Correction: Bayesian regression explains how human participants handle parameter uncertainty.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007886.].

Unraveling brain interactions in vision: The example of crowding.

Crowding, the impairment of target discrimination in clutter, is the standard situation in vision. Traditionally, crowding is explained with (feedforward) models, in which only neighboring elements interact, leading to a "bottleneck" at the earliest stages of vision. It is with this implicit prior that most functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies approach the identification of the "neural locus" of crowding, searching for the earliest visual area in which the blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) signal is suppressed under crowded conditions. Using this classic approach, we replicated previous findings of crowding-related BOLD suppression starting in V2 and increasing up the visual hierarchy. Surprisingly, under conditions of uncrowding, in which adding flankers improves performance, the BOLD signal was further suppressed. This suggests an important role for top-down connections, which is in line with global models of crowding. To discriminate between various possible models, we used dynamic causal modeling (DCM). We show that recurrent interactions between all visual areas, including higher-level areas like V4 and the lateral occipital complex (LOC), are crucial in crowding and uncrowding. Our results explain the discrepancies in previous findings: in a recurrent visual hierarchy, the crowding effect can theoretically be detected at any stage. Beyond crowding, we demonstrate the need for models like DCM to understand the complex recurrent processing which most likely underlies human perception in general.

Bayesian regression explains how human participants handle parameter uncertainty.

Accumulating evidence indicates that the human brain copes with sensory uncertainty in accordance with Bayes' rule. However, it is unknown how humans make predictions when the generative model of the task at hand is described by uncertain parameters. Here, we tested whether and how humans take parameter uncertainty into account in a regression task. Participants extrapolated a parabola from a limited number of noisy points, shown on a computer screen. The quadratic parameter was drawn from a bimodal prior distribution. We tested whether human observers take full advantage of the given information, including the likelihood of the quadratic parameter value given the observed points and the quadratic parameter's prior distribution. We compared human performance with Bayesian regression, which is the (Bayes) optimal solution to this problem, and three sub-optimal models, which are simpler to compute. Our results show that, under our specific experimental conditions, humans behave in a way that is consistent with Bayesian regression. Moreover, our results support the hypothesis that humans generate responses in a manner consistent with probability matching rather than Bayesian decision theory.

Dopaminergic modulation of motor network compensatory mechanisms in Parkinson's disease.

The dopaminergic system has a unique gating function in the initiation and execution of movements. When the interhemispheric imbalance of dopamine inherent to the healthy brain is disrupted, as in Parkinson's disease (PD), compensatory mechanisms act to stave off behavioral changes. It has been proposed that two such compensatory mechanisms may be (a) a decrease in motor lateralization, observed in drug-naïve PD patients and (b) reduced inhibition - increased facilitation. Seeking to investigate the differential effect of dopamine depletion and subsequent substitution on compensatory mechanisms in non-drug-naïve PD, we studied 10 PD patients and 16 healthy controls, with patients undergoing two test sessions - "ON" and "OFF" medication. Using a simple visually-cued motor response task and fMRI, we investigated cortical motor activation - in terms of laterality, contra- and ipsilateral percent BOLD signal change and effective connectivity in the parametric empirical Bayes framework. We found that decreased motor lateralization persists in non-drug-naïve PD and is concurrent with decreased contralateral activation in the cortical motor network. Normal lateralization is not reinstated by dopamine substitution. In terms of effective connectivity, disease-related changes primarily affect ipsilaterally-lateralized homotopic cortical motor connections, while medication-related changes affect contralaterally-lateralized homotopic connections. Our findings suggest that, in non-drug-naïve PD, decreased lateralization is no longer an adaptive cortical mechanism, but rather the result of maladaptive changes, related to disease progression and long-term dopamine replacement. These findings highlight the need for the development of noninvasive therapies, which would promote the adaptive mechanisms of the PD brain.