The role of surgical and total endovascular techniques in the treatment of ruptured juxtarenal aortic aneurysms.

Background: Ruptured juxtarenal aortic aneurysms (RJAAA) represent a special challenge in clinical practice, but the evidence to guide therapeutic decision-making is scarce. The aim of this study was to present two different approaches, open surgical (OAR) and chimney endovascular repair (CHEVAR), for treating patients with RJAAA. Patients and methods: This retrospective two-center study included all patients per center undergoing OAR or CHEVAR for RJAAA between February 2008 and January 2020. Juxtarenal aortic aneurysms were defined as having an infrarenal neck of 2-5 mm, measured after three-dimensional reconstruction of the computed tomography angiography scan. Results: 12 OAR patients (10 male, median age 73 years [58-90 years]) and 6 CHEVAR patients (all male, median age 74 years [59-83 years]) were included. In the OAR group, the proximal aortic clamping was suprarenal in 7 and interrenal in 5 patients. Cold renal perfusion was used in 4 patients, in 2 with suprarenal aortic clamping and in 2 with interrenal aortic clamping. 3 CHEVAR patients received a single renal chimney, the other 3 received double renal chimneys. Technical success was 12/12 in the OAR group 5/6 in the CHEVAR group. In-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality were 3/12 after OAR and 0/6 after CHEVAR. 2 OAR patients required transient dialysis. Median in-hospital stay was 14 (10-63) and 8 (6-21) days and median follow-up (FU) was 20 (3-37) and 30 (7-101) months, respectively. No further deaths occurred during FU. One OAR patient and 4 CHEVAR patients required aortic reinterventions. Conclusions: RJAAAs are rare. Both OAR and CHEVAR can represent adequate treatments for RJAAAs. OAR is the traditional approach, but CHEVAR has - in a high-volume center - promising early results with nonetheless a need for continuous FU to prevent reinterventions. Defining the studied aortic pathology precisely is essential for future research in order to draw valid conclusions.

Intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination for endoleak detection after complex and infrarenal endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (iCEUS) examination for endoleak (EL) detection after complex endovascular aortic repairs (EVAR) in comparison with the standard angiographic completion control. METHODS: Twenty-one patients (16 male; median age, 73 years [range, 54-81 years]) who underwent single-stage EVARs at our center between October 2016 and October 2018 were included prospectively. The procedures comprised fenestrated and/or branched EVAR (n = 14; 66%), infrarenal EVAR (n = 5; 24%), infrarenal EVAR with bilateral iliac side branch implantation (n = 1; 5%), and infrarenal EVAR with occluder implantation into the internal iliac artery (n = 1; 5%). The used endografts included 14 custom made devices (Cook, Australia Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Australia, n = 6; Vascutek Terumo, Glasgow, Scotland, n = 8) and seven standard infrarenal endografts (Medtronic Inc, Santa Rosa, Calif, n = 5; Vascutek Terumo, Glasgow, Scotland, n = 1; Cook, n = 1). All patients underwent an angiographic completion control for EL detection followed by iCEUS examination. The iCEUS examination was performed by the same examiner who was blinded to the angiography result. In addition to the comparison of the angiographic results to iCEUS examination, iCEUS examination was also compared with the computed tomography angiography (CTA) before discharge (median time to CTA, 5 days [range, 1-7 days]). RESULTS: Angiography detected eight type II EL, defining the EL origin in four cases. In addition to detecting all of those eight EL, iCEUS examination revealed eight more type II EL not seen on angiography (P = .002) and allowed a definition of the EL origin in all cases. CTA before discharge showed a persistence of only 5 of the 16 type II EL detected by iCEUS examination (31%, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: An iCEUS examination can be used as another adjunct to decrease exposure to contrast agent and radiation during EVAR, including complex procedures. A replacement of the completion angiography by iCEUS examination is conceivable for infrarenal EVAR, but also for endovascular type IV or type V repairs. Future studies with larger patient numbers will help to further validate iCEUS examination during complex EVAR.

Changes in Target Vessel Anatomy Following Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Midterm Results.

Purpose: To analyze the changes in target vessel (TV) anatomy after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (fEVAR) during midterm follow-up. Materials and Methods: A retrospective single-center study analyzed 56 patients (mean age 71±7 years; 49 men) who underwent fEVAR using custom-made stent-grafts (22 Zenith and 34 Anaconda) between June 2010 and July 2016. Advanta V12 (V12; 74, 53%) and BeGraft (BeG; 66, 47%) stent-grafts were used to bridge to the 140 TVs. Measurements of the TV deviation at the aortic origin, the vessel shift distal to the bridging stent-graft (BSG), and the outer and inner BSG curve lengths were performed after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the serial computed tomography angiography scans. The results of the measurements for the main devices, the TVs, and the bridging stent-grafts were compared using univariable and multivariable analysis. Results: Of the 140 BSGs examined (74 V12s and 66 BeGs), 393 measurements (38 celiac trunks, 102 superior mesenteric arteries, 121 left renal arteries, and 132 right renal arteries) were analyzed. The outer/inner BSG curve length ratio was larger after implantation of Zenith devices compared with Anaconda (p<0.001). The vessel shift distal to the BSG was significantly associated with the interaction of the TV and type of BSG only in the univariable analysis (p=0.001). There were no significant changes of the TV deviation at the aortic origin. Only the outer BSG curve length was significantly associated with TV complications (p=0.033). Median follow-up was 24 months (range 2-61). The BSG curve length ratio showed a significant increase over time (p<0.001) but did not differ between the BeG and V12 (p=0.381). Conclusion: No difference was found between the V12 and the BeG stent-grafts regarding anatomical TV changes during midterm follow-up after fEVAR. Both stent-grafts adapt to the TV anatomy over time, and moderate anatomical changes seem to be tolerated without increasing the risk for TV complications. The type of main device also influences the TV anatomy.

Perfusion-related changes in intestinal diffusion detected by NMR-MOUSE® monitoring in minipigs.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate perfusion-related changes in the intestinal diffusion assessed by NMR-MOUSE monitoring in minipigs. This was a follow-up study of previous experiments on landrace pigs demonstrating the feasibility of NMR-MOUSE monitoring in large animals. METHODS: 5 mature female minipigs (mean body weight 50 ±â€¯2 kg) underwent laparotomy with exposition of several small intestinal loops and their feeding vessels. The loops were examined consecutively using NMR-MOUSE monitoring for assessment of intestinal proton diffusion (fast diffusion component [FC] and slow diffusion component [SC]) and oxygen to see monitoring (O2C, LEA Medizintechnik GmbH, Giessen, Germany) for microcirculatory evaluation. Following a baseline measurement on each loop under physiological perfusion, measurements were continued as one of the following main treatments were performed per loop: method 1 - ischemia; method 2 - flow reduction; method 3 - intraluminal glucose followed by ischemia; method 4 - intraluminal glucose followed by flow reduction. Perioperative monitoring was supplemented by blood gas analyses and histopathological assessment of H.E. stained intestinal biopsies. RESULTS: The NMR-MOUSE measurement showed a significant difference in the change to baseline values in the FC during flow reduction compared to the other treatments according to the unadjusted (pM2 vs. M1 < 0.0001, pM2 vs. M3 = 0.0005, pM2 vs. M4 = 0.0005) and the adjusted p-values (pM2 vs. M1 < 0.0001, pM2 vs. M3 = 0.0030, pM2 vs. M4 = 0.0030). In the SC, the difference between ischemia and flow reduction was significant according to the unadjusted p-values (pM2 vs. M1 = 0.0397). Whereas the FC showed a trend towards ongoing increase during ischemia but towards ongoing decrease during flow reduction, the SC showed contrary trends. These effects seemed to be attenuated by prior glucose application. According to the results of O2C monitoring, ischemia as well as flow reduction caused a significant decrease of microcirculatory oxygen saturation (inner probe: methods 1-4 and outer probe methods 1, 2: p < 0.0001; outer probe: pM2 = 0.0001), velocity (inner probe: pM1 < 0.0001, pM2 = 0.0155, pM3 = 0.0027; outer probe: pM1 < 0.0001, pM2 = 0.0045, pM3 = 0.0047, pM4 = 0.0037) and serosal flow (outer probe, methods 1 and 2: p < 0.0001; pM3 = 0.0009, pM4 = 0.0008). The histopathological analysis showed a significant association with time (p = 0.003) but not with the experimental method (p = 0.1386). CONCLUSIONS: Intestinal diffusion is affected significantly by perfusion changes in mature minipigs. As shown by NMR-MOUSE monitoring, ischemia and flow reduction have contrary effects on intestinal diffusion and, additionally, the fast and slow diffusion components show opposite trends during each of those pathological perfusion states. Prior intraluminal glucose application seems to attenuate the effects of malperfusion on intestinal diffusion.

Editor's Choice - Outcomes After One Stage Versus Two Stage Open Repair of Type II Thoraco-abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the outcomes of open one stage with open two stage repair of type II thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA). METHODS: This retrospective study included 94 patients (68 men) with a mean ± SD age of 54.5 ± 14 years who underwent open type II TAAA repair from March 2006 to January 2016. The mean aneurysm diameter was 65 ± 14.4 mm. The median follow up was 42 months (range 12-96). Seventy-six patients received one stage open repair and 18 patients were treated in two steps: 12 received two open procedures (thoracic and abdominal) and six received hybrid repair (one open and one endovascular procedure). This study focused on the comparison of open one stage and open two stage TAAA repair. The median time between the two steps was 31.5 days (range 1-169). RESULTS: In hospital mortality after open one stage repair versus open two stage type II repair was 22.4% versus 0% (odds ratio 7.352, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.884-959.1]; p = .19). The one year survival rate after one stage repair versus open two stage repair was 74.7% (95% CI 62.7-83.3) versus 90.9% (95% CI 50.8-98.7 [p = .225]). The five year survival rate after one stage repair versus open two stage repair was 53.0% (95% CI 37.2-66.5) versus 90.9% (95% CI 50.8-98.7 [p = .141]). The hazard ratio for survival after one stage repair and after open two stage repair was 4.563 (95% CI 96.9-81.4 [p = .137]). Paraplegia was observed after open one stage repair versus open two stage in 10.5% vs. 8% (p = 1). Acute kidney injury requiring permanent dialysis and myocardial infarction were assessed for after open one stage repair and open two stage and were seen in 3.9% vs. 0% (p = 1) and in 5.3% vs. 0% (p = 1), respectively. CONCLUSION: Open two stage repair may be recommended as a treatment option for type II TAAAs if anatomically feasible, as it has a lower mortality and similar complication rates to one stage repair.

Editor's Choice - Open Thoracic and Thoraco-abdominal Aortic Repair After Prior Endovascular Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to present current results of open thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic repair as secondary procedure after prior endovascular therapy. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross border single centre study. From 2006 to July 2017 45 open thoracic aortic (TAA) or thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) operations were performed on 44 patients (median age 58 [15-80] years) as secondary surgery after previous endovascular therapy comprising TEVAR (n = 38; 86%), EVAR (n = 3; 7%), fenestrated EVAR (n = 1; 2%) and TEVAR plus EVAR (n = 1; 2%). Eleven patients (25%) had had previous open aortic surgery at the secondary surgery site. Indications for TAA(A) repair were Type I endoleak (n = 10; 23%), post-dissection aneurysm progression due to persisting false lumen perfusion (n = 8; 18%), proximal/distal disease progression (n = 16; 36%), device fracture/dislocation (n = 4; 9%), infection (n = 5; 11%), and initial endograft misplacement (n = 1; 2%). The operations included descending thoracic aortic repair (n = 13, 29%), TAAA Type I (n = 4; 9%), Type II (n = 5; 11%), Type III (n = 13; 29%), Type IV (n = 7; 16%), and Type V repair (n = 3; 7%) with simultaneous arch repair in 18% (n = 8). The median time to secondary surgery was 36 (2-168) months. The median follow up was 39 (3-118) months. RESULTS: In hospital mortality was 20% (n = 9) due to intra-operative aneurysm rupture, pneumonia induced sepsis, hemorrhagic cerebellar infarction, mesenteric ischaemia, broncho-esophageal fistula, and multiorgan failure (1/9) as well as haemorrhage (3/9). Estimated survival was 73% at 1 year and 71% overall. The most frequent complications were pneumonia (n = 19; 43%), bleeding requiring revision (n = 11; 25%) and sepsis (n = 14; 32%). Transient dialysis was required in 32% (n = 14), permanent dialysis in 6% (n = 2). Permanent spinal cord deficit (paraparesis) occurred in 6% (n = 2). Estimated freedom from aortic re-intervention was 86%. CONCLUSION: Open TAA(A) repair as a secondary procedure after previous endovascular aortic therapy is an important treatment option even in the endovascular era. It represents a durable treatment that can produce respectable outcomes. Yet the peri-operative morbidity and mortality are relevant and a specialised team and infrastructure are mandatory for these complex procedures. Therefore, centralisation is required.

Editor's Choice - Open Thoracic and Thoraco-abdominal Aortic Repair in Patients with Connective Tissue Disease.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: The aim is to present current results of open complex aortic repair in patients with connective tissue disease (CTD). METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-border, single centre study. From February 2000 to April 2016 72 aortic operations were performed on 65 patients with CTD (41 male, median age 41 years [range 19-70 years]). Fifty-six patients (86%) underwent at least one previous aortic repair (71 open, four endovascular), including 33 patients (51%) operated before at the site of the procedure reported here. The open procedures, counting eight emergency operations (11%), included aortic arch revision (n = 1; 1%), descending thoracic aortic repair (n = 11; 15%), TAAA type I repair (n = 12; 17%), type II repair (n = 29; 40%), type III repair (n = 12; 17%), and type IV repair (n = 5; 7%). Simultaneous repair of the ascending aorta and/or the aortic arch was performed in two (3%) and eight cases (11%), respectively. Seven patients (10%) underwent staged procedures. Median follow-up was 42 months (0.5-180 months). RESULTS: The in hospital mortality was 14% (n = 9) as a result of haemorrhage (n = 3/9), neurological (n = 3/9), cardiac (n = 2/9), and pulmonary (n = 1/9) complications. Paraplegia and paraparesis occurred in one (2%) and three patients (5%), respectively. Seven patients (11%) required temporary dialysis; none needed permanent dialysis. Major complications were revision surgery for bleeding or haematoma (n = 20/65), sepsis (n = 10/65), myocardial infarction/severe cardiac arrhythmia (n = 2/65), stroke (n = 2/65), as well as multiorgan failure, abdominal compartment syndrome, mesenteric and peripheral ischaemia (all n = 1/65). Multivariate analysis identified an operating time > 7 hours (p = .006) as an independent predictor of increased mortality. Freedom from re-intervention was 85%, 1 year survival was 80%, and overall survival was 75%. CONCLUSION: Open TAA(A) repair is a durable therapy for patients with CTD. Often being performed as revision surgery, it can be associated with relevant risks and should therefore be reserved for specialised centres. Staged procedures and thus reducing operating time, if applicable, should be preferred.

Rendezvous intervention using combined surgical carotid endarterectomy followed by endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute tandem occlusions: a proof-of-concept experience at a tertiary care center.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is highly effective in acute stroke patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO), however, presence of concomitant cervical occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) may limit the endovascular access. This study describes feasibility and efficacy of a surgical carotid access (cutdown) to perform interdisciplinary recanalization therapy including carotid endarterectomy (CEA) followed by EVT for recanalization of intracranial LVO in stroke patients with tandem occlusions. METHODS: We identified stroke patients with tandem occlusions who underwent a combined surgical-endovascular approach over a 5-year period. Surgical cutdown was provided by a cardiovascular surgery team at the angio-suite followed by EVT performed by the neuroradiological team. Demographics, stroke characteristics, treatments including antithrombotic management, procedure times, and clinical follow-up were assessed. RESULTS: Four patients with acute stroke because of tandem occlusions received CEA followed by EVT (two patients after frustrating femoral catheterization, two as first-line approach). Successful recanalization (TICI ≥ 2b) via endovascular thrombectomy was achieved in all patients at a median of 28 min after successful surgical CEA. Intraprocedural complication was observed in one case (25%; i.e. ICA dissection). CONCLUSIONS: This small study provides evidence that a combined interdisciplinary approach of CEA followed by EVT in the angio-suite in acute stroke patients with tandem occlusions is a feasible procedure in patients otherwise not accessible to endovascular recanalizing therapy and, therefore, high likelihood of developing large hemispheric infarction. Prospective data are warranted to identify patients who benefit from this combined approach as first-line therapy.

Xenogeneic materials for the surgical treatment of aortic infections.

BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment of aortic infections (AIs) is challenging. In situ aortic reconstructions represent nowadays the favored therapy for fit patients and xenogeneic materials are used increasingly. The aim of this study was to present our experience with xenogeneic reconstructions for AI using self-made bovine pericardium tubes and/or the biosynthetic Omniflow® II graft. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included all patients undergoing xenogeneic aortic and aortoiliac reconstructions from December 2015 to June 2020. Patient comorbidities, symptoms, procedural characteristics, types of pathogens and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients [23 male (82%), median age 68 (range, 28-84) years] were included. Ten patients (36%) had native AIs and 18 (64%) had graft infections, including 3 (11%) aortoesophageal and 2 (7%) aortoduodenal fistulas (ADF). Twenty-four patients (86%) were symptomatic, the most common symptoms being contained aortic rupture (n=8) and sepsis (n=4). The surgical procedures were infra- and juxtarenal aortic repairs (n=11, 39% and n=7, 25%), thoracoabdominal aortic repairs (type IV: n=1, 4%; type V: n=3, 11%), descending thoracic aortic repairs (n=4, 14%) and 2 reconstructions (7%) involving the ascending aorta/aortic arch. Most were urgent (n=10, 43%) or emergent operations (n=11, 35%). Identification of pathogen(s), mostly Gram-positive bacteria, was possible in 25 patients (89%). Twelve patients (43%) had polymicrobial infections and 6 (21%) infections with multi-resistant bacteria. In-hospital mortality was 32% (n=9) due to acute cardiac failure (1/9), endocarditis (1/9), bleeding (3/9) and sepsis (4/9). The most frequent complications were transient need for dialysis (n=12, 43%) and persisting sepsis (n=11, 39%). Two early occlusions of Omniflow® II grafts were observed (7%). Median follow-up (FU), during which 2 patients died of non-aortic causes, was 14 months (95% CI: 9-19 months). Freedom from reoperation was 100%, there was no evidence for reinfection during FU. CONCLUSIONS: Xenogeneic orthotopic reconstructions for AI can be performed at all aortic levels. Combining bovine pericardium and the Omniflow® II graft can be useful for reconstructing the branched aortic segments and both materials show appropriate early to midterm outcomes. Nonetheless, AIs are serious conditions associated with relevant morbidity/mortality rates, even in a specialized center.

Management strategies for true and dissecting visceral artery aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Visceral artery aneurysms (VAA) are rare and the literature regarding management strategies is limited. The study aim was to evaluate our 13-year experience with VAA treatment including conservative, open surgical and endovascular therapy. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included 37 patients (31 male, median age 70 years [46-79 years]) with true and dissecting VAA treated between January 2006 and December 2018. Indications for invasive therapy were ruptured (N.=1) and symptomatic (N.=8) VAA or asymptomatic VAA>20 mm (N.=15). The decision on the treatment type was made after interdisciplinary (vascular surgeons/radiologists) discussion. RESULTS: The aneurysms affected the celiac trunk (N.=18, 49%), the splenic artery (N.=11, 30%), the superior mesenteric artery (SMA, N.=6, 16%), the hepatic artery (N.=5, 14%) and proximal SMA side branches (N.=2, 5%). Six patients had multiple VAA, one had an intrahepatic artery aneurysm and one had peripheral mesocolic artery aneurysms plus a VAA. 46% of the patients (N.=17) had coexisting aneurysms in other vascular territories. Thirteen patients were managed conservatively (median VAA diameter 15 [14-25] mm), 18 underwent open surgery with venous or prosthetic bypass or interposition graft implantation and 6 were treated by endovascular means (coiling [N.=3] or endograft [N.=3]). Median follow-up (FU) was 21 months (4-123 months). In-hospital mortality was 0%. Median length of hospital stay was 11 days (5-28 days) after surgical and 3 days (2-71 days) after endovascular treatment. Complications included an early type I endoleak, 3 secondary open abdominal surgeries for bleeding/peritonitis after endovascular treatment of a ruptured intrahepatic aneurysm, an asymptomatic aorto-truncal bypass occlusion and aneurysm recurrence after a venous SMA interposition graft. None of the conservatively treated VAA required invasive treatment during FU. CONCLUSIONS: Small (<20 mm) asymptomatic VAA can be managed conservatively. Whenever invasive treatment is indicated, both open and endovascular treatments can be performed with low complication rates. In order to choose the optimal therapeutic approach, anatomical features and patient comorbidities should be considered and, ideally, discussed interdisciplinarily.

Evaluation of the NMR-MOUSE as a new method for continuous functional monitoring of the small intestine during different perfusion states in a porcine model.

OBJECTIVE: The study aim was to evaluate a small low-field NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) scanner, the NMR-MOUSE®, for detecting changes in intestinal diffusion under different (patho-) physiological perfusion states. METHODS: Laparotomy was performed on 8 female landrace pigs (body weight 70±6 kg) and the feeding vessels of several intestinal loops were dissected. Successively, the intestinal loops were examined using O2C (oxygen to see, LEA Medizintechnik GmbH, Giessen, Germany) for microcirculatory monitoring and the NMR-MOUSE® for diffusion measurement (fast and slow components). On each loop the baseline measurement (physiological perfusion) was followed by one of the following main procedures: method 1 -ischemia; method 2 -flow reduction; method 3 -intraluminal glucose followed by ischemia; method 4 -intraluminal glucose followed by flow reduction. Additionally, standard perioperative monitoring (blood pressure, ECG, blood gas analyses) and histological assessment of intestinal biopsies was performed. RESULTS: There was no statistical overall time and method effect in the NMR-MOUSE measurement (fast component: ptime = 0.6368, pmethod = 0.9766, slow component: ptime = 0.8216, pmethod = 0.7863). Yet, the fast component of the NMR-MOUSE measurement showed contrary trends during ischemia (increase) versus flow reduction (decrease). The slow-to-fast diffusion ratio shifted slightly towards slow diffusion during flow reduction. The O2C measurement showed a significant decrease of oxygen saturation and microcirculatory blood flow during ischemia and flow reduction (p < .0001). The local microcirculatory blood amount (rHb) showed a significant mucosal increase (pClamping(method 1) = 0.0007, pClamping(method 3) = 0.0119), but a serosal decrease (pClamping(method 1) = 0.0119, pClamping(method 3) = 0.0078) during ischemia. The histopathological damage was significantly higher with increasing experimental duration and at the end of methods 3 and 4 (p < .0001,Fisher-test). CONCLUSION: Monitoring intestinal diffusion changes due to different perfusion states using the NMR-MOUSE is feasible under experimental conditions. Despite the lack of statistical significance, this technique reflects perfusion changes and therefore seems promising for the evaluation of different intestinal perfusion states in the future. Beforehand however, an optimization of this technology, including the optimization of the penetration depth, as well as further validation studies under physiological conditions and including older animals are required.