Seclusion within the first 24 h following admission into inpatient mental health services and associations with referral pathways, recent service contact and HoNOS ratings.

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Seclusion is a harmful and traumatising intervention for people accessing mental health services. People who are subject to seclusion in inpatient mental health services often first experience this within the first 24 h following admission. There is limited research examining how recent contact with services impacts the likelihood of seclusion when people are admitted to inpatient services. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: Males, Maori and Pasifika experience higher rates of seclusion within the first 24 h following inpatient admission. People perceived by clinicians as overactive, aggressive, disruptive or agitated are seven times more likely to be secluded within the first 24 h. People referred from police or justice services are three times more likely to be secluded within the first 24 h. People who had frequent contact with community mental health services prior to inpatient admission were less likely to be secluded. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: The first 24 h of inpatient admission is a critical focus for eliminating the use of seclusion. Initial interactions with people recently admitted should focus on nurturing relationships and reducing distress. Mental health staff should consider the person's cultural needs, referral pathway, recent service contact and baseline ratings on the Health of the Nation Outcomes Scales (HoNOS) when working proactively to prevent the use of seclusion in the first 24 h following admission. Strengthening the focus on nurturing relationships, cultural understanding and non-coercive de-escalation approaches requires leadership support and strategic workforce development. ABSTRACT: Introduction People who experience seclusion in inpatient mental health services often do so within the first 24 h following admission. There is limited research examining the potential contributing factors, particularly recent contact with services. Aim/Question To identify factors associated with seclusion within the first 24 h following admission into acute inpatient mental health services. Method A retrospective analysis was undertaken using routinely collected data from Aotearoa New Zealand mental health services. Results A higher likelihood of seclusion within the first 24 h following admission was associated with: males, Maori, Pasifika, referrals from police/justice services, inpatient transfers, recent contact with crisis assessment teams and clinician perceptions of aggression, problematic substance use, cognitive problems and hallucinations or delusions. Recent contact with community mental health services was associated with a lower likelihood. Discussion People's cultural needs, referral pathway, recent service contact and HoNOS scores should be considered when working to prevent the use of seclusion in the first 24 h following admission. Implications for Practice The first 24 h following inpatient admission is a critical period for preventing the use of seclusion. Nurturing relationships, cultural understanding and use of non-coercive de-escalation approaches can support better outcomes for people recently admitted.

Assessing the content validity of the revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+: the HoNOS Older Adults.

AIMS AND METHOD: Recently, the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+ (HoNOS65+) were revised. Twenty-five experts from Australia and New Zealand completed an anonymous web-based survey about the content validity of the revised measure, the HoNOS Older Adults (HoNOS OA). RESULTS: All 12 HoNOS OA scales were rated by most (≥75%) experts as 'important' or 'very important' for determining overall clinical severity among older adults. Ratings of sensitivity to change, comprehensibility and comprehensiveness were more variable, but mostly positive. Experts' comments provided possible explanations. For example, some experts suggested modifying or expanding the glossary examples for some scales (e.g. those measuring problems with relationships and problems with activities of daily living) to be more older adult-specific. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Experts agreed that the HoNOS OA measures important constructs. Training may need to orient experienced raters to the rationale for some revisions. Further psychometric testing of the HoNOS OA is recommended.

Whakairo: carving a values-led approach to understand and respond to the mental health and substance use of the New Zealand population.

Nil.

Responding to the tangata whai ora voice: an Aotearoa New Zealand quality improvement solution.

Understanding and responding to the voice of people receiving mental health and addiction services is imperative. The policy environment in Aotearoa New Zealand is shifting to place greater value on gathering input and feedback from people accessing health services. This viewpoint article looks at the use of patient reported experience measures (PREMs), with a particular focus on mental health and addiction services and the development of Marama Real-Time Feedback (Marama). Measures examining people's experience of health services are used widely internationally. Marama is one tool that has been specifically developed for the Aotearoa New Zealand context. The tool can be completed by people accessing mental health and addiction services (tangata whai ora - people seeking wellness) along with their whanau. People with lived experience of accessing mental health and addiction services provide critical leadership supporting the use and implementation of Marama within services. Feedback gathered through Marama must be actioned to truly improve services. This action can return power to tangata whai ora who may otherwise feel powerless in the health system.

Structural discrimination in the COVID-19 vaccination programme for people with mental health and addiction issues: now is the time to be equally well.

People with mental health and substance use issues (tangata whai ora katoa), regardless of ethnicity, are much more likely to be hospitalised or die from COVID-19 and were identified as a priority population (Priority Group 3) in Aotearoa New Zealand's vaccination roll-out plan. Data released by the Ministry of Health show that, despite tangata whai ora katoa being a priority group, their vaccination rates are well below those of the general population. These inequities are pronounced for Maori with mental health and addiction issues (tangata whai ora Maori). This is not acceptable. To support tangata whai ora physical health and wellbeing, the onus is on all of us in the health system to actively reach out, have conversations, be supportive and provide accessible vaccination for people with mental health and addiction issues. Urgent action is needed. Now is the time to ensure tangata whai ora katoa can be equally well.

Assessing the Content Validity of the Revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS 2018).

The Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) comprises 12 scales that cover the kinds of problems that may be experienced by working-age adults in contact with specialised mental health services. Drawing on 20 years' experience in clinical practice, a collaborative, international review of the HoNOS was undertaken and a revised measure (known as the HoNOS 2018) was published. In this study, 32 experts from Australia, England and New Zealand completed an anonymous web-based survey to assess the relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility (aspects of content validity) of the HoNOS 2018. The experts rated 11 of the 12 HoNOS 2018 scales as 'important' or 'very important' for determining the overall clinical severity (item-level content validity index or I-CVI ≥ 0.75). Evaluations of the scales' ability to capture change, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility were more variable, but generally positive. Experts' comments provided further insights into this variability; for example, they noted that some scales combine multiple phenomena, which can result in ambiguity in item wording and assessment challenges. Results from this study suggest that the revisions have not altered the importance of the scales. Given the measure's breadth of content, training remains important for ensuring rating fidelity. Inter-rater reliability and utility testing are indicated.

Hazardous drinking and general practitioner visits in the past year.

AIM: To quantify the relationship between any general practitioner (GP) visit and hazardous alcohol use, and whether this differs by sociodemographic factors. METHOD: Hazardous alcohol use (scores 8+ Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test) and any past year GP visits were examined using 2016/17 New Zealand Health Survey data from 13,598 adults. Sub-group analyses examined whether the association differed by age, sex or ethnicity (Maori/non-Maori), and socioeconomic status (NZDep2013) in post-hoc analyses. RESULTS: Results differed for Maori and non-Maori. Regardless of drinking behaviour, Maori males aged 15-24 years were least likely to visit a GP. Among Maori in each demographic group, GP visits were similar for people meeting hazardous drinking criteria and safer drinkers. Conversely, among non-Maori males aged under 45 and non-Maori females aged 15-24 and 45-64 years, GP visits were 10-13 percentage points higher among people meeting hazardous drinking criteria than safer drinkers. GP visits were lower for people meeting hazardous drinking criteria living in more deprived areas. CONCLUSION: Multiple strategies need to be prioritised to address service access particularly for young Maori, and support people drinking at hazardous levels. This includes increasing access to services in various settings, enhancing existing primary health services (eg, cultural responsiveness, alcohol screening, brief interventions), addressing access barriers, and health promotion.

Reducing days of alcohol use improves lifestyle and wellbeing: an analysis of outcomes data from New Zealand adult community alcohol and other drug services.

AIMS: The study examined the impact of alcohol use on lifestyle and wellbeing among adults accessing New Zealand community alcohol and other drug (AOD) services, and practice implications. METHODS: Routinely collected Alcohol and Drug Outcome Measure (ADOM) data for individuals at both treatment start and treatment end was analysed. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses examined the independent impact of changes in days of alcohol use on weekly lifestyle and wellbeing issues. Analyses controlled for sociodemographic variables and other substances used. RESULTS: In total, 598 people reported alcohol as their main substance of concern. The largest improvements in lifestyle and wellbeing were observed for mental health, social relationships and physical health. Change in days of alcohol use significantly contributed to the prediction of change in lifestyle and wellbeing issues experienced (model R2=20%, adjusted R2=19%, p<.001). Results were similar for amount and total volume. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced alcohol use positively impacts on people's lifestyle and wellbeing. Findings have implications for increasing awareness of the benefits for people's lives, even small reductions in alcohol use. The need to strengthen routine ADOM collection in AOD services is highlighted, as well as the availability of vocational rehabilitation to support people's wellbeing.

Variation in seclusion rates across New Zealand's specialist mental health services: Are sociodemographic and clinical factors influencing this?

Rates of seclusion vary across New Zealand's publicly funded district health board (DHB) adult mental health inpatient services as indicated by national data. Anecdotally, this variation has been attributed to a range of factors directly relating to the people admitted to acute inpatient services. This study examined the extent to which variation in seclusion rates could be explained by the sociodemographic and clinical differences between populations admitted into adult mental health inpatient services. Retrospective data were obtained from the Programme for the Integration of Mental Health Data (PRIMHD). A logistic regression model was fitted to these data, with seclusion (yes/no) as the dependent variable and DHB groups as the independent variable. The DHBs were classified into four groups based on their seclusion rates. The model adjusted for ethnicity, age, number of bed nights, total Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) scores, and compulsory treatment status. Odds ratios remained virtually unchanged after adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical factors. People admitted to DHB Group 4 (highest secluding DHBs) were 11 times more likely to be secluded than people in Group 1 (lowest secluding DHBs), adjusted OR = 11.1, 95% CI [7.5,16.4], P < 0.001. Results indicate DHB variation in seclusion rates cannot be attributed to the sociodemographic and clinical factors of people admitted into DHB adult mental health inpatient services. Instead, this variation may be explained by differences in service delivery models and practice approaches. A model of system improvements aimed at reducing seclusion is discussed.

People who experience seclusion in adult mental health inpatient services: An examination of health of the nation outcome scales scores.

The Health of the Nation Outcomes Scales (HoNOS) provides an overview of a person's behaviour, impairment, clinical symptoms, and social functioning. This study investigated the profile of people who had been secluded in New Zealand's adult mental health inpatient services using 12 individual HoNOS ratings. Routinely collected clinical data were extracted from the Programme for the Integration of Mental Health Data (PRIMHD). This is the national data set for mental health and addiction services. A logistic regression model was fitted to the data which adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, bed nights, compulsory treatment, and district health board. After adjustment, three HoNOS items significantly predicted the risk of seclusion: overactive, aggressive, disruptive, or agitated behaviour (adjusted OR = 4.82, 95% CI [3.88, 5.97], P < 0.001); problem drinking or drug-taking (adjusted OR = 1.51, 95% CI [1.25, 1.82], P < 0.001); and problems with hallucinations and delusions (adjusted OR = 1.33, 95% CI [1.09, 1.63], P = 0.006). In addition, two HoNOS items were protective for seclusion: nonaccidental self-injury (adjusted OR = 0.65, 95% CI [0.51, 0.83], P < 0.001) and depressed mood (adjusted OR = 0.58, 95% CI [0.47, 0.72], P < 0.001). Thus, responding effectively to agitation and/or aggression, substance use, and psychosis plays an important role in reducing the use of seclusion. Mental health nurses and other workers can reduce seclusion through early assessment, effective communication, de-escalation techniques, reduction tools, trauma-informed care, and consulting with consumers and whanau.

Primary healthcare utilisation among adults with mood and anxiety disorders: an analysis of the New Zealand Health Survey.

INTRODUCTION In New Zealand, as in other OECD countries, there is a high and growing prevalence of mental health problems, particularly anxiety and depression. These conditions are associated with a range of physical illnesses, and as a result this population have high and often complex needs for healthcare services, particularly through primary care. AIM To use data from the New Zealand Health Survey (NZHS) to examine the associations between internalising disorders (including anxiety, depression and bipolar disorder) and measures related to the utilisation of primary healthcare services. METHODS The study was based on responses from 13,719 adults who took part in the 2015-16 NZHS. Logistic regression analyses adjusted for sociodemographic variables were undertaken to examine the effect of having an internalising disorder on each measure related to primary healthcare utilisation. The strength of associations was indicated by odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS Adults with an internalising disorder were more likely to utilise primary health services (OR = 1.43-2.56, P < 0.001) compared to adults without an internalising disorder. However, they were more likely to have unmet needs due to cost or transport (OR = 2.45-3.38, P < 0.001), unfilled prescriptions due to cost (OR = 3.03, P < 0.001) and less likely to report positive experiences with general practitioners (OR = 0.67-0.79, P < 0.01). DISCUSSION Adults with internalising disorders require a higher level of support from primary healthcare, yet experience more barriers to accessing these services, and report less positive experiences with general practitioners. The NZHS may be a useful source of routinely collected data for understanding, monitoring and improving primary health service utilisation among people with internalising disorders.