Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Immunol Methods ; 135(1-2): 101-9, 1990 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2125617

RESUMEN

In order to facilitate the use of proteosome-based vaccines, we have identified and analyzed the parameters that affect their immunogenicity. As a model system we used synthetic peptides (LCF6) containing sequences from the immunodominant (NANP)n tandem repeat region of the P. falciparum circumsporozoite protein, hydrophobically complexed to multimeric protein preparations (proteosomes) of meningococcal outer membrane proteins (OMP), since we have previously shown that high levels of anti-(NANP)n IgG can be elicited in mice by use of this novel adjuvant system (Lowell et al., 1988a). We have now examined these preparations by velocity sedimentation and measured their ability to elicit an IgG response in mice. Velocity sedimentation of freshly mixed OMP and LCF6, without dialysis, produced a limited number of small complexes, whereas dialysis of the mixture for 4 d yielded heterogeneously sized complexes that became more homogeneous when the dialysis was carried out for 7 or 10 days. The most homogeneous of these peptide-proteosome complexes (those dialyzed for 10 days) induced substantial levels of anti-(NANP)n IgG in mice, and shorter periods of dialysis resulted in vaccines that induced proportionately lower titers. Analysis of a series of preparations with varying LCF6: OMP ratios (w/w) showed that the degree of peptide substitution of the proteosomes was inversely proportional to the rate of sedimentation of the complexes and that there exists an optimal degree of lipopeptide complexing to the proteosomes. Our results suggest that the parameters affecting the immunogenicity of the peptide-proteosome complexes are: (i) hapten density, and (ii) size of the complex. Furthermore, sedimentation analysis of peptide-proteosome immunogens may serve as a rapidly performed assay of immunogenic potency.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos de Protozoos/inmunología , Proteínas de la Membrana Bacteriana Externa/inmunología , Proteínas Protozoarias , Vacunas Sintéticas/inmunología , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , Animales , Anticuerpos Antiprotozoarios/biosíntesis , Anticuerpos Antiprotozoarios/inmunología , Centrifugación por Gradiente de Densidad , Diálisis , Inmunización , Inmunoglobulina G/biosíntesis , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Ratones , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Neisseria meningitidis/inmunología , Péptidos/síntesis química , Péptidos/inmunología , Plasmodium falciparum/inmunología , Vacunas Antiprotozoos/inmunología , Vacunas Sintéticas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Sintéticas/ultraestructura
2.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 42(4): 309-13, 1990 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2184689

RESUMEN

Three inbred mouse strains, C57BL/6 (H-2b), A/J (H-2a), and BALB/c (H-2d), and 1 outbred strain, CD-1, demonstrated differences in susceptibility to iv challenge with the ANKA clone of Plasmodium berghei. Mice were challenged with 100, 1,000, or 10,000 sporozoites, then evaluated daily beginning on day 4 for patency. CD-1 mice were further evaluated at challenge doses of 12,500, 25,000, and 50,000 sporozoites. C57BL/6 mice were the easiest to infect, with 90% becoming infected with 100 sporozoites. The outbred strain CD-1 was the most difficult to infect, requiring a challenge dose of 25,000 sporozoites/mouse in order to achieve a 100% infection rate. Mouse strains also demonstrated differences in their ability to be protected by intravenous immunization with gamma-irradiated sporozoites. A/J mice needed a minimum of 3 doses of irradiated sporozoites for protection against a challenge with 10,000 sporozoites. In contrast, BALB/c mice immunized with a single dose of 1,000 irradiated sporozoites are protected against a 10,000 sporozoite challenge. These data suggest that both infectivity and protection are genetically restricted and that susceptibility to infection may be inversely related to protection.


Asunto(s)
Inmunización , Malaria/inmunología , Plasmodium berghei/inmunología , Animales , Femenino , Rayos gamma , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos A , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Plasmodium berghei/efectos de la radiación , Especificidad de la Especie
3.
Mil Med ; 165(11): 816-20, 2000 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11143425

RESUMEN

At present, the use of molecular probes and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the identification of microorganisms in body fluids or tissues is becoming more commonplace. There is an added advantage when serological or culture methods are difficult, expensive, or unavailable. Slow-growing or fastidious microorganisms, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis, spirochetes, viruses, and the dimorphic fungi, can be detected rapidly using these techniques. The presence of different chromosomal or plasmid-mediated antibiotic-resistant markers can also be determined. PCR is an extremely powerful tool that has been applied to research, and more recently it has been used to augment standard clinical applications. It is a very simple process that can amplify nucleic acid sequences, both DNA and RNA, a million times over. The sensitivity, rapidity, broad applicability, and compactness of this technology make it an ideal candidate for use in the military arena. We recently established a molecular biology laboratory at a Deployable Medical System at the Camp Parks Army Reserve Training Facility in Dublin, California. This article will briefly summarize the use of PCR and its applicability in the air-transportable hospital field environment. Proper handling, processing, and testing as well as the requirements for setting up a molecular biology laboratory will be discussed. Finally, the benefits and disadvantages of using PCR-based techniques in the deployed field environment will be considered.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Aeroespacial , ADN Bacteriano/sangre , Hospitales Militares , Unidades Móviles de Salud , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Laboratorios de Hospital , Estados Unidos
4.
J Clin Lab Anal ; 15(3): 131-7, 2001.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11344528

RESUMEN

Pseudomonas aeruginosa has emerged as one of the most problematic Gram-negative nosocomial pathogens. Bacteremia caused by P. aeruginosa is clinically indistinguishable from other Gram-negative infections although the mortality rate is higher. This microorganism is also inherently resistant to common antibiotics. Standard bacterial identification and susceptibility testing is normally a 48-hour process and difficulty sometimes exists in rapidly and accurately identifying antimicrobial resistance. The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) is a rapid and simple process for the amplification of target DNA sequences. However, many sample preparation methods are unsuitable for the clinical laboratory because they are not cost effective, take too long to perform, or do not provide a good template for PCR. Our goal was to provide same-day results to facilitate rapid diagnosis. In this report, we have utilized our rapid DNA extraction method to generate bacterial DNA direct from clinical samples for PCR. The lower detection level for P. aeruginosa was estimated to be 10 CFU/ml. In addition, we wanted to compare the results of a new rapid-cycle DNA thermocycler that uses continuous fluorescence monitoring with the results of standard thermocycling. We tested 40 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa and 18 non-P. aeruginosa isolates received in a blinded fashion. Coded data revealed that there was 100% correlation in both the rapid-cycle DNA thermocycling and standard thermocycling when compared to standard clinical laboratory results. In addition, total results turn-around time was less than 1 hour. Specific identification of P. aeruginosa was determined using intragenic primer sets for bacterial 16S rRNA and Pseudomonas outer-membrane lipoprotein gene sequences. The total cost of our extraction method and PCR was $2.22 per sample. The accuracy and rapidness of this DNA-extraction method, with its PCR-based identification system, make it an ideal candidate for use in the clinical laboratory.


Asunto(s)
Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/diagnóstico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Costos y Análisis de Costo , ADN Bacteriano/análisis , Electroforesis en Gel de Agar , Humanos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/economía , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , ARN Ribosómico 16S/análisis , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Temperatura , Factores de Tiempo
5.
J Clin Microbiol ; 38(9): 3407-12, 2000 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10970392

RESUMEN

Methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRS) are one of the most common causes of nosocomial infections and bacteremia. Standard bacterial identification and susceptibility testing frequently require as long as 72 h to report results, and there may be difficulty in rapidly and accurately identifying methicillin resistance. The use of the PCR is a rapid and simple process for the amplification of target DNA sequences, which can be used to identify and test bacteria for antimicrobial resistance. However, many sample preparation methods are unsuitable for PCR utilization in the clinical laboratory because they either are not cost-effective, take too long to perform, or do not provide a satisfactory DNA template for PCR. Our goal was to provide same-day results to facilitate rapid diagnosis and therapy. In this report, we describe a rapid method for extraction of bacterial DNA directly from blood culture bottles that gave quality DNA for PCR in as little as 20 min. We compared this extraction method to the standard QIAGEN method for turnaround time (TAT), cost, purity, and use of template in PCR. Specific identification of MRS was determined using intragenic primer sets for bacterial and Staphylococcus 16S rRNA and mecA gene sequences. The PCR primer sets were validated with 416 isolates of staphylococci, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (n = 106), methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (n = 134), and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (n = 176). The total supply cost of our extraction method and PCR was $2.15 per sample with a result TAT of less than 4 h. The methods described herein represent a rapid and accurate DNA extraction and PCR-based identification system, which makes the system an ideal candidate for use under austere field conditions and one that may have utility in the clinical laboratory.


Asunto(s)
Sangre/microbiología , ADN Bacteriano/aislamiento & purificación , Resistencia a la Meticilina/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus/clasificación , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Coagulasa/metabolismo , ADN Bacteriano/análisis , Genes Bacterianos , Genes de ARNr , Humanos , Meticilina/farmacología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/economía , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/sangre , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Staphylococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus/genética , Staphylococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA