First results of the French OCTOPUS survey among festival attendees: a latent class analysis.

BACKGROUND: Illicit substance use has constantly evolved over the years, particularly in the party scene. Monitoring these changes is essential to adapt harm reduction strategies. The OCTOPUS survey was implemented to enhance knowledge on drug use at music festivals. The objective of the work presented here was to describe drug use and to characterize profiles of substance use in music festival attendees. METHODS: OCTOPUS was a cross-sectional survey carried out during 13 various music festivals (dub, eclectic and electronic music) in the Loire-Atlantique department (France) from July 2017 to July 2018. Participants were festival attendees. Data were collected by trained research staff using a face-to-face structured interview. We analysed the use of illicit drugs in the last 12 months to describe the prevalence of use and to characterize the profile of substance use using a latent class analysis. RESULTS: In total, 383 festival attendees were included. Of 314 (82%) participants who reported drug use, the most reported drugs were cannabis, ecstasy/MDMA and cocaine. We identified two profiles of drug use: (i) a "no/low polysubstance use" profile mainly characterized by the use of "classic" stimulants (ecstasy/MDMA, cocaine) and (ii) "moderate/extensive polysubstance use", with high probabilities of "classic" stimulants use and especially other drugs reported: speed, ketamine, new psychoactive substances (NPSs). CONCLUSION: We observed frequent polysubstance use in festival attendees. Harm reduction should be targeted at the increased risk of toxicity linked to polysubstance use, and the reduction in harm caused by particular drugs (ketamine, NPS, speed) could be further strengthened.

Potential drug-drug interactions when managing status epilepticus patients in intensive care: A cohort study.

AIMS: The risk for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) associated with antiseizure drugs (ASDs) used to manage status epilepticus (SE) patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been poorly investigated. We aimed to quantify and describe those potential DDIs and determine SE patient risk profiles. METHODS: We conducted an observational bi-centric cohort study including all SE patients admitted to the ICU in the period 2016-2020. RESULTS: Overall, 431 SE patients were included and 5504 potential DDIs were identified including 1772 DDIs (33%) between ASDs, 2610 DDIs (47%) between ASDs and previous usual treatments (PUTs), and 1067 DDIs (20%) between ASDs and ICU treatments (ICUTs). DDIs were moderate (n = 4871), major (n = 562) or severe (n = 16). All patients exhibited potential DDIs, which were major-to-severe DDIs in 47% of the cases. DDIs were pharmacokinetic (n = 1972, 36%), mostly involving cytochrome P450 modulators, and pharmacodynamic (n = 3477, 64%), mainly leading to increased sedation. ASD/PUT DDIs were the most frequent and severe. Age, PUT and ASD drug numbers and length of ICU stay were significantly associated with increased DDI number. We identified four SE patient profiles with different DDI risks and outcomes including (1) epileptic or brain trauma patients, (2) withdrawal syndrome patients, (3) older patients with comorbidities and (4) self-poisoned patients with psychiatric disorders and/or past epilepsy. CONCLUSION: SE patients are subject to potential DDIs between ASDs, ASD/PUT and ASD/ICUT. Major-to-severe DDIs mostly occur between ASDs and PUTs. Physicians should pay attention to SE patient characteristics and history to limit DDI numbers and prevent their consequences.

CYP1A2 and tobacco interaction: a major pharmacokinetic challenge during smoking cessation.

Smoking cessation is underestimated in terms of drug interactions. Abrupt smoking cessation is common in cases of emergency hospitalization and restrictions of movement. Tobacco is a known cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) inducer, its consumption and withdrawal can lead to major pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Nevertheless, references do exist, but may have different results between them. The objective of our work was to establish the broadest and most consensual list as possible of CYP1A2 substrates treatments and propose a pharmacological approach. We searched the widest possible list of CYP1A2 substrates based on various international references. We compared the references and defined probability and reliability scores of our results to sort the substances based on the scores. For the 245 substances identified as CYP1A2 substrates, we focused on the 63 CYP1A2 substrates with both probability and reliability scores >50%. Our work establishes adaptive pharmacological approaches for the management of patients initiating smoking cessation which must be integrated into the management of smoking cessation. Pharmacologists can now adopt adaptive pharmacological approaches to complement patient-specific clinical information about smoking cessation by considering pharmacokinetic risk. This work establishes an unprecedented list. It should guide in the care of patients initiating smoking cessation to prevent pharmacokinetic drug interactions.

Change in the regulatory framework for zolpidem: What is the impact on the landscape of the prescription of sedative medications? The French national ZORRO study.

AIMS: In recent years, zolpidem has been the subject of numerous reports of misuse, abuse and dependence. In view of these risks, the French drug agency (ANSM) decreed in April 2017 the implementation of secure prescription pads. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of this regulatory measure on the prescription of zolpidem and other sedative medications (zopiclone, benzodiazepines and antihistamines) in long-term users of zolpidem and associated factors. METHODS: We performed a historical cohort study using data from the Generalist Sample of Beneficiaries (EGB). All patients aged over 18 years old who were long-term users (at least 3 months) before the measure were enacted. We analysed the reimbursement trajectories of zolpidem, zopiclone, benzodiazepines and antihistamines (hydroxyzine and alimemazine) up to 2 years after the measure using a state sequence analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 2502 patients were analysed. A four-cluster typology was identified: continuation of zolpidem (n = 1044, 42%), discontinuation of sedative medications (n = 766, 31%), change to zopiclone (n = 537, 21%) and change to hypnotic benzodiazepines (n = 155, 6%). The most frequently prescribed hypnotic benzodiazepine was lormetazepam. We identified age, sex, treatment for psychiatric or addictive disorder and volume of zolpidem use before the measure as factors associated with different reimbursement trajectories after the regulatory change. CONCLUSION: The regulatory change for zolpidem prescriptions reduced exposure to zolpidem among long-term users and also had a broad impact on prescriptions of other sedative medications. Switching to other medications that also present a potential risk of abuse or dependence should be carefully monitored.

Assessment of drug-drug interaction in an elderly human immunodeficiency virus population: Comparison of 3 expert databases.

AIMS: Polypharmacy increase the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in the elderly population living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Several expert databases can be used to evaluate DDIs. The aim of the study was to describe actual DDIs between antiretroviral drugs and comedications in an elderly population and to compare grading of the DDIs in 3 databases. METHODS: All treatments of HIV-infected subjects aged 65 years and older were collected in 6 French HIV centres. Summary of Product Characteristic (SPC), French DDI Thesaurus (THES), and Liverpool HIV DDI website (LIV) were used to define each DDI and specific grade. DDIs were classified in yellow flag interaction (undefined grade in SPC and THES or potential weak interaction in LIV), amber flag interaction (to be considered/precaution of use in SPC and THES and potential interaction in LIV) and red flag interaction (not recommended/contraindication in SPC and THES and do not administer/contraindication in LIV). RESULTS: Among 239 subjects included, 60 (25.1%) had at least 1 DDI for a total of 126 DDIs: 23/126 red flag DDIs were identified in 17 patients. All these 23 DDIs were identified in LIV. THES and SPC missed 6 and 1 red flag DDIs, respectively. Seven of 23 red flag DDIs were identified in the 3 databases concomitantly. CONCLUSION: Polypharmacy is frequent in this elderly HIV population leading to DDI in a quarter of the subjects. The discrepancies between databases can be explained by differences in analysis methods. A consensus between databases would be helpful for clinicians.

Benzodiazepine withdrawal in older people: what is the prevalence, what are the signs, and which patients?

PURPOSE: Benzodiazepines (BZDs) and related drugs (Z-drugs) are mainly taken chronically, and older people are much more likely to take them on a chronic basis despite recommendations. Withdrawal symptoms could be an obstacle to stopping BZD/Z-drug administration. The main objective of this study is to estimate the prevalence of withdrawal symptoms in patients aged 65 years and older who have experience a stop of BZD/Z-drug. The secondary objectives are to describe the withdrawal symptoms and identify factors associated. METHOD: This ancillary study was based on a national observational study in patients with chronic BZD/Z-drug consumption. Patients who made at least one BZD/Z-drug stop experience were selected. Withdrawal symptoms are described, and a logistic regression was carried out to identify the variables most associated with withdrawal symptoms. RESULTS: In total, 697 patients were selected: 78% experienced at least one withdrawal symptom after a stop administering BZDs or Z-drugs; most of the withdrawal symptoms were psychological disorders. CONCLUSION: Our study identifies a specific population experiencing withdrawal symptoms and who cannot stop administering BZD/Z-drug. We assume that withdrawal symptoms in patients with chronic use play an essential role in the nonstop use of BZD/Z-drugs.

Development and validation of a dosing nomogram for amoxicillin in infective endocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Amoxicillin is the first-line treatment for streptococcal or enterococcal infective endocarditis (IE) with a dose regimen adapted to weight. OBJECTIVES: Covariates influencing pharmacokinetics (PK) of amoxicillin were identified in order to develop a dosing nomogram based on identified covariates for individual adaptation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients treated with amoxicillin administered by continuous infusion for IE were included retrospectively. The population PK analysis was performed using the Pmetrics package for R (NPAG algorithm). Influence of weight, ideal weight, height, BMI, body surface area, glomerular filtration rate adapted to the body surface area and calculated by the CKD-EPI method (mL/min), additional ceftriaxone treatment and serum protein level on amoxicillin PK was tested. A nomogram was then developed to determine the daily dose needed to achieve a steady-state free plasma concentration above 4× MIC, 100% of the time, without exceeding a total plasma concentration of 80 mg/L. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were included. Population PK analysis was performed on 540 amoxicillin plasma concentrations. A two-compartment model best described amoxicillin PK and the glomerular filtration rate covariate significantly improved the model when included in the calculation of the elimination constant Ke. CONCLUSIONS: This work allowed the development of a dosing nomogram that can help to increase achievement of the PK/pharmacodynamic targets in IE treated with amoxicillin.

Do older people know why they take benzodiazepines? A national French cross-sectional survey of long-term consumers.

OBJECTIVES: Benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepine hypnotics (or Z-drugs) (BZD/Z) are widely prescribed for older patients despite major side effects and risks when chronically used. The patient's understanding of the treatment is one of the keys to good adherence. The purpose of the study was to assess the knowledge of BZD/Z treatment among older people who were taking BZD/Z for the long term by studying the concordance between the declared reason for taking BZD/Z and its indication. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, pharmacoepidemiologic ancillary of a national study. Data were collected through a semi-structured interview. All patients from the main study were included. "Good knowledge" was considered when patients gave an indication for each BZD/Z that was similar to its marketing authorisation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to adequately determine profiles and characterise associations. RESULTS: More than half of the patients (61.6%) had a good knowledge regarding their treatment. The presence of a psychiatric disorder, a mean duration of BZD/Z use of less than 120 months, a desire to stop treatment, educational status and number and type of BZD/Z used were significantly associated (P < .05) with good knowledge. In the multivariate analysis, only a psychiatric disorder, educational status and taking at least one hypnotic drug were associated with good knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: At the time of shared medical decision, it appears essential to improve the knowledge of the treatment by the patient. The rate of patients with good knowledge of their BZD/Z treatment remains low and even lower than what was previously found in the literature for other drug classes. In contrast to patients with good knowledge, these data highlight the characteristics of patients with poor knowledge of their BZD/Z treatment, which may allow populations at risk to be targeted and enable education measures to be strengthened.

Population Pharmacokinetic Study of Cefazolin Dosage Adaptation in Bacteremia and Infective Endocarditis Based on a Nomogram.

Optimal dosing of continuous-infusion cefazolin can be challenging in patients being treated for bacteremia or infective endocarditis. The aim of this work is to describe and analyze the pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in those patients using a population pharmacokinetics modeling approach and to establish a nomogram to determine the optimal daily dose. Population pharmacokinetics were modeled using the Pmetrics package for R. Plasma concentrations were collected retrospectively from patients treated with continuous-infusion cefazolin for bacteremia or infective endocarditis. The influence of multiple parameters, including renal function, total body weight, body mass index, body surface area (BSA), ideal weight, lean body weight, height, and age, was tested. The probabilities of target attainment for selected target concentrations (40, 60, and 80 mg/liter) were calculated. A dosing nomogram was then developed, using the absolute value of the glomerular filtration rate (aGFR), to determine the optimal daily dose required to achieve the target concentrations in at least 90% of patients. In total, 346 cefazolin plasma concentrations from 162 patients were collected. A one-compartment model best described the data set. The only covariate was aGFR, calculated according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula and the patient's body surface area, for the rate of elimination. Using the nomogram, achieving a cefazolin concentration target of 40 mg/liter with a success rate of at least 90% and with an aGFR of 30, 60, 90, and 120 ml/min requires a daily dose of 2.6, 4.3, 6.1, and 8.0 g/day, respectively. These results confirm the interest of posology adaptation of cefazolin according to aGFR.

Immediate-Type Hypersensitivity Cross-Reactions to Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Descriptive Study of Data from the French National Pharmacovigilance Database.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can trigger immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). Three main patterns of cross-reactivity have been identified: reactions to a single PPI, selective cross-reactions, and cross-reactions with all PPIs. Several hypotheses have been advanced, but no consensus has been reached. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify immediate-type hypersensitivity cross-reactions to PPIs using real-world data about hypersensitivity testing from French pharmacovigilance cases. METHODS: Potentially relevant immediate-type HSRs reported from January 1985 to February 2015 were extracted from the French pharmacovigilance database using a standardized MedDRA query (SMQ). Cases describing skin tests or oral provocation tests (OPTs) performed with several PPIs that yielded at least one positive result were included. RESULTS: The SMQ extracted 2,119 cases, 38 of which were included in our study. Data collected from skin tests and OPTs indicated cross-reactions with all PPIs (n = 1), reactions to a single PPI (n = 14), or selective cross-reactions (n = 23). Esomeprazole, omeprazole, and pantoprazole concerned 78% of all selective cross-reactions. In more than half of the cases (55.3%), only 2 PPIs were tested. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this PPI cross-reactivity study is the largest to date in terms of population size, describing 38 immediate-type HSRs to PPIs explored by skin tests or OPTs. This paucity of data belies the lack of standardized procedures for PPI hypersensitivity testing. It is likely that PPI HSR workups in everyday clinical practice are often incomplete. Further research to gain insight into selective cross-reactions between PPIs is needed. In the meantime, thorough workups should be completed when a PPI is suspected to have triggered an HSR, instead of routine contraindication to all PPIs.