Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
N C Med J ; 79(4): 235-239, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29991615

RESUMEN

In North Carolina, our public health infrastructure consists of a state health department and 85 local health departments representing all 100 counties. The state health department, local health departments, health systems, and clinical providers work literally and figuratively as a team to improve the health of our citizens. In this article, we provide examples of the critical role of public health practitioners as part of the broader team addressing health, specifically in the areas of chronic disease, communicable disease, oral health, environmental health, and maternal and child health.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica/prevención & control , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Salud Pública , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Dental/organización & administración , Humanos , Servicios de Salud Materno-Infantil/organización & administración , North Carolina
2.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 1(4): A16, 2004 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15670448

RESUMEN

Regional health care systems have significant opportunities to adopt community-oriented approaches that impact the incidence and burden of chronic disease. In 1998, a vertically integrated, regional health care system established a community health institute to identify, understand, and respond to health needs from a community perspective. The project was implemented in four communities (two rural counties, a rural/urban transitional county, and an inner-city community) using five steps: 1) support or form a local community coalition; 2) hire and support a local coordinator; 3) prepare a formal community assessment; 4) fund locally designed interventions; and 5) evaluate each project. In four narrative case studies, we present the steps, challenges, and common principles faced at the local level by Carolinas Community Health Institute. The case studies were prepared using three data sources: reviews of written documents, interviews with the seven-member steering committee, and interviews with six key informants from each county. Data were coded and analyzed using standard qualitative software to identify common themes and sources of variance between cases. The project model was generally well accepted. Local autonomy and domain disputes were challenges in all four sites. Funding for local projects was the most frequently cited benefit. The project was successful in increasing local capacity and supporting well-designed interventions to prevent chronic disease. This approach can be used by large health care systems and by other organizations to better support local health initiatives.


Asunto(s)
Academias e Institutos/organización & administración , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Relaciones Interinstitucionales , Regionalización/organización & administración , Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Promoción de la Salud , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Evaluación de Necesidades/organización & administración , North Carolina , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Salud Rural , Salud Urbana
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA