Estimating Preterm Lung Volume: A Comparison of Lung Ultrasound, Chest Radiography, and Oxygenation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between lung ultrasound (LUS) examination, chest radiograph (CXR), and radiographic and clinical evaluations in the assessment of lung volume in preterm infants. STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective cohort study LUS was performed before CXR on 70 preterm infants and graded using (1) a LUS score, (2) an atelectasis score, and (3) measurement of atelectasis depth. Radiographic diaphragm position and radio-opacification were used to determine global and regional radiographic atelectasis. The relationship between LUS, CXR, and oxygenation was assessed using receiver operator characteristic and correlation analysis. RESULTS: LUS scores, atelectasis scores, and atelectasis depth did not correspond with radiographic global atelectasis (area under receiver operator characteristics curves, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.36-0.71], 0.49 [95% CI, 0.34-0.64], and 0.47 [95% CI, 0.31-0.64], respectively). Radiographic atelectasis of the right upper, right lower, left upper, and left lower quadrants was predicted by LUS scores (0.75 [95% CI, 0.59-0.92], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.62-0.89], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.56-0.82], and 0.63 [95% CI, 0.508-0.751]) and atelectasis depth (0.66 [95% CI, 0.54-0.78], 0.65 [95% CI, 0.53-0.77], 0.63 [95% CI, 0.50-0.76], and 0.56 [95% CI, 0.44-0.70]). LUS findings were moderately correlated with oxygen saturation index (ρ = 0.52 [95% CI, 0.30-0.70]) and saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (ρ = -0.63 [95% CI, -0.76 to -0.46]). The correlation between radiographic diaphragm position, the oxygenation saturation index, and peripheral oxygen saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio was very weak (ρ = 0.36 [95% CI, 0.11-0.59] and ρ = -0.32 [95% CI, -0.53 to -0.07], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: LUS assessment of lung volume does not correspond with radiographic diaphragm position preterm infants. However, LUS predicted radiographic regional atelectasis and correlated with oxygenation. The relationship between radiographic diaphragm position and oxygenation was very weak. Although LUS may not replace all radiographic measures of lung volume, LUS more accurately reflects respiratory status in preterm infants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12621001119886.

Predicting extubation failure in preterm infants using lung ultrasound: a diagnostic accuracy study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of pre-extubation lung ultrasound (LUS) to predict reintubation in preterm infants born <32 weeks' gestation. DESIGN: Prospective diagnostic accuracy study. SETTING: Two neonatal intensive care units. METHODS: Anterior and lateral LUS was performed pre-extubation. The primary outcome was the accuracy of LUS scores (range 0-24) to predict reintubation within 72 hours. Secondary outcomes were accuracy in predicting (1) reintubation within 7 days, (2) reintubation stratified by postnatal age and (3) accuracy of lateral imaging only (range 0-12). Pre-specified subgroup analyses were performed in extremely preterm infants born <28 weeks' gestation. Cut-off scores, sensitivities and specificities were calculated using receiver operating characteristic analysis and reported as area under the curves (AUCs). RESULTS: One hundred preterm infants with a mean (SD) gestational age of 27.4 (2.2) weeks and birth weight of 1059 (354) g were studied. Thirteen were subsequently reintubated. The AUC (95% CI) of the pre-extubation LUS score for predicting reintubation was 0.63 (0.45-0.80). Accuracy was greater in extremely preterm infants: AUC 0.70 (0.52-0.87) and excellent in infants who were <72 hours of age at the time of extubation: AUC 0.90 (0.77-1.00). Accuracy was poor in infants who were >7 days of age. Lateral imaging alone demonstrated similar accuracy to scanning anterior and lateral regions. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous studies, LUS was not a strong predictor of reintubation in preterm infants. Accuracy is increased in extremely preterm infants. Future research should focus on infants at highest risk of extubation failure and consider simpler imaging protocols. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12621001356853.