and have used hemorrhage-control skills on live victims. Medical students support efforts to include STB in medical education.

Management of major blunt liver injury at Hartford Hospital: a ten-year review.

The purpose of this study was to describe the management of patients at Hartford Hospital with major blunt liver injuries. The medical records of patients admitted to Hartford Hospital between January 1, 2000 through January 31, 2010 with blunt trauma that resulted in a laceration with significant hepatic disruption were reviewed. One hundred forty-eight patients were identified from the Trauma Registry. Of those, 133 patient records were examined. Twenty-one patients (15.8%) died in the emergency department and three were transferred to other facilities. Of the 109 patients treated at Hartford Hospital, most (60.2%) had agrade IV or V liver injury; 19 had an operation and 90 were managed nonoperatively. Those managed with an operation were more severely injured and had higher mortality, P < .05. Most patients requiring an operation were identified and operated upon in a timely manner.

Creating a culture of patient safety in a primary-care physician group.

Typically risk-management strategies have been applied to the inpatient setting. In 2003, a comprehensive risk-management program was introduced to ProHealth Physicians, one of the largest primary-care practice groups in Connecticut. The program included strategies for education, practice change, incentive and compliance. Performance metrics for clinician participation and compliance were prespecified. Clinicians' attitudes and behavior change were assessed after introduction of the program. Audits were conducted by external reviewers to assess compliance. Financial data from before-to-after program implementation were compared. Results showed fewer claims and substantial cost savings. A strong commitment to the implementation of a comprehensive risk-management program can create a culture of safety in an outpatient setting.

Infection and Antibiotic Agents in Bleeding Trauma Patients: A Review of Available Literature.

Background: Antibiotic prophylaxis is a common, established practice at trauma centers worldwide for patients presenting with various forms of serious injury. Many patients simultaneously present with hemorrhage. The current guidelines by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma recommend re-dosing prophylactic antibiotic agents for every 10 units of blood products administered. However, these guidelines are only mildly supported by dated research. Methods: A literature search was completed through Medline EBSCO Host using antibiotic prophylaxis and transfusion as keywords. Articles judged to be relevant to the study question were selected for full-text review. Case studies were not included. Altogether, 18 articles were cited in our results through this process. Results: Risk of infection increases in patients resuscitated with large volume of blood products. Animal models of trauma offered conflicting findings on whether blood loss and blood resuscitation altered tissue antibiotic concentrations compared with controls. Studies focused on antibiotic pharmacokinetics in non-trauma human patients revealed agreement surrounding reported decreases in serum and tissue concentrations, although there was discrepancy surrounding the clinical relevancy of the reported decreases. Conclusions: Trauma, hemorrhage, and transfusion impair the immune response resulting in increased incidence of infection. Both animal and human models of antibiotic pharmacokinetics show decreased serum and tissue concentrations during hemorrhage. However, available data are insufficient to conclude that trauma patients experiencing hemorrhage are at elevated risk of infection and thus require more frequent redosing of antibiotic agents than the current guidelines suggest. An upcoming, prospective study by our institution seeks to evaluate this question.

A framework for the design and implementation of Stop the Bleed and public access trauma equipment programs.

Traumatic injuries remain the leading cause of death for those under the age of 44 years old. Nearly a third of those who die from trauma do so from bleeding. Reducing death from severe bleeding requires training in the recognition and treatment of life-threatening bleeding, as well as programs to ensure immediate access to bleeding control resources. The Stop the Bleed (STB) initiative seeks to educate and empower people to be immediate responders and provide control of life-threatening bleeding until emergency medical services arrive. Well-planned and implemented STB programs will help ensure program effectiveness, minimize variability, and provide long-term sustainment. Comprehensive STB programs foster consistency, promote access to bleeding control education, contain a framework to guide the acquisition and placement of equipment, and promote the use of these resources at the time of a bleeding emergency. We leveraged the expertise and experience of the Stop the Bleed Education Consortium to create a resource document to help inform and guide STB program developers and implementers on the key areas for consideration when crafting strategy. These areas include (1) equipment selection, (2) logistics and kit placement, (3) educational program accessibility and implementation, and (4) program oversight, facilitation, and administration.

Tactics for hemorrhagic shock: A virtual course and visual aid for improved resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: Our trauma performance improvement initiative recognized missed treatment opportunities for patients undergoing massive transfusion. To improve patient care, we developed a novel cognitive aid in the form of a poster entitled "TACTICS for Hemorrhagic Shock." We hypothesized that this reference and corresponding course would improve the performance of trauma leaders caring for simulated patients requiring massive transfusion. METHODS: First, residents and physician assistants participated in a one-on-one, socially distanced, screen-based virtual patient simulation. Next, they watched a short presentation introducing the TACTICS visual aid. They then underwent a similar second virtual simulation during which they had access to the reference. In both simulations, the participants were assessed using a scoring system developed to measure their ability to provide appropriate predetermined interventions while leading a trauma resuscitation (score range, 0-100%). Preintervention and postintervention scores were compared using a one-group pre-post within-subject design. Participants' feedback was obtained anonymously. RESULTS: Thirty-two participants (21 residents and 11 physician assistants) completed the course. The median score for the first simulation without the use of the visual aid was 43.8% (interquartile range, 33.3.8-61.5%). Commonly missed treatments included giving tranexamic acid (success rate, 37.5%), treating hypothermia (31.3%), and reversing known anticoagulation (28.1%). All participants' performance improved using the visual aid, and the median score of the second simulation was 89.6% (interquartile range, 79.2-94.8%; p < 0.001). Ninety-two percent of survey respondents "strongly agreed" that the TACTICS visual aid would be a helpful reference during real-life trauma resuscitations. CONCLUSION: The TACTICS visual aid is a useful tool for improving the performance of the trauma leader and is now displayed in our emergency department resuscitation rooms. This performance improvement course, the associated simulations, and visual aid are easily and virtually accessible to interested trauma programs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Retrospective review of the costs of routine pelvic X-rays in a trauma setting.

Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) technology plays an important role in the evaluation of injured patients. At our institution pelvic X-ray (PXR) is obtained routinely on trauma patients. Many also receive MDCT of the abdomen and pelvis for other indications. We hypothesized that there would be a substantial cost savings in adopting a policy of deferring PXR in a hemodynamically normal patient who will also proceed to MDCT for other indications. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of trauma patients from February 1, 2008 to February 1, 2009. We reviewed whether a PXR was done, the result, whether an MDCT was also done, and the presence or absence of pelvic fractures. We collected billing and cost data from various hospital sources. We identified 1,330 patients with PXR between February 1, 2008 and February 1, 2009. Of those patients, 810 (61%) had MDCT after PXR. Sixty-six patients (8.0%) had pelvic fractures; 39 were correctly identified on PXR (59% of fractures). Twenty-seven were detected only by MDCT (41% of fractures); all pelvic fractures were identified on MDCT. Seven hundred and forty-four patients (92% of patients with both PXR and MDCT) had negative PXR and negative MDCT. Using three methods of cost analysis, the estimated cost savings range is from $77,011 to $331,080. MDCT of the pelvis is more sensitive and more specific than PXR. In patients who are hemodynamically normal and asymptomatic, forgoing routine PXR could result in an estimated savings from $77,011 to $331,080, depending on the method used to calculate costs.

Addressing Racial Inequity in Surgery: Reflections On a Career in Medicine by a Surgeon.

Racial inequity has influenced both personal and public health in the United States and has impacted enrollment in medical schools and training programs. The effects of racial inequity on training and how it is perceived can differ depending on who is being affected. Recommendations are offered for positive changes through mentoring of individuals, institutional leadership, and structural changes in organizations.

A Connecticut healthcare system's response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Connecticut was impacted severely and early on by the COVID-19 pandemic due to the state's proximity to New York City. Hartford Healthcare (HHC), one of the largest healthcare systems in New England, became integral in the state's response with a robust emergency management system already in place. In this manuscript, we review HHC's prepandemic emergency operations as well as the response of the system-wide Office of Emergency Management to the initial news of the virus and throughout the evolving pandemic. Additionally, we discuss the unique acquisition of vital critical care resources and personal protective equipment, as well as the hospital personnel distribution in response to the shifting demands of the virus. The public testing and vaccination efforts, with early consideration for at risk populations, are described as well as ethical considerations of scarce resources. To date, the vaccination effort resulted in over 70 percent of the adult population being vaccinated and with 10 percent of the population having been infected, herd immunity is eminent. Finally, the preparation for reestablishing elective procedures while experiencing a second wave of the pandemic is discussed. These descriptions may be useful for other healthcare systems in both preparation and response for future catastrophic emergencies of all types.

Advanced trauma operative management course: participant survey.

BACKGROUND: The Advanced Trauma Operative Management (ATOM) course uses standardized porcine simulation to teach the repair of penetrating trauma. It is offered in 26 sites in the United States, Canada, Africa, the Middle East, and Japan. The purpose of the present study was to query ATOM participants regarding their perceptions of the value and influence of the ATOM course on knowledge, confidence, and skill to repair penetrating injuries. METHODS: An anonymous, voluntary survey was posted on the Internet at surveymonkey.com. E-mail notification was sent to all 1,001 ATOM participants through May 2008. Items requested agreement/disagreement on a 5-point Likert scale and space for comments. Agreement indicated positive perceptions of ATOM. RESULTS: A total of 962 surgeons received the request to complete the survey; 444 ATOM participants from 36 states and 17 countries participated, for a response rate of 46%. Range of agreement with all of the items was 75.4-99.0%. Results include the following: 78.9% (95% CI, 74.7-82.6%) can identify injuries more quickly; 80.7% (95% CI, 76.6-84.3%) have a more organized operative approach; 81.1% (95% CI, 77.0-84.6%) can control bleeding more quickly; 86.1% (95% CI, 82.4-89.2%) can control injuries more effectively; 86.4% (95% CI, 82.7-89.4%) are more competent trauma surgeons; 87.0% are more confident (95% CI, 83.4-89.9%), and 89.2% are more knowledgeable (95% CI, 85.8-91.8%) about repairing penetrating injuries; 99% (95% CI, 97.4-99.7%) said ATOM is worthwhile. Overall, 87.4% of the comments were positive. CONCLUSIONS: Participants worldwide perceive that ATOM is worthwhile and helps surgeons improve knowledge, confidence, and skill in repairing penetrating injuries.

Nurse and physician preferences for end-of-life care for trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: End-of-life care for trauma patients requires unique practice guidelines because it is fraught with difficulties not encountered in end-of-life care for terminally ill patients. The purpose of this project was to analyze survey information from nurses and physicians regarding preferences for end-of-life care in trauma that would inform best-practice guidelines. METHODS: A survey was sent via the US Postal Service to a convenience sample of trauma professionals, including physicians, nurses, and emergency medical technicians. Questions were designed to provide information on difficult issues related to death and dying from trauma. The general public was also surveyed, and all results were used to develop a best-practice model for end-of-life care. RESULTS: Seven hundred seventy-four trauma professionals returned the survey for a response rate of 51%. This included 460 nurses and 181 physicians. Some salient findings include: (1) If a loved one required resuscitation in the emergency department, more nurses (78.4%) than physicians (38.7%) prefer to be in the treatment room rather than in the waiting room; (2) similar percentages of nurses (97.7%) and physicians (99.4%) agree that life-sustaining treatment should be withdrawn in cases in whom there is no hope of recovery; and (3) a larger percentage of nurses (58.8%) than physicians (20.6%) believe that patients have the right to demand care that physicians think is medically futile. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses and physicians agree on some issues about end-of-life care in trauma but disagree on others. Education and discourse among trauma professionals are needed to bring understanding to the issues.

Defining a Research Agenda for Layperson Prehospital Hemorrhage Control: A Consensus Statement.

Importance: Trauma is the leading cause of death for US individuals younger than 45 years, and uncontrolled hemorrhage is a major cause of trauma mortality. The US military's medical advancements in the field of prehospital hemorrhage control have reduced battlefield mortality by 44%. However, despite support from many national health care organizations, no integrated approach to research has been made regarding implementation, epidemiology, education, and logistics of prehospital hemorrhage control by layperson immediate responders in the civilian sector. Objective: To create a national research agenda to help guide future work for prehospital hemorrhage control by laypersons. Evidence Review: The 2-day, in-person, National Stop the Bleed (STB) Research Consensus Conference was conducted on February 27 to 28, 2019, to identify and achieve consensus on research gaps. Participants included (1) subject matter experts, (2) professional society-designated leaders, (3) representatives from the federal government, and (4) representatives from private foundations. Before the conference, participants were provided a scoping review on layperson prehospital hemorrhage control. A 3-round modified Delphi consensus process was conducted to determine high-priority research questions. The top items, with median rating of 8 or more on a Likert scale of 1 to 9 points, were identified and became part of the national STB research agenda. Findings: Forty-five participants attended the conference. In round 1, participants submitted 487 research questions. After deduplication and sorting, 162 questions remained across 5 a priori-defined themes. Two subsequent rounds of rating generated consensus on 113 high-priority, 27 uncertain-priority, and 22 low-priority questions. The final prioritized research agenda included the top 24 questions, including 8 for epidemiology and effectiveness, 4 for materials, 9 for education, 2 for global health, and 1 for health policy. Conclusions and Relevance: The National STB Research Consensus Conference identified and prioritized a national research agenda to support laypersons in reducing preventable deaths due to life-threatening hemorrhage. Investigators and funding agencies can use this agenda to guide their future work and funding priorities.

Establishing the first Hartford consensus-compliant medical school in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Following the Hartford Consensus meetings, the Stop the Bleed Campaign was created to reduce the prevalence of death from exsanguination in the case of traumatic hemorrhage. The campaign revolves around providing hemorrhage control training to members of the public and increasing public access to hemorrhage control equipment. To our knowledge, no medical school has established a self-sustaining Stop the Bleed program to train their students and faculty as well as made hemorrhage control equipment available for use in an emergency. METHODS: Bleeding control classes were offered at the Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine beginning in January 2018. A proposal was made to the medical school's Council on Curriculum Oversight in May 2018 to incorporate the training as part of the required curriculum for first-year students. A second proposal was made to Quinnipiac University's Emergency Management Team in June 2018 to purchase hemorrhage control equipment. RESULTS: Twelve bleeding control courses were held between January and August 2018. Two hundred ten medical students, 19 faculty members, and 36 public safety officers completed initial training. Thirty-four medical students, two faculty members, and two public safety officers became certified instructors. Training was incorporated into the first-year curriculum to be taught by certified second-year students under the direction of the school's Department of Surgery. The school purchased approved training equipment. A student-coordinator position was created in the Surgery Interest Group. Hemorrhage control equipment was purchased for each public safety officer, patrol vehicles, and for the Central Dispatch headquarters. Public-access equipment has been purchased for each Automated External Defibrillator cabinet at the medical school. CONCLUSION: The School of Medicine community has been empowered with the ability to save lives. Students and faculty have been trained in life-saving skills, a self-sustaining training process has been created, and equipment has been purchased for hemorrhage control efforts.