Cystine and theanine for chemoradiotherapy-induced esophagitis in non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Although several potential radioprotectants have been explored, radiation esophagitis is still difficult to control. Further development of supportive therapies is required. Our purpose was to investigate the efficacy and safety of cystine and theanine for esophagitis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS: This study is a prospective observational study. The participants were recruited from unresectable locally advanced NSCLC who had scheduled to receive weekly paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel/carboplatin plus radiation therapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions) for 6 weeks. They took an oral amino acid supplement containing 700 mg cystine and 280 mg theanine once daily regardless of CRT timing from the start of CRT until completion. The primary endpoint was the incidence of any grade esophagitis. The secondary endpoints were quality of life (QoL) and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: A total of 26 patients were evaluated. All participants completed 60 Gy of RT in 30 fractions. The overall incidence of esophagitis was 73%; however, no ≥ grade 3 was reported. There were no AEs likely to be related to cystine and theanine. The mean EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level health index score before and after chemoradiotherapy was 0.952 ± 0.0591 and 0.952 ± 0.0515 (P = 0.89), and the mean Visual Analogue Scale scores before and after treatment were 67.9 ± 15.4 and 79.4 ± 13.2 (P = 0.0047), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study showed no severe esophagitis, any AEs, nor QoL decrease in NSCLC patients receiving CRT. Cystine and theanine are potentially effective to reduce severe CRT-induced esophagitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000052622, 26 October 2023, retrospectively registered.

[Effects of aprepitant in daily administrations of low-dose cisplatin].

OBJECTIVE: While aprepitant is actually recommended for the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by a single cisplatin administration, it is still unclear whether it has a clinical benefit when administered along with daily administrations of low- dose cisplatin(20mg/m2 days 1-5). This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of aprepitant in patients receiving daily administration of low-dose cisplatin. METHODS: Our study focused on 25 patients who received cancer therapy including cisplatin, with or without aprepitant (days 1-5). We performed a retrospective study to identify any significant positive effect of aprepitant in the prevention of nausea and vomiting for 10 days(days 1-10). Because cisplatin has a long half-life, we assessed the delayed phase nausea and vomiting(days 6-10). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Multiple-day dosing of aprepitant was effective for prevention of nausea(Odds ratio: 0. 30, p= 0. 0012)and vomiting(Odds ratio: 0. 04, p=0. 0001)throughout the observation. Furthermore, we observed a significant positive effect of aprepitant in the prevention of delayed nausea(Odds ratio: 0. 19, p=0. 0083)and vomiting(Odds ratio: 0. 07, p=0. 0040). These findings suggest that multiple-day dosing of aprepitant is useful for the inhibition of acute delayed nausea and vomiting caused by chemotherapy including daily administration of low-dose cisplatin.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Vancomycin in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation.

Vancomycin is a commonly used antimicrobial agent for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Vancomycin has large inter- and intraindividual pharmacokinetic variability, which is mainly described by renal function; various studies have indicated that vancomycin pharmacokinetics are altered in special populations. However, little is known regarding vancomycin pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing allo-HSCT. Therefore, we aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model of vancomycin in patients undergoing allo-HSCT for effective and safe antimicrobial therapy and to develop a vancomycin dosing nomogram for a vancomycin optimal-dosing strategy. In total, 285 observations from 95 patients undergoing allo-HSCT were available. The final PopPK parameter estimates were central volume of distribution (V1, L), 39.2; clearance (L/h), 4.25; peripheral volume of distribution (V2, L), 56.1; and intercompartmental clearance (L/h), 1.95. The developed vancomycin model revealed an increase in V1 and V2 compared with those in the general population that consisted of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Moreover, serum creatinine was reduced because of an increase in the plasma fraction because of destruction of hematopoietic stem cells accompanying allo-HSCT pretreatment, suggesting that the Cockcroft-Gault equation-based creatinine clearance value was overestimated. To our knowledge, this is the first PopPK study to develop a dosing nomogram for vancomycin in patients undergoing allo-HSCT and was proven to be useful in optimizing the dosage and dosing interval of vancomycin in these patients. This strategy will provide more useful information for vancomycin therapy with an evidence-based dose adjustment.