RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Learning minimally invasive suturing can be challenging, creating a barrier to further implementation, especially with the development of easier methods. Nevertheless, mastering intracorporeal knot tying is crucial when alternative techniques prove inadequate. Therefore, the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) suturing skills of MIS experts are compared with a group of novices during their learning curve on a simulator. METHODS: The novice participants repeatedly performed the intracorporeal suturing task on the EoSim MIS simulator (up to a maximum of 20 repetitions). The experts (>50 MIS procedures and advanced MIS experience) completed the same task once. The first and last exercises of the novices and the expert tasks were all blindly recorded and assessed by two independent assessors using the Laparoscopic Suturing Competency Assessment Tool (LS-CAT). Additionally, objective assessment parameters, "time" and "distance", using instrument tracking, were collected. The scores of the experts were then compared with the novices. RESULTS: At the end of the training, novices significantly outperformed the experts on both the expert assessment (LS-CAT: 16.8 versus 26.8, P = 0.001) and objective parameters (median time: 190 s versus 161 s, P < 0.001; median distance: 6.1 m versus 3.6 m, P < 0.001). Although the experts showed slightly better performance than the novices during their first task, the difference was not significant on the expert assessment (LS-CAT experts 16.8, novices 20.5, P = 0.057). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore the significance of continued MIS suturing training for both residents and surgeons. In this study, trained novices demonstrated a significant outperformance of experts on both quantitative and qualitative outcome parameters within a simulated setting.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Cirujanos , Humanos , Competencia Clínica , Laparoscopía/métodos , Suturas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Técnicas de Sutura/educaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training may be used to acquire MIS skills. While mostly done in a simulation center, it is proposed that this training can be undertaken at-home as well. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether unsupervised at-home training and assessment of MIS skills is feasible and results in increased MIS skills. METHODS: Medical doctors and senior medical students were tested on their innate abilities by performing a pre-test on a take-home simulator. Henceforth, they followed a two-week interval training practicing two advanced MIS skills (an interrupted suture with knot tying task and a precise peg transfer task) and subsequently performed a post-test. Both tests and all training moments were performed at home. Performance was measured using motion analysis software (SurgTrac) and by expert-assessment and self-assessment using a competency assessment tool for MIS suturing (LS-CAT). RESULTS: A total of 38 participants enrolled in the study. Participants improved significantly between the pre-test and the post-test for both tasks. They were faster (632 s vs. 213 s, p < 0.001) and more efficient (distance of instrument tips: 9.8 m vs. 3.4 m, p = 0.001) in the suturing task. Total LS-CAT scores, rated by an expert, improved significantly with a decrease from 36 at the pre-test to 20 at the post-test (p < 0.001) and showed a strong correlation with self-assessment scores (R 0.771, p < 0.001). The precise peg transfer task was completed faster (300 s vs. 163 s, p < 0.001) and more efficient as well (14.8 m vs. 5.7 m, p = 0.005). Additionally, they placed more rings correctly (7 vs. 12, p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: Unsupervised at-home training and assessment of MIS skills is feasible and resulted in an evident increase in skills. Especially in times of less exposure in the clinical setting and less education on training locations this can aid in improving MIS skills.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Laparoscopía , Entrenamiento Simulado , Estudios de Factibilidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/educación , Programas Informáticos , Simulación por Computador , Competencia Clínica , Laparoscopía/métodos , Técnicas de Sutura/educaciónRESUMEN
The importance of multidisciplinary long-term follow-up for adults born with esophageal atresia (EA) is increasingly recognized. Hence, a valid, condition-specific instrument to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) becomes imperative. This study aimed to develop and validate such an instrument for adults with EA. The Specific Quality of life in Esophageal atresia Adults (SQEA) questionnaire was developed through focus group-based item generation, pilot testing, item reduction and a multicenter, nationwide field test to evaluate the feasibility, reliability (internal and retest) and validity (structural, construct, criterion and convergent), in compliance with the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments guidelines. After pilot testing (n = 42), items were reduced from 144 to 36 questions. After field testing (n = 447), three items were discarded based on item-response theory results. The final SQEA questionnaire (33 items) forms a unidimensional scale generating an unweighted total score. Feasibility, internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.94) and test-retest agreement (intra-class coefficient 0.92) were good. Construct validity was discriminative for esophageal replacement (P < 0.001), dysphagia (P < 0.001) and airway obstruction (P = 0.029). Criterion validity showed a good correlation with dysphagia (area under the receiver operating characteristic 0.736). SQEA scores correlated well with other validated disease-specific HRQoL scales such as the GIQLI and SGRQ, but poorly with the more generic RAND-36. Overall, this first condition-specific instrument for EA adults showed satisfactory feasibility, reliability and validity. Additionally, it shows discriminative ability to detect disease burden. Therefore, the SQEA questionnaire is both a valid instrument to assess the HRQoL in EA adults and an interesting signaling tool, enabling clinicians to recognize more severely affected patients.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Atresia Esofágica , Humanos , Adulto , Calidad de Vida , Atresia Esofágica/complicaciones , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Psicometría , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Skill deterioration of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) skills may be prevented by continuous training. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether unsupervised continuous at-home training of MIS skills results in better skill retention compared to no training. METHODS: Medical doctors followed a two-week interval training for two MIS tasks (precise peg transfer and interrupted suture with knot tying), ending with a baseline test. They were randomly assigned to the no-practice group or continuous-practice group. The latter practiced unsupervised at home every two weeks during the study period. Skill retention was measured after three and six months on both tasks by the total time needed, distance traveled by instruments and LS-CAT score (8 best possible score and > 40 worst score). RESULTS: A total of 38 participants were included. No significant differences in performance were found at pre-test or baseline. At six months the no-practice group needed more time for the suturing task (309 s vs. 196 s at baseline, p = 0.010) and the LS-CAT score was significantly worse (30 vs. 20 at baseline, p < 0.0001). The continuous-practice group performed the suturing task significantly better than the no-practice group at both three and six months (17 vs. 25, p < 0.001 and 17 vs. 30, p < 0.001) and faster as well (p = 0.034 and p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study shows a skill decay after only a few months of non-use and shows better skill retention after continuous unsupervised at-home practice of MIS skills. This indicates an added value of regular at-home practice of surgical skills.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Laparoscopía , Competencia Clínica , Laparoscopía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/educación , Curriculum , Técnicas de Sutura/educaciónRESUMEN
Background: Alcohol misuse among medical professionals poses a significant concern, and there is a lack of clarity in (inter)national guidelines regarding alcohol use during work. Moreover, there exists an insufficient body of research on the specific impact of alcohol on fine motor skills within the medical sector, specifically surgery. This study aims to investigate the impact of alcohol on fine motor skills in a minimally invasive surgical setting. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Lowland Science on August 19th, 20th, and 21st, 2022, during the Lowlands music festival in Biddinghuizen, the Netherlands. Participants were divided into five groups based on measured alcohol consumption. Exclusion criteria included drug use, prior surgical experience, being underage, and previous participation. The main outcomes were the number of correctly transferred rings during the PEG transfer task and the number of errors. Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) was measured using a breathalyser. Results: A total of 1056 participants were included in the study. The results indicated an inverse relationship between BAC levels and surgical performance, with higher alcohol levels associated with a decrease in performance (p = 0.023). However, there was no significant difference in the number of errors among the five groups (p = 0.597). The group with the highest alcohol consumption (BAC >0.08 %) exhibited significantly worse performance compared to the group with a BAC of 0.0 % (p = 0.002). Conclusion: This study uncovers a negative impact of increased alcohol intake on fine motor skills in a minimally invasive surgery simulation exercise. While there was no effect on the occurrence of errors. Professional medical organizations should reconsider and explicate their position on alcohol use in (surgical) healthcare.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To develop and maintain suturing skills, clinical exposure is important. When clinical exposure cannot be guaranteed, an adequate training schedule for suturing skills is required. This study evaluates the effect of continuous training, 'reflection before practice' and self-assessment on basic open suturing skills. METHODS: Medical students performed four basic suturing tasks on a simulation set up before ('pre-test') and after their surgical rotation ('after-test'). Participants were divided in three groups; the 'clinical exposure group' (n = 44) had clinical exposure during their rotation only, the 'continuous training group' (n = 16) completed a suturing interval training during their rotation and the 'self-assessment group' (n = 16) also completed a suturing interval training, but with the use of reflection before practice and self-assessment. Parameters measured by a tracking system during the suturing tasks and a calculated 'composite score' were compared between groups and test-moments. RESULTS: A significantly better composite score was found at the after-test compared to the pre-test for all groups for all basic suturing tasks (0.001 ≤ p ≤ 0.049). The self-assessment group scored better at the pre-test than the other two groups for all tasks, except for 'knot tying by hand' (0.004 ≤ p ≤ 0.063). However, this group did not score better at the after-test for all tasks, compared to the other two groups. This resulted in a smaller delta of time ('transcutaneous suture', p = 0.013), distance ('Donati suture' and 'intracutaneous suture', 0.005 ≤ p ≤ 0.009) or composite score (all tasks, except for knot tying by hand, 0.007 ≤ p ≤ 0.061) in the self-assessment group. CONCLUSION: Reflection before practice and self-assessment during continuous training of basic open suturing tasks, may improve surgical skills at the start of the learning curve.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Autoevaluación (Psicología) , Técnicas de Sutura , Técnicas de Sutura/educación , Humanos , Estudiantes de Medicina , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Entrenamiento Simulado , Masculino , Femenino , Evaluación EducacionalRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Sufficient training is needed to acquire and retain the procedural skills needed for the surgical correction of congenital anatomical malformations. This study aims to assess the opinions of trainees and pediatric surgeons on the use of simulation-based continued at-home training, which can help to acquire these skills. METHODS: This study consisted of two parts. First, an international survey among trainees and pediatric surgeons assessed their opinions on simulation-based at-home training for pediatric surgical procedures (5-point Likert scale). Second, participants of pediatric colorectal courses were instructed to practice the posterior sagittal anorectoplasty procedure at-home on a simulation model and, subsequently, complete a questionnaire regarding their opinions on continuous at-home training (5-point Likert scale). RESULTS: A total of 163 participants (83% pediatric surgeons) completed the international survey (response rate 43%). Overall, participants considered the training useful for both laparoscopic (mean 4.7) and open procedures (mean 4.2) and agreed that it may be used at home after a hands-on course (mean 4.3).Twenty participants completed the questionnaire on continued training (response rate 36%). All agreed that at-home training was of added value (mean 4.5) and that the skills were transferable to the clinical setting (mean 4.3). At-home training was regarded a suitable exercise after a hands-on workshop (mean 4.3), but less so without a workshop (mean 3.7, p=0.017). CONCLUSION: Participating trainees and pediatric surgeons were of the opinion that simulation models and at-home training have added value. This implies that simulation-based training may be used more often in pediatric surgical training.
Asunto(s)
Entrenamiento Simulado , Especialidades Quirúrgicas , Cirujanos , Humanos , Niño , Competencia ClínicaRESUMEN
Introduction: Acquiring and retaining minimally invasive surgery (MIS) skills may be aided by using MIS take-home box simulators. This study aims to evaluate the use of a take-home MIS box trainer for training sessions at-home. Methods: Trainees who previously bought the LaparoscopyBoxx (between 2016 and 2020) were asked to complete an online questionnaire. The first part was on their demographic data, and the second part was on their use and opinion on the box trainer (on a 5-point Likert scale). Results: A total of 39 participants (9 surgeons and 30 trainees) completed the questionnaire (response rate 40%). Overall, participants had a positive opinion on the use of the box trainer and would recommend it to others for training (mean 4.2). Basic tasks, such as needle trail and ring transfer, were practiced most often and were regarded most relevant (mean 4.1-4.3). They regarded practicing on the stimulator of added value to practicing in the clinic (mean 4.2), were more confident during clinical procedures (mean 3.9), and felt that their skills had improved (mean 4.1). Of quarter of the participants who bought the MIS box trainer during the COVID-19 pandemic reported an increased use during times of less clinical exposure. Conclusion: Surgeons and trainees have a positive opinion on using a take-home MIS box trainer for at-home training for general as well as for pediatric MIS skills. Especially during periods of less exposure in the clinical setting and less hands-on courses, such as during the COVID-19 pandemic, at-home training may be a valuable addition.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Niño , Pandemias , Laparoscopía/educación , Competencia Clínica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/educaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This review evaluates the validation and availability of simulation models in the field of pediatric surgery that can be used for training purposes. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for studies describing a simulation models in pediatric surgery. Articles were included if face, content and/or construct validity was described. Additionally, the costs and availability were assessed. Validation scores for each model were depicted as percentage (0-100), based on the reported data, to compare the outcomes. A score of >70% was considered adequate. RESULTS: Forty-three studies were identified, describing the validation process of 38 simulation models. Face validity was evaluated in 33 articles, content in 36 and construct in 19. Twenty-two models received adequate validation scores (>70%). The majority (27/38, 70%) was strictly inanimate. Five models were available for purchase and eleven models were replicable based on the article. CONCLUSION: The number of validated inanimate simulation models for pediatric surgery procedures is growing, however, few are replicable or available for widespread training purposes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
Asunto(s)
Entrenamiento Simulado , Especialidades Quirúrgicas , Humanos , Niño , Simulación por Computador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Entrenamiento Simulado/métodos , Competencia ClínicaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The correction of an anorectal malformation (ARM) is complex and relatively infrequent. Simulation training and subsequent assessment may result in better clinical outcomes. Assessment can be done using a competency assessment tool (CAT). This study aims to develop and validate a CAT for the posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) on a simulation model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CAT-PSARP was developed after consultation with experts in the field. The PSARP was divided into five steps, while tissue and instrument handling were scored separately. Participants of pediatric colorectal hands-on courses in 2019 and 2020 were asked to participate. They performed one PSARP procedure on an ARM simulation model, while being assessed by two objective observers using the CAT-PSARP. RESULTS: A total of 82 participants were enrolled. A fair interobserver agreement was found for general skills (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.524, p < 0.001), a good agreement for specific skills (ICC = 0.646, p < 0.001), and overall performance (ICC = 0.669, p < 0.001). The experienced group scored higher on all steps (p < 0.001), except for "anoplasty (p = 0.540)," compared with an inexperienced group. CONCLUSION: The CAT-PSARP is a suitable objective assessment tool for the overall performance of the included steps of the PSARP for repair of an ARM on a simulation model.
Asunto(s)
Malformaciones Anorrectales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Canal Anal/anomalías , Canal Anal/cirugía , Malformaciones Anorrectales/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Humanos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Recto/anomalías , Recto/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
A condition-specific instrument (EA-QOL©) to assess quality of life of children born with esophageal atresia (EA) was developed in Sweden and Germany. Before implementing this in the Netherlands, we evaluated its psychometric performance in Dutch children. After Swedish−Dutch translation, cognitive debriefing was conducted with a subset of EA patients and their parents. Next, feasibility, reliability, and validity were evaluated in a nationwide field test. Cognitive debriefing confirmed the predefined concepts, although some questions were not generally applicable. Feasibility was poor to moderate. In 2-to-7-year-old children, 8/17 items had >5% missing values. In 8-to-17-year-old children, this concerned 3/24 items of the proxy-report and 5/14 items of the self-report. The internal reliability was good. The retest reliability showed good correlation. The comparison reliability between self-reports and proxy-reports was strong. The construct validity was discriminative. The convergent validity was strong for the 2-to-7-year-old proxy-report, and weak to moderate for the 8-to-17-year-old proxy-report and self-report. In conclusion, the Dutch-translated EA-QOL questionnaires showed good reliability and validity. Feasibility was likely affected by items not deemed applicable to an individual child's situation. Computer adaptive testing could be a potential solution to customizing the questionnaire to the individual patient. Furthermore, cross-cultural validation studies and implementation-evaluation studies in different countries are needed.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: An anorectal malformation (ARM) is a congenital malformation that requires surgical correction. To acquire the skills needed to perform this complex procedure, an affordable simulation model has previously been developed and validated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the suitability of this ARM model (with perineal fistula) for training in hands-on workshops. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ARM model consists of a wooden casing with disposable perineal body. Participants in several international pediatric colorectal hands-on workshops in 2019 and 2020 were asked to participate. They were divided in a target group and an experienced group based on experience. All practiced the posterior sagittal anorectoplasty procedure on the model with multimodality guidance. Subsequently, statements on the suitability of the model for use during hands-on workshops were scored on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: A total of 80 participants were included (43 surgical specialists, 13 pediatric surgery fellows, and 25 residents). Nearly, all statements scored at least a mean of >4.0, all scored significantly better than a neutral opinion. The target group (n = 58) scored higher compared with the experienced group (n = 22) on "transferability of the skills to the clinical setting" (means 4.4 vs. 4.0, p = 0.038); however, the "suitability as a replacement for an animal model" scored significantly lower (means 3.6 vs. 3.9, p = 0.049). No other differences were found. CONCLUSION: This affordable ARM model was regarded a suitable model for training during preclinical hands-on workshops and could be used for the specified steps of the procedure.
Asunto(s)
Malformaciones Anorrectales , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Canal Anal/anomalías , Canal Anal/cirugía , Malformaciones Anorrectales/cirugía , Niño , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Humanos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Recto/anomalías , Recto/cirugíaRESUMEN
Background: Current training programs for complex pediatric minimal invasive surgery (MIS) are usually bulk training, consisting of 1- or 2-day courses. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of bulk training versus interval training on the preservation of high-complex, low-volume MIS skills. Materials and Methods: Medical students, without prior surgical experience, were randomly assigned to either a bulk or interval training program for complex MIS (congenital diaphragmatic hernia [CDH] and esophageal atresia [EA] repair). Both groups trained for 5 hours; the bulk group twice within 3 days and the interval groups five times in 3 weeks. Skills retention was assessed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6 months posttraining, using a composite score (0%-100%) based on the objective parameters tracked by SurgTrac. Results: Seventeen students completed the training sessions (bulk n = 9, interval n = 8) and were assessed accordingly. Retention of the skills for EA repair was significantly better for the interval training group than for the bulk group at 6 weeks (P = .004). However, at 6 months, both groups scored significantly worse than after the training sessions for EA repair (bulk 60 versus 67, P = .176; interval 63 versus 74, P = .028) and CDH repair (bulk 32 versus 67, P = .018; interval 47 versus 62, P = .176). Conclusion: This pilot study suggests superior retention of complex pediatric MIS skills after interval training, during a longer period of time, than bulk training. However, after 6 months, both groups scored significantly worse than after their training, indicating the need for continuous training.
Asunto(s)
Esofagoplastia/educación , Herniorrafia/educación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/educación , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Enseñanza , Adulto , Niño , Competencia Clínica , Atresia Esofágica/cirugía , Esofagoplastia/métodos , Esofagoplastia/psicología , Femenino , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/psicología , Proyectos Piloto , Retención en PsicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Minimal invasive surgery (MIS) is increasingly used for the correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and esophageal atresia (EA). It is important to master these complex procedures, preferably preclinically, to avoid complications. The aim of this study was to validate recently developed models to train these MIS procedures preclinically. METHODS: Two low cost, reproducible models (one for CDH and one for EA) were validated during several pediatric surgical conferences and training sessions (January 2017-December 2018), used in either the LaparoscopyBoxx or EoSim simulator. Participants used one or both models and completed a questionnaire regarding their opinion on realism (face validity) and didactic value (content validity), rated on a five-point-Likert scale. RESULTS: Of all 60 participants enrolled, 44 evaluated the EA model. All items were evaluated as significantly better than neutral, with means ranging from 3.7 to 4.1 (pâ¯<â¯0.001). The CDH model was evaluated by 48 participants. All items scored significantly better than neutral (means 3.5-3.9, pâ¯<â¯0.001), with exception of the haptics of the simulated diaphragm (mean 3.3, pâ¯=â¯0.054). Both models were considered a potent training tool (means 3.9). CONCLUSION: These readily available and low budget models are considered a valid and potent training tool by both experts and target group participants. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
Asunto(s)
Atresia Esofágica , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas , Niño , Atresia Esofágica/cirugía , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/cirugía , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Self-assessment aids "reflection-before-practice," which is expected to result in a better understanding of one's strengths and weaknesses and consequently a better overall performance. This is, however, rarely used in surgical training. This study aims to evaluate the correlation between self-, peer-, and expert assessment on surgical skills of pediatric surgical trainees. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A competency assessment tool for the posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (CAT-PSARP) was previously developed and validated. During international hands-on pediatric colorectal workshops in 2019 and 2020, participants practiced the PSARP on an inanimate anorectal malformation model. They were assisted by a peer and assessed by two independent expert observers, using the CAT-PSARP. After the training session, both self- and peer assessment were completed, using the same CAT-PSARP. RESULTS: A total of 79 participants were included. No correlation was found between the overall CAT-PSARP scores of the expert observers and the self-assessment (r = 0.179, p = 0.116), while a weak correlation was found between experts and peer assessment (r = 0.317, p = 0.006). When comparing the self-assessment scores with peer assessment, a moderate correlation was found for the overall performance score (r = 0.495, p < 0.001). Additionally, the participants who were first to perform the procedure scored significantly better than those who trained second on the overall performance (mean 27.2 vs. 24.4, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Participants, peers, and experts seemed to have a unique view on the performance during training because there was little correlation between outcomes of the trainees and the experts. Self-assessment may be useful for reflection during training; however, expert assessment seems to be essential for assessment of surgical skills.
Asunto(s)
Malformaciones Anorrectales/cirugía , Competencia Clínica , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/normas , Autoevaluación (Psicología) , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Pediatría/educación , Embarazo , Entrenamiento Simulado/métodos , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/educaciónRESUMEN
Background: To increase complex minimally invasive skills (MIS), frequent training outside the clinical setting is of uttermost importance. This study compares two low-cost pediatric MIS simulators, which can easily be used preclinically. Materials and Methods: The LaparoscopyBoxx is a portable simulator without a tracking system, with costs ranging from 90 to 315. The EoSim simulator has a built-in camera and tracking system and costs range from 780 to 1800. During several pediatric surgical conferences and workshops (January 2017-December 2018), participants were asked to use both simulators. Afterward, they completed a questionnaire regarding their opinion on realism and didactic value, scored on a five-point Likert scale. Results: A total of 50 participants (24 experts and 25 target group, one unknown) evaluated one or both simulators. Both simulators scored well on the questionnaire. The LaparoscopyBoxx scored significantly better regarding the "on screen representation of the instrument actions" (mean 4.2 versus 3.5, P = .001), "training tool for pediatric surgery" (mean 4.4 versus 3.9, P = .005), and "appealing take-home simulator" (mean 4.6 versus 4.0, P = .002). Conclusion: The simulators tested in this study were both regarded an appealing take-home simulator. The LaparoscopyBoxx scored significantly better than the EoSim, even though this is a low budget simulator without tracking capabilities.
Asunto(s)
Educación a Distancia/métodos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Laparoscopía/educación , Pediatría/educación , Entrenamiento Simulado/métodos , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/educación , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Competencia Clínica , Educación a Distancia/economía , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Entrenamiento Simulado/economía , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The development of a symptomatic lymphocele (SL) is a frequent postoperative surgical complication after kidney transplantation. It may lead to pain and discomfort and cause transplant malfunction or even secondary graft loss. A large cohort of renal recipients was investigated to identify the possible risk factors for SL. METHODS: All renal transplant patients of a single centre were retrospectively analysed for SL between January 2010 and December 2017. The SL group was compared to a control group from the same cohort. RESULTS: 45 out of 1003 transplanted patients developed an SL (incidence 4.5%), on average 50 days after kidney transplantation. SLs developed more in older patients, in those with a PD catheter and in ADKDP as primary diagnosis. Surgical predictors for SLs were venous anastomosis on the external iliac vein, concomitant PD catheter removal, perfusion defects, shorter operating time, splint > 7 days, double J stenting, discharge with drain, low initial drain production and ureteral obstruction. Opening of the peritoneum, re-operation for postoperative bleeding and previous nephrectomy seem protective for developing SL. CONCLUSION: We found multiple heterogeneous predictors for SL with a common denominator related to surgical management of the retroperitoneal space, peritoneum and the ureter. Future prospective studies are necessary to evaluate the influence of these variables on the development of SL.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Linfocele/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Linfocele/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Adipocytes secrete the hormone leptin to signal the sufficiency of energy stores. Reductions in circulating leptin concentrations reflect a negative energy balance, which augments sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activation in response to metabolically demanding emergencies. This process ensures adequate glucose mobilization despite low energy stores. We report that leptin receptor-expressing neurons (LepRb neurons) in the periaqueductal gray (PAG), the largest population of LepRb neurons in the brain stem, mediate this process. Application of noxious stimuli, which often signal the need to mobilize glucose to support an appropriate response, activated PAG LepRb neurons, which project to and activate parabrachial nucleus (PBN) neurons that control SNS activation and glucose mobilization. Furthermore, activating PAG LepRb neurons increased SNS activity and blood glucose concentrations, while ablating LepRb in PAG neurons augmented glucose mobilization in response to noxious stimuli. Thus, decreased leptin action on PAG LepRb neurons augments the autonomic response to noxious stimuli, ensuring sufficient glucose mobilization during periods of acute demand in the face of diminished energy stores.