The Effect of Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Medications on Wide-Awake Hand Surgery: An Analysis of 2,162 Cases.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine if perioperative prescription anticoagulant (AC) or antiplatelet (AP) medication use increases the rate of revision surgeries or complications following wide-awake hand surgery performed under local anesthesia. METHODS: All patients who underwent outpatient wide-awake hand surgery under local anesthesia without a tourniquet by two fellowship-trained orthopedic hand surgeons at a single academic practice over a 3-year period were included. Prescription history was reviewed to determine if any prescriptions were filled for an AC/AP drug within 90 days of surgery. All cases requiring revision were identified. Office notes were reviewed to determine postoperative complications and/or postoperative antibiotics prescribed for infection concerns. The number of revisions, complications, and postoperative antibiotic prescriptions were compared between patients who did, and did not, use perioperative AC/AP drugs. RESULTS: A total of 2,162 wide-awake local anesthesia surgeries were included, and there were 128 cases (5.9%) with perioperative AC/AP use. Of the 2,162 cases, 19 cases required revision surgery (18 without AC/AP use and one with AC/AP use). Postoperative wound complications occurred in 42 patients (38 without AC/AP use and four with AC/AP use). Of the wound complications, four were related to postoperative bleeding, one case of incisional bleeding, and three cases of incisional hematomas (three without AC/AP use and one with AC/AP use). None of these patients required additional intervention; their incisional bleeding or hematoma was resolved by their subsequent office visit. Sixty-five patients received postoperative antibiotics for infection concerns (59 without AC/AP use and six with AC/AP use). CONCLUSIONS: Prescription AC/AP medication use in the perioperative period for wide-awake hand surgery performed under local anesthesia was not associated with an increased risk for revision surgery or postoperative wound complications. This study demonstrates the safety of continuing patients' prescribed AC/AP medications during wide-awake hand surgery. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognosis IV.

Rate of Complications After Capitellum Fracture Fixation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: This systematic review aimed to determine the incidence of complications following surgical fixation of an acute capitellum fracture. We secondarily aimed to compare the complication rate between anterior-to-posterior (A-P) versus posterior-to-anterior (P-A) screw insertion. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched to identify studies on surgical fixation of capitellum fractures in skeletally mature patients. The main outcome was the rate of complication after fracture fixation. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the impact of the fixation technique on the outcomes after surgery. An inverse variance method using random or fixed effects models was used to perform a meta-analysis based on the degree of heterogeneity between studies. Study heterogeneity was evaluated using Q statistics to calculate the I2 index. RESULTS: We included 42 studies in the final analysis. The most reported complications after surgical fixation of capitellum fractures included elbow pain (21%), radiocapitellar arthritis (19%), hardware removal (17%), and heterotopic ossification (13%). When groups were stratified based on the direction of screw insertion, the mean rate of avascular necrosis was higher in the P-A direction (29% vs 11%). In comparison, the rate of revision fixation (2.9% vs 6.7%) and heterotopic ossification (7.3% vs 22%) were higher in the A-P direction. Transient posterior interosseous nerve palsy was reported in four patients in four studies, of whom three patients had A-P screw fixation. CONCLUSION: Fixation of a displaced capitellum fracture is recommended when possible. However, patients should be counseled about the potential risk of complications and chances of undergoing an unplanned surgery. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

The effect of outpatient web-based online scheduling versus traditional staff scheduling systems on progression to surgery and no-show rates.

Background: This study aimed to compare the rate of scheduled surgery and no-show rates between online-scheduled appointments and traditionally scheduled appointments. Materials and Methods: All scheduled outpatient visits at a single large multi-subspecialty orthopedic practice in three U.S. states (PA, NJ, and NY) were collected from February 1, 2022, to February 28, 2022. Visits were categorized as "online-scheduled" or "traditionally scheduled" and then further grouped as "no-show," "canceled," or "visited." Finally, visits were categorized as either "new patient" or "follow-up." Results: There was no significant difference between scheduling systems for patient progression to any procedure within 3 months of the initial visit (P = 0.97) and patient progression for surgery only within 3 months of the initial visit (P = 0.88). However, we found a significant difference with a higher rate of progression to surgery in traditionally scheduled than online-scheduled visits when accounting for only new patient visits that progressed to surgery within 3 months of the initial encounter (P = 0.036). No-show rates between scheduling systems were not significant (P = 0.79), but no-show rates were significant when comparing the practice's subspecialties (P < 0.001). Finally, no-show rates for online-scheduled compared to traditionally scheduled patients for both new and follow-up appointments were not significantly different (P = 0.28 and P = 0.94, respectively). Conclusion: Orthopedic practices should utilize online-scheduling systems as there was a higher progression to surgery of traditionally scheduled appointments compared to online. Depending on the subspecialty, no-show rates differed. Furthermore, online-scheduling allows for more patient autonomy and less burden on office staff.

Length of Plates and Number of Screws for the Fixation of Distal Humerus Fractures: A Finite Element Biomechanical Study.

PURPOSE: We performed a biomechanical analysis using the finite element method to assess the effects of plate length and the number of screws on construct stiffness, stress distribution, and fracture displacement in the fixation of type A2 distal humerus fractures. METHODS: A 3-dimensional humerus model was constructed using computed tomography of a healthy man. After creating a 2-mm extra-articular fracture gap, orthogonal double-plate fixation was performed with an incremental increase in plate length and the number of screws, creating 17 fixation models. Four screws were placed in each plate's distal segment, and the number of screws was increased incrementally in the segment proximal to the fracture, starting from 2 in the medial (M) and 2 in the lateral (L) plate (M2∗L2). RESULTS: The fifth screw proximal to the fracture in the lateral plate (L5) played an essential role in increasing stiffness under bending, axial, and torsional forces surpassing the intact bone, which may have been due to the bypassing of the stress riser area. Minimum construct stiffness was created when 5 (M3∗L2) screws were inserted into the proximal segment. For bending forces, the M4∗L2 construct was stronger than M3∗L3 (total 6 proximal screws), and M5∗L3 was stronger than M4∗L4 (total 8 proximal screws), showing higher stiffness when the plates ended at different levels. The M4∗L2 construct (6 screws) had stiffness comparable with M4∗L3, M4∗L4, and M5∗L4 during bending, showing comparable stiffness with the least instrumentation density. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggested M3∗L5 as the optimum and M3∗L2 as the minimum construct to resist all bending, axial and torsional forces. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Applying the results may improve surgical techniques, decrease the rate of complications, including fixation failure and nerve injury, and optimize the time of surgery. Moreover, hardware removal is less cumbersome with fewer screws.

Biomechanical comparison of elbow stability constructs.

BACKGROUND: Despite surgical stabilization of complex elbow trauma, additional fixation to maintain joint congruity and stability may be required. Multiple biomechanical constructs include a static external fixator (SEF), a hinged external fixator (HEF), an internal joint stabilizer (IJS), and a hinged elbow orthosis (HEO). The optimal adjunct fixation to surgical reduction is yet to be determined. METHODS: Eight matched cadaveric upper extremities were tested in a biomechanical model. Anteroposterior stress radiographs were obtained of the elbow in full supination at 0° and 45° of elbow flexion with the weight of the hand serving as a varus load as the baseline. A 360° capsuloligamentous soft-tissue release was performed around the elbow. The biomechanical constructs were applied in the same sequential order: SEF, HEF, IJS, and HEO. For each construct, 0 kg (0-lb) and 2.3 kg (5-lb) of weight were applied to the distal arm. At both weights, radiographs were obtained with the elbow at 0° and 45° of flexion, with subsequent measurement of displacement, congruence at the ulnohumeral joint, and the ulnohumeral opening angle. Statistical analysis was performed to quantify the strength and stability of each construct. RESULTS: Compared with the control group at 0° with and without 2.3 kg (5-lb) of varus force and at 45° with and without 2.3 kg (5-lb) of varus force, no difference was noted in the medial ulnohumeral joint space, lateral ulnohumeral joint space, or ulnohumeral opening angle between the SEF, HEF, and IJS. The gap change after exertion of a 2.3-kg (5-lb) force between the control condition and application of each construct demonstrated no difference between the SEF, HEF, and IJS. Comparison among destabilized elbows showed no significant difference between the SEF, HEF, and IJS. The HEO catastrophically failed in each position at 0 kg (0-lb) of weight. CONCLUSION: The SEF, HEF, and IJS are neither superior nor inferior at maintaining elbow congruity with the weight of the arm and 2.3 kg (5-lb) of varus stress. The HEO did not provide additional stability to the unstable elbow.

Rhenium-188 radiosynovectomy for chronic haemophilic synovitis: Evaluation of its safety and efficacy in haemophilic patients.

INTRODUCTION: Radiocolloids labelled with less costly and more accessible radionuclides such as rhenium-188 are of interest to developing countries compared with those labelled with rhenium-186 and yttrium-90. AIM: This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiosynovectomy using rhenium-188 in patients with chronic haemophilic synovitis and recurrent hemarthrosis. METHODS: In this quasi-experimental prospective study, 20 haemophilic patients were evaluated at preinjection, and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after injection. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was done to measure synovial thickness and to calculate Denver score. Joint radiographs were taken to measure the Pettersson score. The Gilbert questionnaire, Functional Independence Score in Hemophilia (FISH) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain were completed, and the number of bleeding episodes and factor consumption were recorded at each follow-up visit. RESULTS: The number of bleeding episodes, the amount of factor consumption per month, VAS pain scores and synovial thickness decreased significantly over time (P < .05). Gilbert and FISH scores showed significant improvement (P < .001). However, Pettersson score and Denver score showed no significant changes after injection. Minor complications including temporary pain and swelling occurred in 20% of patients, and no major complication was observed after rhenium-188 injection. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated high clinical impact, efficacy, safety and low invasion of rhenium-188 in radiosynovectomy of haemophilic patients. Considering the availability and relatively low cost of rhenium-188 in developing countries, this can be a good treatment option for haemophilic patients with recurrent hemarthrosis, particularly when the synovial hypertrophy is not massive yet.

Visualization During Endoscopic Versus Open Cubital Tunnel Decompression: A Cadaveric Study.

PURPOSE: To determine the minimum incision size needed using an open cubital tunnel technique to obtain equivalent visualization comparable with an endoscopic technique. METHODS: Visualization was assessed in 10 fresh-frozen cadavers with a 2-cm incision, using percutaneous needle localization with the endoscopic system. The most proximal and distal extent of the field of view was marked. Next, an open cubital tunnel release was performed on each cadaver specimen. The incision size was increased incrementally, and the most proximal and distal extents of visualization were recorded for each incision size. The mean visualization distance and standard deviation for each incisional length were calculated. RESULTS: The mean proximal field of view with the endoscopic technique was 8.1 cm. The mean distal field of view was 8.3 cm. Using the open technique, a 2-cm incision allowed 5.9 cm visualization proximally and 5.2 cm distally, which was significantly less than the endoscopic view. A 4-cm open incision provided similar visualization as the endoscopic technique. A 6-cm open incision was required to obtain statistically significant improvements in visualization compared with an endoscopic technique. CONCLUSIONS: A 4-cm open incision allowed visualization of approximately 9 cm proximal and 9 cm distal to the medial epicondyle, which was equivalent to the 2-cm endoscopic technique for cubital tunnel release. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although the endoscopic release allows greater visualization of the ulnar nerve with a smaller incision, it is unclear whether this improvement in visualization improves the surgeon's ability to decompress the ulnar nerve.

Electrodiagnostic Grade and Carpal Tunnel Release Outcomes: A Prospective Analysis.

PURPOSE: The value of electrodiagnostic (EDX) study grades as a prognostic indicator of clinical results after carpal tunnel release (CTR) remains controversial. In this study, we tested the primary null hypothesis that symptom relief after CTR would not differ based on EDX grade. Secondarily, we evaluated the degree of symptomatic and functional postoperative improvement relative to preoperative EDX grade. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 199 consecutive patients with 256 hands after CTR confirmed with EDX. Data were collected before surgery and patients were observed at 2 weeks and 3 months after surgery. There were 20 hands with mild, 126 with moderate, and 110 with severe involvement in the preoperative EDX. Demographic, EDX grade (mild, moderate, or severe); surgical parameters; Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire; symptom severity scale, functional status scale, pain catastrophizing scale, and visual analog scale data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: There was significant improvement in Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, symptom severity scale, and functional status scale scores from the preoperative to 2-week and 3-month postoperative visits in all categories of EDX grade. There was no significant difference in the extent of recovery by the 2-week and 3-month visits relative to EDX grade. Catastrophic thinking did not have a significant effect on any of the 3 groups. Pain decreased dramatically at 2 weeks after surgery but there was no additional significant difference in visual analog scale scores between the 2-week and 3-month postoperative visits. Postoperative pain improvement occurred regardless of EDX grade. There were no major complications or reoperations in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Carpal tunnel release demonstrated consistently significant improvement in outcomes regardless of EDX grade at initial and final follow-up. The extent of postoperative improvement after CTR overall was also not statistically different between groups with differing EDX severity. Older patients with severe CTS achieved more modest gains. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

The Rate of Radial Head Prosthesis Removal or Revision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review with the primary objective to determine the overall incidence of radial head prosthesis removal or revision. Our secondary objectives addressed the incidence of removal or revision based on the type of prosthesis fixation (cemented, uncemented smooth stem, uncemented press-fit), material (metal, Vitallium, titanium, pyrocarbon), and design (short vs long stem and monopolar vs bipolar), and the reasons for prosthetic removal or revision. METHODS: We included 30 studies with a total of 1,017 patients out of whom 77 prostheses were removed and 45 prostheses were revised. RESULTS: The pooled rate of radial head prosthesis removal or revision was 10.0% (95% confidence interval, 7.3%-13.6%) with a mean follow-up of 38 months. Subgroup analysis showed that the incidence of removal/revision was lowest with the cemented fixation, longer-stem, Vitallium material, and bipolar prosthesis. More than half of the prostheses were removed/revised for excision of the heterotopic ossification (47%) and for the treatment of stiffness and limitation of motion (42%). Other reasons recorded were pain (19%), loosening (16%), overstuffing (13%), instability (12%), infection (8%), and prosthesis disassembly (4%). CONCLUSIONS: The current data show that the highest incidence of removal/revision occurred within 2 years after implantation. There was no major difference in the incidence of removal/revision among different designs and materials. Implant removal was often performed as part of a procedure to manage elbow stiffness and heterotopic ossification at the surgeon's preference, not necessarily because the implant was malfunctioning. It appears that most radial head arthroplasties have an acceptable and comparable mid-term longevity; however, it is unclear whether long-term longevity will differ between devices. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

Radiocapitellar prosthetic arthroplasty: short-term to midterm results of 19 elbows.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have discussed the short-term results of radiocapitellar (RC) prosthetic arthroplasty (PA). In this study, we assessed the short-term to midterm functional and radiographic results of elbows after RC PA. Our secondary aim was to assess the survival of the RC PA. METHODS: We included 19 elbows in 18 patients with a mean follow-up of 35 months (range, 12-88 months). Patients were examined for instability and range of motion and were assessed using Mayo Elbow Performance Index and Oxford Elbow Score at any subsequent visits. RC PA was the primary treatment in 16 elbows, and 3 were revision radial head arthroplasty with concomitant capitellar resurfacing. RESULTS: Range of motion, pain, and functional scores improved significantly from the preoperative to the final follow-up visit. Categoric grouping of the final Mayo Elbow Performance Index outcome scores showed 9 excellent, 5 good, 3 fair, 0 poor, and 2 missing data. However, stability of the elbow remained unchanged. There was no pain in 11 patients, mild pain in 5, and moderate pain in 3. Radiographic assessment showed no significant progress in ulnohumeral arthritis, although 3 elbows showed osteoarthritis progression to a higher grade. There were no major complications, including infection, revision, disassembly of the components, or conversion to total elbow arthroplasty. Survival of the RC PA was 100%. CONCLUSION: Elbow arthritis seems to become stationary after RC PA. Symptomatic RC osteoarthritis would probably benefit from RC PA regardless of the etiology.

Portal placement in elbow arthroscopy by novice surgeons: cadaver study.

PURPOSE: In this anatomical cadaver study, the distance between major nerves and ligaments at risk for injury and portal sites created by trainees was measured. Trainees, inexperienced in elbow arthroscopy, have received a didactic lecture and cadaver instruction prior to portal placement. The incidence of iatrogenic injury from novice portal placement was also determined. METHODS: Anterolateral, direct lateral, and anteromedial arthroscopic portals were created in ten cadavers by ten inexperienced trainees in elbow arthroscopy. After creating each portal, the trajectory of the portal was marked with a guide pin. Subsequently, the cadavers were dissected and the distances between the guide pin in the anterolateral, direct lateral, and anteromedial portals and important ligaments and nerves were measured. RESULTS: The difference between the distance of the direct lateral portal and the posterior antebrachial cutaneous nerve (PABCN) (22 mm, p < 0.001), the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (4.0 mm, p < 0.001), and the radial nerve (25 mm, p < 0.001) was different from the average reported distances in the literature. A difference was found between the distance of the anterolateral portal and the PABCN (32 mm, p < 0.001) compared to previous studies. Three major iatrogenic complications were observed, including: laceration of the posterior bundle of the medial ulnar collateral ligament, lateral ulnar collateral ligament midsubstance laceration, and median nerve partial laceration. CONCLUSION: Surgeons increasingly consider arthroscopic treatment as an option for elbow pathology. In the present study a surgical complication rate of 30 % was found with novice portal placement during elbow arthroscopy. Furthermore, as the results from this study have indicated, accurate, precise, and safe portal placement in elbow arthroscopy is not easily achieved by didactic lecture and cadaver instruction session alone. Level of evidence V.

One-stage surgical treatment for concomitant rotator cuff tears with shoulder stiffness has comparable results with isolated rotator cuff tears: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Addressing preoperative shoulder stiffness before rotator cuff repair (RCR) is advocated, but the effectiveness of this approach is debatable. We hypothesized that 1-stage treatment of concomitant rotator cuff tear (RCT) with shoulder stiffness has comparable results with isolated RCT. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched using the keywords of "shoulder stiffness" OR "adhesive capsulitis" OR "frozen shoulder" AND "rotator cuff." Studies that met all the criteria compared the 2 arms of isolated RCT vs. RCT with concomitant shoulder stiffness, received no physical therapy before surgery, and reported data of preoperative and postoperative range of motion (ROM) and functional outcomes after surgery. RESULTS: Four level III studies met the inclusion criteria. The non-stiff group (isolated RCT) included 460 patients who underwent RCR; the stiff group (RCT with concomitant shoulder stiffness) included 111 patients who underwent RCR and manipulation under anesthesia with or without capsular release. There were significant differences in preoperative ROM between stiff and non-stiff groups. At final follow-up, there were no statistical differences in all ROM between the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in comparing preoperative and postoperative outcome scores including visual analog scale for pain, Constant, modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and University of California-Los Angeles scores. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant surgical treatment of nonmassive RCT and moderate shoulder stiffness in 1 stage may have comparable results to the surgical treatment of RCT in patients without preoperative stiffness. Therefore, a physical therapy regimen before surgical intervention may not be necessary.

Multicenter trial of an internal joint stabilizer for the elbow.

BACKGROUND: Our primary efficacy objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of the internal joint stabilizer of the elbow (IJS-E) in maintaining concentric location of the elbow during and after removal of the device in the treatment of persistent or recurrent instability after elbow fracture or dislocations, or both. The secondary study objectives were to assess range of motion, Broberg-Morrey functional score, Broberg-Morrey categorical rating, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and the rate of complications and adverse events after the use of IJS-E. METHODS: Twenty-four patients were studied in a multicenter, nonrandomized, prospective, single-arm study. The IJS-E was used to provide temporary stabilization of the elbow joint and allow a functional range of motion while ligaments and fractures healed. RESULTS: The elbow remained concentrically aligned in 23 of 24 patients. One coronoid-deficient elbow did not maintain concentric reduction. At the last evaluation a minimum of 6 months after device removal, the mean arc of elbow flexion was 119° (range, 80°-150°; standard deviation [SD], 18°), and the mean arc of forearm rotation was 151° (range, 90°-190°; SD, 24°). The mean and median Broberg-Morrey scores were 93 and 97, respectively. Categorically the results were excellent in 14, good in 8, fair in 1, and poor in 1. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 16 (range, 0-68; SD, 18). CONCLUSION: The IJS-E maintains concentric reduction, allows elbow motion, and avoids the inconveniences and pin problems of percutaneous fixation.

Side-to-Side Versus Pulvertaft Extensor Tenorrhaphy-A Biomechanical Study.

PURPOSE: We hypothesized that a side-to-side (STS) tendon repair has biomechanical characteristics that match those of a Pulvertaft (PT) weave. METHODS: Thirty extensor tendons were harvested (4 extensor digitorum communis and 1 extensor indicis proprius from 6 cadaver arms). Three hand surgery fellows with similar backgrounds of training under the same conditions and precise standardized technique performed the repairs (5 PT and 5 STS per surgeon). After the repairs, the tendons were passed through a graft-sizing guide to determine bulk and results were expressed as a repaired versus native diameter ratio. The specimens were then tested for ultimate strength and fatigue properties. Failure type and mechanical properties were recorded and compared with those of the native tendon. RESULTS: The average peak force to failure was 93 ± 20 N for the STS and 62 ± 32 N for PT group. Relative strength ratio (repair strength compared with native tendon strength) was 37% ± 21% for the STS and 22% ± 11% for the PT group. In the STS group, all failures occurred as a result of tissue failure; however, in the PT, suture failures occurred in 3 tendons before tissue failure. The mean bulk ratio of the repaired site versus native proximal tendon was 37 ± 14% and 40% ± 22% more for the STS and PT groups, respectively. These values for native distal tendon were 28% ± 9.9% and 26% ±24 %, respectively for STS and PT repair. Furthermore, the bulk of the repaired site for the STS and PT groups was 4.2 ± 0.50 and 4.7 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Side-to-side repair technique showed superior biomechanical properties while demonstrating comparable repair bulk of the tendon coaptation compared with the Pulvertaft weave. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this study may help guide a surgeon's choice of repair technique when addressing tendon injuries or tendon transfers.

A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Corticosteroid Injection for Enthesopathy of the Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis Origin.

PURPOSE: The null hypothesis that there is no effect of corticosteroid injection on visual analog scale for pain in patients with enthesopathy of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (eECRB) origin 6 months after treatment was tested. Our secondary hypotheses were that there is no effect of corticosteroid injection on pain intensity at 1 and 3 months after treatment; that there is no effect of corticosteroid injection on grip strength at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment; and that there is no effect of corticosteroid injection on Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment. METHODS: EMBASE, PubMed Publisher, MEDLINE, OvidSP, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Central were searched for relevant studies. Studies were eligible if there was (1) a description of corticosteroid injection treatment for eECRB; (2) randomized placebo injection-controlled trials with at least 10 adults included with eECRB; (3) a full-text article available with data describing the mean differences between the corticosteroid and the control groups and the outcome measures used; and (4) follow-up of at least 1 month. In total, 7 randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of corticosteroid injection with a placebo injection on symptoms of eECRB were included in our meta-analysis. RESULTS: We found no difference in pain intensity 6 months after injection of corticosteroids or placebo. Pain intensity was slightly, but significantly, lower 1 month, but not 3 months, after steroid injection. There were no significant differences in grip strength or Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that there is no difference in pain intensity between corticosteroid injection and placebo 6 months after injection. We interpret the weight of evidence to date as suggesting that corticosteroid injections are neither meaningfully palliative nor disease modifying when used to treat eECRB. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic I.

Factors associated with operative treatment of enthesopathy of the extensor carpi radialis brevis origin.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the factors associated with variation in the rate of surgery for enthesopathy of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (eECRB). METHODS: We used a large database from 3 academic hospitals including 5964 patients with the diagnosis of eECRB from 2001 to 2007. Of those, 244 patients (4%) had surgery for eECRB. We used the date of the first encounter as the date of diagnosis. We also recorded the date of the first cortisone injection and surgery for eECRB. We used Cox multivariable regression analysis to find factors associated with surgery. We considered the following explanatory factors: age, sex, race, diabetes, a diagnosis of major depression, a diagnosis of an anxiety disorder, hospital, provider (surgeon vs. nonsurgeon), corticosteroid injection, and the time from diagnosis to the first cortisone injection. RESULTS: The hazard ratio of having surgery was 12-times greater if the initial provider was an orthopedic surgeon rather a nonsurgeon and 1.7-times greater at 1 of the 2 hospitals. The rate of surgery varied substantially, ranging from 0% to 22%. Corticosteroid injection delayed the time to surgery but was ultimately associated with a higher rate of surgery. The majority (86%) of surgeries were done within 1 year of the first documented office visit. CONCLUSIONS: It seems likely that an emphasis on the preferences and values of the patient rather than the surgeon would decrease the variation in surgery rates for eECRB observed in this study. Methods for optimizing the influence of patient preferences and values on decision making (eg, decision aids) merit additional study.

Involvement of the lesser sigmoid notch in elbow fracture dislocations.

BACKGROUND: This study addressed the primary null hypothesis that there is no difference in the articular surface area of the lesser sigmoid notch involved among Mayo classes. Secondarily, we analyzed the fracture line location and the pattern of lesser sigmoid notch articular surface involvement among Mayo classes. METHODS: Using quantitative 3-dimensional computed tomography, we reconstructed and analyzed fractures involving the lesser sigmoid notch articular surface in 52 patients. Further, we assessed the surface area involved in the fracture, the number of fracture fragments, and the location and direction of the fracture lines. Coronoid fractures were classified according to Mayo types. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between Mayo types 1 and 2 in any characteristic of the involvement of the lesser sigmoid notch articular surface, whereas Mayo type 3 was significantly different from both Mayo types 1 and 2 in the area involved in the fracture (42% in Mayo type 3 vs. 9% in Mayo types 1 and 2), the number of articular fragments (>3 fragments in type 3 vs. 2 fragments in types 1 and 2), and the direction of fracture line (both horizontal and vertical lines in type 3 vs. only horizontal line in types 1 and 2). CONCLUSION: Mayo type III results in a more complex fracture, which might need to be addressed directly or indirectly during open reduction with internal fixation of olecranon fracture dislocations because changes in the geometry of lesser sigmoid notch may affect the radioulnar joint if it remains incongruent.

Intraoperative Technique for Evaluation of the Interosseous Ligament of the Forearm.

PURPOSE: To introduce a technique for the diagnosis of interosseous ligament (IOL) disruption based on lateral displacement of the radius after radial head resection and to determine the cutoff value of the lateral displacement for the diagnosis of disruption, the best elbow position for testing, and the diagnostic performance of the technique in different positions. METHODS: We used 10 fresh-frozen cadavers. After resection of the radial head, a Steinman pin was placed into the radius medullary canal and used to mark the pin location on the capitellum. We applied 1 kg force to pull the proximal radius laterally and measured the displacement in full supination, neutral, and full pronation of the forearm with the elbow in extension and then in 90° flexion. All measurements were performed once with the IOL intact and again with it cut. To assess diagnostic efficacy, receiver operating characteristics curves were constructed. To determine the quality of the technique, we measured the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for each position. We also determined the cutoff value to obtain the highest sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: The area under the curve of the test in extension-supination and flexion-supination showed that these positions were excellent for the diagnosis of IOL disruption. The cutoff value of 5.5 mm lateral displacement in extension-supination had 100% sensitivity and 90% specificity. In flexion-supination, the cutoff value of 9 mm had 100% sensitivity and 90% specificity for the diagnosis of IOL disruption. CONCLUSIONS: This maneuver was reliable and accurate in cadavers with complete IOL disruption. It is likely that in an intraoperative setting, these results will be reproducible. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic II.

Intraoperative Physical Examination for Diagnosis of Interosseous Ligament Rupture-Cadaveric Study.

PURPOSE: To study the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the diagnosis of interosseous ligament (IOL) rupture in a cadaver model. METHODS: On 12 fresh frozen cadavers, radial heads were cut using an identical incision and osteotomy. After randomization, the soft tissues of the limbs were divided into 4 groups: both IOL and triangular fibrocartilage (TFCC) intact; IOL disruption but TFCC intact; both IOL and TFCC divided; and IOL intact but TFCC divided. All incisions had identical suturing. After standard instruction and demonstration of radius pull-push and radius lateral pull tests, 10 physician evaluators with different levels of experience examined the cadaver limbs in a standardized way (elbow at 90° with the forearm held in both supination and pronation) and were asked to classify them into one of the 4 groups. Next, the same examiners were asked to re-examine the limbs after randomly changing the order of examination. RESULTS: The interobserver reliability of agreement for the diagnosis of IOL injury (groups 2 and 3) was fair in both rounds of examination and the intraobserver reliability was moderate. The intra- and interobserver reliabilities of agreement for the 4 groups of injuries among the examiners were fair in both rounds of examination. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive, and negative predictive values were all around 70%. The likelihood of a positive test corresponding with the presence of IOL rupture (positive likelihood ratio) was 2.2. The likelihood of a negative test correctly diagnosing an intact IOL was 0.40. CONCLUSIONS: In cadavers, intraoperative tests had fair reliability and 70% accuracy for the diagnosis of IOL rupture using the push-pull and lateral pull maneuvers. The level of experience did not have any effect on the correct diagnosis of intact versus disrupted IOL. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although not common, some failure of surgeries for traumatic elbow fracture-dislocations is because of failure in timely diagnosis of IOL disruption.

Oxford Shoulder Score: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation Study of the Persian Version in Iran.

BACKGROUND: Oxford shoulder score is a specific 12-item patient-reported tool for evaluation of patients with inflammatory and degenerative disorders of the shoulder. Since its introduction, it has been translated and culturally adapted in some Western and Eastern countries. The aim of this study was to translate the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) in Persian and to test its validity and reliability in Persian speaking population in Iran. METHODS: One hundred patients with degenerative or inflammatory shoulder problem participated in the survey in 2012. All patients completed the Persian version of OSS, Persian DASH and the SF-36 for testing validity. Randomly, 37 patients filled out the Persian OSS again three days after the initial visit to assess the reliability of the questionnaire. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.93. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.93. In terms of validity, there was a significant correlation between the Persian OSS and DASH and SF-36 scores (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The Persian version of the OSS proved to be a valid, reliable, and reproducible tool as demonstrated by high Cronbach's alpha and Pearson's correlation coefficients. The Persian transcript of OSS is administrable to Persian speaking patients with shoulder condition and it is understandable by them.