Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Med Internet Res ; 26: e46455, 2024 Aug 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39163593

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy and gestation information is routinely recorded in electronic medical record (EMR) systems across China in various data sets. The combination of data on the number of pregnancies and gestations can imply occurrences of abortions and other pregnancy-related issues, which is important for clinical decision-making and personal privacy protection. However, the distribution of this information inside EMR is variable due to inconsistent IT structures across different EMR systems. A large-scale quantitative evaluation of the potential exposure of this sensitive information has not been previously performed, ensuring the protection of personal information is a priority, as emphasized in Chinese laws and regulations. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to perform the first nationwide quantitative analysis of the identification sites and exposure frequency of sensitive pregnancy and gestation information. The goal is to propose strategies for effective information extraction and privacy protection related to women's health. METHODS: This study was conducted in a national health care data network. Rule-based protocols for extracting pregnancy and gestation information were developed by a committee of experts. A total of 6 different sub-data sets of EMRs were used as schemas for data analysis and strategy proposal. The identification sites and frequencies of identification in different sub-data sets were calculated. Manual quality inspections of the extraction process were performed by 2 independent groups of reviewers on 1000 randomly selected records. Based on these statistics, strategies for effective information extraction and privacy protection were proposed. RESULTS: The data network covered hospitalized patients from 19 hospitals in 10 provinces of China, encompassing 15,245,055 patients over an 11-year period (January 1, 2010-December 12, 2020). Among women aged 14-50 years, 70% were randomly selected from each hospital, resulting in a total of 1,110,053 patients. Of these, 688,268 female patients with sensitive reproductive information were identified. The frequencies of identification were variable, with the marriage history in admission medical records being the most frequent at 63.24%. Notably, more than 50% of female patients were identified with pregnancy and gestation history in nursing records, which is not generally considered a sub-data set rich in reproductive information. During the manual curation and review process, 1000 cases were randomly selected, and the precision and recall rates of the information extraction method both exceeded 99.5%. The privacy-protection strategies were designed with clear technical directions. CONCLUSIONS: Significant amounts of critical information related to women's health are recorded in Chinese routine EMR systems and are distributed in various parts of the records with different frequencies. This requires a comprehensive protocol for extracting and protecting the information, which has been demonstrated to be technically feasible. Implementing a data-based strategy will enhance the protection of women's privacy and improve the accessibility of health care services.


Asunto(s)
Confidencialidad , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , China , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(6): e2418800, 2024 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38922614

RESUMEN

Importance: Among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate response to methotrexate, a treatment sequence initiated with biosimilar disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) provides better clinical efficacy compared with conventional synthetic DMARDs recommended by current treatment guidelines; but its cost-effectiveness evidence remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the treatment sequence initiated with biosimilar DMARDs after failure with methotrexate vs leflunomide and inform formulary listing decisions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This economic evaluation's cost-effectiveness analysis was performed at a Hong Kong public institution using the Markov disease transition model to simulate the lifetime disease progression and cost for patients with RA, using monetary value in 2022. Scenario and sensitivity analyses were performed to test the internal validity of the modeling conclusion. Participants included patients diagnosed with RA from 2000 to 2021 who were retrieved retrospectively from local electronic medical records to generate model input parameters. Statistical analysis was performed from January 2023 to March 2024. Interventions: The model assesses 3 competing treatment sequences initiated with biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13), biosimilar adalimumab (ABP-501), and leflunomide; all used in combination with methotrexate. Main Outcomes and Measures: Lifetime health care cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of the simulated cohort. Results: In total, 25 099 patients with RA were identified (mean [SD] age, 56 [17] years; 19 469 [72.7%] women). In the base-case analysis, the lifetime health care cost and QALYs for the treatment sequence initiated with leflunomide were US $154 632 and 14.82 QALYs, respectively; for biosimilar infliximab, they were US $152 326 and 15.35 QALYs, respectively; and for biosimilar adalimumab, they were US $145 419 and 15.55 QALYs, respectively. Both biosimilar sequences presented lower costs and greater QALYs than the leflunomide sequence. In the deterministic sensitivity analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (US$/QALY) comparing biosimilar infliximab sequence vs leflunomide sequence and biosimilar adalimumab sequence vs leflunomide sequence ranged from -15 797 to -8615 and -9088 to 10 238, respectively, all below the predefined willingness-to-pay threshold (US $48 555/QALY gain). In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the probability of treatment sequence initiated with leflunomide, biosimilar infliximab, and biosmilar adalimumab being cost-effective out of 10 000 iterations was 0%, 9%, and 91%, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In this economic evaluation study, the treatment sequences initiated with biosimilar DMARDs were cost-effective compared with the treatment sequence initiated with leflunomide in managing patients with RA who experienced failure with the initial methotrexate treatment. These results suggest the need to update clinical treatment guidelines for initiating biosimilars immediately after the failure of methotrexate for patients with RA.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Leflunamida , Humanos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reumatoide/economía , Leflunamida/uso terapéutico , Leflunamida/economía , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/economía , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/economía , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Infliximab/economía , Adulto , Hong Kong , Estudios Retrospectivos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Adalimumab/economía , Anciano
3.
Health Care Sci ; 2(3): 135-152, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38939112

RESUMEN

Since the identification of the first case of pneumonia of unknown cause in 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic has spread the globe for over 3 years. As the most populous country in the world, China's disease prevention policies and response plans concern the health of the country's 1.4 billion people and beyond. During the course of the pandemic, scientific research has been accumulated and given evidence-based support to the official guidance of COVID-19 management. The National Health Commission of China have compiled, published, and updated a total of 10 versions of the "Diagnosis and Treatment Protocol for COVID-19 Patients" to better inform clinical practitioners and staff to effectively screen, diagnose, manage, treat, and care for cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. This paper compares and summarizes each version of the protocol in terms of etiology and epidemiology, clinical manifestation and diagnosis, treatment and nursing, disease control and management, presenting detailed changes, additions, deletions, and refinement of the protocols.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA