RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab is a beneficial therapy in several advanced cancer types. Predictive biomarkers to better understand which patients are destined to benefit or experience toxicity are needed. Associations between bevacizumab induced hypertension and survival have been reported but with conflicting conclusions. METHODS: We performed post-hoc analyses to evaluate the association in 3124 patients from two phase III adjuvant breast cancer trials, E5103 and BEATRICE. Differences in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients with hypertension and those without were compared. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 160 mmHg (n = 346) and SBP ≥ 180 mmHg (hypertensive crisis) (n = 69). Genomic analyses were performed to evaluate germline genetic predictors for the hypertensive crisis. RESULTS: Hypertensive crisis was significantly associated with superior IDFS (p = 0.015) and OS (p = 0.042), but only IDFS (p = 0.029; HR = 0.28) remained significant after correction for prognostic factors. SBP ≥ 160 mmHg was not associated with either IDFS or OS. A common single-nucleotide polymorphism, rs6486785, was significantly associated with hypertensive crisis (p = 8.4 × 10-9; OR = 5.2). CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab-induced hypertensive crisis is associated with superior outcomes and rs6486785 predicted an increased risk of this key toxicity.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Hipertensión , Crisis Hipertensiva , Femenino , Humanos , Bevacizumab/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/inducido químicamente , Células Germinativas , Hipertensión/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
The NCCN Guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic focus primarily on assessment of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants associated with increased risk of breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer, including BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, PALB2, PTEN, and TP53, and recommended approaches to genetic counseling/testing and care strategies in individuals with these P/LP variants. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize important updates regarding: (1) a new section for transgender, nonbinary and gender diverse people who have a hereditary predisposition to cancer focused on risk reduction strategies for ovarian cancer, uterine cancer, prostate cancer, and breast cancer; and (2) testing criteria and management associated with TP53 P/LP variants and Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias Ováricas , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Pruebas Genéticas , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ováricas/genéticaRESUMEN
We sought to determine whether there are racial disparities in cascade testing rates and whether providing testing at no-charge impacts rates in Black and White at-risk-relatives (ARR). Probands with a pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variant in a cancer predisposition gene were identified up to one year before and up to one year after cascade testing became no-charge in 2017. Cascade testing rates were measured as the proportion of probands who had at least one ARR obtain genetic testing through one commercial laboratory. Rates were compared between self-reported Black and White probands using logistic regression. Interaction between race and cost (pre/post policy) was tested. Significantly fewer Black probands than White probands had at least one ARR undergo cascade genetic testing (11.9% versus 21.7%, OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.39-0.61, p < 0.0001). This was seen both before (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.24-0.61, p < 0.001) and after (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.41-0.68, p < 0.001) the no-charge testing policy. Rates of an ARR undergoing cascade testing were low overall, and significantly lower in Black versus White probands. The magnitude of difference in cascade testing rates between Blacks and Whites did not significantly change with no-charge testing. Barriers to cascade testing in all populations should be explored in order to maximize the benefits of genetic testing for both treatment and prevention of cancer.
Asunto(s)
Pruebas Genéticas , Neoplasias , Humanos , Grupos de Población , Neoplasias/genética , Disparidades en Atención de SaludRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Prior data suggest that breast cancer patients accept significant toxicity for small benefit. It is unclear whether personalized estimations of risk or benefit likelihood that could be provided by biomarkers alter treatment decisions in the curative setting. METHODS: A choice-based conjoint (CBC) survey was conducted in 417 HER2-negative breast cancer patients who received chemotherapy in the curative setting. The survey presented pairs of treatment choices derived from common taxane- and anthracycline-based regimens, varying in degree of benefit by risk of recurrence and in toxicity profile, including peripheral neuropathy (PN) and congestive heart failure (CHF). Hypothetical biomarkers shifting benefit and toxicity risk were modeled to determine whether this knowledge alters choice. Previously identified biomarkers were evaluated using this model. RESULTS: Based on CBC analysis, a non-anthracycline regimen was the most preferred. Patients with prior PN had a similar preference for a taxane regimen as those who were PN naïve, but more dramatically shifted preference away from taxanes when PN was described as severe/irreversible. When modeled after hypothetical biomarkers, as the likelihood of PN increased, the preference for taxane-containing regimens decreased; similarly, as the likelihood of CHF increased, the preference for anthracycline regimens decreased. When evaluating validated biomarkers for PN and CHF, this knowledge did alter regimen preference. CONCLUSIONS: Patients faced with multi-faceted decisions consider personal experience and perceived risk of recurrent disease. Biomarkers providing information on likelihood of toxicity risk do influence treatment choices, and patients may accept reduced benefit when faced with higher risk of toxicity in the curative setting.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Taxoides/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Antraciclinas/administración & dosificación , Antraciclinas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/fisiopatología , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/inducido químicamente , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/genética , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/fisiopatología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/fisiopatología , Taxoides/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are a heterogeneous set of tumors defined by an absence of actionable therapeutic targets (ER, PR, and HER-2). Microdissected normal ductal epithelium from healthy volunteers represents a novel comparator to reveal insights into TNBC heterogeneity and to inform drug development. Using RNA-sequencing data from our institution and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) we compared the transcriptomes of 94 TNBCs, 20 microdissected normal breast tissues from healthy volunteers from the Susan G. Komen for the Cure Tissue Bank, and 10 histologically normal tissues adjacent to tumor. Pathway analysis comparing TNBCs to optimized normal controls of microdissected normal epithelium versus classic controls composed of adjacent normal tissue revealed distinct molecular signatures. Differential gene expression of TNBC compared with normal comparators demonstrated important findings for TNBC-specific clinical trials testing targeted agents; lack of over-expression for negative studies and over-expression in studies with drug activity. Next, by comparing each individual TNBC to the set of microdissected normals, we demonstrate that TNBC heterogeneity is attributable to transcriptional chaos, is associated with non-silent DNA mutational load, and explains transcriptional heterogeneity in addition to known molecular subtypes. Finally, chaos analysis identified 146 core genes dysregulated in >90 % of TNBCs revealing an over-expressed central network. In conclusion, use of microdissected normal ductal epithelium from healthy volunteers enables an optimized approach for studying TNBC and uncovers biological heterogeneity mediated by transcriptional chaos.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/patología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Análisis por Conglomerados , Femenino , Proteína Forkhead Box M1 , Factores de Transcripción Forkhead/metabolismo , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Redes Reguladoras de Genes , Humanos , Glándulas Mamarias Humanas/metabolismo , Microdisección , Mutación , Análisis de Secuencia de ARN , Transcripción Genética , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
A germline pathogenic variant may be present even if the results of tumor genomic sequencing do not suggest one. There are key differences in the assay design and reporting of variants between germline and somatic laboratories. When appropriate, both tests should be completed to aid in therapy decisions and determining optimal screening and risk-reduction interventions.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have high risk of recurrence with prior data suggesting improved outcomes with capecitabine. Targeted agents have demonstrated activity across multiple cancer types. BRE12-158 was a phase II, multicenter trial that randomly allocated patients with TNBC with residual disease after NAC to genomically directed therapy versus treatment of physician choice (TPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 2014 to December 2018, 193 patients were enrolled. Residual tumors were sequenced using a next-generation sequencing test. A molecular tumor board adjudicated all results. Patients were randomly allocated to four cycles of genomically directed therapy (arm A) versus TPC (arm B). Patients without a target were assigned to arm B. Primary end point was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) among randomly assigned patients. Secondary/exploratory end points included distant disease-free survival, overall survival, toxicity assessment, time-based evolution of therapy, and drug-specific outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-three patients were randomly allocated or were assigned to arm B. The estimated 2-year DFS for the randomized population only was 56.6% (95% CI, 0.45 to 0.70) for arm A versus 62.4% (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.75) for arm B. No difference was seen in DFS, distant disease-free survival, or overall survival for the entire or randomized populations. There was increased uptake of capecitabine for TPC over time. Patients randomly allocated later had less distant recurrences. Circulating tumor DNA status remained a significant predictor of outcome with some patients demonstrating clearance with postneoadjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION: Genomically directed therapy was not superior to TPC for patients with residual TNBC after NAC. Capecitabine should remain the standard of care; however, the activity of other agents in this setting provides rationale for testing optimal combinations to improve outcomes. Circulating tumor DNA should be considered a standard covariate for trials in this setting.
Asunto(s)
Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Capecitabina/uso terapéutico , ADN Tumoral Circulante/genética , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Medicina de Precisión , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Capecitabina/efectos adversos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Neoplasia Residual , Selección de Paciente , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Factores de Tiempo , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/patologíaRESUMEN
Next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a non-invasive method to guide therapy selection for cancer patients. ctDNA variant allele frequency (VAF) is commonly reported and may aid in discerning whether a variant is germline or somatic. We report on the fidelity of VAF in ctDNA as a predictor for germline variant carriage. Two patient cohorts were studied. Cohort 1 included patients with known germline variants. Cohort 2 included patients with any variant detected by the ctDNA assay with VAF of 40-60%. In cohort 1, 36 of 91 (40%) known germline variants were identified through ctDNA analysis with a VAF of 39-87.6%. In cohort 2, 111 of 160 (69%) variants identified by ctDNA analysis with a VAF between 40 and 60% were found to be germline. Therefore, variants with a VAF between 40 and 60% should induce suspicion for germline status but should not be used as a replacement for germline testing.
Asunto(s)
ADN Tumoral Circulante/genética , Neoplasias/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Femenino , Frecuencia de los Genes , Pruebas Genéticas , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This retrospective analysis aimed to determine the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and to evaluate the impact of BMI on disease recurrence and survival in the homogeneous, high-risk population of patients with residual TNBC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: BRE12-158 was a phase II trial of genomically directed therapy versus physician's choice in residual TNBC after chemotherapy. ctDNA was isolated from plasma samples, and categorized as positive or negative. BMI (kg/m2) after surgery was analyzed as both a continuous and categorical variable: normal weight, <25; overweight, 25-30; and obese, ≥30. We compared ctDNA category and BMI, and estimated probability of disease-free survival (DFS), distant DFS (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) by BMI. RESULTS: Of 177 patients in BRE12-158, 172 had BMI and 140 had ctDNA data. There was no difference in mean BMI between those with ctDNA positivity versus negativity (P = 0.48). There was no relationship between BMI category and presence of ctDNA (P = 0.31). In multivariate analysis, continuous BMI was not prognostic of DDFS (P = 0.996), DFS (P = 0.41), or OS (P = 0.98). There was no association between BMI categories and survival (P = 0.92, 0.74, and 0.97 for DDFS, DFS, and OS, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with residual TNBC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, BMI was not prognostic of DDFS, DFS, or OS. There was no signal of a relationship between BMI and presence of ctDNA. This suggests inherent aggressive tumor biology, in which host phenotype may have less influence and impact of weight loss interventions may be diminished.
Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , ADN Tumoral Circulante/sangre , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Obesidad/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/terapia , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , ADN Tumoral Circulante/genética , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/genética , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Neoplasia Residual , Obesidad/diagnóstico , Periodo Preoperatorio , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/sangre , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/mortalidadRESUMEN
Our group has previously reported that SNPs in the VEGF promoter are strongly associated with efficacy and toxicity to the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab in breast cancer. In order to better understand the biologic mechanism for our previously reported biomarkers, we embarked on a comprehensive evaluation of genetic variation in the VEGF promoter coupled with a study of its intrinsic function. We resequenced 48 Caucasians and 48 African-Americans for the VEGF promoter to identify SNPs and elucidate its haplotype structure. We further cloned the haplotypes into reporter constructs and assessed the role of SNPs on promoter function in breast cancer cell lines. SNPs that were identified included twenty previously reported SNPs/insertions/deletions, one novel SNP, and one novel deletion. Among these variants, we identified five SNPs that tag six haplotypes capturing 74% of the genetic variation of the promoter. Subsequently, assessment of the haplotypes in reporter constructs demonstrates significant variation in promoter induced expression among the haplotypes. In particular, two haplotypes had higher expression and one haplotype had lower expression across cell lines. Haplotypes containing SNPs previously reported to be associated with increased survival with the use of bevacizumab are high-expressing haplotypes, thus lending putative functional evidence to the prior clinical finding.
Asunto(s)
Haplotipos/genética , Regiones Promotoras Genéticas/genética , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/genética , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/metabolismo , Secuencia de Bases , Línea Celular , Humanos , Desequilibrio de Ligamiento/genética , Luciferasas/metabolismo , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple/genéticaRESUMEN
The identification of cancer-predisposing germline variants has potentially substantial clinical impact for patients and their families. Although management guidelines have been proposed for some genes, guidelines for other genes are lacking. This review focuses on the current surveillance and management guidelines for the most common hereditary cancer syndromes and discusses some of the most pivotal studies supporting the available guidelines. We also highlight the gaps in the identification of germline carriers, the cascade testing of at-risk relatives, and the challenges impeding the proper follow-up and optimal management of pathogenic germline carriers. The anticipated surge in the number of identified germline carriers, deficient management guidelines, poor cascade testing uptake, and long-term follow-up necessitate the development of multidisciplinary clinics as an obligatory step toward the improvement of cancer prevention.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Identification of incidental germline mutations in the context of next-generation sequencing is an unintended consequence of advancing technologies. These data are critical for family members to understand disease risks and take action. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of 1,028 adult patients with metastatic cancer who were sequenced with tumor and germline whole exome sequencing (WES). Germline variant call files were mined for pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants using the ClinVar database and narrowed to high-quality submitters. RESULTS: Median age was 59 years, with 16% of patients ≤ 45 years old. The most common tumor types were breast cancer (12.5%), colorectal cancer (11.5%), sarcoma (9.3%), prostate cancer (8.4%), and lung cancer (6.6%). We identified 3,427 P/LP variants in 471 genes, and 84% of patients harbored one or more variant. One hundred thirty-two patients (12.8%) carried a P/LP variant in a cancer predisposition gene, with BRCA2 being the most common (1.6%). Patients with breast cancer were most likely to carry a P/LP variant (19.2%). One hundred ten patients (10.7%) carried a P/LP variant in a gene that would be recommended by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics to be reported as a result of clinical actionability, with the most common being ATP7B (2.7%), BRCA2 (1.6%), MUTYH (1.4%), and BRCA1 (1%). Of patients who carried a P/LP variant in a cancer predisposition gene, only 53% would have been offered correct testing based on current clinical practice guidelines. Of 471 mutated genes, 231 genes had a P/LP variant identified in one patient, demonstrating significant genetic heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients undergoing clinical cancer WES harbor a pathogenic germline variation. Identification of clinically actionable germline findings will create additional burden on oncology clinics as broader WES becomes common.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To ascertain whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the Vascular Endothelial Growth factor (VEGFA), Complement Factor H (CFH), and LOC387715 genes could predict outcome to anti-VEGF therapy for patients with age related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Patients with "wet" AMD were identified by chart review. Baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT) and visual acuity (VA) data, and at least 6 months of clinical follow up after 3 initial monthly injections of bevacizumab or ranibizumab were required for inclusion. Based on OCT and VA, patients were categorized into two possible clinical outcomes: (a) responders and (b) non-responders. DNA was extracted from saliva and genotyped for candidate SNPs in the VEGFA, LOC387715, and CFH genes. Clinical outcomes were statistically compared to patient genotypes. RESULTS: 101 patients were recruited, and one eye from each patient was included in the analysis. 97% of samples were successfully genotyped for all SNPs. We found a statistically significant association between the LOC387715 A69S TT genotype and outcome based on OCT. CONCLUSION: Genetic variation may be associated with outcome in patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy.