RESUMEN
Barrett's oesophagus is the only known precursor to oesophageal adenocarcinoma, a cancer with very poor prognosis. The main risk factors for Barrett's oesophagus are a history of gastro-oesophageal acid reflux symptoms and obesity. Men, smokers and those with a family history are also at increased risk. Progression from Barrett's oesophagus to cancer occurs via an intermediate stage, known as dysplasia. However, dysplasia and early cancer usually develop without any clinical signs, often in individuals whose symptoms are well controlled by acid suppressant medications; therefore, endoscopic surveillance is recommended to allow for early diagnosis and timely clinical intervention. Individuals with Barrett's oesophagus need to be fully informed about the implications of this diagnosis and the benefits and risks of monitoring strategies. Pharmacological treatments are recommended for control of symptoms, but not for chemoprevention. Dysplasia and stage 1 oesophageal adenocarcinoma have excellent prognoses, since they can be cured with endoscopic or surgical therapies. Endoscopic resection is the most accurate staging technique for early Barrett's-related oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic ablation is effective and indicated to eradicate Barrett's oesophagus in patients with dysplasia. Future research should focus on improved accuracy for dysplasia detection via new technologies and providing more robust evidence to support pathways for follow-up and treatment.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Esófago de Barrett , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Esófago de Barrett/terapia , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Esófago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Humanos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiología , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Factores de Riesgo , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Lesiones Precancerosas/terapia , Lesiones Precancerosas/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND : Endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE) with Seattle protocol biopsies is time-consuming and inadequately performed in routine practice. There is no recommended procedural time for BE surveillance. We investigated the duration of surveillance procedures with adequate tissue sampling and effect on dysplasia detection rate (DDR). METHODS : We performed post hoc analysis from the standard arm of a crossover randomized controlled trial recruiting patients with BE (≥C2 and/or ≥M3) and no clearly visible dysplastic lesions. After inspection with white-light imaging, targeted biopsies of subtle lesions and Seattle protocol biopsies were performed. Procedure duration and biopsy number were stratified by BE length. The effect of endoscopy-related variables on DDR was assessed by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS : Of 142 patients recruited, 15 (10.6â%) had high grade dysplasia/intramucosal cancer and 15 (10.6â%) had low grade dysplasia. The median procedural time was 16.5 minutes (interquartile range 14.0-19.0). Endoscopy duration increased by 0.9 minutes for each additional 1âcm of BE length. Seattle protocol biopsies had higher sensitivity for dysplasia than targeted biopsies (86.7â% vs. 60.0â%; Pâ=â0.045). Longer procedural time was associated with increased likelihood of dysplasia detection on quadrantic biopsies (odds ratio [OR] 1.10, 95â%CI 1.00-1.20, Pâ=â0.04), and for patients with BE >â6âcm also on targeted biopsies (OR 1.21, 95â%CI 1.04-1.40; Pâ=â0.01). CONCLUSIONS : In BE patients with no clearly visible dysplastic lesions, longer procedural time was associated with increased likelihood of dysplasia detection. Adequate time slots are required to perform good-quality surveillance and maximize dysplasia detection.
Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Humanos , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Biopsia/métodos , HiperplasiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) provides a powerful method of measuring fat fraction. However, previous studies have shown that MRS results give lower values compared with visual estimates from biopsies in fibrotic livers. This study investigated these discrepancies and considered whether a tissue water content correction, as assessed by MRI relaxometry, could provide better agreement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 110 patients were scanned in a 1.5 T Philips scanner and biopsies were obtained. Multiple echo MRS (30 × 30 × 30 mm volume) was used to determine Proton Density Fat Fraction (PDFF). Biopsies were assessed by visual assessment for fibrosis and steatosis grading. Digital image analysis (DIA) was also used to quantify fat fraction within tissue samples. T1 relaxation times were then used to estimate tissue water content to correct PDFF for confounding factors. RESULTS: PDFF values across the four visually assessed steatosis grades were significantly less in the higher fibrosis group (F3-F4) compared to the lower fibrosis group (F0-F2). The slope of the linear regression of PDFF vs DIA fat fraction was ~ 1 in the low fibrosis group and 0.77 in the high fibrosis group. Correcting for water content based on T1 increased the gradient but it did not reach unity. DISCUSSION: In fibrotic livers, PDFF underestimated fat fraction compared to DIA methods. Values were improved by applying a water content correction, but fat fractions were still underestimated.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico , Humanos , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/patología , Protones , Espectroscopía de Resonancia Magnética/métodos , FibrosisRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus often is invisible on high-resolution white-light endoscopy (HRWLE). We compared the diagnostic accuracy for inconspicuous dysplasia of the combination of autofluorescence imaging (AFI)-guided probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) and molecular biomarkers vs HRWLE with Seattle protocol biopsies. METHODS: Barrett's esophagus patients with no dysplastic lesions were block-randomized to standard endoscopy (HRWLE with the Seattle protocol) or AFI-guided pCLE with targeted biopsies for molecular biomarkers (p53 and cyclin A by immunohistochemistry; aneuploidy by image cytometry), with crossover to the other arm after 6 to 12 weeks. The primary end point was the histologic diagnosis from all study biopsies (trial histology). A sensitivity analysis was performed for overall histology, which included diagnoses within 12 months from the first study endoscopy. Endoscopists were blinded to the referral endoscopy and histology results. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy for dysplasia by real-time pCLE vs HRWLE biopsies. RESULTS: Of 154 patients recruited, 134 completed both arms. In the primary outcome analysis (trial histology analysis), AFI-guided pCLE had similar sensitivity for dysplasia compared with standard endoscopy (74.3%; 95% CI, 56.7-87.5 vs 80.0%; 95% CI, 63.1-91.6; P = .48). Multivariate logistic regression showed pCLE optical dysplasia, aberrant p53, and aneuploidy had the strongest correlation with dysplasia (secondary outcome). This 3-biomarker panel had higher sensitivity for any grade of dysplasia than the Seattle protocol (81.5% vs 51.9%; P < .001) in the overall histology analysis, but not in the trial histology analysis (91.4% vs 80.0%; P = .16), with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.83. CONCLUSIONS: Seattle protocol biopsies miss dysplasia in approximately half of patients with inconspicuous neoplasia. AFI-guided pCLE has similar accuracy to the current gold standard. The addition of molecular biomarkers could improve diagnostic accuracy.
Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Humanos , Esófago de Barrett/complicaciones , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Microscopía Confocal/métodos , Biopsia , Hiperplasia , Biomarcadores/análisis , Aneuploidia , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
Enzymatic inactivation of Rho-family GTPases by the glucosyltransferase domain of Clostridioides difficile Toxin B (TcdB) gives rise to various pathogenic effects in cells that are classically thought to be responsible for the disease symptoms associated with C. difficile infection (CDI). Recent in vitro studies have shown that TcdB can, under certain circumstances, induce cellular toxicities that are independent of glucosyltransferase (GT) activity, calling into question the precise role of GT activity. Here, to establish the importance of GT activity in CDI disease pathogenesis, we generated the first described mutant strain of C. difficile producing glucosyltransferase-defective (GT-defective) toxin. Using allelic exchange (AE) technology, we first deleted tcdA in C. difficile 630Δerm and subsequently introduced a deactivating D270N substitution in the GT domain of TcdB. To examine the role of GT activity in vivo, we tested each strain in two different animal models of CDI pathogenesis. In the non-lethal murine model of infection, the GT-defective mutant induced minimal pathology in host tissues as compared to the profound caecal inflammation seen in the wild-type and 630ΔermΔtcdA (ΔtcdA) strains. In the more sensitive hamster model of CDI, whereas hamsters in the wild-type or ΔtcdA groups succumbed to fulminant infection within 4 days, all hamsters infected with the GT-defective mutant survived the 10-day infection period without primary symptoms of CDI or evidence of caecal inflammation. These data demonstrate that GT activity is indispensable for disease pathogenesis and reaffirm its central role in disease and its importance as a therapeutic target for small-molecule inhibition.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas Bacterianas , Toxinas Bacterianas , Clostridioides difficile , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa , Glucosiltransferasas , Animales , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Proteínas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Toxinas Bacterianas/genética , Toxinas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Clostridioides difficile/enzimología , Clostridioides difficile/genética , Clostridioides difficile/patogenicidad , Cricetinae , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/enzimología , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/genética , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/patología , Femenino , Eliminación de Gen , Glucosiltransferasas/genética , Glucosiltransferasas/metabolismo , Masculino , RatonesRESUMEN
These consensus guidelines were jointly commissioned by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) and Public Health England (PHE). They provide an evidence-based framework for the use of surveillance colonoscopy and non-colonoscopic colorectal imaging in people aged 18 years and over. They are the first guidelines that take into account the introduction of national bowel cancer screening. For the first time, they also incorporate surveillance of patients following resection of either adenomatous or serrated polyps and also post-colorectal cancer resection. They are primarily aimed at healthcare professionals, and aim to address:Which patients should commence surveillance post-polypectomy and post-cancer resection?What is the appropriate surveillance interval?When can surveillance be stopped? two or more premalignant polyps including at least one advanced colorectal polyp (defined as a serrated polyp of at least 10 mm in size or containing any grade of dysplasia, or an adenoma of at least 10 mm in size or containing high-grade dysplasia); or five or more premalignant polyps The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument provided a methodological framework for the guidelines. The BSG's guideline development process was used, which is National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) compliant.two or more premalignant polyps including at least one advanced colorectal polyp (defined as a serrated polyp of at least 10 mm in size or containing any grade of dysplasia, or an adenoma of at least 10 mm in size or containing high-grade dysplasia); or five or more premalignant polyps The key recommendations are that the high-risk criteria for future colorectal cancer (CRC) following polypectomy comprise either:two or more premalignant polyps including at least one advanced colorectal polyp (defined as a serrated polyp of at least 10 mm in size or containing any grade of dysplasia, or an adenoma of at least 10 mm in size or containing high-grade dysplasia); or five or more premalignant polyps This cohort should undergo a one-off surveillance colonoscopy at 3 years. Post-CRC resection patients should undergo a 1 year clearance colonoscopy, then a surveillance colonoscopy after 3 more years.
Asunto(s)
Pólipos del Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Colonoscopía/normas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/métodos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/normas , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Selección de Paciente , Periodo PosoperatorioRESUMEN
Given the high global prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), the need for relevant noninvasive biomarkers and algorithms to accurately stage disease severity is a critical unmet medical need. Identifying those with advanced fibrosis (≥ F3) is the most crucial, as these individuals have the greatest risk of adverse, long-term, liver-related outcomes. We aimed to investigate the role of PRO-C3 (a marker of type III collagen formation) as a biomarker for advanced fibrosis in NAFLD. We measured PRO-C3 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in two large independent cohorts with extensive clinical phenotyping and liver biopsy: 150 in the derivation and 281 in the validation cohort. A PRO-C3-based fibrosis algorithm that included age, presence of diabetes, PRO-C3, and platelet count (ADAPT) was developed. PRO-C3 increased with fibrosis stage (Rho 0.50; P < 0.0001) and was independently associated with advanced fibrosis (odds ratio = 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.08; P = 0.003). ADAPT showed areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.86 (95% CI 0.79-0.91) in the derivation and 0.87 in the validation cohort (95% CI 0.83-0.91) for advanced fibrosis. This was superior to the existing fibrosis scores, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI), FIB-4, and NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) in most comparisons. Conclusion: PRO-C3 is an independent predictor of fibrosis stage in NAFLD. A PRO-C3-based score (ADAPT) accurately identifies patients with NAFLD and advanced fibrosis and is superior to APRI, FIB-4, and NFS.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Complemento C3/análisis , Cirrosis Hepática/sangre , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/sangre , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/diagnóstico , Adulto , Biopsia , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/patología , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Objectives: The role of random, four-quadrant biopsy (i.e. systematic biopsy) in Barrett's oesophagus surveillance has been questioned given its drawbacks and the emergence of high-resolution endoscopy and advanced imaging modalities. Our study aims to assess whether neoplastic pathology is typically diagnosed in routine clinical practice by random, four-quadrant or targeted biopsy whilst using high-resolution endoscopy.Methods: The Nottingham University Hospital Barrett's oesophagus dysplasia database was retrospectively analysed. Endoscopic and histopathologic data pertaining to the initial endoscopy in which pathology was diagnosed was extracted from the medical records. The most advanced histopathologic abnormality at initial diagnosis and within twelve months were noted. The corresponding endoscopic impression at initial diagnosis was used to group cases per type of biopsy - random, four-quadrant or targeted. Pearson's χ2 test of independence was used to analyse the relationship between the type of biopsy and diagnosis, indication for endoscopy, endoscopist level and advanced techniques used.Results: Of the 222 patients involved in the study - a higher proportion were diagnosed through random, four-quadrant biopsy (72.97%) than targeted biopsy (27.03%). 90.91% of low-grade dysplasia, 71.43% of high-grade dysplasia and 50% of intramucosal adenocarcinoma cases were diagnosed by random, four-quadrant biopsy. Across all grades of clinicians, patients were typically diagnosed through random, four-quadrant biopsy. However, amongst specialist consultant endoscopists (n = 10) the proportion was equal.Conclusions: Our findings strongly emphasize the importance of random, four-quadrant biopsy in the detection of not only low-grade dysplasia, but also high-grade dysplasia and early invasive carcinoma as part of Barrett's oesophagus surveillance.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/patología , Esófago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Hiperplasia/patología , Anciano , Biopsia/métodos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Esofagoscopía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Endoscopic resection (ER) for early (pT1) esophageal adenocarcinoma can be justified if the rate of coexisting lymph node (LN) metastasis is less than the mortality rate from esophagectomy. This study examines endoscopic and surgical outcomes, histological assessment of submucosal (sm) disease, factors influencing LN metastasis, and the safety of treating pT1b disease endoscopically. Histopathological reexamination recorded thickness, width and depth of sm invasion, grade, presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI), resection margin status and tumor stage. Multivariate analysis was employed to evaluate the factors influencing survival and LN metastasis. Rate of LN metastasis for pT1 low-risk (LR: sm invasion < 500 µm, G1-2, no LVI) or high-risk (HR: sm invasion >500 µm, G3-4 or LVI) disease were analyzed. Ninety three patients underwent ER and 96 underwent esophagectomy. We demonstrate conflicting histological methods of sm disease reporting, which may explain the difference in LN metastasis rate between reported surgical & endoscopic series. Multivariate analysis confirmed age, T stage, and presence of LN metastases were the independent factors predicting poor prognosis. Tumor thickness as well as grade, T stage, LVI were predictors of LN metastasis. Rates of LN metastasis are <2% in LR sm1 disease, and >15% in HR sm1 disease. Pathological reporting of sm invasion should be updated for uniform analysis of endoscopic and surgical specimens. Following rigorous histopathological examination and within a close endoscopic follow-up regimen, pT1a and pT1b LRsm1 disease may be treated with curative intent endoscopically, whereas pT1b HRsm1-sm3 disease should be offered surgery.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
AIMS: There is evidence that four or five gastric cancer biopsies are required for accurate HER2 interpretation. However, the number of biopsies that need to be taken to reach this number of viable cancer biopsies is without evidence. This study aimed to address this gap by assessing the number of biopsies required to gain at least four viable biopsies containing cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 105 consecutive biopsy cases of gastric and oesophageal adenocarcinoma were retrieved from files. Only definite cancer diagnoses were included; missed cancers or unproven cases were not considered. The cases were reviewed and the number of biopsies taken, and the number containing viable tumour was recorded. In total, 667 biopsies were taken, of which 471 had viable tumour (70.6%). Seventy of 105 cases (67%) had four viable tumour biopsies, but only 47 of 105 (45%) had five viable tumour biopsies. In order to have a >90% chance of having four viable tumour biopsies, seven needed to be taken, while 10 or more were required for a >90% chance of five viable tumour biopsies. Mathematically, using a 0.7 probability for a single biopsy, eight biopsies would be required for a 94% chance of at least four viable tumour biopsies. CONCLUSION: In our large upper GI cancer centre, many biopsy cases do not contain sufficient material for adequate HER2 assessment. In order to meet the four-biopsy requirement for adequate HER2 assessment in >90% of cases, at least eight biopsies need to be taken, while 10 biopsies would be required for the 5-cancer biopsy threshold.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Biopsia/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Patología Quirúrgica/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/métodos , Gastroenterología/métodos , Humanos , Receptor ErbB-2/análisisRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patient outcomes in gastric adenocarcinoma are poor due to late diagnosis. Detecting and treating at the premalignant stage has the potential to improve this. Helicobacter pylori is also a strong risk factor for this disease. AIMS: Primary aims were to assess the diagnostic accuracy of magnified narrow band imaging (NBI-Z) endoscopy and serology in detecting normal mucosa, H. pylori gastritis and gastric atrophy. Secondary aims were to compare the diagnostic accuracies of two classification systems using both NBI-Z and white light endoscopy with magnification (WLE-Z) and evaluate the inter-observer agreement. METHODS: Patients were prospectively recruited. Images of gastric mucosa were stored with histology and serum for IgG H. pylori and Pepsinogen (PG) I/II ELISAs. Blinded expert endoscopists agreed on mucosal pattern. Mucosal images and serological markers were compared with histology. Kappa statistics determined inter-observer variability for randomly allocated images among four experts and four non-experts. RESULTS: 116 patients were prospectively recruited. Diagnostic accuracy of NBI-Z for determining normal gastric mucosa was 0.87(95%CI 0.82-0.92), H. pylori gastritis 0.65(95%CI 0.55-0.75) and gastric atrophy 0.88(95%CI 0.81-0.94). NBI-Z was superior to serology at detecting gastric atrophy: NBI-Z gastric atrophy 0.88(95%CI 0.81-0.94) vs PGI/II ratio < 3 0.74(95%CI 0.62-0.85) p<.0001. Overall NBI-Z was superior to WLE-Z in detecting disease using two validated classifications. Inter-observer agreement was 0.63(95%CI 0.51-0.73). CONCLUSIONS: NBI-Z accurately detects changes in the GI mucosa which currently depend on histology. NBI-Z is useful in the detection of precancerous conditions, potentially improving patient outcomes with early intervention to prevent gastric cancer.
Asunto(s)
Gastritis Atrófica/diagnóstico por imagen , Gastroscopía/métodos , Imagen de Banda Estrecha , Lesiones Precancerosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Mucosa Gástrica/patología , Gastritis Atrófica/microbiología , Gastritis Atrófica/patología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Reino Unido , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
For routine EUS-guided sampling of solid masses and lymph nodes (LNs) ESGE recommends 25G or 22G needles (high quality evidence, strong recommendation); fine needle aspiration (FNA) and fine needle biopsy (FNB) needles are equally recommended (high quality evidence, strong recommendation).When the primary aim of sampling is to obtain a core tissue specimen, ESGE suggests using 19G FNA or FNB needles or 22G FNB needles (low quality evidence, weak recommendation).ESGE recommends using 10-mL syringe suction for EUS-guided sampling of solid masses and LNs with 25G or 22G FNA needles (high quality evidence, strong recommendation) and other types of needles (low quality evidence, weak recommendation). ESGE suggests neutralizing residual negative pressure in the needle before withdrawing the needle from the target lesion (moderate quality evidence, weak recommendation).ESGE does not recommend for or against using the needle stylet for EUS-guided sampling of solid masses and LNs with FNA needles (high quality evidence, strong recommendation) and suggests using the needle stylet for EUS-guided sampling with FNB needles (low quality evidence, weak recommendation).ESGE suggests fanning the needle throughout the lesion when sampling solid masses and LNs (moderate quality evidence, weak recommendation).ESGE equally recommends EUS-guided sampling with or without on-site cytologic evaluation (moderate quality evidence, strong recommendation). When on-site cytologic evaluation is unavailable, ESGE suggests performance of three to four needle passes with an FNA needle or two to three passes with an FNB needle (low quality evidence, weak recommendation).For diagnostic sampling of pancreatic cystic lesions without a solid component, ESGE suggests emptying the cyst with a single pass of a 22G or 19G needle (low quality evidence, weak recommendation). For pancreatic cystic lesions with a solid component, ESGE suggests sampling of the solid component using the same technique as in the case of other solid lesions (low quality evidence, weak recommendation).ESGE does not recommend antibiotic prophylaxis for EUS-guided sampling of solid masses or LNs (low quality evidence, strong recommendation), and suggests antibiotic prophylaxis with fluoroquinolones or beta-lactam antibiotics for EUS-guided sampling of cystic lesions (low quality evidence, weak recommendation). ESGE suggests that evaluation of tissue obtained by EUS-guided sampling should include histologic preparations (e.âg., cell blocks and/or formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue fragments) and should not be limited to smear cytology (low quality evidence, weak recommendation).
Asunto(s)
Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico/instrumentación , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico/normas , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/patología , Agujas , Neoplasias Quísticas, Mucinosas y Serosas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Profilaxis Antibiótica/normas , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico/efectos adversos , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico/métodos , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Neoplasias Quísticas, Mucinosas y Serosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Quiste Pancreático/diagnóstico por imagen , Quiste Pancreático/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Manejo de Especímenes/normas , SucciónRESUMEN
Short-term very-low-energy diets (VLEDs) are used in clinical practice prior to bariatric surgery, but regimens vary and outcomes of a short intervention are unclear. We examined the effect of 2 VLEDs, a food-based diet (FD) and a meal-replacement plan (MRP; LighterLife UK Limited, Harlow, UK), over the course of 2 weeks in a randomized controlled trial. We collected clinical and anthropometric data, fasting blood samples, and dietary evaluation questionnaires. Surgeons took liver biopsies and made a visual assessment of the liver. We enrolled 60 participants of whom 54 completed the study (FD, n = 26; MRP, n = 28). Baseline demographic features, reported energy intake, dietary evaluation and liver histology were similar in the 2 groups. Both diets induced significant weight loss. Perceived difficulty of surgery correlated significantly with the degree of steatosis on histology. There were reductions in the circulating inflammatory mediators C-reactive protein, fetuin-A and interleukin-6 between baseline (pre-diet) and post-diet. The diets achieved similar weight loss and reduction in inflammatory biomarkers. There were no significant differences in perceived operative difficulty or between patients' evaluation of diet satisfaction, ease of use or hunger frequency. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease histology assessments post-diet were also not significantly different between diets. The results of this study show the effectiveness of short-term VLEDs and energy restriction, irrespective of macronutrient composition, although the small sample size precluded detection of subtle differences between interventions.
Asunto(s)
Restricción Calórica , Metabolismo de los Lípidos , Hígado/metabolismo , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/dietoterapia , Obesidad Mórbida/dietoterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Cirugía Bariátrica , Biomarcadores/sangre , Biopsia , Índice de Masa Corporal , Restricción Calórica/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Mediadores de Inflamación/sangre , Hígado/inmunología , Hígado/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/inmunología , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/metabolismo , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/patología , Obesidad Mórbida/inmunología , Obesidad Mórbida/metabolismo , Obesidad Mórbida/patología , Tamaño de los Órganos , Cuidados Preoperatorios/efectos adversos , Pérdida de Peso , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: For patients with operable esophagogastric cancer, peri-operative chemotherapy confers a significant overall survival benefit compared to surgery alone, however only 30-40% of patients demonstrate histopathological response. It is unclear whether those with no neoadjuvant chemotherapy response should go onto receive adjuvant chemotherapy, as no further benefit may be conferred. METHODS: Esophagogastric cancers were prospectively captured with associated histopathological tumor regression grades following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This cohort was then interrogated for clinico-pathological and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery, patients with chemotherapy responsive cancers, who were administered adjuvant chemotherapy gained a significant overall survival benefit. Multivariate Cox analysis, demonstrated a final adjusted hazard ratio for adjuvant therapy of 0.509; (95%CI 0.28-0.93); P = 0.028. In contrast, patients with non-responsive tumors, who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy, did not show any survival benefit. Chemotherapy toxicity was prevalent and contributed to only half of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest the benefit of the adjuvant portion of chemotherapy is limited to those who demonstrate a histopathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The administration of the adjuvant portion of chemotherapy to patients without a response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy may not provide any survival benefit, while potentially causing increased morbidity.
Asunto(s)
Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Capecitabina/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Epirrubicina/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Liver fibrosis is traditionally graded into categorical stages with cirrhosis as the highest stage. However, cirrhosis stage may vary between individuals widely in terms of the amount of fibrosis which is not assessed by traditional staging systems. We aimed to utilise visual morphometry to quantify the amount of fibrosis in liver biopsy and compare how non-invasive methods of quantifying liver fibrosis correlated with histological measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Liver biopsy specimens from 115 consecutive chronic liver disease patients were assessed by a single pathologist for fibrosis stage by the Clinical Research Network and METAVIR systems as well as percentage fibrosis by visual morphometry. Liver T1 relaxation times, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography and enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score were compared between fibrosis stages. In addition, these parameters were correlated with pathologist's visual estimate of percentage fibrosis and their predictive ability for advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis assessed by area under receiver operating curve (AUROC). RESULTS: All four parameters increased sequentially from fibrosis stage F0 to F4 (p<.001 for each). AUROCs for advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis were 0.931 and 1.000 respectively for pathologist's estimate of fibrosis, 0.707 and 0.926 for ELF score, 0.763 and 0.972 for T1 and 0.881 and 0.989 for LSM. LSM, ELF score and T1 correlated significantly with pathologist's estimate of percentage fibrosis. CONCLUSION: Non-invasive markers of fibrosis LSM, ELF and T1 relaxation time provide continuous surrogates for categorical histopathological staging of fibrosis which can be useful as markers of progression and regression of fibrosis on follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico por imagen , Cirrosis Hepática/patología , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Hígado/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Curva ROC , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
AIMS: p53 immunostaining in Barrett's oesophagus (BO) has been shown to be predictive of progression, but data regarding its generalizability to routine practice are lacking. This study compared the reliability of p53 and dysplasia interpretation and grading. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-two cases encompassing the full spectrum of BO were circulated to 10 pathologists from four institutions after a brief training session in p53 interpretation. Each pathologist classified cases on haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) alone using the Vienna classification and assessed the p53 staining using a qualitative system. Agreement was assessed using kappa statistics. For the four-tier Vienna system, the average unweighted kappa was 0.30. Weighted kappa values varied from 0.27 to 0.69 with an average of 0.47. When grouped into definite dysplasia versus no definite dysplasia the average kappa was 0.55, but the kappa for low-grade dysplasia (LGD) versus high-grade dysplasia (HGD) was only 0.31. For p53, using the three recognized patterns, the unweighted kappa was 0.6 (confidence interval 0.58-0.63). When cases were evaluated with both H&E and p53 the average kappa was 0.61 for definite dysplasia versus the rest. CONCLUSIONS: p53 immunohistochemistry interpretation is more reliable than dysplasia diagnosis, even with limited training. As it is predictive of prognosis and improves diagnostic reproducibility, it is suitable for routine use by pathologists as an adjunct to dysplasia diagnosis. The distinction of LGD versus HGD was poor. This study supports simplifying dysplasia diagnosis into 'present', 'indefinite' or 'absent', and the use of p53 as an ancillary marker in difficult cases. This should help to prevent overdiagnosis of dysplasia and inappropriate treatment.
Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/biosíntesis , Eosina Amarillenta-(YS) , Hematoxilina , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Lesiones Precancerosas/diagnóstico , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Coloración y Etiquetado , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/análisisRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus (BO) is limited by sampling error and the subjectivity of diagnosing dysplasia. We aimed to compare a biomarker panel on minimal biopsies directed by autofluorescence imaging (AFI) with the standard surveillance protocol to derive an objective tool for dysplasia assessment. DESIGN: We performed a cross-sectional prospective study in three tertiary referral centres. Patients with BO underwent high-resolution endoscopy followed by AFI-targeted biopsies. 157 patients completed the biopsy protocol. Aneuploidy/tetraploidy; 9p and 17p loss of heterozygosity; RUNX3, HPP1 and p16 methylation; p53 and cyclin A immunohistochemistry were assessed. Bootstrap resampling was used to select the best diagnostic biomarker panel for high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early cancer (EC). This panel was validated in an independent cohort of 46 patients. RESULTS: Aneuploidy, p53 immunohistochemistry and cyclin A had the strongest association with dysplasia in the per-biopsy analysis and, as a panel, had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.99) for diagnosing HGD/EC. The diagnostic accuracy for HGD/EC of the three-biomarker panel from AFI+ areas was superior to AFI- areas (p<0.001). Compared with the standard protocol, this panel had equal sensitivity for HGD/EC, with a 4.5-fold reduction in the number of biopsies. In an independent cohort of patients, the panel had a sensitivity and specificity for HGD/EC of 100% and 85%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A three-biomarker panel on a small number of AFI-targeted biopsies provides an accurate and objective diagnosis of dysplasia in BO. The clinical implications have to be studied further.
Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett/patología , Biomarcadores/análisis , Esofagoscopía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Imagen Óptica , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a commonly undiagnosed condition that predisposes to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Routine endoscopic screening for BE is not recommended because of the burden this would impose on the health care system. The objective of this study was to determine whether a novel approach using a minimally invasive cell sampling device, the Cytosponge, coupled with immunohistochemical staining for the biomarker Trefoil Factor 3 (TFF3), could be used to identify patients who warrant endoscopy to diagnose BE. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A case-control study was performed across 11 UK hospitals between July 2011 and December 2013. In total, 1,110 individuals comprising 463 controls with dyspepsia and reflux symptoms and 647 BE cases swallowed a Cytosponge prior to endoscopy. The primary outcome measures were to evaluate the safety, acceptability, and accuracy of the Cytosponge-TFF3 test compared with endoscopy and biopsy. In all, 1,042 (93.9%) patients successfully swallowed the Cytosponge, and no serious adverse events were attributed to the device. The Cytosponge was rated favorably, using a visual analogue scale, compared with endoscopy (p < 0.001), and patients who were not sedated for endoscopy were more likely to rate the Cytosponge higher than endoscopy (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.001). The overall sensitivity of the test was 79.9% (95% CI 76.4%-83.0%), increasing to 87.2% (95% CI 83.0%-90.6%) for patients with ≥3 cm of circumferential BE, known to confer a higher cancer risk. The sensitivity increased to 89.7% (95% CI 82.3%-94.8%) in 107 patients who swallowed the device twice during the study course. There was no loss of sensitivity in patients with dysplasia. The specificity for diagnosing BE was 92.4% (95% CI 89.5%-94.7%). The case-control design of the study means that the results are not generalizable to a primary care population. Another limitation is that the acceptability data were limited to a single measure. CONCLUSIONS: The Cytosponge-TFF3 test is safe and acceptable, and has accuracy comparable to other screening tests. This test may be a simple and inexpensive approach to identify patients with reflux symptoms who warrant endoscopy to diagnose BE.
Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/instrumentación , Péptidos/metabolismo , Anciano , Esófago de Barrett/metabolismo , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Biomarcadores/análisis , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Péptidos/análisis , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factor Trefoil-3RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a common premalignant lesion for which surveillance is recommended. This strategy is limited by considerable variations in clinical practice. We conducted an international, multidisciplinary, systematic search and evidence-based review of BE and provided consensus recommendations for clinical use in patients with nondysplastic, indefinite, and low-grade dysplasia (LGD). METHODS: We defined the scope, proposed statements, and searched electronic databases, yielding 20,558 publications that were screened, selected online, and formed the evidence base. We used a Delphi consensus process, with an 80% agreement threshold, using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) to categorize the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. RESULTS: In total, 80% of respondents agreed with 55 of 127 statements in the final voting rounds. Population endoscopic screening is not recommended and screening should target only very high-risk cases of males aged over 60 years with chronic uncontrolled reflux. A new international definition of BE was agreed upon. For any degree of dysplasia, at least two specialist gastrointestinal (GI) pathologists are required. Risk factors for cancer include male gender, length of BE, and central obesity. Endoscopic resection should be used for visible, nodular areas. Surveillance is not recommended for <5 years of life expectancy. Management strategies for indefinite dysplasia (IND) and LGD were identified, including a de-escalation strategy for lower-risk patients and escalation to intervention with follow-up for higher-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this uniquely large consensus process in gastroenterology, we made key clinical recommendations for the escalation/de-escalation of BE in clinical practice. We made strong recommendations for the prioritization of future research.
Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett/patología , Esófago de Barrett/terapia , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esófago/patología , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Lesiones Precancerosas/terapia , Técnicas de Ablación , Factores de Edad , Biopsia , Metilación de ADN , Esofagoscopía , Humanos , Lesiones Precancerosas/química , Lesiones Precancerosas/genética , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Espera Vigilante/métodosRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: Although a higher prevalence of raised liver enzymes and altered echotexture on ultrasound have been reported in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), the histological spectrum and natural history of chronic liver disease (CLD) in T1DM is unknown. We investigated the prevalence and outcome of histologically proven CLD in a longitudinal cohort of patients with T1DM. We identified patients who have had liver biopsy from a computerized database (DIAMOND; Hicom Technology, Brookwood, UK) containing longitudinal data for over 95% of type 1 diabetes patients from an overall catchment population of 700,000 people. Gender-matched patients with oral hypoglycemic-treated (T2OH) and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2IN) who had liver biopsy formed two comparative cohorts. We collated clinical and histological data, as well as long-term outcomes of all three groups, and compared T1DM cirrhosis incidence to UK general population data. Of 4,644 patients with T1DM, 57 (1.2%) underwent liver biopsy. Of these, 53.1% of patients had steatosis, 20.4% had nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and 73.5% had fibrosis on index liver biopsy. Cirrhosis was diagnosed in 14 patients (24.6%) during follow-up. T1DM with age under 55 years had an odds ratio of 1.875 (95% confidence interval: 0.936-3.757) for cirrhosis incidence, compared to the general population. Longitudinal liver-related outcomes were similar comparing the T1DM cohort and respective type 2 diabetes cohorts--when adjusted for important confounders, diabetic cohort type did not predict altered risk of incident cirrhosis or portal hypertension. CONCLUSION: Type 1 diabetes is associated with a previously unrecognized burden of CLD and its complications.