RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The physical dependence on prescription opioids among cancer survivors remains an under-investigated area, with a scarcity of well-designed prospective studies. METHODS: This single-arm, phase-2 clinical trial in Korea assessed the efficacy and safety of a transdermal buprenorphine patch (TBP) in managing physical dependence on prescription opioids in cancer survivors, as confirmed through the DSM-5 criteria or psychiatric consultation for opioid withdrawal. This study involved a 4-phase treatment protocol of screening, induction/stabilization, discontinuation, and monitoring. The primary outcome was the rate of successful opioid discontinuation, as measured by a negative urine-drug screening at 8 weeks. Key secondary outcomes included the resumption of prescribed opioids, changes in both the Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS) and morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD), and assessments related to the psychological and physiological aspects of dependence and safety. RESULTS: Thirty-one participants were enrolled. In the intention-to-treat population, the success rate of opioid discontinuation was 58%, with only 2 participants experiencing a resumption of prescribed opioids. Significant reductions were observed in MEDD, which decreased from 98 to 26 mg/day (Pâ <â .001), and COWS scores, which decreased from 5.5 to 2.8 (Pâ <â .001). Desire to use opioids reduced from 7.0 to 3.0 on a 10-point numeric rating scale (Pâ <â .001). Toxicities related to TBP were mild and manageable, without severe precipitated withdrawal symptoms. CONCLUSION: TBP may be considered as an alternative therapeutic option in cancer survivors physically dependent on prescription opioids, especially where sublingual formulations are unavailable.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Megestrol acetate (MA) is used to manage anorexia and cachexia in patients with advanced cancer. This study investigated the prescription patterns of MA in patients with metastatic gastric cancer, as well as evaluated its impact on survival outcomes and the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). METHODS: A Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA) service database was used to investigate differences in baseline characteristics, survival, and the incidence of VTE according to MA prescription patterns (i.e., prescription vs. no prescription) in patients diagnosed with metastatic gastric cancer from July 2014 to December 2015. RESULTS: A total of 1938 patients were included in this study. In total, 65% of the patients were prescribed MA. Older age, treatment in tertiary hospitals, and palliative chemotherapy were statistically significant predictive factors for MA prescription. Continuous prescription of MA was observed in 37% of patients. There was no statistically significant difference in survival between the MA and non-MA prescription groups on multivariate analysis. Among the 1427 patients included in the analysis for VTE incidence, 4.3% and 2.9% were diagnosed with VTE during the follow-up period in the MA and non-MA prescription groups, respectively. However, there was no statistically significant difference in VTE diagnosis between the groups on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: MA is commonly prescribed for metastatic gastric cancer, especially in elderly patients and those undergoing palliative chemotherapy, without significantly affecting survival or VTE risk.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gástricas , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Anciano , Acetato de Megestrol/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Caquexia/etiología , Seguro de Salud , Factores de Transcripción/uso terapéutico , Proteínas de Ciclo Celular/uso terapéutico , Chaperonas de Histonas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although the prognostic value of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has been reported in several previous studies, its clinical relevance for the presence of sarcopenia has not been assessed. METHODS: In this study, 305 DLBCL patients were reviewed. They were categorized into normal/mild (n = 219) and moderate/severe (n = 86) CONUT groups. Sarcopenia was assessed using the L3-skeletal muscle index measured by baseline computed tomography imaging. Based on CONUT score and sarcopenia, patients were grouped: A (normal/mild CONUT and no sarcopenia), B (either moderate/severe CONUT or sarcopenia, but not both), and C (both moderate/severe CONUT and sarcopenia). RESULTS: The moderate/severe CONUT group showed higher rates of ≥ grade 3 febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, non-hematologic toxicities, and early treatment discontinuation not related to disease progression, compared to the normal/mild CONUT group. The moderate/severe CONUT group had a lower complete response rate (58.1% vs. 80.8%) and shorter median overall survival (18.5 vs. 162.6 months) than the normal/mild group. Group C had the poorest prognosis with a median survival of 8.6 months, while groups A and B showed better outcomes (not reached and 60.1 months, respectively). Combining CONUT score and sarcopenia improved the predictive accuracy of the Cox regression model (C-index: 0.763), compared to the performance of using either CONUT score (C-index: 0.754) or sarcopenia alone (C-index: 0.755). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the moderate/severe CONUT group exhibited treatment intolerance, lower response, and poor prognosis. Additionally, combining CONUT score and sarcopenia enhanced predictive accuracy for survival outcomes compared to individual variables.
Asunto(s)
Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Sarcopenia , Humanos , Pronóstico , Músculo Esquelético/patología , Estado Nutricional , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Evaluación NutricionalRESUMEN
Background: This multicenter study investigated the predictive value of baseline AFP and on-treatment AFP response for survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with regorafenib. Materials & methods: A total of 578 patients with HCC treated with regorafenib from 12 institutions in South Korea and Italy were included. Baseline AFP (cutoff, 400 ng/ml) and AFP response (20% reduction from baseline) were analyzed for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Baseline AFP below 400 ng/ml was a significant factor that was independently associated with longer OS and PFS. AFP response was also a significant factor independently associated with longer OS and PFS. Conclusion: Baseline AFP and AFP response may be used as prognostic factors for survival in HCC treated with regorafenib.
Regorafenib is standard second-line therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who show failure to sorafenib treatment, but there is no reliable factor to predict survival. In this multicenter, retrospective study with patients from South Korea and Italy, we have found that both baseline AFP level and on-treatment AFP response have independent predictive value for survival in patients with HCC under regorafenib treatment. We observed similar results when the patients were divided according to their nationality (South Korea vs Italy), despite the fact that the baseline characteristics of the patients from the two cohorts were significantly different.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Humanos , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Pronóstico , Piridinas , alfa-FetoproteínasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The risk of opioid-related aberrant behavior (OAB) in Korean cancer patients has not been previously evaluated. The purpose of this study is to investigate the Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) in Korean cancer patients receiving opioid treatment. METHODS: Data were obtained from a multicenter, cross-sectional, nationwide observational study regarding breakthrough cancer pain. The study was conducted in 33 South Korean institutions from March 2016 to December 2017. Patients were eligible if they had cancer-related pain within the past 7 days, which was treated with strong opioids in the previous 7 days. RESULTS: We analyzed ORT results of 946 patients. Only one patient in each sex (0.2%) was classified as high risk for OAB. Moderate risk was observed in 18 males (3.3%) and in three females (0.7%). Scores above 0 were primarily derived from positive responses for personal or familial history of alcohol abuse (in men), or depression (in women). In patients with an ORT score of 1 or higher (n = 132, 14%), the score primarily represented positive responses for personal history of depression (in females), personal or family history of alcohol abuse (in males), or 16-45 years age range. These patients had more severe worst and average pain intensity (proportion of numeric rating scale ≥ 4: 20.5% vs. 11.4%, P < 0.001) and used rescue analgesics more frequently than patients with ORT scores of 0. The proportion of moderate- or high-risk patients according to ORT was lower in patients receiving low doses of long-acting opioids than in those receiving high doses (2.0% vs. 6.6%, P = 0.031). Moderate or high risk was more frequent when ORT was completed in an isolated room than in an open, busy place (2.7% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.089). CONCLUSIONS: The score of ORT was very low in cancer patients receiving strong opioids for analgesia. Higher pain intensity may associate with positive response to one or more ORT item.
Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo , Neoplasias , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/complicaciones , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: A caregiver's prognostic awareness can affect clinical decisions for the patient. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of family caregivers' prognostic awareness on the quality of life (QOL) and emotional state of both patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers. METHODS: This prospective cohort study was conducted from December of 2016 to January of 2018. A total of 159 patients with advanced cancer and an equal number of caregivers participated. The investigation tools used include the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C15-Palliative, the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and evaluation was performed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Covariance analysis with a general linear modeling was used to compare changes in quality of life scores according to the caregivers' awareness of the prognosis. RESULTS: Mean patient overall QOL score increased in the group of caregivers who were aware of prognosis and decreased in the caregivers who were not aware of the prognosis (p = 0.018). The changes over time in the patients' QOL scores associated with symptoms improved with caregiver awareness (pain, p = 0.017; dyspnea, p = 0.048; appetite loss, p = 0.045). The percentage of depressed patients was smaller after 3 months in the group with caregivers aware of the prognosis (baseline to 3 months p = 0.028). Caregivers who did not understand their patients' prognosis exhibited better existential well-being (p = 0.036), and the incidence of depression was lower in this group at 3 months (p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: Caregivers' prognostic awareness may improve the quality of life and mood in patients with advanced cancer; however, this awareness may harm the quality of life and mood of the caregivers. These results may aid in developing in-depth interventions regarding prognosis for both patients and their caregivers.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Depresión/epidemiología , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Neoplasias/terapia , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Adulto , Afecto , Anciano , Concienciación , Depresión/psicología , Emociones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/psicología , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) is a new generation medical therapeutic option for bacterial infections. CAP causes physical cell wall rupture and DNA damage, therefore making it highly useful in the treatment of various conditions such as skin infections. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: The antimicrobial activity of cold atmospheric microwave plasma (CAMP) against major strains in canine skin infections was tested and the difference in antimicrobial activity between the antibiotic-resistant and antibiotic-susceptible strains of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius was evaluated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strains (Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli) and clinical isolates identified as methicillin-resistant S. pseudintermedius (n = 27) and methicillin-susceptible S. pseudintermedius (n = 13) were exposed to CAMP for 10 s, 30 s and 60 s. Afterwards, the bacterial survival rate was confirmed. RESULTS: Gram-negative bacteria (P. aeruginosa and E. coli) were more susceptible than Gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus and S. pseudintermedius) for the same duration of CAMP exposure. Only the Gram-negative bacteria were completely killed after 60 s exposure. In S. pseudintermedius isolates, CAMP exposure had similar antibacterial effects regardless of antibiotic resistance. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: CAMP has sufficient antimicrobial activity against major bacterial strains that cause pyoderma and otitis externa in dogs, and may be an alternative therapeutic option for S. pseudintermedius skin infections, for which antibiotics often are ineffective because of antimicrobial resistance in clinical veterinary medicine.
Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Enfermedades de los Perros , Otitis Externa , Gases em Plasma , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Animales , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bacterias , Enfermedades de los Perros/tratamiento farmacológico , Perros , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/veterinaria , Microondas , Otitis Externa/veterinaria , Gases em Plasma/farmacología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/veterinaria , StaphylococcusRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR) inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), pancreatic cancer (PC), or colorectal cancer (CRC) has been demonstrated. However, dermatological reactions to these inhibitors can cause significant physical and psychosocial discomfort. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of EGF ointment for EGFR inhibitor-related skin adverse events (ERSEs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter, pilot phase III trial enrolled patients with NSCLC, PC, or CRC treated with EGFR inhibitors. Patients with grade ≥2 ERSEs were included. Patients were randomized to three treatment arms: arm 1, placebo; arm 2, 1 ppm of EGF ointment; and arm 3, 20 ppm of EGF ointment. Patients applied ointment to their skin lesions twice daily. RESULTS: Efficacy evaluation was available for 80 patients (9 for PC, 28 for NSCLC, and 43 for CRC). Responses were 44.4% in arm 1, 61.5% in arm 2, and 77.8% in arm 3. There was a linear correlation between EGF concentrations and responses (p = .012). Quality of life (QoL) was assessed for 74 patients. Maximum changes in composite scores by Skindex-16 after treatment were significantly different among arms (mean ± SD: -5.2 ± 8.6 for arm 1, -11.7 ± 14.2 for arm 2, and - 18.6 ± 17.7 for arm 3; p = .008). EGF arms showed significant improvement in emotions (p = .005) and functioning (p = .044) scores over the placebo arm. CONCLUSION: EGF ointment is effective for managing ERSEs. It can also improve patients' QoL compared with placebo. Clinical trial identification number. NCT02284139 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, or colorectal cancer who are treated with epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR) inhibitors may experience dermatologic reactions to their treatment. This study investigated the benefit of an EGF ointment in the treatment of these adverse events and observed the ointment to be effective in managing EGFR inhibitor-related skin adverse events.
Asunto(s)
Pomadas/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades de la Piel/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Método Doble Ciego , Receptores ErbB/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Enfermedades de la Piel/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Regorafenib is an approved agent in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who progressed on sorafenib, but little is known about its clinical outcomes in Child-Pugh B patients. We aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of regorafenib in Child-Pugh B HCC patients. METHODS: This multicentre retrospective study included 59 patients with Child-Pugh B HCC who received regorafenib. Comparative analyses were performed with an independent cohort of Child-Pugh class A patients from the same registry (n = 440). RESULTS: The median age was 58 years (range, 19-83). All patients had progression on prior sorafenib. Regorafenib was given as 2nd line, and 3rd-4th line systemic therapy in 37 (62.7%) and 22 (37.3%) patients respectively. Compared to Child-Pugh A cohort, grade 3-4 AEs were more common in the Child-Pugh B cohort (27.1% vs 14.1%, P = .017). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 1.8 and 4.6 months, respectively, and these were significantly poorer than the Child-Pugh A cohort (P = .008 and P < .001 respectively). Child-Pugh B patients with albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade 3 had a significantly higher frequency of increased bilirubin (P = .01 for any grade and P = .01 for grade 3-4) and showed significantly poorer OS (P = .021), compared to those with ALBI grade 1 or 2. CONCLUSION: Regorafenib's poor clinical outcomes and increased frequency of severe adverse events lead us to discourage its use in the Child-Pugh B population. In particular, regorafenib should not be used in Child-Pugh B patients with ALBI grade 3.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Piridinas , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Little has been determined regarding the association between patients' and families' illness understanding and preferences for medical care. We aimed to evaluate the association of illness understanding with advance care planning (ACP) and preferences for end-of-life care, such as aggressive care, early palliative care (EPC), and hospice care, among advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers. METHODS: Patients were recruited for a prospective cohort study at outpatient and inpatient facilities in nine university hospitals in Korea (n = 150), and their primary family caregivers were also asked to participate (n = 101). Data on ACP and end-of-life care preferences were collected only at baseline in the cohort study with optional questions and were used to analyze these study results. RESULTS: Patients with illness understanding were more likely to have documented physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLSTs) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] of 4.94) and to have discussed ACP with their families (aOR 2.15) than those who did not. Being expected to live for several months, they were unlikely to prefer active treatment. Caregivers understanding patients' illness were more likely to write advance directives (ADs) and to discuss ACP; furthermore, they had already discussed ACP with family members. They did not prefer active treatment or life-sustaining treatments when their family members were expected to die within a few weeks. There was no significant association between illness understanding and preferences for EPC. CONCLUSION: Accurately recognizing an incurable disease is associated with preferences for more ACP and less aggressive care but not with preferences for EPC or hospice care among both advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers.
Asunto(s)
Planificación Anticipada de Atención , Comprensión , Neoplasias/terapia , Prioridad del Paciente , Cuidado Terminal , Planificación Anticipada de Atención/estadística & datos numéricos , Directivas Anticipadas/psicología , Directivas Anticipadas/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Cuidadores/psicología , Estudios de Cohortes , Comprensión/fisiología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Familia/psicología , Femenino , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/psicología , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/patología , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/psicología , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Prioridad del Paciente/psicología , Prioridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , República de Corea/epidemiología , Cuidado Terminal/psicología , Cuidado Terminal/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the association between quality of life (QOL) and breakthrough cancer pain (BTCP) intensity in patients who met the commonly accepted definition of BTCP. METHODS: This study was a subset analysis of a South Korean multicenter, non-interventional, cross-sectional, nationwide survey. Participants were recruited from March 2016 to December 2017. BTCP was defined as a controlled background pain of less than a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 3 and any flare-up pain intensity. Pain intensity data were collected using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), which includes an interference assessment of the affective and physical domains. Patients were categorized by BTCP intensity into mild (NRS 1-3), moderate (4-6), and severe (7-10) groups. RESULTS: Of the 969 screened patients with cancer, 679 had ≤ NRS 3 background pain, of whom 438 completed the BPI. Of these 438 patients, 40, 204, and 194 were in the mild, moderate, and severe BTCP groups, respectively. The median NRS of BTCP was 6.0 (interquartile range = 5.0-8.0). Patients with moderate-severe BTCP had significantly higher interference with daily functioning (IDF) scores than did mild BTCP patients (3.3 vs. 5.7; p < 0.01). Both domains of IDF were significantly hampered proportionally by increased BTCP intensity (p < 0.001). The median total IDF scores of the no, moderate, and severe BTCP groups were 3.3, 5.0, and 6.9, respectively. Furthermore, IDF depended on BTCP intensity, duration, and frequency (p < 0.01) but not on pain type and cause. CONCLUSION: An increase in BTCP intensity is likely to result in IDF, regardless of the cause or type of BTCP.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Irruptivo/fisiopatología , Dolor en Cáncer/fisiopatología , Neoplasias/fisiopatología , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although international guidelines recommend palliative care approaches for many serious illnesses, the palliative needs of patients with serious illnesses other than cancer are often unmet, mainly due to insufficient prognosis-related discussion. We investigated physicians' and the general public's respective attitudes toward prognostic disclosure for several serious illnesses. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 928 physicians, sourced from 12 hospitals and the Korean Medical Association, and 1,005 members of the general public, sourced from all 17 administrative divisions in Korea. RESULTS: For most illnesses, most physicians (adjusted proportions - end-organ failure, 99.0%; incurable genetic or neurologic disease, 98.5%; acquired immune deficiency syndrome [AIDS], 98.4%; stroke or Parkinson's disease, 96.0%; and dementia, 89.6%) and members of the general public (end-organ failure, 92.0%; incurable genetic or neurologic disease, 92.5%; AIDS, 91.5%; stroke or Parkinson's disease, 92.1%; and dementia, 86.9%) wanted to be informed if they had a terminal prognosis. For physicians and the general public, the primary factor to consider when disclosing terminal status was "the patient's right to know his/her condition" (31.0%). Yet, the general public was less likely to prefer prognostic disclosure than physicians. Particularly, when their family members were patients, more than 10% of the general public did not want patients to be informed of their terminal prognosis. For the general public, the main reason for not disclosing prognosis was "psychological burden such as anxiety and depression" (35.8%), while for the physicians it was "disclosure would have no beneficial effect" (42.4%). CONCLUSION: Most Physicians and the general public agreed that disclosure of a terminal prognosis respects patient autonomy for several serious illnesses. The low response rate of physicians might limit the generalizability of the results.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica/psicología , Revelación , Médicos/psicología , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Estudios Transversales , Familia/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Cuidados Paliativos , Pronóstico , Puntaje de Propensión , República de Corea , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Cuidado TerminalRESUMEN
This corrects the article on e327 in vol. 33, PMID: 30505258.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among bacteria in dogs with otitis externa has led to a need for novel therapeutic agents. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVE: To examine the antibacterial effects of manuka oil combined with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-tromethamine (Tris-EDTA) against Gram-negative bacteria isolates from dogs with otitis externa. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 53 clinical isolates including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae ssp. pneumoniae and Proteus mirabilis. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using disk diffusion; the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of manuka essential oil, with or without Tris-EDTA, were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 44 isolates were resistant to at least one antibiotic and 19 strains were multidrug-resistant, with resistance to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial classes. The MICs and MBCs of manuka oil alone were ≥1% (v/v) and ≥2% (v/v), respectively. There was no antimicrobial effect of Tris-EDTA (1.125:0.3 mg/mL) without manuka oil. However, the combination of manuka oil with Tris-EDTA significantly decreased the MICs (ranging from 0.06% to 0.5%, v/v; P < 0.001) and MBCs (ranging from 0.06% to 1%, v/v; P < 0.001). There also was no significant difference between multidrug-resistant and nonresistant bacterial isolates in terms of the antimicrobial activity of manuka oil with Tris-EDTA. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The study findings suggest that manuka oil, especially when combined with Tris-EDTA, may be a promising alternative therapeutic option for Gram-negative otic pathogens. Clinical studies are needed to assess potential for in vivo ototoxic effects and efficacy.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Ácido Edético/farmacología , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Leptospermum/química , Aceites Volátiles/farmacología , Otitis Externa/veterinaria , Animales , Enfermedades de los Perros/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de los Perros/microbiología , Perros , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Otitis Externa/microbiologíaRESUMEN
While recently extending that research, however, we discovered that 236 members of the general population were mistakenly duplicated by the investigating agency (Word Research) and 1241 were reported rather than 1005. Here, we present corrections and discuss the relevant data.
RESUMEN
In the original publication of the article, the incorrect grant number HC13C1391 was published in the acknowledgement section. The correct grant number is HC15C1391.
RESUMEN
[This corrects the article e327 in vol. 33, PMID: 30505258.].
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Reports of canine pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) are uncommon in the veterinary literature. Rarer still are cases describing dogs with both skin lesions and internal organ involvement. OBJECTIVE: To describe a case of canine PG with skin and internal organ involvement. ANIMALS: A client-owned dog. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Complete blood count, serum chemistry, C-reactive protein and SNAP cPL tests, and abdominal ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration of the spleen were performed. RESULTS: The dog was treated with oral prednisolone and ciclosporin. After three months of therapy, ultrasonography revealed normalization of the spleen and resolution of skin lesions. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Dogs with skin lesions compatible with PG should be screened carefully for internal organ involvement. Ciclosporin may be a useful treatment for the immediate and long-term management of canine PG.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Perros/diagnóstico , Pancreatitis/veterinaria , Piodermia Gangrenosa/veterinaria , Enfermedades de la Piel/veterinaria , Piel/patología , Bazo/patología , Animales , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades de los Perros/tratamiento farmacológico , Perros , Femenino , Pancreatitis/diagnóstico , Pancreatitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Prednisolona/uso terapéutico , Piodermia Gangrenosa/complicaciones , Piodermia Gangrenosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de la Piel/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de la Piel/etiología , Bazo/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Understanding the concept of a "good death" is crucial to end-of-life care, but our current understanding of what constitutes a good death is insufficient. Here, we investigated the components of a good death that are important to the general population, cancer patients, their families, and physicians. METHODS: We conducted a stratified nationwide cross-sectional survey of cancer patients and their families from 12 hospitals, physicians from 12 hospitals and the Korean Medical Association, and the general population, investigating their attitudes toward 10 good-death components. FINDINGS: Three components-"not be a burden to the family," "presence of family," and "resolve unfinished business"-were considered the most important components by more than 2/3 of each of the three groups, and an additional three components-"freedom from pain," "feel that life was meaningful," and "at peace with God"-were considered important by all but the physicians group. Physicians considered "feel life was meaningful," "presence of family," and "not be a burden to family" as the core components of a good death, with "freedom from pain" as an additional component. "Treatment choices' followed, "finances in order," "mentally aware," and "die at home" were found to be the least important components among all four groups. CONCLUSION: While families strongly agreed that "presence of family" and "not be a burden to family" were important to a good death, the importance of other factors differed between the groups. Health care providers should attempt to discern each patient's view of a good death.
Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Muerte , Cuidadores , Familia , Personal de Salud , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/psicología , Cuidado Terminal/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Cuidadores/psicología , Cuidadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Muerte , Familia/psicología , Femenino , Personal de Salud/psicología , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor , Médicos/psicología , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Opinión Pública , República de Corea/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Cuidado Terminal/psicología , Cuidado Terminal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of caregivers' role preference in decision making on conflicts and psychiatric distresses. METHODS: The responses of 406 caregivers of terminal cancer patients enrolled in a trial determining the efficacy of a decision aid focused on the disclosure of terminal disease status were included in this secondary analysis. The outcomes include the change scores of the Decision Conflict Scale (DCS) and depression and anxiety subscales of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at the 1 and 3 months from baseline. The linear mixed model was employed to discover the impact of caregivers' decisional role preference on the outcomes. FINDINGS: Of the 406, 137 (33.7%) showed an active role preference and 269 (66.3%) showed a passive role preference. In the post hoc analysis of the adjusted differences of change scores between passive caregivers who received decision aid (passive-decision aid) and active caregivers with decision aid (active-decision aid), non-significant differences were observed in the DCS. However, at the 3-month, the change scores of the HADS depression subscale increased by 4.43 (effect size, 0.71) and those of the HADS anxiety subscale increased by 4.14 (effect size, 0.61) in the passive-decision aid group than in active-decision aid group, showing moderate to large difference. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that information might be ethically recommended in a format that is interactive and tailored to how much an individual wishes to be involved in the decision-making process.