Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Sleep Res ; 27(6): e12726, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29989248

RESUMEN

This study investigated whether providing sham feedback about sleep to individuals with insomnia influenced daytime symptom reports, sleep-related attentional bias and psychomotor vigilance. Sixty-three participants meeting DSM-5 criteria for insomnia disorder were recruited from the community. Following baseline assessments and actigraphy briefing, participants were randomised to receive next-day sham feedback on sleep quality ("positive" vs. "negative" sleep efficiency condition). Feedback was delivered at habitual rise-time using an integrated actigraphy-diary watch to simulate wearable device behaviour. Participants completed symptom reports immediately before receiving feedback, and at 12:00 and 15:00 hr, using the experience sampling method. Following this they returned to the laboratory in the evening to complete symptom reports and computerised tests of sleep-related attentional bias and basic psychomotor vigilance. Participants randomised to negative feedback (n = 32) evidenced impaired daytime function (decreased alert cognition [d = 0.79], increased sleepiness/fatigue [d = 0.55]) in the evening compared with those given positive feedback (n = 31). Within-day trajectories revealed that the positive-feedback group, relative to the negative-feedback group, displayed a significantly greater increase in positive mood and alert cognition (from rise-time to 12:00 hr), and significantly greater decrease in sleepiness/fatigue. There were no significant between-group differences on measures of sleep-related attentional bias [d = 0.20] or psychomotor vigilance [d = 0.12]. This controlled experiment shows that sham feedback about sleep biases appraisal of daytime symptoms, highlighting a pathway connecting sleep misperception with daytime features of insomnia. Findings have important implications for wearable devices that claim to measure "objective" sleep yet may provide inaccurate data relative to gold-standard measurement.


Asunto(s)
Actigrafía/métodos , Actigrafía/psicología , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/fisiopatología , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/psicología , Somnolencia , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles/psicología , Adulto , Afecto/fisiología , Anciano , Sesgo Atencional/fisiología , Cognición/fisiología , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Fatiga/diagnóstico , Fatiga/fisiopatología , Fatiga/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Placebos , Sueño/fisiología , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/diagnóstico , Vigilia/fisiología , Adulto Joven
2.
Sleep ; 43(9)2020 09 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32128593

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the impact of digital cognitive behavioral therapy (dCBT) for insomnia on both self-reported cognitive impairment and objective cognitive performance. METHODS: The Defining the Impact of Sleep improvement on Cognitive Outcomes (DISCO) trial was an online, two-arm, single-blind, randomized clinical trial of dCBT versus wait-list control. Participants were aged 25 years and older, met DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for insomnia disorder, and reported difficulties with concentration or memory. Assessments were carried out online at baseline, and 10 and 24 weeks post-randomization. The primary outcome measure was self-reported cognitive impairment, assessed with the British Columbia Cognitive Complaints Inventory (BC-CCI). Secondary outcomes included tests of cognitive performance, insomnia symptoms, cognitive failures, fatigue, sleepiness, depression, and anxiety. RESULTS: Four hundred and ten participants with insomnia were recruited and assigned to dCBT (N = 205) or wait-list control (N = 205). At 10 weeks post-randomization the estimated adjusted mean difference for the BC-CCI was -3.03 (95% CI: -3.60, -2.47; p < 0.0001, d = -0.86), indicating that participants in the dCBT group reported less cognitive impairment than the control group. These effects were maintained at 24 weeks (d = -0.96) and were mediated, in part, via reductions in insomnia severity and increased sleep efficiency. Treatment effects in favor of dCBT, at both 10 and 24 weeks, were found for insomnia severity, sleep efficiency, cognitive failures, fatigue, sleepiness, depression, and anxiety. We found no between-group differences in objective tests of cognitive performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that dCBT robustly decreases self-reported cognitive impairment at post-treatment and these effects are maintained at 6 months.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Adulto , Cognición , Humanos , Método Simple Ciego , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA