Ultrasound Versus Computed Tomographic Guidance for Percutaneous Biopsy of Chest Lesions.

OBJECTIVES: To compare ultrasound (US) versus computed tomography (CT) for primary guidance during needle biopsy of chest lesions. METHODS: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant retrospective study, and the need for informed consent was waived. All US- and CT-guided chest biopsy procedures performed between January 1, 2012, and October 15, 2014, at our institution were reviewed, and all procedures targeting peripheral intrathoracic and chest wall lesions were included. Axillary lesions, lung lesions without peripheral pleural contact, and mediastinal lesions without a transcutaneous US window were excluded. Radiologic, pathologic, and clinical records were reviewed. RESULTS: Fifty-five procedures with primary US guidance (23 lung, 6 pleural, 2 mediastinal, and 24 chest wall) and 130 CT procedures (88 lung, 10 pleural, 7 mediastinal, and 25 chest wall) were performed. Diagnostic samples were obtained in 98% (54 of 55) of US procedures and 87% (113 of 130) of CT procedures (P = .02). Pneumothorax requiring treatment occurred in 2% (1 of 55) of US procedures and 5% (7 of 130) of CT procedures (P = .25). Computed tomographic localization was used in 29% (16 of 55) of US procedures. Nevertheless, the average patient radiation dose was significantly less in US procedures (182 mGy-cm) versus CT procedures (718 mGy-cm; P< .01). The average procedure time was 40 minutes for US and 38 minutes for CT (P = .39). The average lesion size was 4.5 cm for US and 4.9 cm for CT (P = .14). CONCLUSIONS: During biopsy of peripheral intrathoracic lesions and chest wall lesions, primary US guidance resulted in a higher likelihood of a diagnostic sample and a decreased patient radiation dose compared with CT guidance.

Endovascular management of traumatic pseudoaneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Pseudoaneurysms (PAs) caused by traumatic injury to the arterial vasculature have a high risk of rupture, leading to life-threatening hemorrhage and mortality, requiring urgent treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine the technical and clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment of visceral and extremity traumatic pseudoaneurysms. METHODS: Clinical data were retrospectively collected from all patients presenting for endovascular treatment of PAs between September 2012 and September 2018 at a single academic level one trauma center. Technical success was defined as successful treatment of the PA with no residual filling on post-embolization angiogram. Clinical success was defined as technical successful treatment with no rebleeding throughout the follow-up period and no reintervention for the PA. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (10F/25M), average age (± stdev) 41.7 ± 20.1 years, presented with PAs secondary to blunt (n = 31) or penetrating (n = 4) trauma. Time from trauma to intervention ranged from 2 h - 75 days (median: 4.4 h, IQR: 3.5-17.1 h) with 27 (77%) of PAs identified and treated within 24 h of trauma. Average hospitalization was 13.78 ± 13.4 days. Ten patients underwent surgery prior to intervention. PA number per patient ranged from 1 to 5 (multiple diffuse). PAs were located on the splenic (n = 12, 34.3%), pelvic (n = 11, 31.4%), hepatic (n = 9, 25.7%), upper extremity/axilla (n = 2, 5.7%), and renal arteries (n = 1, 2.9%). Technical success was 85.7%. Clinical success was 71.4%, for technical failure (n = 5), repeat embolization (n = 1) or post-IR surgical intervention (n = 4). There was no PA rebleeding or reintervention for any patient after discharge over the reported follow-up periods. Three patients died during the trauma hospitalization for reasons unrelated to the PAs. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment of traumatic visceral and extremity PAs is efficacious with minimal complication rates and low reintervention requirements.