A complete oral regimen for induction therapy of patients with high-risk APL: An oral etoposide instead of intravenous infusion for cytoreductive chemotherapy.

There is an urgent need for an oral, efficient and safe regimen for high-risk APL under the pandemic of COVID-19. We retrospectively analysed 60 high-risk APL patients. For induction therapy (IT), in addition to all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and oral arsenic (RIF), 22 patients received oral etoposide (VP16) as cytotoxic chemotherapy (CC), and 38 patients received intravenous CC as historical control group. The median dose of oral VP16 was 1000 mg [interquartile rage (IQR), 650-1250]. One patient died during IT in the control group, 59 evaluable patients (100%) achieved complete haematological remission (CHR) after IT and complete molecular remission (CMR) after consolidation therapy. The median time to CHR and CMR was 36 days (33.8-44) versus 35 days (32-42; p = 0.75) and 3 months (0.8-3.5) versus 3.3 months (2.4-3.7; p = 0.58) in the oral VP16 group and in the control group. Two (9.1%) and 3 (7.9%) patients experienced molecular relapse in different group respectively. The 2-year estimated overall survival and event-free survival were 100% versus 94.7% (p = 0.37) and 90.9% versus 89.5% (p = 0.97) respectively. A completely oral, efficient and safe induction regimen including oral VP16 as cytoreductive chemotherapy combined with ATRA and RIF is more convenient to administer for patients with high-risk APL.

Only FLT3-ITD co-mutation did not have a deleterious effect on acute myeloid leukemia patients with NPM1 mutation, but concomitant with DNMT3A co-mutation or a < 3log reduction of MRD2 predicted poor survival.

Co-occurring mutations are frequently observed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with NPM1 mutation, and NPM1 measurable residual disease (MRD) is an effective prognostic biomarker. This retrospective study investigated the impact of gene co-mutations and NPM1 MRD on outcomes in these patients. Among 234 patients, 11.5% carried the rare type NPM1 mutation (NPM1RT). The median age was 49 years (IQR 36-58), with a median follow-up of 30.4 months (IQR 12.1-55.7). Nine genes were mutated in > 10%, with DNMT3A (53.8%) and FLT3-ITD (44.4%) being most prevalent. Univariable analysis in 137 patients showed FLT3-ITD, DNMT3A co-mutations, and MRD2 < 3 log reduction predicted poorer survival. FLT3-ITD and DNMT3A co-mutations correlated with the lowest event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) (3-year EFS 30.0%; 3-year OS 34.4%; both p < 0.001). FLT3-ITD alone did not worsen survival compared to patients without FLT3-ITD. Multivariable analysis identified DNMT3A co-mutation [EFS, HR = 1.9, p = 0.021; OS, HR = 2.2, p = 0.023] and MRD2 ≥ 3 log reduction (EFS, HR = 0.2; OS, HR = 0.1, both p < 0.001) as independent survival predictors. Patients with FLT3-ITD and DNMT3A co-mutations or a MRD2 < 3 log reduction were identified as high risk, but allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) improved survival significantly compared to chemotherapy only (3-year EFS, 57.9% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.012; 3-year OS, 72.9% vs. 34.4%, p = 0.001). In AML patients with NPM1 mutation, the detrimental impact of FLT3-ITD mutation was exacerbated by DNMT3A co-mutation. Poor-risk younger patients identified by FLT3-ITD and DNMT3A co-mutations or MRD2 < 3 log reduction benefit from allo-HSCT.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is still a highly curative therapy in adults with philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

The application of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and novel immunotherapies has improved outcomes in patients with Ph + acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), and the issue of whether there is still a need for stem cell transplantation has become controversial. We performed a retrospective study to explore whether stem cell transplantation still held a place in patients with Ph + ALL if only imatinib and 2nd generation TKIs are available and affordable. A total of 292 patients were included. The median age was 38 years [range 14-64, IQR 28-48]. Patients receiving transplants (n = 216) had better rates of 4-year disease-free survival (DFS, 68% vs. 24%, P < .0001) and overall survival (OS, 72% vs. 47%, P < .0001) than those receiving continuous TKIs plus chemotherapy (TKI-chemo) (n = 76). In the multivariate analysis, male sex, WBC count ≥ 95 × 109/L and PLT count ≤ 154 × 109/L at diagnosis were significantly associated with poorer outcomes, and transplantation was significantly associated with favourable DFS and OS. In addition, the transplant outcomes were superior in any subgroup according to the number of risk variables. Furthermore, propensity score matching (PSM) analyses showed similar findings in the whole cohort and in age- and BCR-ABL1 level-based subgroups after the first or second consolidation. In conclusion, transplantation as a one-time procedure for adults with Ph + ALL patients remains important in countries lacking accessibility to third-generation TKIs or immunotherapies, regardless of the depth of the molecular response.

COVID-19 infection in patients with haematological malignancies: A single-centre survey in the latest Omicron wave in China.

As the COVID-19 variant Omicron surge in Beijing, China, a better understanding of risk factors for adverse outcomes may improve clinical management in patients with haematological malignancies (HM) diagnosed with COVID-19. The study sample includes 412 cases, mainly represented by acute leukaemia, chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), plasma cell disorders and lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. COVID-19 pneumonia was observed in 10.4% (43/412) of patients, and severe/critical illness was observed in 5.3% (22/412). Among the 86 cases with advanced malignancies, 17.6% (12/86) of patients developed severe/critical COVID-19, which was significantly higher than reported in patients with stable malignancies (9/326, 2.70%, p < 0.001). Similarly, the advanced malignancy cohort had a higher mortality rate (9/86, 10.5% vs. 0/326, 0%, p < 0.001) and a poor 30-day overall survival (OS) compared with the stable malignancy cohort (74.2% vs. 100.0%, p < 0.0001). Overall, nine patients (2.2%) died. The primary cause of death was progressive HM in four patients and a combination of both COVID-19 and HM in five patients. In the multivariable analysis, over 65 years of age, comorbidities and advanced malignancy were correlated with severe/critical COVID-19 in HM patients. This study sheds light on the poor outcomes among COVID-19 HM patients with the leading cause of advanced malignancy.

Treatment of refractory or relapsed myelodysplastic neoplasms with luspatercept: a multicenter Chinese study.

Few effective therapies are available to treat patients with relapsed/refractory myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS). Luspatercept was shown to display good efficacy in a phase 3 clinical trial for lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS) patients, yet real-world data are limited, especially in China. Therefore, data from patients diagnosed as having MDS with low blasts and SF3B1 mutation (MDS-SF3B1) and MDS with SF3B1 mutation and thrombocytosis were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 23 enrolled patients, 17 (73.9%) were males (median age 67 years: range 29 to 80 years). Previously, a total of 22 (95.7%) patients had received recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO), 9 (39.1%) roxadustat, 7 (30.4%) lenalidomide and 3 (13.0%) hypomethylating agents (HMA). The median treatment time was 22.9 weeks (9.0-32.4). At week 12, 60.9% (14/23) of the patients achieved a hematologic improvement-erythroid (HI-E) response. Red blood cell transfusion independence (RBC-TI) for ≥ 8 weeks was found in 57.1% (8/14) of transfusion-dependent patients. The median hemoglobin concentration was 84 g/L, and patients had significantly higher hemoglobin concentrations after 12 weeks of treatment (P < 0.001). It is noteworthy that responders had a greater reduction in serum ferritin (P = 0.021). Those with serum EPO < 500 IU/L at baseline tended to have a higher HI-E rate (P = 0.081), but only patients in non-transfusion and low transfusion burden (LTB) subgroups had statistical differences (P = 0.024). The most commonly occurring adverse events were blood bilirubin increase (17.4%), fatigue (13.0%) and dizziness (13.0%). Luspatercept was effective and tolerated well in refractory LR-MDS-SF3B1 patients. In particular, baseline non-transfusion and LTB patients exhibited a greater response rate to treatment.

Comparison of efficacy between homoharringtonine, aclarubicin, cytarabine (HAA) and idarubicin, cytarabine (IA) regimens as induction therapy in patients with de novo core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.

To compare efficacy between homoharringtonine combined with cytarabine and aclarubicin (HAA) and idarubicin and cytarabine (IA) regimens as first induction chemotherapy in patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML). Cox regression model and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to identify the regimen associated with a better remission rate and outcomes. In total, 374 patients with CBF-AML (243 with RUNX1::RUXN1T1 and 131 with CBFB::MYH11) were included in this study. The patients received the HAA or IA regimen (187 each) as the first induction therapy. For patients with RUNX1::RUXN1T1, multivariate analyses showed that the HAA regimen was significantly associated with a higher CR/CRi rate after the first induction (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.3 [95% CI 2.3, 12.2]; p < 0.001) and more favorable relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR = 0.5 [0.3, 0.8], p = 0.01). In PSM analysis, the HAA regimen also had a higher CR/CRi rate (96% vs. 77%, p < 0.001), especially for those harboring wild-type KIT (KITWT) (96% vs. 83%, p = 0.02) or non-D816 KIT mutation (100% vs. 63%, p = 0.002), as well as more favorable RFS (p = 0.01), compared with the IA regimen. However, there was no difference in the remission rate or outcomes between the two regimens for patients with CBFB::MYH11. The HAA regimen as first induction chemotherapy resulted in a higher CR/CRi rate in AML patients with RUNX1::RUNX1T1, especially those harboring KITWT and non-D816 KIT mutation, and a more favorable RFS compared with the IA regimen. The efficacy between the two regimens did not differ in those with CBFB::MYH11.

Comparison of haploidentical-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and intensive immunosuppressive therapy for patients with severe aplastic anemia with an absolute neutrophil count of zero: a retrospective study.

A retrospective analysis was conducted based on the clinical data from 60 patients older than 16 years from January 2016 to January 2021. All the patients were newly diagnosed with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) with an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of zero. We compared the hematological response and survival of haploidentical-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HID-HSCT) (n = 25) and intensive immunosuppressive therapy (IST) (n = 35) treatments. At six months, the overall response rate and complete response were significantly higher in the HID-HSCT group than those in the IST group (84.0% vs. 40.0%, P = 0.001; 80.0% vs. 17.1%, P = 0.001). With a median follow-up of 18.5 months (4.3~30.8 months), patients in the HID-HSCT group had longer overall survival and event-free survival (80.0% vs. 47.9%, P = 0.0419; 79.2% vs. 33.5%, P = 0.0048). These data suggested that HID-HSCT might be an effective alternative treatment option for adult patients with SAA with an ANC of zero, which requires further validation in an additional prospective study.

Efficacy and safety of the C5 inhibitor crovalimab in complement inhibitor-naive patients with PNH (COMMODORE 3): A multicenter, Phase 3, single-arm study.

The Phase 3 single-arm COMMODORE 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04654468) evaluated efficacy and safety of crovalimab (novel C5 inhibitor) in complement inhibitor-naive patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). COMMODORE 3 enrolled patients from five China centers. Eligible complement inhibitor-naive patients with PNH were ≥12 years old, had lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥2 × upper limit of normal (ULN), and had ≥4 transfusions of packed red blood cells within the prior 12 months. Patients received crovalimab loading doses (one intravenous, four subcutaneous) and subsequent every-4-weeks subcutaneous maintenance doses per weight-based tiered-dosing schedule. Co-primary efficacy endpoints were mean proportion of patients with hemolysis control (LDH ≤1.5 × ULN) from Week (W)5 through W25 and difference in proportion of patients with transfusion avoidance from baseline through W25 versus within 24 weeks of prescreening in patients who had ≥1 crovalimab dose and ≥1 central LDH assessment after first dose. Between March 17 and August 24, 2021, 51 patients (15-58 years old) were enrolled; all received treatment. At primary analysis, both co-primary efficacy endpoints were met. Estimated mean proportion of patients with hemolysis control was 78.7% (95% CI: 67.8-86.6). Difference between proportion of patients with transfusion avoidance from baseline through W25 (51.0%; n = 26) versus within 24 weeks of prescreening (0%) was statistically significant (p < .0001). No adverse events led to treatment discontinuation. One treatment-unrelated death (subdural hematoma following a fall) occurred. In conclusion, crovalimab, with every-4-weeks subcutaneous dosing is efficacious and well tolerated in complement inhibitor-naive patients with PNH.

Porcine antilymphocyte globulin versus rabbit antithymocyte globulin for intensive immunosuppressive therapy of acquired aplastic anemia: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Several studies have reported that porcine antilymphocyte globulin (pALG) has a significant effect on aplastic anemia (AA), but their conclusions are inconsistent. To objectively evaluate its efficacy and safety, a meta-analysis was conducted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically searched the relevant literature on pALG vs. rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) as the first-line treatment in AA patients until August 31, 2022, in electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, etc. Two researchers independently extracted data and evaluated the quality of the study. Stata 14.0 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: 50 studies were included in the analysis. The overall responses at 3, 6, and 12 months between the pALG group and rATG group were equivalent. We analyzed early mortality, total mortality, relapse rates, and 5-year survival after the administration of pALG or rATG, and there was no significant difference between the pALG and rATG groups. In our study, the incidence of infection in the pALG group was better than that in the rATG group, OR = 0.63, 95% CI (0.44 - 0.88), p = 0.008, which showed a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of pALG in AA patients is equivalent to that of rATG. rATG was associated with a significantly higher incidence rate of infection than pALG.

A real-word experience of eltrombopag plus rabbit antithymocyte immunoglobulin-based IST in Chinese patients with severe aplastic anemia.

Eltrombopag (EPAG), a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, was approved for the treatment of severe aplastic anemia (SAA) combined with immunosuppressive therapy (IST). However, the effects of real-life use of low doses of EPAG combined with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-based IST in Asian patients with SAA are yet unknown. A total of 121 previously untreated Chinese patients with SAA were enrolled in a multicenter registry of the Chinese Eastern Collaboration Group of Anemia (2014-2020): 67 patients received IST alone and 54 patients received additional EPAG. Patients receiving IST plus EPAG had a higher overall response rate (ORR) at 1 month (P = 0.002), 3 months (P = 0.028), 6 months (P = 0.006), and 12 months (P = 0.031) compared to those receiving IST alone. EPAG was the favorable factor for response efficacy at 6 months. The complete response rate in the EPAG plus IST group was 17% at 3 months, 27% at 6 months, and 32% at 12 months, compared to 7% (P = 0.069), 14% (P = 0.11), and 33% (P = 0.92) for those treated with IST alone. The 2-year overall survival rate in EPAG plus IST and IST alone groups was 98% and 88%, respectively (P = 0.078). The rate of adverse events, including clonal evolution, infection, and transaminitis, was similar in the two cohorts. The addition of EPAG to IST was well-tolerated and associated with high rates of hematologic responses among the previously untreated Chinese patients with SAA.

The loss or absence of minimal residual disease of <0·1% at any time after two cycles of consolidation chemotherapy in CBFB-MYH11-positive acute myeloid leukaemia indicates poor prognosis.

No consensus has been reached on the relationship between CBFB-MYH11 copies and prognosis. Of 1525 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, 58 with CBFB-MYH11-positive AML (16/58 patients with c-kit mutation) were retrospectively analyzed with a median follow-up duration of 29.8 (range: 4.8-74.4) months. Of these, 25/58 (43.1%) patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), 10 of whom had the c-kit mutation. Of the 33 patients who did not undergo allo-HSCT, recurrence in patients with CBFB-MYH11/ABL level >0.1% at any time after two consolidation cycles was significantly higher than in patients with CBFB-MYH11/ABL level <0.1% (61.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.001); further, the 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS; 31.4% vs. 100%, P = 0.004) and event-free survival (EFS; 33.1% vs. 100%, P = 0.004) were significantly decreased in patients with CBFB-MYH11/ABL level >0.1% at any time after two consolidation cycles. The 3-year RFS and EFS rates were lower in patients who did not receive allo-HSCT than in those who did (31.4% vs 84.6%, P = 0.000; 31.4% vs. 80.8%, P = 0.001). CBFB-MYH11-positive AML patients with CBFB-MYH11/ABL level >0.1% at any time after two cycles of consolidation had poor prognoses, and allo-HSCT could improve their survival.

PML-RARA transcript levels at the end of induction therapy are associated with prognosis in non-high-risk acute promyelocytic leukaemia with all-trans retinoic acid plus arsenic in front-line therapy: long-term follow-up of a single-centre cohort study.

Despite the high cure probability for acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL), a minority of patients will relapse and the risk factors for relapse are unclear. We retrospectively analysed 212 patients who were diagnosed with non-high-risk APL and received all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) plus arsenic as front-line therapy at Peking University Institute of Hematology from February 2014 to December 2018. A total of 176 patients (83%) received oral arsenic (realgar-indigo naturalis formula) plus ATRA, 36 patients (17%) received arsenic trioxide plus ATRA and 203 patients were evaluable for relapse. After a median (range) follow-up of 53·6 (24·3-85·4) months, two patients had molecular relapse and eight had haematological relapse. A promyelocytic leukaemia/retinoic acid receptor alpha (PML-RARA) transcript level of ≥6·5% at the end of induction therapy was associated with relapse (P = 0·031). The 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse, event-free survival and overall survival were 5·5%, 92·3% and 96·3% respectively. In conclusion, the present long-term follow-up study further confirmed the high cure probability of ATRA plus oral arsenic as front-line therapy for non-high-risk APL and showed that the PML-RARA transcript level at the end of induction therapy was associated with relapse.

Both the subtypes of KIT mutation and minimal residual disease are associated with prognosis in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective clinical cohort study in single center.

Core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML), including cases with KIT mutation, is currently defined as a low-risk AML. However, some patients have poor response to treatment, and the prognostic significance of KIT mutation is still controversial. This study aimed to explore the prognostic significance of different KIT mutation subtypes and minimal residual disease (MRD) in CBF-AML. We retrospectively evaluated continuous patients diagnosed with CBF-AML in our center between January 2014 and April 2019. Of the 215 patients, 147 (68.4%) and 68 (31.6%) patients were RUNX1-RUNX1T1- and CBFB-MYH11 positive, respectively. KIT mutations were found in 71 (33.0%) patients; of them, 38 (53.5%) had D816/D820 mutations. After excluding 10 patients who died or were lost to follow-up within a half year, 42.0% (n = 86) of the remaining 205 patients received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). An MRD > 0.1% at the end of two cycles of consolidation predicted relapse (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that D816 or D820 mutations and MRD > 0.1% at the end of two cycles of consolidation were independent adverse factors affecting relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Allo-HSCT could improve RFS (74.4% vs. 34.6%, P < 0.001) and OS (78.1% vs. 52.3%, P = 0.002). In conclusion, high-risk CBF-AML patients must be identified before treatment. D816/D820 mutation, MRD > 0.1% at the end of two cycles of consolidation chemotherapy predicted poor survivals, and allo-HSCT can improve the survival of properly identified patients.

Detection of measurable residual disease may better predict outcomes than mutations based on next-generation sequencing in acute myeloid leukaemia with biallelic mutations of CEBPA.

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients with biallelic mutations of CEBPA (bi CEBPA) have a 30-50% relapse rate. This study established the value of mutations based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) and multiparameter flow cytometric measurable residual disease (MFC-MRD) detection and compared the outcomes. From 2014 to 2018, 124 newly diagnosed bi CEBPA AML patients were treated. The median age was 37·5 (16-69) years. The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 33·0%, 64·7% and 84·3%, respectively. Patients without additional mutations and with GATA2 mutations were defined as 'NGS low risk', which was the only favourable independent factor for CIR and RFS of pretreatment parameters. Patients with sustained positive MRD after two consolidation cycles and MRD negative losses at any time were defined as 'MRD high risk', which was the only poor independent factor for CIR, RFS and OS, including pretreatment and post-treatment parameters. In CR2 and non-remission patients who underwent allo-HSCT, superior OS was achieved. We conclude that NGS low risk was a favourable factor in the analysis of pretreatment parameters. MRD risk stratification was an independent prognostic factor in pretreatment and post-treatment parameters. Relapsed patients still have a favourable outcome followed by allo-HSCT.

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation versus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Combined with Chemotherapy in Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Here we compare outcomes between the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) plus chemotherapy regimen and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (transplantation cohort) in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) and explore factors associated with prognosis. Data from 145 Ph+ ALL patients were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were treated with imatinib plus chemotherapy and then transplantation or continuous TKIs with chemotherapy based on patient preference. A total of 145 Ph+ ALL patients were recruited for this study (median age, 37 years; range, 14 to 65). Among these patients, 81 were men (55.9%) and 86 underwent IKZF1 detection, which identified 59 patients (68.6%) with IKZF1 deletions. After treatment 136 patients (95.8%) achieved complete remission (CR) eventually. With a median follow-up of 33 months (range, 4 to 114) for CR patients, 77 patients (57.9%) underwent transplantation and 56 (42.1%) received continuous TKIs with chemotherapy. At the 4-year follow-up the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were 29.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.9% to 34.4%), 60.9% (95% CI, 56.5% to 65.3%), and 69.2% (95% CI, 65.1% to 73.3%), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that WBC counts < 30 × 109/L at diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR], 4.2; 95% CI, 1.9 to 9.2; P < .001; HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.9; P = .003; HR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4 to 5.4; P = .003), 3-log reduction of BCR-ABL levels from baseline after 2 consolidation cycles (HR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.9 to 9.9; P < .001; HR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.7 to 5.9; P < .001; HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.9 to 8.7; P = .001; defined as "minimal residual disease low level"), and transplantation (HR, 5.0; 95% CI, 2.2 to 11.2; P < .001; HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.7 to 6.4; P < .001; HR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.9 to 8.7; P < .001) were the favorable factors of CIR, DFS, and OS. According to the first 2 risk factors, CR patients were divided into 3 groups: low risk (no factor, n = 42, 31.6%), intermediate risk (1 factor, n = 73, 54.9%), and high risk (2 factors, n = 18, 13.5%). In the low-risk group at the 4-year follow up no significant difference existed between the transplant and nontransplant arms for the probabilities of CIR (8.5% versus 7.7%, P = .671), DFS (88.2% versus 83.9%, P = .426), and OS (96.6% versus 83.3%, P = .128). In the intermediate- and high-risk groups at the 4-year follow-up, CIR (23.6% versus 36.9%, P = .017; 37.5% versus 100.0%, P <.001), DFS (62.4% versus 43.8%, P = .048; 56.2% versus 0%, P <.001), and OS (76.1% versus 47.7%, P = .037; 51.4% versus 6.3%, P = .001) rates were significantly better in the transplant arm than in the nontransplant arm. In surviving patients of the low-risk group, no difference in complete molecular response (CMR) rates (85.7% versus 72.7%, P = .379) between the transplant and nontransplant arms was found. However, in the intermediate-risk group the proportion of CMR was significantly higher in the transplant arm than in the nontransplant arm (82.8% versus 42.9%, P = .006). In the high-risk group 4 of 7 transplant patients (57.1%) were in CMR, and no patients survived in the nontransplant arm. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation confers significant survival advantages for Ph+ ALL patients compared with TKIs plus chemotherapy, especially in intermediate- and high-risk patients.

First-line choice for severe aplastic anemia in children: Transplantation from a haploidentical donor vs immunosuppressive therapy.

We retrospectively compared the outcomes of children with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) who received immunosuppressive therapy (IST) or who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from a haploidentical donor (HID), between 2007 and 2016. A total of 52 children with SAA under the age of 17 years were initially treated with IST (n = 24) or haploidentical HSCT (n = 28) as first-line treatment. The estimated 10-year overall survival was 73.4 ± 12.6% and 89.3 ± 5.8% in patients treated with IST or HID-HSCT (P = .806). The failure-free survival was significantly inferior in patients receiving IST than in those undergoing transplantation from an HID (52.6 ± 10.5% vs 89.3 ± 5.8, P = .008). In univariate and multivariate analysis, the choice of first-line immunosuppressive therapy was the only adverse predictor for failure-free survival. At the last follow-up, completely normal blood count was observed in 11 of 20 (55.0%) and 24 of 25 (96.0%) live cases in IST and HID-HSCT cohort (P = .003). These suggest that HSCT from a haploidentical donor could be considered as first-line treatment in children who lack a matched related donor, especially in experienced transplantation centers.

High EVI1 Expression Predicts Poor Outcomes in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Intermediate Cytogenetic Risk Receiving Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND Acute myeloid leukemia with intermediate cytogenetic risk (ICR-AML) needs to be stratified. The abnormal gene expression might be prognostic, and its cutoff value for patient grouping is pivotal. MATERIAL AND METHODS Ecotropic viral integration site 1 (EVI1) transcripts were assessed in 191 adult ICR-AML patients at diagnosis who received chemotherapy only. MLL-PTD, WT1 transcript levels, FLT3-ITD, and NPM1 mutations were simultaneously evaluated, and 27 normal bone marrow samples were tested to define normal threshold. RESULTS The normal upper limit of EVI1 transcript levels was 8.0%. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that 1.0% (a 0.9-log reduction from the normal limit) was the EVI1 optimal cutoff value for significantly differentiating relapse (P=0.049). A total of 23 patients (12%) had EVI1 levels ≥1.0%. EVI1 ≥1.0% had no effect on CR achievement, whereas it was significantly associated with lower 2-year relapse-free survival (RFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates in the entire cohort (P=0.0003, 0.0017, and 0.0009, respectively), patients with normal karyotypes (P=0.0032, 0.0047, and 0.0007, respectively), and FLT3-ITD (-) patients (all P<0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that EVI1 ≥1.0% was an independent adverse prognostic factor for RFS, DFS, and OS in the entire cohort. In addition, patients with EVI1 transcript levels between 1.0% and 8.0% had 2-year RFS rates similar to those with EVI1 ≥8.0%, and they both had significantly lower RFS rates than those with EVI1 <1.0% (P=0.0005 and 0.027). CONCLUSIONS High EVI1 expression predicts poor outcome in ICR-AML patients receiving chemotherapy. The optimal cutoff value for patient stratification is different from the normal limit.

[Hypermethylation of CpG island in promoter region of MEIS1 gene and its expression in HOX11(+) acute T lymphoblastic leukemia].

OBJECTIVE: To detect the status of methylation in promoter region of MEIS1 gene and its expression in cell lines and patients with HOX11(+) T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and explore the relationship between the expression level of MEIS1 gene and methylation of CpG island in promoter region. METHODS: The methylation pattern in MEIS1 gene was detected with bisulfite sequencing PCR, DNA methylation immunoprecipitation and promoter oligonucleotide microarray. And the expression level of MEIS1 mRNA was detected with reverse transcription PCR in 3 T-ALL cell lines: sil-ALL, DND41 and RPMI as well as in 75 clinical bone marrow samples including 38 de novo T-ALL patients, 29 complete remission T-ALL patients and 8 normal samples from January 2009 to December 2011. RESULTS: The expressions of HOX11 mRNA in the patients were classified into high expression (HOX11(+)) groups (n = 14) and low expression (HOX11(-)) groups (n = 24) . There was hypermethylation of CpG island in promoter region of MEIS1 gene in patients with HOX11(+) T-ALL. The methylation rate of promoter CpG islands of MEIS1 gene in HOX11(+) T-ALL (76.8%) was significantly higher than that of HOX11(-) T-ALL (29.5%) (P < 0.01). The expression MEIS1 in complete remission T-ALL patients and normal samples was significantly lower than that in de novo T-ALL patients (both P < 0.05) . The expression MEIS1 in HOX11(+) cell lines was significantly lower than that in HOX11(-) cell lines (0.392 ± 0.226,0.378 ± 0.317 vs 1.059 ± 0.533, both P < 0.05) and the expression level of MEIS1 in HOX11(+) T-ALL patients (0.462 ± 0.281) significantly lower than that in HOX11(-) T-ALL patients (0.916 ± 0.437) (P < 0.01). The relationship between MEIS1 and HOX11 mRNA expression level had a negative correlation (rs = -0.416, P < 0.01) . The expression level of MEIS1 gene was negatively correlated with the methylation of CpG island in promoter region in T-ALL (rs = -0.383, P < 0.01) . CONCLUSIONS: The expression of MEIS1 becomes down-regulated or even lost by promoter methylation in T-ALL. HOX11 maybe a negative regulator of MEIS1 gene.