Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Gut ; 69(5): 801-810, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32047093

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has proved to be an extremely effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection, and there is interest in its potential application in other gastrointestinal and systemic diseases. However, the recent death and episode of septicaemia following FMT highlights the need for further appraisal and guidelines on donor evaluation, production standards, treatment facilities and acceptable clinical indications. DESIGN: For these consensus statements, a 24-member multidisciplinary working group voted online and then convened in-person, using a modified Delphi approach to formulate and refine a series of recommendations based on best evidence and expert opinion. Invitations to participate were directed to Australian experts, with an international delegate assisting the development. The following issues regarding the use of FMT in clinical practice were addressed: donor selection and screening, clinical indications, requirements of FMT centres and future directions. Evidence was rated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on 27 statements to provide guidance on best practice in FMT. These include: (1) minimum standards for donor screening with recommended clinical selection criteria, blood and stool testing; (2) accepted routes of administration; (3) clinical indications; (4) minimum standards for FMT production and requirements for treatment facilities acknowledging distinction between single-site centres (eg, hospital-based) and stool banks; and (5) recommendations on future research and product development. CONCLUSIONS: These FMT consensus statements provide comprehensive recommendations around the production and use of FMT in clinical practice with relevance to clinicians, researchers and policy makers.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Clostridium/terapia , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Australia , Consenso , Selección de Donante , Femenino , Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Med J Aust ; 206(3): 132-135, 2017 Feb 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28208046

RESUMEN

There is an ongoing investigation into infections with non-tuberculous mycobacteria associated with contaminated heater-cooler units used in cardiac surgery. The overall risk is low, but surgical site and disseminated infections have been reported, including one possible case in Australia, mainly with surgery involving implantation of prosthetic material. Mycobacterium chimaera infection should be considered in patients who have previously undergone surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and who present with cardiac or disseminated infection or sternal wound infection unresponsive to standard antibiotic therapy. Where cases are suspected, patients should be investigated and managed in consultation with an infectious diseases physician and/or clinical microbiologist. If cases are confirmed or heater-cooler devices are found to be contaminated, details should be reported to the hospital infection control team, the jurisdictional health department, the Therapeutic Goods Administration and the Australian distributor of the affected heater-cooler unit(s). Measures to manage risk should include communicating with relevant hospital departments, ensuring that the manufacturer's updated instructions for use are followed, regular testing of machines, and reviewing the location of machines when in use.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/microbiología , Micobacterias no Tuberculosas , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología , Australia , Humanos , Esternón
4.
Commun Dis Intell Q Rep ; 40(2): E236-43, 2016 Jun 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27522135

RESUMEN

From 1 January to 31 December 2014, 27 institutions around Australia participated in the Australian Enterococcal Sepsis Outcome Programme (AESOP). The aim of AESOP 2014 was to determine the proportion of enterococcal bacteraemia isolates in Australia that were antimicrobial resistant, and to characterise the molecular epidemiology of the Enterococcus faecium isolates. Of the 952 unique episodes of bacteraemia investigated, 94.4% were caused by either E. faecalis (54.9%) or E. faecium (39.9%). Ampicillin resistance was detected in 0.6% of E. faecalis and in 89.4% of E. faecium. Vancomycin non-susceptibility was reported in 0.2% and 46.1% of E. faecalis and E. faecium respectively. Overall 51.1% of E. faecium harboured vanA or vanB genes. For the vanA/B positive E. faecium isolates, 81.5% harboured vanB genes and 18.5% vanA genes. The percentage of E. faecium bacteraemia isolates resistant to vancomycin in Australia is significantly higher than that seen in most European countries. E. faecium consisted of 113 pulsed-field gel electrophoresis pulsotypes of which 68.9% of isolates were classified into 14 major pulsotypes containing 5 or more isolates. Multilocus sequence typing grouped the 14 major pulsotypes into clonal cluster 17, a major hospital-adapted polyclonal E. faecium cluster. The geographical distribution of the 4 predominant sequence types (ST203, ST796, ST555 and ST17) varied with only ST203 identified across most regions of Australia. Overall 74.7% of isolates belonging to the four predominant STs harboured vanA or vanB genes. In conclusion, the AESOP 2014 has shown enterococcal bacteraemias in Australia are frequently caused by polyclonal ampicillin-resistant high-level gentamicin resistant vanA or vanB E. faecium, which have limited treatment options.


Asunto(s)
Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Enterococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Sepsis/epidemiología , Sepsis/microbiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Informes Anuales como Asunto , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Australia/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Enterococcus/clasificación , Enterococcus/genética , Femenino , Genotipo , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tipificación de Secuencias Multilocus , Fenotipo , Vigilancia de la Población , Adulto Joven
7.
Crit Care Resusc ; 20(2): 109-116, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29852849

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing has been reported to decrease bloodstream infections and colonisation of multidrug-resistant organisms (MROs) in intensive care units (ICUs). However, its effectiveness in an Australian setting has not been assessed. OBJECTIVE: To test whether the introduction of ICU-wide CHG bathing in place of triclosan would affect rates of the primary outcome of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), or the secondary outcomes of ICU-acquired positive blood cultures or other clinical specimens, and MRO colonisation including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, sequential, before-and-after observational study. Patient microbiological and clinical data were compared in the 12 months before and after the introduction of CHG bathing in the ICU. RESULTS: A total of 4262 ICU admissions were studied, 2117 before and 2145 during the CHG-bathing period. There were no significant changes in the rates of CLABSI (from 1.69/1000 central venous catheter-days [95% CI, 0.68-3.48] to 1.33 [95% CI, 0.49-2.90]; P = 0.68), or ICU-acquired positive blood cultures (from 5.14/1000 patientdays [95% CI, 3.45-7.39] to 4.45 [95% CI, 3.00-6.36]; P = 0.58). However, we observed a lower incidence of MRSA acquisition during the CHG-bathing period (mean difference, -2.13 [95% CI, -3.65 to -0.60] per 1000 patient-days; P = 0.007). There was no difference in the rate of isolates involving other pathogens including VRE. CONCLUSIONS: In a tertiary Australian ICU, routine CHG bathing compared with triclosan did not affect the rates of ICU-acquired CLABSI or positive blood cultures. However, it significantly decreased the incidence of MRSA acquisition.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Baños/métodos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Clorhexidina/análogos & derivados , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/efectos de los fármacos , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA