Imaging spectrum of Bing-Neel syndrome: how can a radiologist recognise this rare neurological complication of Waldenström's macroglobulinemia?

OBJECTIVES: Bing-Neel syndrome (BNS) is a rare neurological complication of Waldenström's macroglobulinemia. The aim of this study is to describe the spectrum of radiological manifestations of this syndrome and their prevalence in order to facilitate its early diagnosis. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with BNS were diagnosed between 1994 and 2016 in eight centres in France. We retrospectively examined the medical records of these patients as well as the corresponding literature, focusing on imaging studies. Recorded data were statistically analysed and radiological findings described. RESULTS: The mean age of our patients was 62.4 years (35-80 years). The vast majority of patients were men, with a male to female ratio of 9:1. Findings included parenchymal or meningeal involvement or both. The most common finding was leptomeningeal infiltration, either intracranial or spinal, with a prevalence reaching 70.8%. Dural involvement was present in 37.5% of patients. In 41.7% (10/24) of patients, there was parenchymal involvement with a higher prevalence of brain comparing to medullar involvement (33.3% and 23.1% respectively). High T2 signal of the parenchyma was identified in 41.7% of patients and high signal in diffusion was evident in 25% of them. Intraorbital or periorbital involvement was also detected in four cases. A proposition regarding the appropriate imaging protocol completed our study. CONCLUSION: BNS's diagnosis remains challenging. Central nervous system MRI findings in the setting of known or suspected Waldenström's macroglobulinemia appear to be highly suggestive of BNS and appropriate imaging protocols should be implemented for their depiction. KEY POINTS: • Diagnosis of Bing-Neel syndrome (BNS) remains challenging and recent expert recommendations include MRI in the diagnostic criteria for the syndrome. • The most common radiological manifestations of BNS are leptomeningeal/dural infiltration or parenchymal involvement of brain or spinal cord, but many atypical forms may exist with various presentations. • Appropriate imaging protocol for BNS should include enhanced MRI studies of both brain and spine.

Hinchey Ia acute diverticulitis with isolated pericolic air on CT imaging; to operate or not? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Colonic diverticulitis is one of the most common gastrointestinal pathologies and its prevalence increases with the aging of the population in Western countries. Approximately 15% of patients with Hinchey Ia acute diverticulitis present with concomitant isolated pericolic air bubbles that denote intestinal perforation and thus prompting a more "aggressive" treatment attitude, including emergency surgery, despite the absence of evidence-based indications. This study is trying to delineate whether this approach is justified or whether a conservative treatment would suffice for this group of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were systematically searched in order to identify all studies that reported the need for emergency surgery and for percutaneous drainage in patients presenting with Hinchey Ia colonic diverticulitis with extraluminal pericolic gas on CT imaging who were initially treated conservatively. The last database search was performed on November 29, 2019 and no language or study type restriction criteria were applied. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of bias of selected studies. RESULTS: Nine observational cohort studies with 411 patients reported the need for emergency surgery, with a pooled rate of 5.1%. Among these studies, four studies comprising 165 patients reported the need for percutaneous drainage separately with a pooled rate of 1.2%. CONCLUSION: Non-operative management of Hinchey Ia acute diverticulitis with isolated pericolic air is feasible and safe with a success rate of 94.9%. Abscess formation requiring percutaneous drainage is present in only 1.2% of patients, thus rendering the conservative initial treatment of these patients justified. Nevertheless, low quality of included studies indicates further research to validate the outcomes of this review.