Surgical treatment of vertigo in cochlear implantees by electrode resealing.

CONCLUSION: Our present findings demonstrate that resealing to cover the electrode is an effective method to treat vertigo after CI. An insufficient cochleostomy sealing can be regarded as a cause of postoperatively newly occuring vertigo after CI. A transtympanic revision is a promising treatment option in cases of post-operative dizziness. Intoduction: A well-known and frequently reported complication after cochlear implantation is the appearance of postoperative vertigo symptoms. The aim of the present study was to observe if the postoperatively new occurrence of vertigo can be treated by resealing of the round window patch after cochlear implantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis revealed that 10 patients underwent revision surgery transtympanally. Vertigo was assessed preoperatively and directly postoperatively and after 6 month after revision surgery by using the Dizziness Handycap Inventory (DHI). RESULTS: The most common symptom was rotating vertigo. A spontanous nystagmus was seen in four cases. No nystagmus was found after the revision surgery. In three cases, the onset of dizziness was associated with an event (sneezing, otitis media, climbing a mountain). A preoperative CT showed insuspectible results in seven patients but revealed pathologies two patients. Vertigo was improved significantly in six patients, and three of them were symptom-free.

Cochlear implant electrode sealing techniques and related intracochlear pressure changes.

BACKGROUND: The inserted cochlear implanted electrode is covered at the site of the round window or cochleostomy to prevent infections and leakage. In a surgically hearing preservational concept, low intracochlear pressure changes are of high importance. The aim of this study was to observe intracochlear pressure changes due to different sealing techniques in a cochlear model. METHODS: Cochlear implant electrode insertions were performed in an artifical cochlear model and the intracochlear pressure changes were recorded in parallel with a micro-pressure sensor positioned in the apical region of the cochlea model to follow the maximum amplitude of intracochlear pressure. Four different sealing conditions were compared: 1) overlay, 2) overlay with fascia pushed in, 3) donut-like fascia ring, 4) donut-like fascia ring pushed in. RESULTS: We found statistically significant differences in the occurrence of maximum amplitude of intracochlear pressure peak changes related to sealing procedure comparing the different techniques. While the lowest amplitude changes could be observed for the overlay technique (0.14 mmHg ± 0.06) the highest values could be observed for the donut-like pushed in technique (1.79 mmHg ± 0.69). CONCLUSION: Sealing the electrode inserted cochlea can lead to significant intracochlear pressure changes. Pushing in of the sealing tissue cannot be recommended.