Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pediatr Neurol ; 160: 32-37, 2024 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39178652

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Topiramate is often considered as a second-line medication for the treatment of pseudotumor cerebri syndrome (PTCS), but limited studies exist that evaluate its efficacy in children. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients aged <21 years with PTCS who were treated with topiramate alone or in combination with acetazolamide was performed. Data regarding clinical courses and visual outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were identified. Three (6.5%) patients were treated with topiramate alone, 31 (67.4%) transitioned to topiramate from acetazolamide, and 12 (26.1%) took both topiramate and acetazolamide concurrently. The median time to resolution of papilledema on topiramate was 0.57 years (interquartile range 0.32 to 0.84). Among eyes with papilledema graded on the Frisen scale at topiramate initiation, 40 of 57 (70.2%) were grade 1, nine of 57 (15.8%) were grade 2, and eight of 57 (14.0%) were grade 3. Twenty-seven of 46 (58.7%) reported headache improvement after starting topiramate. The mean dose of topiramate was 1.3 ± 0.8 mg/kg/day. The most common side effect was patient report of cognitive slowing (10 of 46 [21.7%]). All patients on topiramate monotherapy who were compliant with treatment and follow-up had resolution of papilledema with no evidence of visual function loss. CONCLUSIONS: Topiramate can effectively treat PTCS in children with mild to moderate papilledema or in those unable to tolerate acetazolamide. More research is needed to assess the efficacy of topiramate for higher grade papilledema.


Asunto(s)
Acetazolamida , Seudotumor Cerebral , Topiramato , Humanos , Topiramato/administración & dosificación , Topiramato/efectos adversos , Topiramato/farmacología , Seudotumor Cerebral/tratamiento farmacológico , Seudotumor Cerebral/inducido químicamente , Niño , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Acetazolamida/efectos adversos , Acetazolamida/uso terapéutico , Acetazolamida/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Papiledema/tratamiento farmacológico , Papiledema/inducido químicamente , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Preescolar , Resultado del Tratamiento , Quimioterapia Combinada , Inhibidores de Anhidrasa Carbónica/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Anhidrasa Carbónica/administración & dosificación , Fructosa/análogos & derivados , Fructosa/efectos adversos , Fructosa/uso terapéutico , Fructosa/administración & dosificación
2.
J AAPOS ; 28(4): 103966, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38969090

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS) are a recently defined optical coherence tomography (OCT) finding. The purpose of this study was to characterize the presence of PHOMS and their visual significance in pediatric patients with and without optic nerve pathologies. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated 400 patients (<18 years of age) including normal control subjects and patients with optic neuritis, papillitis, optic nerve head drusen (ONHD), and papilledema. Information on demographics, visual function, and structural parameters were obtained. RESULTS: PHOMS were found in 7 of 258 normal control eyes (2.7%), 9 of 59 eyes with optic neuritis (15.3%), 58 of 76 eyes with ONHD (76.3%), 3 of 11 eyes with papillitis (27.3%), and 180 of 308 eyes with papilledema (58.4%). PHOMS were more prevalent in the papilledema (P < 0.001), ONHD (P < 0.001), and optic neuritis (P = 0.028) eyes than in control eyes. We identified 5 cases where PHOMS developed de novo. This occurred over an average of 2.3 years (range, 0.2-7.4 years). Sixteen cases of PHOMS resolved over an average of 1.1 years (range, 0.3-4.0 years). Cross-sectionally, PHOMS were not associated with visual acuity (P = 0.551), retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (P = 0.068), ganglion cell volume (P = 0.375), or visual field mean deviation (P = 0.795). CONCLUSIONS: PHOMS are present in a majority of children with papilledema or ONHD. PHOMS are dynamic and may form de novo over time with optic nerve pathology and may resolve either through treatment or atrophy. There was no relationship between the presence of PHOMS and poor visual function in our study cohort.


Asunto(s)
Drusas del Disco Óptico , Disco Óptico , Enfermedades del Nervio Óptico , Papiledema , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Niño , Femenino , Masculino , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Adolescente , Prevalencia , Papiledema/diagnóstico , Papiledema/fisiopatología , Disco Óptico/patología , Disco Óptico/diagnóstico por imagen , Preescolar , Enfermedades del Nervio Óptico/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Nervio Óptico/fisiopatología , Drusas del Disco Óptico/fisiopatología , Drusas del Disco Óptico/diagnóstico , Campos Visuales/fisiología , Fibras Nerviosas/patología , Células Ganglionares de la Retina/patología , Neuritis Óptica/fisiopatología , Neuritis Óptica/diagnóstico , Lactante
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA