MRI radiomics may predict early tumor recurrence in patients with sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) follows a poor prognosis with high tendency for local recurrence. We aimed to evaluate whether MRI radiomics can predict early local failure in sinonasal SCC. METHODS: Sixty-eight consecutive patients with node-negative sinonasal SCC (January 2005-December 2020) were enrolled, allocated to the training (n = 47) and test sets (n = 21). Early local failure, which occurred within 12 months of completion of initial treatment, was the primary endpoint. For clinical features (age, location, treatment modality, and clinical T stage), binary logistic regression analysis was performed. For 186 extracted radiomic features, different feature selections and classifiers were combined to create two prediction models: (1) a pure radiomics model; and (2) a combined model with clinical features and radiomics. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were calculated and compared using DeLong's method. RESULTS: Early local failure occurred in 38.3% (18/47) and 23.8% (5/21) in the training and test sets, respectively. We identified several radiomic features which were strongly associated with early local failure. In the test set, both the best-performing radiomics model and the combined model (clinical + radiomic features) yielded higher AUCs compared to the clinical model (AUC, 0.838 vs. 0.438, p = 0.020; 0.850 vs. 0.438, p = 0.016, respectively). The performances of the best-performing radiomics model and the combined model did not differ significantly (AUC, 0.838 vs. 0.850, p = 0.904). CONCLUSION: MRI radiomics integrated with a machine learning classifier may predict early local failure in patients with sinonasal SCC. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: MRI radiomics intergrated with machine learning classifiers may predict early local failure in sinonasal squamous cell carcinomas more accurately than the clinical model. KEY POINTS: • A subset of radiomic features which showed significant association with early local failure in patients with sinonasal squamous cell carcinomas was identified. • MRI radiomics integrated with machine learning classifiers can predict early local failure with high accuracy, which was validated in the test set (area under the curve = 0.838). • The combined clinical and radiomics model yielded superior performance for early local failure prediction compared to that of the radiomics (area under the curve 0.850 vs. 0.838 in the test set), without a statistically significant difference.

Hypofractionated volumetric-modulated arc therapy for breast cancer: A propensity-score-weighted comparison of radiation-related toxicity.

We assessed the clinical benefit of combining volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and hypofractionated radiotherapy (HF-RT) considering the incidence of radiation-related toxicities. After a retrospective review for breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant RT between 2005 and 2017, a total of 4209 patients treated with three-dimensional conventional fractionation (CF-3D, 50.4 Gy/28 fractions) and 1540 patients treated with HF-RT (768 received HF-3D; 772, HF-VMAT; 40 Gy/15 fractions) were included. A total of 2229 patients (38.8%) received regional node irradiation (RNI): 1642 (39.0%), 167 (21.7%) and 420 (54.4%) received RNI via CF-3D, HF-3D and HF-VMAT, respectively. Acute/subacute and late toxicities were evaluated. Propensity scores were calculated via logistic regression. Grade 2+ acute/subacute toxicities was the highest in CF-3D group (15.0%, 2.6% and 1.6% in CF-3D, HF-3D and HF-VMAT, respectively; P < .001). HF-VMAT reduced Grade 2+ acute/subacute toxicities significantly compared to CF-3D (odds ratio [OR] 0.11, P < .001) and HF-3D (OR 0.45, P = .010). The 3-year cumulative rate of late toxicities was 18.0% (20.1%, 10.9% and 13.4% in CF-3D, HF-3D and HF-VMAT, respectively; P < .001). On sensitivity analysis, the benefit of HF-VMAT was high in the RNI group. Acute and late toxicities were fewer after HF-VMAT than after HF-3D or CF-3D, especially in women who underwent RNI.

Risk of Lymphedema Following Contemporary Treatment for Breast Cancer: An Analysis of 7617 Consecutive Patients From a Multidisciplinary Perspective.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the comprehensive risk factors for lymphedema, thereby enabling a more informed multidisciplinary treatment decision-making. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Lymphedema is a serious long-term complication in breast cancer patients post-surgery; however, the influence of multimodal therapy on its occurrence remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively collected treatment-related data from 5549 breast cancer patients who underwent surgery between 2007 and 2015 at our institution. Individual radiotherapy plans were reviewed for regional nodal irradiation (RNI) field design and fractionation type. We identified lymphedema risk factors and used them to construct nomograms to predict individual risk of lymphedema. Nomograms were validated internally using 100 bootstrap samples and externally using 2 separate datasets of 1877 Asian and 191 Western patients. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-nine patients developed lymphedema during a median follow-up of 60 months. The 3-year lymphedema incidence was 10.5%; this rate increased with larger irradiation volumes (no RNI vs RNI excluding axilla I-II vs RNI including axilla I-II: 5.7% vs 16.8% vs 24.1%) and when using conventional fractionation instead of hypofractionation (13.5% vs 6.8%). On multivariate analysis, higher body mass index, larger number of dissected nodes, taxane-based regimen, total mastectomy, larger irradiation field, and conventional fractionation were strongly associated with lymphedema (all P < 0.001). Nomograms constructed based on these variables showed good calibration and discrimination internally (concordance index: 0.774) and externally (0.832 for Asian and 0.820 for Western patients). CONCLUSIONS: Trimodality breast cancer treatment factors interact to promote lymphedema. Lymphedema risk can be decreased by deintensifying node dissection, chemotherapy regimen, and field and dose of radiotherapy. Deescalation strategies on a multidisciplinary basis might minimize lymphedema risk.

Patterns of failures after surgical resection in olfactory neuroblastoma.

INTRODUCTION: Patterns of failure in patients with olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) according to two surgical approaches, craniofacial resection (CFR) and endoscopic surgery (ENDO), have yet to be analyzed. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 28 patients with surgically treated ONB between January 1995 and October 2017. Fourteen (50.0%) patients underwent CFR (9 CFR alone, 5 ENDO-assisted CFR) and 14 (50.0%) underwent ENDO. Nineteen (67.9%) patients underwent post-operative radiotherapy (RT). RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 53.8 months (range 10.4-195.3), the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and 10-year overall survival were 37.3% and 57.5%, respectively. Patients with adjuvant RT had a 5-year PFS of 46.7%, whereas those treated with surgery alone had a 5-year PFS of 19.4% (p = 0.01). Locoregional failure (LRF) occurred in ten patients (median 59.6 months after initial diagnosis; range 12.7-59.7). Neck node metastasis occurred in 25.0% (7 of 28). Five patients with ENDO showed LRF and underwent proper subsequent treatments with either surgery or adjuvant RT. Approximately 35.7% patients (five patients) in the CFR group experienced distant metastasis in the intracranial dura region (median 116.4 months after initial diagnosis; range 2.6-142.4). Three of four patients who developed LRF after CFR developed dura-based metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Both dura-based and neck node metastasis in the delayed phase were distinct patterns of failure in ONB. Patterns of recurrence differed based on surgical approach; dura-based metastases were common after CFR. LRF was the distinct failure pattern in ENDO, but could be successfully salvaged. Treatment outcome was improved considerably with RT following surgical resection.

A Clinical Trial of Combination Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Transoral Robotic Surgery in Patients with T3 and T4 Laryngo-Hypopharyngeal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a prospective clinical trial of combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy, transoral robotic surgery (TORS), and customized adjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancer. METHODS: Between September 2008 and August 2016, 35 patients were enrolled in this clinical trial. RESULTS: Twenty patients had hypopharyngeal cancer and 15 had laryngeal cancer. Twenty-nine patients (82.9%) had T3 disease and six patients (17.1%) had T4 disease, while 12 patients (34.3%) had stage III disease and 23 patients (65.7%) had stage IV disease. The 3-year disease-specific survival rate was 82.4% and the 3-year disease-free survival rate was 69.48%. Decannulation was successful in 31 of 34 patients at an average of 18 days postoperatively. Among all patients, 83% exhibited a favorable subjective swallowing status, while five patients (14.4%) became dependent on feeding tubes. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with TORS and customized adjuvant therapy, based on detailed pathological information, afforded favorable oncological outcomes and preserved organ functionalities in T3-T4 laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancer.

A New Clinical Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Combined With Transoral Robotic Surgery and Customized Adjuvant Therapy for Patients With T3 or T4 Oropharyngeal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: A prospective clinical trial of combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy, transoral robotic surgery (TORS), and customized adjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer was conducted. METHODS: Between July 2009 and October 2016, 31 patients were enrolled in this clinical trial. RESULTS: The primary lesions were located in the tonsils of 27 patients and in the base of the tongue of 4 patients. Of the 31 patients, 16 (51.6%) were classified as T3 and 15 patients (48.4%) as T4a. Three patients (9.7%) had stage 3 disease, and 28 (90.3%) had stage 4 disease. The 5-year overall survival rate was 78.7%; the 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 85%; and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 80.8%. At the final follow-up visit, 26 patients were alive with no evidence of disease, and 1 was alive with disease. Four patients died during the study: two of tumor-node-metastasis (TNM)-related disease and two of another condition. All the patients tolerated an oral diet at an average of 7.4 days postoperatively. At the subjective swallowing evaluation using the Functional Outcome Swallowing Scale score, 83.9% of the patients exhibited favorable outcomes. No patient was permanently dependent on a feeding tube. All the patients breathed and phonated in the absence of a permanent tracheotomy at the final follow-up evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment strategy in this study afforded good oncologic and functional outcomes for patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer. Although future large-scale multicenter studies with longer follow-up periods are needed, this study showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with TORS is useful for treating advanced oropharyngeal cancer.

Chemoradiotherapy versus surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy in tonsil cancer: Korean Radiation Oncology Group (KROG) study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of tonsil cancer, a subset of oropahryngeal cancer, varies between surgery and radiotherapy. Well-designed studies in tonsil cancer have been rare and it is still controversial which treatment is optimal. This study aimed to assess the outcome and failure patterns in tonsil cancer patients treated with either approaches. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 586 patients with tonsil cancer, treated between 1998 and 2010 at 16 hospitals in Korea. Two hundred and one patients received radiotherapy and chemotherapy (CRT), while 385 patients received surgery followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy (SRT). Compared with the SRT group, patients receiving CRT were older, with more advanced T stage and received higher radiotherapy dose given by intensity modulation techniques. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and clinicopathologic factors were analyzed. RESULTS: At follow-up, the 5-year OS, DFS, LRRFS and DMFS rates in the CRT group were 82, 78, 89, and 94%, respectively, and in the SRT group were 81, 73, 87, and 89%, respectively. Old age, current smoking, poor performance status, advanced T stage, nodal involvement, and induction chemotherapy were associated with poor OS. Induction chemotherapy had a negative prognostic impact on OS in both treatment groups (p = 0.001 and p = 0.033 in the CRT and SRT groups, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In our multicenter, retrospective study of tonsil cancer patients, the combined use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy resulted in comparable oncologic outcome to surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy, despite higher-risk patients having been treated with the definitive radiotherapy. Induction chemotherapy approaches combined with either surgery or definitive radiotherapy were associated with unfavorable outcomes.

IMRT vs. 2D-radiotherapy or 3D-conformal radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma : Survival outcome in a Korean multi-institutional retrospective study (KROG 11-06).

OBJECTIVE: We compared treatment outcomes of two-dimensional radiotherapy (2D-RT), three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 1237 patients with cT1-4N0-3M0 NPC were retrospectively analyzed. Of these, 350, 390, and 497 were treated with 2D-RT, 3D-CRT, and IMRT, respectively. RESULTS: 3D-CRT and IMRT showed better 5-year overall survival (OS) rates (73.6 and 76.7 %, respectively) than did 2D-RT (5-year OS of 59.7 %, all p < 0.001). In T3-4 subgroup, IMRT was associated with a significantly better 5-year OS than was 2D-RT (70.7 vs. 50.4 %, respectively; p ≤ 0.001) and 3D-CRT (70.7 vs. 57.8 %, respectively; p = 0.011); however, the difference between the 2D-RT and 3D-CRT groups did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.063). In multivariate analyses of all patients, IMRT was a predictive factor for OS when compared with 2D-RT or 3D-CRT, as was 3D-CRT when compared with 2D-RT. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that 3D-CRT and IMRT were associated with a better local progression-free survival and OS than was 2D-RT in NPC. IMRT was significantly superior in terms of OS for advanced primary tumors (T3-4).

Recursive partition analysis of peritoneal and systemic recurrence in patients with gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy: Implications for neoadjuvant therapy consideration.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To classify patients with nonmetastatic advanced gastric cancer who underwent D2-gastrectomy into prognostic groups based on peritoneal and systemic recurrence risks. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2007, 1,090 patients with T3-4 or N+ gastric cancer were identified from our registry. Recurrence rates were estimated using a competing-risk analysis. Different prognostic groups were defined using recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 7 years. In the RPA-model for peritoneal recurrence risk, the initial node was split by T stage, indicating that differences between patients with T1-3 and T4 cancer were the greatest. The 5-year peritoneal recurrence rates for patients with T4 (n = 627) and T1-3 (n = 463) disease were 34.3% and 9.1%, respectively. N stage and neural invasion had an additive impact on high-risk patients. The RPA model for systemic relapse incorporated N stage alone and gave two terminal nodes: N0-2 (n = 721) and N3 (n = 369). The 5-year cumulative incidences were 7.7% and 24.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We proposed risk stratification models of peritoneal and systemic recurrence in patients undergoing D2-gastrectomy. This classification could be used for stratification protocols in future studies evaluating adjuvant therapies such as preoperative chemoradiotherapy. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:859-864. © 2016 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Radiological-pathological correlation study of hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing local chemoradiotherapy and surgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Optimal response criteria and assessment timing were investigated through radiologic-pathologic correlation in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with localized chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS: We reviewed 19 consecutive HCC patients who underwent surgical resection after radiotherapy and concurrent hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. Patients who received transarterial chemoembolization before RT or surgery were excluded from evaluation. Tumor diameters and total and enhancing tumor volumes were measured from CT images obtained 1, 3, 6, and 9 months after CRT. Percent changes calculated using size (RECIST and WHO) and enhancement criteria (mRECIST and EASL) were correlated with percent changes in total and enhancing tumor volumes, and with percent viable tumor in surgical specimens. RESULTS: Median time between CRT and resection was 4.1 months (range, 1.5-15.4 months). CR and PR rates were 0 and 68% by RECIST, 0 and 63% by WHO, 53% and 37% by mRECIST, and 53% and 42% by EASL. Pathologic CR (pCR) rate was 52.6%. Radiologic criteria showed strong correlation with tumor volumes at 1 and 3 months after CRT; at 6 months, however, size and enhancement criteria showed strong correlation only with total and enhancing tumor volumes, respectively. Enhancement criteria were better predictors of pathologic response at all times including preoperative evaluation (RECIST: R(2) = 0.303, P = 0.015 and WHO: R(2) = 0.366, P = 0.006 vs. mRECIST: R(2) = 0.760, P < 0.0001 and EASL: R(2) = 0.768, P < 0.0001). Time interval >6 months before resection showed significant correlation with pCR (P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend using enhancement criteria in assessing tumor viability, especially if the tumor was to be resected <6 months after CRT.

Impact of p16 expression in oropharyngeal cancer in the postoperative setting: the necessity of re-evaluating traditional risk stratification.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of p16 expression as a surrogate marker of human papillomavirus status in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients underwent surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy. METHODS: We identified 126 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed, newly diagnosed oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma who received surgery followed by radiotherapy and had p16 expression data available. All patients were treated between 2001 and 2011. Patients with high-risk factors (positive surgical margin and/or extracapsular extension) or other risk factors (multiple positive lymph nodes, perineural/lymphovascular invasion) were offered postoperative radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy. RESULTS: One hundred and four (82.5%) patients were p16-positive (p16 (+)) and 22 (17.5%) were p16-negative (p16 (-)). With a median follow-up of 56 months, patients with p16 (+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma exhibited a significantly better 5-year disease-free survival (80.7% vs. 57.6%, P < 0.001) and overall survival (84.9% vs. 59.1%, P < 0.001) than those with p16 (-) tumors. The p16 (+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with high-risk factors (n = 64) showed no difference in disease-free survival (79.7% vs. 68.3%; P = 0.531) and overall survival (82.1% vs. 76.2%; P = 0.964) between postoperative radiotherapy and postoperative radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Expression of p16 is a strong independent prognostic factor of survival in the postoperative setting of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. The favorable prognosis of p16 (+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma suggests a need to re-examine traditional risk stratification for determining optimal adjuvant treatment.

Efficacy of combined orbital radiation and systemic steroids in the management of Graves' orbitopathy.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with orbital irradiation and systemic steroids versus steroid monotherapy in the management of active Graves' orbitopathy (GO). METHODS: The clinical charts of 127 patients with active inflammation due to GO who received intravenous steroid pulse therapy as a first-line treatment with or without orbital radiotherapy between 2010 and 2014 were reviewed. Patients were divided into two treatment groups: 1) combined orbital radiotherapy and steroid pulse therapy (SRT group) and 2) steroid pulse therapy only (ST group). Primary outcome measures included clinical activity score (CAS); NOSPECS classification; ocular motility impairment; and exophthalmos at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. The secondary outcome measure was the change in orbital, extraocular muscle (EOM), and fat volume after treatment measured by orbit computed tomography. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were included in the SRT group, and 59 patients were in the ST group. In both treatments, CAS and NOSPECS were significantly reduced. In the comparison of the degree of change from baseline between the groups, the SRT group demonstrated more improvement in NOSPECS and scores of ocular motility. Orbital, EOM, and fat volume significantly decreased in the SRT group; however, only fat volume was reduced in the ST group. Compressive optic neuropathy after treatment developed in 0 % of the SRT group and 3.4 % (2/59) of the ST group. Reactivation of inflammation occurred in 11.8 % (8/68) of the SRT group and 28.8 % (17/59) of the ST group. CONCLUSIONS: Orbital radiotherapy in combination with steroid treatment significantly improved ocular motility by reducing EOM volume in patients with active GO.

Does internal mammary node irradiation affect treatment outcome in clinical stage II-III breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuv ant chemotherapy?

The purpose of this study is to assess the value of internal mammary node irradiation (IMNI) in patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) using modern systemic therapy. Between 2001 and 2009, 521 consecutive patients with clinical stage II-III breast cancer received NAC and postoperative radiotherapy. With a consistent policy, the treating radiation oncologist either included (N = 284) or excluded (N = 237) the internal mammary node in the treatment volume. Anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy was provided to 482 (92.5 %) patients. To account for the unbalanced characteristics between the two groups, we performed propensity score matching and covariate adjustment using the propensity score. The median follow-up duration was 71 months (range 31-153 months). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) with and without IMNI was 81.8 and 72.7 %, respectively (p = 0.019). The benefit of IMNI varied according to patient characteristics such that it was more apparent in patients with N1-2 disease, inner/central location, and triple-negative subtype. After adjusting for all potential confounding variables, IMNI was independently associated with improved DFS (p = 0.049). The significant effect of IMNI on DFS was sustained after propensity score matching (p = 0.040) and covariate adjustment using the propensity score (p = 0.048). Symptomatic radiation pneumonitis developed in 9 (3.2 %) patients receiving IMNI. Our results indicated that IMNI was associated with a significant improvement in DFS with low toxicity rate for breast cancer patients receiving NAC. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm the effect of IMNI in the NAC setting.

Incorporation of radiotherapy in the multidisciplinary treatment of isolated retroperitoneal lymph node recurrence from colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This article was designed to study the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors following radiotherapy (RT) in the multidisciplinary management of isolated retroperitoneal lymph node (RPLN) recurrence of colorectal cancer. METHODS: We identified 52 patients treated consecutively with tumor-directed RT for isolated RPLN recurrence. Twenty-five patients received upfront RT (Group 1). Twenty-seven patients received RT after systemic therapy. The deferred RT was administered either to locally controlled tumors (Group 2, n = 17) or to locally progressive tumors in RPLNs (Group 3, n = 10). RESULTS: The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 41 and 13 months, respectively, with a median follow-up time of 34 months. Survival was not significantly different among three groups. Local recurrence (32/52) was predominant and occurred earlier than distant metastasis (31/52). Two-thirds of the local recurrences (21/32) involved outfield recurrence, which was mostly in the cranial direction (15/21) from the upper margin of the RT volume. Repeated RT successfully salvaged a substantial number of patients. A shorter disease-free interval, low-dose radiation, and a tumor location above the renal vein were independent risk factors for local recurrence (all P < 0.05). A large gross tumor volume was an independent risk factor for distant metastasis (P = 0.037). No acute or late RT-related toxicity ≥ grade 3 occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that both upfront RT and deferred RT incorporated into multidisciplinary management are potentially effective treatment strategies. We found that gross tumor volume, tumor location, and disease-free interval are important prognostic factors and should be taken into consideration to decide the timing of RT.

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy effects on anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection: a propensity score matching analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal cancer resection, using propensity score matching. BACKGROUND: Conflicting data have emerged over the last decade regarding the effect of preoperative CRT on AL. METHODS: We reviewed 1437 consecutive patients with rectal cancer who underwent low anterior resection (LAR) at our institution between 2005 and 2012. AL evaluated as grade C was the primary endpoint, as proposed by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer in 2010. The patients were treated with (n = 360) or without (n = 1077) preoperative CRT. The total radiation dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. Multivariate and propensity score matching analyses were used to compensate for the differences in some baseline characteristics. RESULTS: The preoperative CRT group contained more patients with the following characteristics, older age, male sex, smoker, advanced stage tumor, lower/mid rectal tumor location, ultra-LAR, and diverting stoma, than the non-preoperative CRT group (all Ps < 0.05). Postoperative AL occurred in 91 patients (6.3%). Before propensity score matching, the incidence of AL in patients with or without preoperative CRT was 7.5% and 5.9%, respectively (P = 0.293). After propensity score matching, the 2 groups were nearly balanced except for the initial stage and the length of the surgeon's career, and the incidence of AL in patients with or without preoperative CRT was 7.5% and 8.1%, respectively (P = 0.781). CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe that preoperative CRT increased the risk of postoperative AL after LAR in patients with rectal cancer, using propensity score matching analysis.

A competing risk analysis of cancer-specific mortality of initial treatment with radical prostatectomy versus radiation therapy in clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the optimal treatment for localized high-risk prostate cancer (PC), and much debate exists regarding the ideal treatment approach. For these reasons, we evaluated the competing risks of PC-specific mortality after initial therapy with radical prostatectomy (RP) versus radiotherapy (RT) in men with clinically localized high-risk PC. METHODS: We reviewed patients treated with RP and RT combined with androgen-deprivation therapy between 1990 and 2009. High-risk PC is defined as clinical stage ≥T3a, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >20 ng/mL, or a biopsy Gleason sum of 8-10 according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Competing risk analysis was conducted to assess the association of RP (n = 251) or RT (n = 125) with cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Thereafter, secondary analysis with propensity score matching was conducted to further elucidate patient characteristics, with optimal matching of 0.25 times the standard deviation of propensity scores. RESULTS: With an overall median follow-up of 76 months, 35 (9.3 %) men with high-risk PC died due to PC (23 in the RT group and 12 in the RP group). The 5-year estimates of cancer-specific survival rate for men treated with RP and RT were 96.5 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 94.2-98.9) and 88.3 % (95 % CI 82.8-94.3), respectively. Cumulative incidence estimates for CSM were statistically increased amongst men treated with RT (p = 0.002). Propensity score matching extracted 168 men with high-risk PC from the total patient cohort. Cumulative incidence estimates for CSM were statistically different amongst men treated with RT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Initial treatment with RP versus RT was associated with a decreased risk of CSM in men with clinically localized high-risk PC.

Perfusion MRI for the prediction of treatment response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the utility of perfusion MRI as a potential biomarker for predicting response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with primary rectal carcinoma who were scheduled for preoperative CRT were prospectively recruited. Perfusion MRI was performed with a 3.0-T MRI system in all patients before therapy, at the end of the 2nd week of therapy, and before surgery. The K (trans) (volume transfer constant) and V (e) (extracellular extravascular space fraction) were calculated. RESULTS: Before CRT, the mean tumour K (trans) in the downstaged group was significantly higher than that in the non-downstaged group (P = 0.0178), but there was no significant difference between tumour regression grade (TRG) responders and TRG non-responders (P = 0.1392). Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed significant differences for evolution of K (trans) values both between downstaged and non-downstaged groups (P = 0.0215) and between TRG responders and TRG non-responders (P = 0.0001). Regarding V (e), no significant differences were observed both between downstaged and non-downstaged groups (P = 0.689) or between TRG responders and TRG non-responders (P = 0.887). CONCLUSION: Perfusion MRI of rectal cancer can be useful for assessing tumoural K (trans) changes by CRT. Tumours with high pre-CRT K (trans) values tended to respond favourably to CRT, particularly in terms of downstaging criteria. KEY POINTS: • Perfusion MRI can now assess therapeutic response of tumours to therapy. • Tumours with high initial K ( trans ) values responded favourably to chemoradiotherapy. • Perfusion MRI of rectal cancer may help with decisions about management.

Reirradiation to the pelvis for recurrent rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated late toxicity and infield progression-free survival in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) who had previously received irradiation to the pelvis. METHODS: Twenty-two patients were treated by reirradiation to the pelvis between January 2000 and August 2007. All patients received curative surgery with preoperative or postoperative chemoradiotherapy as an initial treatment. Five patients (23%) underwent surgical resection after reirradiation. The median follow-up duration was 20 months (range, 7-91 months). RESULTS: Two patients (9%) had grade-3 acute toxicity and eight patients (36%) had grade-3 to -4 late toxicity. The incidence of grade-3 to -4 late toxicity in the gastrointestinal and urinary system was 18% and 27%, respectively. Recurrent tumor location (axial or anterior) and surgical resection after reirradiation significantly influenced severe late toxicity (P = 0.024 and P = 0.039, respectively). In the 17 patients not undergoing surgery after reirradiation, median infield progression-free survival was 16 months. Reirradiation doses exceeding 50 Gy(αß10) (equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions) significantly increased the infield progression-free survival (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor location (axial or anterior) and surgery after reirradiation may increase severe late toxicity. In addition, an EQD2 exceeding 50 Gy(αß10) may improve infield control.

IMRT with simultaneous integrated boost and concurrent chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer: plan evaluation and treatment outcome.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the outcome of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost and concurrent chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer. METHODS: We analyzed 53 consecutive nasopharyngeal cancer patients who received definitive treatment using intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost and cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy. Forty-six patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiation and seven patients with induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiation. The gross tumor (PTV(70)) received 69.96 Gy (2.12 Gy/fraction), high-risk subclinical disease (PTV(60)) received 59.4 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) and low-risk subclinical disease (PTV(56)) received 56.1 Gy (1.7 Gy/fraction) in 33 fractions. Twenty-eight patients were treated with step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy and 25 patients with helical tomotherapy. Dosimetric parameters were compared between the two modalities. RESULTS: The median treatment duration was 49 days (range: 41-65 days). The complete response rate was 92.5%. Three local, two regional, one locoregional and seven distant failures were observed. With the median follow-up of 41 months (range: 8-89 months), the 3- and 5-year local control, locoregional control, disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 91.8 and 91.8%; 87.6 and 87.6%; 77.5 and 70.5%; and 86.4 and 82.1%, respectively. Grade 3 mucositis, dermatitis, leucopenia and grade 4 leucopenia were observed in 10, 1, 2 and 1 patient, respectively. No grade 3 or higher xerostomia occurred. Helical tomotherapy significantly improved dosimetric parameters including the maximum dose, volume receiving >107% of the prescribed dose and uniformity index (D(5)/D(95)). CONCLUSIONS: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost with concurrent chemotherapy is a safe and effective treatment modality for nasopharyngeal cancer. Helical tomotherapy has a dosimetric advantage over step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy in a clinical setting.