RESUMEN
Osimertinib administration has been approved as an adjuvant treatment after complete surgical resection in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. This article presents the first report of life-threatening postoperative osimertinib-induced interstitial lung disease. An 83-year-old male patient underwent right upper lobectomy (pathologic stage IIA) and osimertinib (80 mg/d) was initiated on postoperative day 75. On day 44 of osimertinib administration, chest computed tomography revealed diffuse ground-glass opacities; accordingly, osimertinib-induced interstitial lung disease was diagnosed. Steroid pulse therapy was initiated using a high-flow nasal cannula to treat dyspnea and hypoxemia, rapidly improving the respiratory status and imaging findings; moreover, the patient's clinical course was excellent. This case report suggests that the postoperative occurrence of severe osimertinib-induced interstitial lung disease is a crucial factor that must be considered in patient decision-making regarding perioperative treatment.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: For epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), administration of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is mandatory to prolong survival. To date, a comparison of second- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs has not been reported as far as we are aware. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the survival time of patients diagnosed with EGFR-mutated advanced or recurrent NSCLC who had received afatinib, a second-generation EGFR-TKI, or osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI, as the first-line treatment. RESULTS: Among the 49 patients included in the study, 15 received afatinib and 34 received osimertinib. No significant differences in overall survival were observed between the two groups [afatinib vs. osimertinib=36 vs. 33 months (hazard ratio=2.917, 95% confidence interval=0.780-10.905; p=0.112)]. T790M mutation was detected in three of the patients in the afatinib group, and all three subsequently received osimertinib. The median overall survival of these three patients and of the 12 without the mutation were 63 and 36 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was no apparent difference in the effect on survival between second- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs, whereas the sequential administration of second- followed by third-generation EGFR-TKIs appeared to confer a better long-term prognosis.