No evidence in favor of a more deleterious impact of a major depressive episode on verbal memory in older patients with antidepressant response.

BACKGROUND: Older patients may be more vulnerable to the deleterious effect of depressive episodes on delayed narrative memory, a cognitive task which reflects hippocampal activity. We aimed to disentangle which factors could explain such increased vulnerability in the elderly, including the poorer response to treatment, a longer lifetime exposure to past depressive episodes, and lower baseline memory skills. METHODS: From an initial sample of 8,229 depressed outpatients, we focused on the 2,424 treatment responders, and compared older (65 years old and over, N = 233) to younger (N = 2,191) ones. These patients were included through general practitioners' assessment and tested for the Wechsler delayed paragraph recall index, a valid and sensitive test assessing verbal declarative memory (and a marker of the hippocampal function), at baseline and after six weeks of treatment. RESULTS: As expected, older patients after response to antidepressants showed decreased narrative memory abilities compared to younger ones. As baseline memory performance and residual depressive symptoms were also found in excess in this sample, they could act as confounders. Indeed, after controlling for these two factors, the role of age in memory performance after treatment response was ruled out. CONCLUSIONS: The potential "toxicity" of a depressive episode to cognitive functions related to the hippocampus may not be more critical in older patients compared to younger ones. Limiting remaining depressive symptoms in older depressed patients might be a way to counteract the observed worsening of memory functions in depressed patients.

Are participants in pharmacological and psychotherapy treatment trials for social anxiety disorder representative of patients in real-life settings?

BACKGROUND: The present study sought to quantify the generalizability of clinical trial results in individuals with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, diagnosis of social anxiety disorder (SAD) to a large representative community sample. METHODS: Data were derived from the 2004-2005 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions, a large nationally representative sample of 34,653 adults from the US population. We applied a standard set of exclusion criteria representative of pharmacological and psychotherapy clinical trials to all adults with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, diagnosis of SAD (n = 965) in the past 12 months and then to a subsample of participants seeking treatment (n = 363). Our aim was to assess how many participants with SAD would fulfill typical eligibility criteria. RESULTS: We found that more than 7 of 10 respondents from the overall SAD sample in a typical pharmacological efficacy trial and more than 6 of 10 participants in a typical psychotherapy efficacy trial would have been excluded by at least 1 criterion. In addition, more than 8 of 10 respondents seeking treatment for SAD would have been excluded from participation in a typical pharmacological or psychotherapy efficacy trial. Having a current major depression explained a large proportion of ineligibility. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical trials should carefully consider the impact of exclusion criteria on the generalizability of their results and explain the rationale for their use. For SAD treatment trials to adequately inform clinical practice, the eligibility rate must be increased through a general relaxation of overly stringent eligibility criteria.