Learning by Debate: Innovative Tool in the Hematology-Oncology Fellowship Program.

The knowledge base for medicine and medical education is continuously evolving, prominently medical oncology. These quick advances expose the oncologists to the pressing need to be up-to-date in their fields and complicate the oncology education of medical students and oncology fellows. As the international societies have developed new tools to help both practitioners and trainees stay abreast of the new advances, we have incorporated the debate teaching tool in our oncology fellowship program. A survey of the participants in the debate sessions over the last three years shows that fellows considered this teaching tool effective in consolidating and enriching their medical knowledge, enhancing their research and presentation skills, improving cognitive and communication skills as well as encouraging evidence-based learning.

The management of patients with metastatic prostate cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic.

During the ongoing global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the benefit of treating patients with cancer must be weighed against the COVID-19 infection risks to patients, staff and society. Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers among men and raises particular interest during the pandemic as recent reports show that the TMPRSS2 (and other serine proteases), which facilitate the entry, replication and budding of the virion from a cell, can be inhibited using androgen deprivation therapy. Nevertheless, patients with metastatic prostate cancer commonly receive chemotherapy which may compromise their immune system. This paper aims to address the current status of the COVID-19 in patients with cancer overall and suggests an optimal approach to patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

Overcoming the resistance to BRAF inhibitor by the double BRAF and MEK inhibitions in advanced melanoma: a case report.

The advent of BRAF and MEK inhibitors changed the landscape of the management of BRAF mutated melanoma patients. In this article, we report the case of a 51-year-old man with BRAF mutated locally advanced cutaneous melanoma of the head who demonstrated a limited response to initial anti-BRAF monotherapy followed by extensive surgery. Anti-PD1 therapy failed to reverse the disease progression. However, subsequent double inhibition of the BRAF and MEK pathways induced a fast and remarkable tumour response.

Factors associated with the time to first palliative care consultation in Lebanese cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Early palliative care is recommended for cancer patients. However, palliative care consults (PCC) are often delayed in Lebanon. The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with timing of PCC and their impact on the place of death. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single institution, study conducted at Hotel Dieu de France University Hospital in Lebanon. The clinical and demographic characteristics of oncology patients who received PCC were obtained. Cox and logistic regression models were used to evaluate the factors determining the time to first PCC and location of death, respectively. RESULTS: Two hundred and ten patients were included in our analyses with a median age of 69 years (range 22-92 years). The median survival times were: overall survival 18.7 months, time to first PCC 17.9 months, and survival post-PCC 0.6 months. Among patients who were followed-up at home, the median time spent at home was 0.6 months. Late PCC were associated with a childless status (HR = 0.57, 95%CI = 0.37-0.86, p = 0.007), awareness of the diagnosis (HR = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.45-0.91, p = 0.013), and lack of palliative home care (HR = 0.42, 95%CI = 0.25-0.65, p < 0.001). Older patients (OR = 1.03, 95%CI = 1.01-1.05, p = 0.026) and those who had been followed up at home during the PCC (OR = 160.56, 95%CI = 21.39-1205.50, p < 0.001) were significantly more likely to have died at home as opposed to the hospital. DISCUSSION: Cancer patients often receive PCC only shortly before their death. PCC for Lebanese cancer patients were found to be significantly delayed in patients that are childless, knowledgeable of their diagnosis, and lack home palliative care.

Do checkpoint inhibitors compromise the cancer patients' immunity and increase the vulnerability to COVID-19 infection?

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) has been declared a pandemic by the WHO that claimed the lives of thousands of people within a few months. Cancer patients represent a vulnerable population due to the acquired immunodeficiency associated with anti-cancer therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have largely impacted the prognosis of a multitude of malignancies with significant improvement in survival outcomes and a different, tolerable toxicity profile. In this paper, we assess the safety of ICI administration in cancer patients during the coronavirus pandemic in order to guide the usage of these highly efficacious agents.

Docetaxel Rechallenge in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.

BACKGROUND: Recent years have witnessed a huge shift in the management and prognosis of metastatic prostate cancer with the advent of new-generation anti-hormonal treatments. Docetaxel, which was initially approved in the castrate-resistant prostate cancer setting, has been approved in the earlier course of the disease as it is still castrate sensitive. SUMMARY: Apart from cabazitaxel and in the absence of other effective chemotherapies, docetaxel rechallenge (DR) in patients with proved sensitivity to docetaxel in the earlier stage of the disease remains a possible option. Unfortunately, the pivotal trials rarely reported on the outcomes of docetaxel retreatment which seems a plausible option in patients initially responding to docetaxel and maintaining a minimum progression-free interval of 3-6 months. In this review, a summary of the clinical evidence and potential concerns for the use of DR in patients with metastatic prostate cancer will be presented. Key Messages: Pivotal trials of docetaxel in metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer as well as metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer have not reported on the outcomes of DR except in the GETUG-AFU 15 trial where the outcomes were disappointing. Based on the published retrospective data, DR may be effective in patients who initially responded to docetaxel and maintained a progression-free interval exceeding 6 months.

Characteristics of Gastric Cancer in Lebanon: a Descriptive Study from a Single Institutional Experience.

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of gastric cancer in the Middle East has never been described. Therefore, the characteristics of gastric cancer in the Lebanese population will be reported in this study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study that included all patients diagnosed with gastric cancer at Hotel Dieu de France University Hospital in Beirut, Lebanon between 2010 and 2016 was conducted. All eligible patients were reviewed for demographic and epidemiologic analysis. RESULTS: The study included 123 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer. The median age at diagnosis was 59 years (range 15-72 years), and the median ECOG performance status was 2 (range 1-4). Most patients were metastatic at diagnosis (52.8%), and diffuse pathology type was predominant (39%). HER2 was positive in 16.2% and correlated with the occurrence of hepatic metastasis (p = 0.048). The HER2 status did not differ significantly between the histological subtypes, the site of the tumor, the stage of the gastric cancer at diagnosis, and the recurrence of cancer (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Gastric cancer in the Lebanese population is characterized by aggressive features such as advanced stage at diagnosis, high prevalence of diffuse type histology, and HER2 positivity.