Donafenib inhibits PARP1 expression and induces DNA damage, in combination with PARP1 inhibitors promotes apoptosis in liver cancer cells.

Liver cancer is a prevalent malignant tumor globally. The newly approved first-line drug, donafenib, is a novel oral small molecule multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has significant antitumor effects on liver cancer. This study aims to investigate the antitumor effects of donafenib on liver cancer and to explore its potential mechanisms. Donafenib significantly inhibited the viability of Huh-7 and HCCLM3 cells, inhibited malignant cell proliferation, and promoted cell apoptosis, as demonstrated by CCK-8, EdU, and Calcein/PI (propidium iodide) staining experiments. The results of DNA damage detection experiments and western blot analysis indicate that donafenib caused considerable DNA damage in liver cancer cells. The analysis of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) in liver cancer patients using online bioinformatics data websites such as TIMER2.0, GEPIA, UALCAN, cBioPortal, Kaplan-Meier Plotter, and HPA revealed a high expression of PARP1, which is associated with poor prognosis. Molecular docking and western blot analysis demonstrated that donafenib can directly target and downregulate the protein expression of PARP1, a DNA damage repair protein, thereby promoting DNA damage in liver cancer cells. Western blot and immunofluorescence detection showed that the group treated with donafenib combined with PARP1 inhibitor had significantly higher expression of γ-H2AX and 8-OHdG compared to the groups treated with donafenib or PARP1 inhibitors alone, the combined treatment suppresses the expression of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl2 and enhances the protein expression level of the proapoptotic protein Bcl-2-associated X protein (BAX). These data suggest that the combination of donafenib and a PARP1 inhibitor results in more significant DNA damage in cells and promotes cell apoptosis. Thus, the combination of donafenib and PARP1 inhibitors has the potential to be a treatment option for liver cancer.

E2F2 enhances the chemoresistance of pancreatic cancer to gemcitabine by regulating the cell cycle and upregulating the expression of RRM2.

Both pro-oncogenic and anti-oncogenic effects of E2F2 have been revealed in different malignancies. However, the precise role of E2F2 in pancreatic cancer, in particular in relation to therapeutic intervention with gemcitabine, remains unclear. In this study, the effect of E2F2 on the proliferation and cell cycle modulation of pancreatic cancer cells, and whether E2F2 plays a role in the treatment of pancreatic cancer cells by gemcitabine, were investigated. The expression of E2F2 in pancreatic cancer was assessed by various methods including bioinformatics prediction, Western blotting, and real-time PCR. The effect of E2F2 on the proliferation and cell cycling of pancreatic cancer cells was analyzed by tissue culture and flow cytometry. In addition, the effect of E2F2 on the intervention of pancreatic cancer by gemcitabine was investigated using both in vitro and in vivo approaches. The expression of E2F2 was found to be significantly increased in pancreatic cancer tissues and cell lines. The pathogenic capacity of E2F2 lied in the fact that this transcription factor promoted the transformation of pancreatic cancer cell cycle from G1-phase to S-phase, thus enhancing the proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells. Furthermore, the expression of E2F2 was increased in pancreatic cancer cells in the presence of gemcitabine, and the augmented expression of E2F2 upregulated the gemcitabine resistance-related gene RRM2 and its downstream signaling molecule deoxycytidine kinase (DCK). The resistance of pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine was confirmed using both in vitro and in vivo models. In this study, E2F2 has been demonstrated for the first time to play a pro-oncogenic role in pancreatic cancer by promoting the transition of the cell cycle from G1-phase to S-phase and, therefore, enhancing the proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells. E2F2 has also been demonstrated to enhance the chemotherapy resistance of pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine by upregulating the expression of RRM2 and DCK that is downstream of RRM2.

Surgical treatment of liver inflammatory pseudotumor-like follicular dendritic cell sarcoma: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory pseudotumor-like follicular dendritic cell sarcoma (IPT-like FDCS) is rare with a low malignant potential. Hepatic IPT-like FDCS has similar clinical features to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), making it extremely difficult to distinguish between them in clinical practice. We describe the case of a young female patient diagnosed with HCC before surgery, which was pathologically diagnosed as IPT-like FDCS after the left half of the liver was resected. During 6 mo of follow-up, the patient recovered well with no signs of recurrence or metastasis. CASE SUMMARY: A 23-year-old female patient with a 2-year history of hepatitis B presented to the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University. She was asymptomatic at presentation, and the findings from routine laboratory examinations were normal except for slightly elevated alpha-fetoprotein levels. However, ultrasonography revealed a 3-cm diameter mass in the left hepatic lobe, and abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed that the tumor had asymmetrical enhancement during the arterial phase, which declined during the portal venous phase, and had a pseudo-capsule appearance. Based on the findings from clinical assessments and imaging, the patient was diagnosed with HCC, for which she was hospitalized and had undergone laparoscopic left hepatectomy. However, the tumor specimens submitted for pathological analyses revealed IPT-like FDCS. After surgical removal of the tumor, the patient recovered. In addition, the patient continued to recover well during 6 mo of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Hepatic IPT-like FDCS is difficult to distinguish from HCC. Hepatectomy may provide beneficial outcomes in non-metastatic hepatic IPT-like FDCS.