RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A subset of women with breast implants have reported a myriad of nonspecific systemic symptoms collectively termed systemic symptoms associated with breast implants (SSBI). SSBI symptoms are similar to manifestations associated with autoimmune and connective tissue disorders Breast tissue is rich in adipose cells, comprised of lipids. Insertion of an implant creates an oxidative environment leading to lipid oxidation. Oxylipins can influence immune responses and inflammatory processes. OBJECTIVES: This study explores the abundance of a spectrum of oxylipins in the peri-prosthetic tissue surrounding the breast implant. Since oxylipins are immunogenic, we sought to determine if they are associated with the SSBI subjects. We have also attempted to determine if the common manifestations exhibited by such subjects have any association with oxylipin abundance. METHODS: The study included 120 subjects divided in three cohorts. Forty-six subjects with breast implants exhibiting manifestation associated with SSBI, 29 in control cohort I subjects with breast implants not exhibiting manifestation associated with SSBI (non-SSBI) and 45 in control cohort II subjects without implants (normal tissue) were analyzed. Lipid extraction and oxylipin quantification was performed using LCMS. LC-MS/MS targeted analysis from the breast adipose tissue was performed. RESULTS: Of the fifteen oxylipins analyzed, four exhibited increased abundance in the SSBI cohort compared to the non-SSBI and normal cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The study documents the association of the oxylipins with each manifestation reported by the subject. This study provides an objective assessment on the subjective questionnaire highlighting which symptoms could be more relevant than the others.
RESUMEN
This study investigates a mechanistic link of bacterial biofilm-mediated host-pathogen interaction leading to immunological complications associated with breast implant illness (BII). Over 10 million women worldwide have breast implants. In recent years, women have described a constellation of immunological symptoms believed to be related to their breast implants. We report that periprosthetic breast tissue of participants with symptoms associated with BII had increased abundance of biofilm and biofilm-derived oxylipin 10-HOME compared with participants with implants who are without symptoms (non-BII) and participants without implants. S. epidermidis biofilm was observed to be higher in the BII group compared with the non-BII group and the normal tissue group. Oxylipin 10-HOME was found to be immunogenically capable of polarizing naive CD4+ T cells with a resulting Th1 subtype in vitro and in vivo. Consistently, an abundance of CD4+Th1 subtype was observed in the periprosthetic breast tissue and blood of people in the BII group. Mice injected with 10-HOME also had increased Th1 subtype in their blood, akin to patients with BII, and demonstrated fatigue-like symptoms. The identification of an oxylipin-mediated mechanism of immune activation induced by local bacterial biofilm provides insight into the possible pathogenesis of the implant-associated immune symptoms of BII.
Asunto(s)
Implantes de Mama , Humanos , Femenino , Ratones , Animales , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Implantes de Mama/microbiología , Oxilipinas , Biopelículas , InmunidadRESUMEN
Background: Breast implants are commonly placed postbreast cancer reconstruction, cosmetic augmentation, and gender-affirming surgery. Breast implant illness (BII) is a systemic complication associated with breast implants. Patients with BII may experience autoimmune symptoms including fatigue, difficulty concentrating, hair loss, weight change, and depression. BII is poorly understood, and the etiology is unknown. The purpose of this literature review is to characterize BII autoimmune disorders and determine possible causes for its etiology. Methods: The PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, Web of Science, and OVID databases were interrogated from 2010 to 2020 using a query strategy including search term combinations of "implants," "breast implant illness," "autoimmune," and "systemic illness." Results: BII includes a spectrum of autoimmune symptoms such as fatigue, myalgias/arthralgias, dry eyes/mouth, and rash. A review of epidemiological studies in the past ten years exhibited evidence affirming an association between breast implants and autoimmune diseases. The most commonly recognized were Sjogren's syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, chronic fatigue syndrome, and Raynaud's syndrome. Explantation resulted in alleviation of symptoms in over 50% of patients, strengthening the hypothesis linking breast implants to BII. Studies have shown that silicone is a biologically inert material and unlikely to be the cause of these symptoms. This is supported by the fact that increased risk of autoimmune disease was also reported in patients with other implantable biomaterials such as orthopedic implants. Recent studies shed light on a possible role of bacterial biofilm and subsequent host-pathogen interactions as a confounding factor to this problem. Conclusion: BII could be dependent on biofilm infection and the microenvironment around the implants. The true pathophysiology behind these complaints must be further investigated so that alternative treatment regimens other than explantation can be developed. Translational significance of these studies is not limited to breast implants but extends to other implants as well.