Zinc and manganese homeostasis closely interact in mammalian cells.

Understanding the homeostatic interactions among essential trace metals is important for explaining their roles in cellular systems. Recent studies in vertebrates suggest that cellular Mn metabolism is related to Zn metabolism in multifarious cellular processes. However, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. In this study, we examined the changes in the expression of proteins involved in cellular Zn and/or Mn homeostatic control and measured the Mn as well as Zn contents and Zn enzyme activities to elucidate the effects of Mn and Zn homeostasis on each other. Mn treatment decreased the expression of the Zn homeostatic proteins metallothionein (MT) and ZNT1 and reduced Zn enzyme activities, which were attributed to the decreased Zn content. Moreover, loss of Mn efflux transport protein decreased MT and ZNT1 expression and Zn enzyme activity without changing extracellular Mn content. This reduction was not observed when supplementing with the same Cu concentrations and in cells lacking Cu efflux proteins. Furthermore, cellular Zn homeostasis was oppositely regulated in cells expressing Zn and Mn importer ZIP8, depending on whether Zn or Mn concentration was elevated in the extracellular milieu. Our results provide novel insights into the intricate interactions between Mn and Zn homeostasis in mammalian cells and facilitate our understanding of the physiopathology of Mn, which may lead to the development of treatment strategies for Mn-related diseases in the future.

The usefulness of machine-learning-based evaluation of clinical and pretreatment 18F-FDG-PET/CT radiomic features for predicting prognosis in patients with laryngeal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether machine learning (ML) analyses involving clinical and 18F-FDG-PET-based radiomic features are helpful in predicting prognosis in patients with laryngeal cancer. METHODS: This retrospective study included 49 patients with laryngeal cancer who underwent18F-FDG-PET/CT before treatment, and these patients were divided into the training (n = 34) and testing (n = 15) cohorts.Seven clinical (age, sex, tumor size, T stage, N stage, Union for International Cancer Control stage, and treatment) and 40 18F-FDG-PET-based radiomic features were used to predict disease progression and survival. Six ML algorithms (random forest, neural network, k-nearest neighbors, naïve Bayes, logistic regression, and support vector machine) were used for predicting disease progression. Two ML algorithms (cox proportional hazard and random survival forest [RSF] model) considering for time-to-event outcomes were used to assess progression-free survival (PFS), and prediction performance was assessed by the concordance index (C-index). RESULTS: Tumor size, T stage, N stage, GLZLM_ZLNU, and GLCM_Entropy were the five most important features for predicting disease progression.In both cohorts, the naïve Bayes model constructed by these five features was the best performing classifier (training: AUC = 0.805; testing: AUC = 0.842). The RSF model using the five features (tumor size, GLZLM_ZLNU, GLCM_Entropy, GLRLM_LRHGE and GLRLM_SRHGE) exhibited the highest performance in predicting PFS (training: C-index = 0.840; testing: C-index = 0.808). CONCLUSION: ML analyses involving clinical and 18F-FDG-PET-based radiomic features may help predict disease progression and survival in patients with laryngeal cancer. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: ML approach using clinical and 18F-FDG-PET-based radiomic features has the potential to predict prognosis of laryngeal cancer.

Differentiating primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma by time-dependent diffusion using oscillating gradient.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to elucidate the impact of effective diffusion time setting on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-based differentiation between primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs) and glioblastomas (GBMs) and to investigate the usage of time-dependent diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted involving 21 patients with PCNSLs and 66 patients with GBMs using diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) sequences with oscillating gradient spin-echo (Δeff = 7.1 ms) and conventional pulsed gradient (Δeff = 44.5 ms). In addition to ADC maps at the two diffusion times (ADC7.1 ms and ADC44.5 ms), we generated maps of the ADC changes (cADC) and the relative ADC changes (rcADC) between the two diffusion times. Regions of interest were placed on enhancing regions and non-enhancing peritumoral regions. The mean and the fifth and 95th percentile values of each parameter were compared between PCNSLs and GBMs. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values were used to compare the discriminating performances among the indices. RESULTS: In enhancing regions, the mean and fifth and 95th percentile values of ADC44.5 ms and ADC7.1 ms in PCNSLs were significantly lower than those in GBMs (p = 0.02 for 95th percentile of ADC44.5 ms, p = 0.04 for ADC7.1 ms, and p < 0.01 for others). Furthermore, the mean and fifth and 95th percentile values of cADC and rcADC were significantly higher in PCNSLs than in GBMs (each p < 0.01). The AUC of the best-performing index for ADC7.1 ms was significantly lower than that for ADC44.5 ms (p < 0.001). The mean rcADC showed the highest discriminating performance (AUC = 0.920) among all indices. In peritumoral regions, no significant difference in any of the three indices of ADC44.5 ms, ADC7.1 ms, cADC, and rcADC was observed between PCNSLs and GBMs. CONCLUSIONS: Effective diffusion time setting can have a crucial impact on the performance of ADC in differentiating between PCNSLs and GBMs. The time-dependent diffusion MRI parameters may be useful in the differentiation of these lesions.

Differentiating brain metastasis from glioblastoma by time-dependent diffusion MRI.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to investigate the use of time-dependent diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters in distinguishing between glioblastomas and brain metastases. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted involving 65 patients with glioblastomas and 27 patients with metastases using a diffusion-weighted imaging sequence with oscillating gradient spin-echo (OGSE, 50 Hz) and a conventional pulsed gradient spin-echo (PGSE, 0 Hz) sequence. In addition to apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps from two sequences (ADC50Hz and ADC0Hz), we generated maps of the ADC change (cADC): ADC50Hz - ADC0Hz and the relative ADC change (rcADC): (ADC50Hz - ADC0Hz)/ ADC0Hz × 100 (%). RESULTS: The mean and the fifth and 95th percentile values of each parameter in enhancing and peritumoral regions were compared between glioblastomas and metastases. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of the best discriminating indices were compared. In enhancing regions, none of the indices of ADC0Hz and ADC50Hz showed significant differences between metastases and glioblastomas. The mean cADC and rcADC values of metastases were significantly higher than those of glioblastomas (0.24 ± 0.12 × 10-3mm2/s vs. 0.14 ± 0.03 × 10-3mm2/s and 23.3 ± 9.4% vs. 14.0 ± 4.7%; all p < 0.01). In peritumoral regions, no significant difference in all ADC indices was observed between metastases and glioblastomas. The AUC values for the mean cADC (0.877) and rcADC (0.819) values in enhancing regions were significantly higher than those for ADC0Hz5th (0.595; all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The time-dependent diffusion MRI parameters may be useful for differentiating brain metastases from glioblastomas.