Photobiomodulation Therapy Plus Usual Care Is Better than Usual Care Alone for Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Plantar fasciitis (PF) results in pain-related disability and excessive healthcare costs. Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) has shown promise for decreasing both pain and disability related to PF. Purpose: The purpose was to assess the clinical impact of PBMT on pain and function in people with PF. Study Design: Prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. Methods: A convenience sample of adults with PF were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) usual care, (2) usual care plus nine doses of PBMT with 25W output power over three weeks, or (3) usual care plus nine doses of PBMT with 10W output power over three weeks. Both 10W and 25W PBMT participants received the same total dose (10J/cm2) by utilizing a simple area equation. Pain (with Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale) and function (by Foot and Ankle Ability Measure) were measured at baseline, weeks 3, and 6 for all groups, and at 13 and 26 weeks for PBMT groups. Results: PBMT groups experienced a reduction in pain over the first three weeks (from an average of 4.5 to 2.8) after which their pain levels remained mostly constant, while the UC group experienced a smaller reduction in pain (from an average of 4 to 3.8). The effects on pain were not different between PBMT groups. PBMT in both treatment groups also improved function more than the UC group, again with the improvement occurring within the first three weeks. Conclusions: Pain and function improved during the three weeks of PBMT plus UC and remained stable over the following three weeks. Improvements sustained through six months in the PBMT plus UC groups. Level of Evidence: Level II- RCT or Prospective Comparative Study.

The experience of phantom limb pain in patients with combat-related traumatic amputations.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence and characteristics of phantom limb pain (PLP) and the use and perceived effectiveness of standard medical and self-treatment methods by traumatic amputees with combat-related injuries. DESIGN: A retrospective descriptive questionnaire study. SETTING: Outpatient amputee clinic at a major military medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of military members (N=30) with single or multiple traumatic amputations from combat and/or training. Inclusion criteria were 18 to 50 years old and amputation within 5 years of the study. Exclusion criteria were nontraumatic amputees and amputation or most recent surgical revision within 3 months before the study. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary dependent variables were pain and relief, as measured by an investigator-developed questionnaire. RESULTS: Seventy-seven percent of participants experienced PLP at some time since their amputation. Of those with PLP, the mean average intensity was 3.3+/-2.0 out of 10 and the mean worst intensity was 5.4+/-2.6 out of 10. The PLP was intermittent, and 78% reported episodes of PLP at least weekly. Sixty-eight percent of participants with PLP were receiving treatment from their health care providers. The most common medical treatment was gabapentin, although some patients reported greater pain relief from self-treatment methods such as distraction and relaxation techniques. CONCLUSIONS: With over 750 service members living with amputations from recent combat, PLP will continue to be a troubling problem that requires effective interventions. The discrepancy between perceived effectiveness of different treatment types supports the need for highly individualized pain management plans.

Auricular Acupuncture for Chronic Pain and Insomnia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Objective: In the United States, ∼1.6 million adults use complementary and alternative or integrative medicine for treating pain and insomnia. However, very few studies have tested the use of auricular acupuncture using a standard protocol for chronic pain and insomnia. The aims of this research were to assess the feasibility and credibility of auricular acupuncture, and to evaluate the effects of auricular acupuncture on pain severity and interference scores, and on insomnia severity over an 8-day study period. Materials and Methods: Forty-five participants were randomized to either an auricular acupuncture group (AAG) or a usual care group (CG) on study day 4. A standard auricular acupuncture protocol was administered, with penetrating semipermanent acupuncture needles in place for up to 4 days. The main outcome measures were feasibility of conducting the study, credibility of auricular acupuncture as a treatment modality, Brief Pain Inventory pain severity and interference scores, and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) scores. Results: There was high interest in the study and the retention was 96%. Credibility of auricular acupuncture as a treatment was high in both groups. The use of the standard auricular acupuncture protocol in the AAG led to significant within- and between-group reduced pain severity and interference scores, compared to the CG. Both groups showed within-group decreased ISI scores. However, the AAG showed significant between-group reduced ISI severity scores compared to the CG. Conclusions: With the heightened focus on the opioid crisis in the United States, this easy-to-administer protocol may be an option for treating military beneficiaries who have chronic pain and insomnia.