Quantitative evaluation of 90Y-PET/CT and 90Y-SPECT/CT-based dosimetry following Yttrium-90 radioembolization.

BACKGROUND: Following yttrium-90 radioembolization (90Y-RE), 90Y-PET/CT and 90Y-SPECT/CT imaging provide the means to calculate the voxelized absorbed dose distribution. Given the widespread use of the two imaging modalities and lack of well-established standardized dosimetry protocols for 90Y-RE, there is a clinical need to systematically investigate and evaluate differences in the performance of voxel-based dosimetry between 90Y-PET/CT and 90Y-SPECT/CT. PURPOSE: To quantitatively analyze and compare 90Y-PET/CT and 90Y-SPECT/CT-based dosimetry following 90Y-RE. METHODS: 90Y-PET/CT and 90Y-SPECT/CT imaging was acquired for 35 patients following 90Y-RE with TheraSphere for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Dosimetry was performed using the local deposition method with known activity and the mean dose (Dmean) was calculated for perfused liver volumes (PV), tumors (T), and perfused normal livers (NL). Additionally, the absorbed dose to x% of the volume (Dx, x ∈ $ \in $ [5%, 10%, …, 90%, 95%]) and the volume receiving y Gy (Vy, y ∈ $ \in $ [10 Gy, 20 Gy, …, 190 Gy, 200 Gy]) were calculated for T and NL, respectively. Dose metrics were compared using linear regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and statistical testing. RESULTS: Both 90Y-SPECT/CT and 90Y-PET/CT-based tumor Dmean were strongly correlated (R2 ≥ 0.90) with Dx, excluding metrics on the extrema. Intra-modality comparisons of various Dx and Vy metrics yielded statistically significant differences (ANOVA, p < 0.001) for both90Y-PET/CT and 90Y-SPECT/CT. Based on statistical testing, only Dx metrics separated by greater than 20%-30% coverage, and only Vy metrics separated by greater than 40-70 Gy, reported significant differences. For PV, there was a strong correlation (R2 ≥ 0.99) between Dmean derived separately from 90Y-PET/CT and 90Y-SPECT/CT imaging. The strength of the correlation was slightly reduced for T and NL with R2 = 0.91 and R2 = 0.95, respectively. For PV, the mean bias ± standard error (SE) and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) between Dmean from the two modalities was effectively zero with -0.8 ± 0.4% (± 2.5%). For T and NL, the mean bias ± SE (± LOA) was -14.5 ± 3.7% (± 24%) and 9.4 ± 4.7% (± 27%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The strong correlation between Dmean and Dx suggests information from multiple dose metrics (e.g., D70 and Dmean) is largely redundant when establishing dose-response relationships in 90Y-RE. Dmean is highly correlated between 90Y-PET/CT and 90Y-SPECT/CT-based dosimetry, for all liver VOIs. Relative to 90Y-SPECT/CT, 90Y-PET/CT, on average, yielded higher Dmean to tumors (14%) and lower Dmean to perfused normal livers (9%). Absorbed dose differences for perfused liver volumes between 90Y-SPECT/CT and 90Y-PET/CT were negligible.

A comparison of methods for in vivo activity and absorbed dose quantification with PET/CT following yttrium-90 radioembolization.

BACKGROUND: Yttrium-90 (90Y) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging is increasingly being used to perform tumor (T) and normal liver (NL) voxel dosimetry after 90Y-radioembolization (90Y-RE). Yet, the accuracy of in vivo 90Y-PET/CT imaging, subject to motion blur and co-registration inaccuracies, and 90Y-PET/CT dose quantification, subject to availability of different voxel dosimetry algorithms, are not well understood. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of 90Y-PET/CT-based activity estimates following 90Y-RE and characterize differences between 90Y-PET/CT-based voxel dosimetry algorithms. METHODS: Thirty-five patients underwent 90Y-PET/CT imaging after 90Y-RE with TheraSphere. The net administered 90Y activity (Aadmin) was determined using a dose calibrator and pre- and post-procedure exposure rate measurements. The summation of image-based activity (Aimage) was extracted from perfused volume (PV) and 3D-isotropically 2-cm expanded PV contour (PV+2 cm). Absorbed doses were calculated using voxel S-value (VSV), local deposition method (LDM), and LDM with known activity (LDMKA) dosimetry algorithms. Linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis quantified the relationship between Aimage and Aadmin and between mean dose estimates (DLDM, DVSV, DLDM-KA) for PV, T, and perfused NL volumes. RESULTS: While Aadmin and Aimage in PV were highly correlated (R2 > 0.95), the mean bias ± standard error (SE) and (95% limits of agreement, LOA) was significantly non-zero with -22.7 ± 4.7% (± 28.4%). In PV+2 cm, the mean bias ± SE (± LOA) decreased to 1.3 ± 3.4% (± 18.0%) consistent with zero mean error. DLDM and DVSV were highly correlated (R2 > 0.99) for all volumes of interest (VOIs) and the mean bias ± SE (± LOA) was 2.2 ± 0.2% (± 1.0%), 0.7 ± 0.4% (± 2.8%), and 3.2 ± 0.5% (± 2.8%) for PV, T, and NL, respectively. DLDM-KA and DVSV were correlated with R2 = 0.86, 0.80, and 0.86 for PV, T, and NL, respectively. The mean bias ± SE (± LOA) between DLDM-KA and DVSV was significantly non-zero with -19.6 ± 5.1% (± 31.0%), -20.8 ± 4.4% (± 29.0%), and -18.1 ± 5.3% (± 31.1%) for PV, T, and NL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The summation of Aimage in PV was underestimated relative to Aadmin. Only by accounting for respiratory motion, limited spatial resolution, and PET/CT co-registration errors through VOI expansion was Aimage, on average, equal to Aadmin. The differences between DLDM and DVSV were not clinically relevant, though DLDM-KA was approximately 20% greater than DVSV. Given the high quantitative accuracy of dose calibrators and challenges associated with accurate 90Y-PET/CT quantification, LDMKA is the preferred algorithm for accurate 90Y-PET/CT-based dosimetry following 90Y-RE.

Monte Carlo-derived 99m Tc uptake quantification with commercial planar MBI: Absolute tumor activity.

BACKGROUND: Molecular breast imaging (MBI) of 99m Tc-sestamibi is an emerging adjunct qualitative tool in the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. PURPOSE: This work outlines the development and performance evaluation of a methodology to absolutely quantify tumor 99m Tc activity uptake using a commercially available dual-headed MBI system by implementing corrections for background, scatter, attenuation, and detector characteristics. METHODS: A validated Monte Carlo application of a commercial MBI system was used to simulate over 7000 unique acquisitions of spherical and ellipsoidal tumors in breast tissue. Tumor absolute activity was calculated following background, scatter, and attenuation corrections of tumor region of interest counts. The methodology was first optimized using a set of high-uptake spherical tumors, and its accuracy and precision was then assessed in a set of spherical tumors with clinical uptake conditions. Finally, the performance of the activity methodology was evaluated under various bias and uncertainty conditions to better characterize the technique under expected clinical measurement conditions. RESULTS: In a test set of images with clinically relevant contrast and noise conditions, the mean ± standard deviation relative error in total tumor activity was 0.5% ± 6.5% (n = 2363) under ideal measurement conditions. Allowing for variability in tumor and background contours and in estimated tumor depths, the expected accuracy of the methodology in clinical practice was 0.5% ± 11.1% (n = 2363), with minimal loss of accuracy for ellipsoidal tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Planar MBI photopeak images acquired with standard-of-care protocols can be used to accurately quantify absolute tumor 99m Tc activity with an accuracy and precision of 0.5% ± 11.1%. The reported precision was based on a comprehensive evaluation of random errors and systematic biases.

Single-Compartment Dose Prescriptions for Ablative 90Y-Radioembolization Segmentectomy.

BACKGROUND: Yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization is increasingly being utilized with curative intent. While single-compartment doses with respect to the perfused volume for the complete pathologic necrosis (CPN) of tumors have been reported, the actual doses delivered to the tumor and at-risk margins that leads to CPN have hitherto not been estimated. We present an ablative dosimetry model that calculates the dose distribution for tumors and at-risk margins based on numerical mm-scale dose modeling and the available clinical CPN evidence and report on the necessary dose metrics needed to achieve CPN following 90Y-radioembolization. METHODS: Three-dimensional (3D) activity distributions (MBq/voxel) simulating spherical tumors were modeled with a 121 × 121 × 121 mm3 soft tissue volume (1 mm3 voxels). Then, 3D dose distributions (Gy/voxel) were estimated by convolving 3D activity distributions with a 90Y 3D dose kernel (Gy/MBq) sized 61 × 61 × 61 mm3 (1 mm3 voxels). Based on the published data on single-compartment segmental doses for the resected liver samples of HCC tumors showing CPN after radiation segmentectomy, the nominal voxel-based mean tumor dose (DmeanCPN), point dose at tumor rim (DrimCPN), and point dose 2 mm beyond the tumor boundary (D2mmCPN), which are necessary to achieve CPN, were calculated. The single-compartment dose prescriptions to required achieve CPN were then analytically modeled for more general cases of tumors with diameters dt = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 cm and with tumor-to-normal-liver uptake ratios T:N = 1:1, 2:1, 3:1, 4:1, and 5:1. RESULTS: The nominal case defined to estimate the doses needed for CPN, based on the previously published clinical data, was a single hyperperfused tumor with a diameter of 2.5 cm and T:N = 3:1, treated with a single-compartment segmental dose of 400 Gy. The voxel-level doses necessary to achieve CPN were 1053 Gy for the mean tumor dose, 860 Gy for the point dose at the tumor boundary, and 561 Gy for the point dose at 2 mm beyond the tumor edge. The single-compartment segmental doses necessary to satisfy the criteria for CPN in terms of the mean tumor dose, point dose at the tumor boundary, and the point dose at 2 mm beyond the tumor edge were tabulated for a range of tumor diameters and tumor-to-normal-liver uptake ratios. CONCLUSIONS: The analytical functions that describe the relevant dose metrics for CPN and, more importantly, the single-compartment dose prescriptions for the perfused volume needed to achieve CPN are reported for a large range of conditions in terms of tumor diameters (1-7 cm) and T:N uptake ratios (2:1-5:1).

Disease control and failure patterns of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma following transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres and with/without sorafenib.

BACKGROUND: Impressive survival outcome of our previous study in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients undergoing yttrium-90 glass microspheres transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with/without sorafenib according to individuals' disease burden, i.e., intrahepatic tumor load (IHT) and adverse disease features (ADFs) might partly be confounded by other treatments and underlying hepatic function. Therefore, a dedicated study focusing on treatment response and assessment of failure patterns might be a way to improve treatment outcome in addition to patient selection based on the disease burden. AIM: To assess the tumor response, disease control and patterns of disease progression following TARE with/without sorafenib in unresectable HCC patients. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in successful TARE procedures with available pre- and post-treatment imaging studies (n = 169). Three treatment subgroups were (1) TARE only (TARE_alone) for IHT ≤ 50% without ADFs, i.e., macrovascular invasion, extrahepatic disease (EHD) and infiltrative/ill-defined HCC (n = 63); (2) TARE with sorafenib (TARE_sorafenib) for IHT > 50% and/or presence of ADFs (n = 81); and (3) TARE only for patients who could not receive sorafenib due to contraindication or intolerance (TARE_no_sorafenib) (n = 25). Objective response rate (ORR; consisted of complete response (CR) and partial response (PR)), disease control rate (DCR; consisted of CR, PR and stable disease) and failure patterns of treated, intrahepatic and extrahepatic sites were assessed using the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. Time to progression (TTP) was calculated from TARE to the first radiologic progression at any site using Kaplan-Meier method. Identification of prognostic factors for TTP using the univariate Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model were performed in major population subgroups, TARE_alone and TARE_sorafenib. RESULTS: The median radiologic follow-up time was 4.4 mo (range 0.5-48.8). In treated area, ORR was highest in TARE_sorafenib (53.1%), followed by TARE_alone (41.3%) and TARE_no_sorafenib (16%). In intrahepatic area, DCR remained highest in TARE_sorafenib (84%), followed by TARE_alone (79.4%) and TARE_no_sorafenib (44%). The overall DCR was highest in TARE_alone (79.4%), followed by TARE_sorafenib (71.6%) and TARE_no_sorafenib (40%). Dominant failure patterns were intrahepatic for both TARE_alone (44.5%) and TARE_sorafenib (38.4%). Extrahepatic progression was more common in TARE_sorafenib (32%) and TARE_no_sorafenib (40%) than in TARE_alone (12.7%). TTP was longest in TARE_alone (8.6 mo; 95%CI: 3.4-13.8), followed by TARE_sorafenib (5.1 mo; 95%CI: 4.0-6.2) and TARE_no_sorafenib (2.7 mo; 95%CI: 2.2-3.1). Pre-existing EHD (HR: 0.37, 95%CI: 0.24-0.56, P < 0.001) was a sole prognostic factor for TTP in TARE_sorafenib with no prognostic factor for TTP in TARE_alone. CONCLUSION: TARE with/without sorafenib according to individuals' disease burden provided DCR approximately 70% with intrahepatic progression as dominant failure pattern. Extrahepatic progression was more common in procedures with initially high disease burden.

Performance evaluation of the 5-Ring GE Discovery MI PET/CT system using the national electrical manufacturers association NU 2-2012 Standard.

The GE Discovery MI PET/CT system has a modular digital detector design allowing three, four, or five detector block rings that extend the axial field-of-view (FOV) from 15 to 25 cm in 5 cm increments. This study investigated the performance of the 5-ring system and compared it to 3- and 4-ring systems; the GE Discovery IQ system that uses conventional photomultiplier tubes; and the GE Signa PET/MR system that has a reduced transaxial FOV. METHODS: PET performance was evaluated at three different institutions. Spatial resolution, sensitivity, counting rate performance, accuracy, and image quality were measured in accordance with National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2012 standards. The mean energy resolution, mean timing resolution, and PET/CT subsystem alignment were also measured. Phantoms were used to determine the effects of varying acquisition time and reconstruction parameters on image quality. Retrospective patient scans were reconstructed with various scan durations to evaluate the impact on image quality. RESULTS: Results from all three institutions were similar. Radial/tangential/axial full width at half maximum spatial resolution measurements using the filtered back projection algorithm were 4.3/4.3/5.0 mm, 5.5/4.6/6.5 mm, and 7.4/5.0/6.6 mm at 1, 10, and 20 cm from the center of the FOV, respectively. Measured sensitivity at the center of the FOV (20.84 cps/kBq) was significantly higher than systems with reduced axial FOV. The peak noise-equivalent counting rate was 266.3 kcps at 20.8 kBq/ml, with a corresponding scatter fraction of 40.2%. The correction accuracy for count losses up to the peak noise-equivalent counting rate was 3.6%. For the 10-, 13-, 17-, 22-, 28-, and 37-mm spheres, contrast recoveries in the image quality phantom were measured to be 46.2%, 54.3%, 66.1%, 71.1%, 85.3%, and 89.3%, respectively. The mean energy and timing resolution were 9.55% and 381.7 ps, respectively. Phantom and patient images demonstrated excellent image quality, even at short acquisition times or low injected activity. CONCLUSION: Compared to other PET/CT models, the extended axial FOV improved the overall PET performance of the 5-ring GE Discovery MI scanner. This system offers the potential to reduce scan times or injected activities through increased sensitivity.