RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) is a rare etiology of acute aortic syndrome. Few studies exist regarding the perioperative outcome. The aim was to analyze clinical outcome and risk factors of mortality in this treatment population. METHODS: Retrospective, monocentric study from 2010 to 2021. Clinical data of endovascular or open treated PAU were analyzed. In-hospital mortality was selected as the primary study endpoint. Angio-morphologies were analyzed and risk factors for mortality were identified by using univariate analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 133 patients were identified. 29% (n=38) of patients presented symptomatically. In 64% (n=85), the PAU was localized in the thoracic aorta. On average, PAUs had a depth of 15.4±10.1 mm and a width of 17.9±9.6 mm. The patients had a median of 2 (95% confidence interval [CI]=2-3) high-risk features (HRF) as PAU depth >10 mm, PAU width >20 mm, aortic diameter >40 mm, symptomatic, intramural hematoma (IMH), pleural effusion. Significantly more HRF were observed in symptomatic patients (p=0.01). 53% (n=71) of patients were treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), 41% (n=54) by endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), and 6% (n=8) by open surgery. A hybrid procedure with cervical debranching was performed in 16% (n=21) and complex endovascular repair with fenestrated or branched endografts in 15% (n=20). Overall, complications greater than grade II according to the Clavien-Dindo classification occurred in 19% (n=25) and of the patients. In-hospital mortality manifested in 6% (n=8). Factors associated with increased mortality were the diameter of the aorta >40 mm (88% vs 39%, p=0.03), as well as symptomatic patients (63% vs 26%, p=0.04), coincident IMHs (38% vs 10%, p=0.05), and complex endovascular procedures (50% vs 50% p<0.01). Penetrating aortic ulcer width >20 mm tended to show higher mortality (75% vs 40%, p=0.06). Routine follow-up was available for 89% (n=117) for a median of 39 months (95% CI=25-42). One-year and 5-year survival were 83% and 60%, respectively, with 1 aortic pathology-related death. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of PAU is associated with an acceptable perioperative morbidity and mortality. Risk factors associated with increased mortality are an elevated aortic diameter, the presence of IMHs, clinical symptomatology at presentation, and complex endovascular procedures.
RESUMEN
Background: The clinical outcomes and survival of patients with penetrating aortic ulcers (PAU) were evaluated in a tertiary care hospital, comparing those who underwent aortic repair to those treated conservatively. Patients and methods: A retrospective single-centre analysis included all patients that underwent a computed tomography angiography (CT-A) scan with the diagnosis of a PAU between January 2009 and May 2019. "PAU" was identified in 1,493 of 112,506 CT-A scan reports in 576 patients. Clinical and angiomorphological data were collected. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), with secondary outcomes focusing on identifying risk factors for poor OS. Survival probabilities were analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method using the log-rank test. A Cox hazard model using survival as dependent variable with stepwise backward eliminations based on the likelihood ratios was employed. Results: 315 PAUs were identified in 278 patients. The prevalence in the cohort was 0.8%. The mean age of the patients was 74.4 years, and they were predominantly male (n = 208, 74.8%). The mean ulcer depth was 11.8 mm (range 2-50 mm). Out of the patients, 232 were asymptomatic (83.5%). Among 178 PAUs (56.5%), high-risk factors, such as ulcer depth >10 mm, aortic diameter >40 mm, and ulcer length >20 mm, were observed. Aortic repair was associated with a better mean OS compared to conservatively managed patients (72.6 versus 32.2 months, p = 0.001). The Cox hazard model showed that ulcer depth >1 mm was associated with poor OS (HR 0.67, p = 0.048), while aortic repair was related to a better OS (HR 4.365, p<0.013). Conclusions: Aortic repair is associated with better OS, but this finding should be interpreted with caution because of differences in age and comorbidities between the groups. Further evaluation is warranted through prospective studies with randomized groups. Further assessment for angiomorphological parameters is recommended to identify patients at increased risk for poor OS.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Aorta , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Tratamiento Conservador , Úlcera , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Úlcera/mortalidad , Úlcera/diagnóstico por imagen , Úlcera/terapia , Úlcera/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tratamiento Conservador/efectos adversos , Tratamiento Conservador/mortalidad , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Tiempo , Enfermedades de la Aorta/mortalidad , Enfermedades de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de la Aorta/terapia , Enfermedades de la Aorta/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Medición de Riesgo , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Aortografía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Úlcera Aterosclerótica PenetranteRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Co-prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and cancer poses a unique challenge in medical care since both diseases and their respective therapies might interact. Recently, reduced AAA growth rates were observed in cancer patients that received radiation therapy (RT). The purpose of this study was to perform a fine-grained analysis of the effects of RT on AAA growth with respect to direct (infield) and out-of-field (outfield) radiation exposure, and radiation dose-dependency. METHODS: A retrospective single-center analysis identified patients with AAA, cancer, and RT. Clinical data, radiation plans, and aneurysm diameters were analyzed. The total dose of radiation to each aneurysm was computed. AAA growth under infield and outfield exposure was compared to patients with AAA and cancer that did not receive RT (no-RT control) and to an external noncancer AAA reference cohort. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2020, a total of 38 AAA patients who had received well-documented RT for their malignancy were identified. AAA growth was considerably reduced for infield patients (nâ¯= 18) compared to outfield patients (nâ¯= 20), albeit not significantly (0.8⯱ 1.0 vs. 1.3⯱ 1.6â¯mm/year, pâ¯= 0.28). Overall, annual AAA growth in RT patients was lower compared to no-RT control patients (1.1⯱ 1.5 vs. 1.8⯱ 2.2â¯mm/year, pâ¯= 0.06) and significantly reduced compared to the reference cohort (1.1⯱ 1.5 vs. 2.7⯱ 2.1â¯mm/year, pâ¯< 0.001). The pattern of AAA growth reduction due to RT was corroborated in linear regression analyses correcting for initial AAA diameter. A further investigation with respect to dose-dependency of radiation effects on AAA growth, however, revealed no apparent association. CONCLUSION: In this study, both infield and outfield radiation exposure were associated with reduced AAA growth. This finding warrants further investigation, both in a larger scale clinical cohort and on a molecular level.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a dreaded condition with a difficult diagnosis and high mortality. Due to different baseline situations, the frequently performed comparison between endovascular and open surgical treatment is interfered with selection bias. The purpose of this study was to review outcomes in AMI treatment with an open or endovascular approach in association with laparotomy and to evaluate the endovascular-first strategy in similar clinical situations. METHODS: The clinical data of 74 patients treated for AMI from 2007 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed and compared. In-hospital mortality was appointed as the primary study endpoint. Risk factors for mortality were identified by using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: In total, 61 patients (82%) were treated open surgically (OT) and, 13 patients (18%) with an endovascular approach (ET) in combination with laparatomy. The etiology of AMI was 49% arteriosclerotic and 51% thromboembolic occlusions. The total in-hospital mortality manifested at 43% (n =32) (OT 41% vs. ET 53.8%; P=0.54). As independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality, pneumatosis intestinalis (P=0.01), increased lactate concentration (P=0.04), and ischemic intestinal sections (P=0.01) were identified. Additionally, on univariate analysis patient age, congestive heart failure (> NYHA II) and atrial fibrillation were related with higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and mortality of AMI remains at a high level. Conventional open or intraoperative endovascular therapy achieved similar results in patients with indication for laparotomy. Advanced disease stage with ischemic intestinal sections at presentation and cardiovascular comorbidities were associated with adverse outcome.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Isquemia Mesentérica , Humanos , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirugía , Laparotomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Isquemia/etiología , Enfermedad AgudaRESUMEN
Background: Multi-morbidity poses a substantial challenge for health care in an aging population. Recent studies did not provide evidence for general side effects of anti-cancer therapy regarding the growth rate of coincident abdominal aortic aneurysms, although it was suggested that specific therapeutic substances might accelerate growth. Aneurysm pathology, however, differs with respect to localization. Hence, we present the first ever analysis on the association of cancer and cancer therapy with growth alteration of aneurysms of the ascending aorta (AscAA). Patients and methods: A retrospective single-center identification of AscAA+cancer patients was performed in the institutional picture archiving and communication system (PACS). Included were all patients with ≥2 CT angiograms over ≥6 months and additional malignancy. Clinical data and aneurysm diameters were retrieved and analyzed for an association of cancer (stratified by tumor entity) or cancer therapy (stratified by several classes of chemotherapeutic agents and radiation therapy) with annual growth rate, respectively. Statistics included t-test, Wilcoxon test, and a linear regression model accounting for initial AscAA diameter and type of treatment. Results: From 2003 to 2021, 151 patients (median age 70 years; 85% male) with AscAA and coincident 163 malignancies were identified. Prostate (37%) and hematologic cancer (17%) were most frequent. One-hundred-eleven patients (74%) received chemotherapy and 75 patients (50%) had radiation. After exclusion of six patients with an initial AscAA diameter >55 mm, the average annual AscAA growth rate was 0.18±0.64 mm/year, with only 12 patients experiencing a growth rate >1mm/year. Neither tumor entity nor radiation or chemotherapy - alone or in combination - were significantly associated with an alteration of the annual AscAA growth rate. Likewise, a subanalysis for singular chemotherapeutic agents did not reveal a specific association with AscAA growth alteration. Conclusions: Growth rates of AscAA are low in this cohort with coincident malignancy. Cancer and/or chemotherapy or radiation are not associated with an alteration of the annual growth rate. Additional control examinations seem unnecessary.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Neoplasias , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aorta Torácica , Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/epidemiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/terapiaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is a rare but life-threatening disease. This study reviewed outcomes in patients treated surgically for CMI by open treatment (OT) and endovascular treatment (ET), analyzing risk factors for endovascular failure. METHODS: Clinical data for 36 patients treated for CMI from 2007 to 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The study's primary endpoint was symptom-free survival. The secondary endpoint was the primary technical success for endovascular and open surgical treatments. Risk factors for endovascular failure were identified by using univariate analysis. RESULTS: Patients were analyzed as treated: 21 patients (58.3%) in the ET and 15 (41.6%) in the OT group. Overall, 20 patients (56%) presented with abdominal angina, 9 (25%) with rest pain, and 7 (19%) without symptoms. An ET was initially attempted in 31 patients (86.1%). The conversion rate from ET to OT was 32.3%, which resulted in a primary technical success of 67.6% in ET and 100% in OT. Six patients from the ET group (19.3%) required surgical revision due to restenosis. One-year (OT 91.6% vs. ET 96.8%; n.s.) and three-year primary patency (OT 91.6% vs. ET 80.6%; n.s.) as well as 3-year symptom-free survival did not differ between the groups (OT 62.5% vs. ET 69.4%; n.s). Overall, in-hospital mortality was 2.8% (n = 1), which was not statistically different between the groups (OT 6% vs. ET 0%; n.s.). High-grade stenosis of the superior mesenteric artery tended to be associated with higher technical failure (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: ET showed a comparable perioperative outcome with higher technical failure. OT was distinguished by excellent early and late technical success.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Isquemia Mesentérica , Oclusión Vascular Mesentérica , Enfermedad Crónica , Constricción Patológica , Humanos , Isquemia/etiología , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirugía , Oclusión Vascular Mesentérica/complicaciones , Oclusión Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico , Oclusión Vascular Mesentérica/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Stents/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The evidence regarding the treatment of open retrograde stenting of innominate artery (IA) or common carotid artery stenosis (CCA) is limited, and is suspected to carry a high risk of stroke and death. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of such hybrid procedures. METHODS: A retrospective, monocentric study of all patients who underwent retrograde stenting of proximal IA and CCA stenosis via surgical cutdown of the CCA, with or without concomitant CEA, between 2016 and 2023 was performed. RESULTS: Overall, 33 patients were treated. A total of 15 patients (45.5%) were male, with the mean age being 67 ± 9.1 years, and 58% (n = 19) of the patients presented with neurological symptoms. Open retrograde stenting was performed in 67% (n = 22) in ACC, and in 33% (n = 11) in IA stenosis. A total of 20 patients (61%) underwent retrograde stenting with synchronous ipsilateral CEA for concomitant stenosis of the carotid bifurcation. There was no 30-day mortality. The perioperative stroke rate was 3% (n = 1) with complete symptom recovery. During the follow up at 32 months (95% CI: 24-39), three late deaths (9.1%) and one symptomatic stent occlusion were observed and, in five patients (15.2%), re-intervention for restenosis was necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Open retrograde stenting for of proximal IA or CCA stenosis with or without CEA, in case of tandem carotid lesions, can be performed safely with a low rate of early adverse events. Continuous follow up examinations are necessary due to relevant instent re-stenosis rates.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) is a rare disease. Thus far, only limited data is available and the indications for conservative and endovascular treatment are not well defined. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical presentation, course, CT imaging features and outcome of patients with type B aortic IMHs. METHODS: We included all patients with type B IMHs between 2012 and 2021 in this retrospective monocentric study. Clinical data, localization, thickness of IMHs and the presence of ulcer-like projections (ULPs) was evaluated before and after treatment. RESULTS: Thirty five patients (20 females; 70.3 y ± 11 y) were identified. Almost all IMHs (n = 34) were spontaneous and symptomatic with back pain (n = 34). At the time of diagnosis, TEVAR was deemed indicated in 9 patients, 26 patients were treated primarily conservatively. During the follow-up, in another 16 patients TEVAR was deemed indicated. Endovascularly and conservatively treated patients both showed decrease in thickness after treatment. Patients without ULPs showed more often complete resolution of the IMH than patients with ULPs (endovascularly treated 90.9% (10/11) vs 71.4% (5/7); conservatively treated 71.4% (10/14) vs 33.3% (1/3); P = .207). Complications after TEVAR occurred in 32% and more frequently in patients treated primarily conservatively (37.5% vs 22.2%). No in-hospital mortality was observed during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Prognosis of IMH seems favourable in both surgically as well as conservatively treated patients. However, it is essential to identify patients at high risk for complications under conservative treatment, who therefore should be treated by TEVAR. In our study, ULPs seem to be an adverse factor for remodeling.
Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Tratamiento Conservador , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Hematoma , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Anciano , Hematoma/terapia , Hematoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Hematoma/etiología , Hematoma/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tratamiento Conservador/efectos adversos , Tratamiento Conservador/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Disección Aórtica/terapia , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Enfermedades de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de la Aorta/terapia , Enfermedades de la Aorta/mortalidad , Hematoma Intramural AórticoRESUMEN
Background/Objectives: A popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) is traditionally treated by an open PAA repair (OPAR) with a popliteo-popliteal venous graft interposition. Although excellent outcomes have been reported in elective cases, the results are much worse in cases of emergency presentation or with the necessity of adjunct procedures. This study aimed to identify the risk factors that might decrease amputation-free survival (efficacy endpoint) and lower graft patency (technical endpoint). Patients and Methods: A dual-center retrospective analysis was performed from 2000 to 2021 covering all consecutive PAA repairs stratified for elective vs. emergency repair, considering the patient (i.e., age and comorbidities), PAA (i.e., diameter and tibial runoff vessels), and procedural characteristics (i.e., procedure time, material, and bypass configuration). Descriptive, univariate, and multivariate statistics were used. Results: In 316 patients (69.8 ± 10.5 years), 395 PAAs (mean diameter 31.9 ± 12.9 mm) were operated, 67 as an emergency procedure (6× rupture; 93.8% severe acute limb ischemia). The majority had OPAR (366 procedures). Emergency patients had worse pre- and postoperative tibial runoff, longer procedure times, and more complex reconstructions harboring a variety of adjunct procedures as well as more medical and surgical complications (all p < 0.001). Overall, the in-hospital major amputation rate and mortality rate were 3.6% and 0.8%, respectively. The median follow-up was 49 months. Five-year primary and secondary patency rates were 80% and 94.7%. Patency for venous grafts outperformed alloplastic and composite reconstructions (p < 0.001), but prolonged the average procedure time by 51.4 (24.3-78.6) min (p < 0.001). Amputation-free survival was significantly better after elective procedures (p < 0.001), but only during the early (in-hospital) phase. An increase in patient age and any medical complications were significant negative predictors, regardless of the aneurysm size. Conclusions: A popliteo-popliteal vein interposition remains the gold standard for treatment despite a probably longer procedure time for both elective and emergency PAA repairs. To determine the most effective treatment strategies for older and probably frailer patients, factors such as the aneurysm size and the patient's overall condition should be considered.
RESUMEN
Vascular graft/endograft infection (VGEI) is a serious complication after aortic surgery. This study investigates VGEI and patient characteristics, PET/CT quantification before surgical or conservative management of VGEI and post-intervention outcomes in order to identify patients who might benefit from such a procedure. PET standard uptake values (SUV) were quantitatively assessed and compared to a non-VGEI cohort. The primary endpoints were in-hospital mortality and aortic reintervention-free survival at six months. Ninety-three patients (75% male, 65 ± 10 years, 82% operated) were included. The initial operation was mainly for aneurysm (67.7%: 31% EVAR, 12% TEVAR, 57% open aortic repair). Thirty-two patients presented with fistulae. PET SUVTLR (target-to-liver ratio) showed 94% sensitivity and 89% specificity. Replacement included silver-coated Dacron (21.3%), pericardium (61.3%) and femoral vein (17.3%), yet the material did not influence the overall survival (p = 0.745). In-hospital mortality did not differ between operative and conservative treatment (19.7% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.84). At six months, 50% of the operated cohort survived without aortic reintervention. Short- and midterm morbidity and mortality remained high after aortic graft removal. Neither preoperative characteristics nor the material used for reconstruction influenced the overall survival, and, with limitations, both the in-hospital and midterm survival were similar between the surgically and conservatively managed patients.
RESUMEN
Purpose: The use of inner-branch aortic stent grafts in the treatment of complex aortic pathologies aims at broad applicability and stable bridging stent sealing compared to other endovascular technologies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the early outcomes with a single manufacturer custom-made and off-the-shelf inner-branched endograft in a mixed patient cohort. Methods: This retrospective, monocentric study between 2019 and 2022 included 44 patients treated with inner-branched aortic stent grafts (iBEVAR) as custom-made device (CMD) or off-the-shelf device (E-nside) with at least four inner branches. The primary endpoints were technical and clinical success. Results: Overall, 77% (n = 34) and 23% (n = 10) of the patients (mean age 77 ± 6.5 years, n = 36 male) were treated with a custom-made iBEVAR with at least four inner branches and an off-the-shelf graft, respectively. Treatment indications were thoracoabdominal pathologies in 52.2% (n = 23), complex abdominal aneurysms in 25% (n = 11), and type Ia endoleaks in 22.7% (n = 10). Preoperative spinal catheter placement was performed in 27% (n = 12) of patients. Implantation was entirely percutaneous in 75% (n = 33). Technical success was 100%. Target vessel success manifested at 99% (178/180). There was no in-hospital mortality. Permanent paraplegia developed in 6.8% (n = 3) of patients. The mean follow-up was 12 months (range 0-52 months). Three late deaths (6.8%) occurred, one related to an aortic graft infection. Kaplan-Meier estimated 1-year survival manifested at 95% and branch patency at 98% (177/180). Re-intervention was necessary for a total of six patients (13.6%). Conclusions: Inner-branch aortic stent grafts provide a feasible option for the treatment of complex aortic pathologies, both elective (custom-made) and urgent (off-the-shelf). The technical success rate is high with acceptable short-term outcomes and moderate re-intervention rates comparable to existing platforms. Further follow-up will evaluate long-term outcomes.
RESUMEN
Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are the most frequent aortic dilation, with considerable morbidity and mortality. Inflammatory (infl) and IgG4-positive AAAs represent specific subtypes of unclear incidence and clinical significance. Here, histologic and serologic analyses with retrospective clinical data acquisition are investigated via detailed histology, including morphologic (HE, EvG: inflammatory subtype, angiogenesis, and fibrosis) and immunhistochemic analyses (IgG and IgG4). In addition, complement factors C3/C4 and immunoglobulins IgG, IgG2, IgG4 and IgE were measured in serum samples and clinical data uses patients' metrics, as well as through semi-automated morphometric analysis (diameter, volume, angulation and vessel tortuosity). A total of 101 eligible patients showed five (5%) IgG4 positive (all scored 1) and seven (7%) inflammatory AAAs. An increased degree of inflammation was seen in IgG4 positive and inflAAA, respectively. However, serologic analysis revealed no increased levels of IgG or IgG4. The operative procedure time was not different for those cases and the short-term clinical outcomes were equal for the entire AAA cohort. Overall, the incidence of inflammatory and IgG4-positive AAA samples seems very low based on histologic and serum analyses. Both entities must be considered distinct disease phenotypes. Short-term operative outcomes were not different for both sub-cohorts.
RESUMEN
Background Indication for prophylactic surgical abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair depends on the maximal aortic diameter. The lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 (LOX-1) is the major receptor for uptake of oxidized low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and is implicated in atherosclerosis. A soluble form of LOX-1 (sLOX-1) has been discussed as a novel biomarker in coronary artery disease and stroke. Herein, we assessed the regulation of aortic LOX-1 as well as the diagnostic and risk stratification potential of sLOX-1 in patients with AAA. Methods and Results Serum sLOX-1 was assessed in a case-control study in AAA (n=104) and peripheral artery disease (n=104). sLOX-1 was not statistically different between AAA and peripheral artery disease but was higher in AAA (ß=1.28, P=0.04) after adjusting for age, atherosclerosis, type 2 diabetes, prescription of statins, ß-blockers, ACE inhibitors, and therapeutic anticoagulation. sLOX-1 was not associated with the aortic diameter, AAA volume, or the thickness of the intraluminal thrombus. Aortic LOX-1 mRNA expression tended to be higher in AAA when compared with disease, and expression was positively associated with cleaved caspase-3, smooth muscle actin, collagen, and macrophage content. Conclusions In AAA, sLOX-1 was differently affected by age, cardiometabolic diseases, and corresponding medical therapies. Comparison with nonatherosclerotic disease would be beneficial to further elucidate the diagnostic potential of sLOX-1, although it was not useful for risk stratification. Aneurysmal LOX-1 mRNA expression was increased and positively associated with smooth muscle cells and collagen content, suggesting that LOX-1 is eventually not deleterious in human AAA and could counteract AAA rupture.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Aterosclerosis , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/genética , Biomarcadores , Estudios de Casos y Controles , ARN Mensajero , Receptores Depuradores de Clase ERESUMEN
Red blood cells are found within the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), in the intraluminal thrombus (ILT), and in neovessels. Hemolysis promotes aortic degeneration, e.g., by heme-induced reactive oxygen species formation. To reduce its toxicity, hemoglobin is endocytosed by the CD163 receptor and heme is degraded by heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1). A soluble form (sCD163) is discussed as an inflammatory biomarker representing the activation of monocytes and macrophages. HO-1 and NAD(P)H quinone dehydrogenase 1 (NQO1) are antioxidant genes that are induced by the Nrf2 transcription factor, but their regulation in AAA is only poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to analyze linkages between CD163, Nrf2, HO-1, and NQO1 and to clarify if plasma sCD163 has diagnostic and risk stratification potential. Soluble CD163 was 1.3-fold (p = 0.015) higher in AAA compared to patients without arterial disease. The difference remained significant after adjusting for age and sex. sCD163 correlated with the thickness of the ILT (rs = 0.26; p = 0.02) but not with the AAA diameter or volume. A high aneurysmal CD163 mRNA was connected to increases in NQO1, HMOX1, and Nrf2 mRNA. Further studies are needed to analyze the modulation of the CD163/HO-1/NQO1 pathway with the overall goal of minimizing the detrimental effects of hemolysis.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment of cardiovascular risk factors slows the progression of small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) is a stress- and hemin-induced enzyme providing cytoprotection against oxidative stress when overexpressed. However, nothing is known about the effects of cardiometabolic standard therapies on HO-1 expression in aortic walls in patients with end-stage AAA. METHODS: The effects of statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), beta-blockers, diuretics, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), and therapeutic anticoagulation on HO-1 mRNA and protein expressions were analyzed in AAA patients using multivariate logistic regression analysis and comparison of monotherapy. RESULTS: Analysis of monotherapy revealed that HO-1 mRNA and protein expressions were higher in patients on diuretics and lower in patients on statin therapy. Tests on combinations of antihypertensive medications demonstrated that ACE inhibitors and diuretics, ARBs and diuretics, and beta-blockers and diuretics were associated with increase in HO-1 mRNA expression. ASA and therapeutic anticoagulation were not linked to HO-1 expression. CONCLUSION: Diuretics showed the strongest association with HO-1 expression, persisting even in combination with other antihypertensive medications. Hence, changes in aortic HO-1 expression in response to different medical therapies and their effects on vessel wall degeneration should be analyzed in future studies.