Catheter-related and clinical complications associated with QDOT MICROTM Ablation Catheter.

INTRODUCTION: The QDOT MICROTM Ablation Catheter is a next-generation ablation catheter that allows for high-power ablation up to 90 watts. METHODS: We aimed to assess AE associated with the QDOT MICROTM catheter using the MAUDE database. A MAUDE database search was conducted on May 25, 2024, to capture all AEs (since FDA approval) associated with this ablation catheter. RESULTS: A total of 302 AEs from November 23, 2022, to April 30, 2024, were reported including 148 (49%) catheter-related issues and 154 (51%) clinical complications. Among the catheter-related issues, physical catheter damage (74.3%, n = 110) was most common, followed by communication or display issue (10.8%, n = 16), irrigation issue (9.5%, n = 14), signal issue or artifact (3.4%, n = 5), and inaccurate temperature measurement (2.0%, n = 3). Regarding clinical complications, the most common AE was pericardial effusion (43.5%, n = 67), followed by char formation (11.7%, n = 18), catheter thrombosis (7.1%, n = 11), stroke (7.1%, n = 11), pericarditis (7.1%, n = 11), esophageal complications (6.5%, n = 10), phrenic nerve palsy (3.9%, n = 6), cardiac arrest (3.9%, n = 6), significant AV block (3.9%, n = 6), pulmonary vein stenosis (3.2%, n = 5), coronary artery spasm (1.3%, n = 2), and pulmonary embolism (0.6%, n = 1). There were 11 deaths (five related to esophageal complications, five related to cardiac arrest, and one related to pericardial effusion with cardiac tamponade). CONCLUSION: As high-power ablation strategy with novel ablation catheters is becoming more widely utilized, operators must be aware of potential catheter-related issues and clinical complications that may arise. More data are needed to further evaluate risks of these complications to improve the catheter's safety and efficacy.

Clinical outcomes of radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) is rare in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), management of which is challenging. Limited data exists on the utility of catheter ablation for the treatment of VT in this population. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess clinical outcomes of catheter ablation for VT in HCM patients. METHODS: A systematic search, without language restriction, using PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed. The meta-analysis was performed using a meta-package for R version 4.0/RStudio version 1.2 and Freeman Tukey double arcsine method to establish the variance of raw proportions. Outcomes measured included (1) acute procedure success (defined as noninducible for clinical VT), (2) freedom from VT at follow-up, (3) mortality. RESULTS: This systematic review of six studies (three from the United States and three from Japan) incorporated a total of 68 drug-refractory HCM patients who underwent VT radiofrequency catheter ablation (mean age 57.6 ± 13.3 years, mean LVEF 45.8 ± 15.4%, 85% men, maximum septal wall thickness 17.4 ± 4.6 mm, and 32.3% with an apical aneurysm). Acute procedural success was achieved in 84.5% patients (95% confidence interval [CI]: 70.6%-95.2%) with 27.9% patients had recurrent VT requiring multiple ablations (median 1, IQR 1-3). During the follow-up period (18.3 ± 11.7 months), the pooled incidence of freedom from recurrent VT after index procedure was 70.2% (95% CI: 51.9%-86.2%), while after the last ablation was 82.8% (95% CI: 57%-99.2%). There were two deaths during follow-up, one from heart failure and one from SCD 0.8% (95% CI: 0%-5.8%). CONCLUSION: The results of our pooled analysis demonstrated that catheter ablation for VT in HCM patients was associated with high acute procedural success, and reduced VT recurrence-findings comparable to previously published reports in other disease substrates.

Adverse events associated with amplatzer left atrial appendage occlusion delivery system: A Food and Drug Administration MAUDE database study.

BACKGROUND: Dual occlusive closure mechanism (disc and lobe type), Amulet device (Abbott; a second-generation device that has replaced Amplatzer Cardiac Plug) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in August 2021 for percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). However, real-world safety data on the delivery system (Amplatzer Cardiac Plug and Amplatzer Amulet device) are lacking. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the type of adverse events associated with the Amplatzer LAAO delivery system using the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. METHODS: A MAUDE database search was conducted on March 31, 2023, for reports received between February 2013 and March 2023 to capture all adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 59 adverse events were reported, of which 58 were sheath-related events, and one was a wire-related event. The most commonly encountered issue was air embolism (19%, 11 events), followed by sheath thrombosis (13.8%, eight events, two of which were also associated with device thrombosis), kinked sheath (10.3%, six events), and sheath deformation (8.6%, five events). Patient-related adverse events included pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocentesis (22.4%, 13 events), vascular complications (20.7%, 12 events), and device dislodgement (5.2%, three events). CONCLUSION: LAAO-related adverse events are increasingly being reported using the Amplatzer LAAO delivery sheath. It is anticipated that improvements in device technology, the advent of steerable sheaths, and operator experience will minimize these complications.

Swallowing-induced atrial tachycardia: A rare demonstration on fluoroscopic esophagram.

BACKGROUND: Swallowing-associated arrhythmias are rare and most commonly present as atrial tachycardias. METHODS: We present a case of a 45-year-old female who experienced frequent episodes of palpitations and dyspnea occurring immediately after swallowing solid food. She was noted to have atrial tachycardia with deglutition that was recorded on the 12-lead electrocardiogram. She underwent fluoroscopic esophagram that demonstrated atrial tachycardia as the barium passed through the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. CONCLUSION: Swallowing induced arrhythmias occur rarely and can be confirmed by EKG obtained during deglutition. Gastroesophageal evaluation is required to rule out primary esophageal disorders. Treatment of such arrhythmias is required if symptoms are intractable and can include pharmacotherapy and radiofrequency ablation.

Network meta-analysis and systematic review comparing efficacy and safety between very high power short duration, high power short duration, and conventional radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: High-power short-duration (HPSD) atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with a power of 40-50 W was proved to be safe and effective. Very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) AF ablation is a novel method using >50 W to obtain more durable AF ablation. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vHPSD ablation compared with HPSD ablation and conventional power ablation. METHODS: A literature search for studies that reported AF ablation outcomes, including short-term freedom from atrial arrhythmia, first-pass isolation (FPI) rate, procedure time, and major complications, was conducted utilizing MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. All relevant studies were included in this analysis. A random-effects model of network meta-analysis and surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were used to rank the treatment for all outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 29 studies with 9721 patients were included in the analysis. According to the SUCRA analysis, HPSD ablation had the highest probability of maintaining sinus rhythm. Point estimation showed an odds ratio of 1.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-1.9) between HPSD ablation and conventional power ablation and an odds ratio of 1.3 (95% CI: 0.78-2.2) between vHPSD ablation and conventional power ablation. While the odds ratio of FPI between HPSD ablation and conventional power ablation was 3.6 (95% CI: 1.5-8.9), the odds ratio between vHPSD ablation and conventional power ablation was 2.2 (95% CI: 0.61-8.6). The procedure times of vHPSD and HPSD ablations were comparable and, therefore, shorter than that of conventional power ablation. Major complications were low in all techniques. CONCLUSION: vHPSD ablation did not yield higher efficacy than HPSD ablation and conventional power ablation. With the safety concern, vHPSD ablation outcomes were comparable with those of other techniques.

The missing vector - TactiFlex sensor enabled ablation catheter.

New ablation catheters have continuously developed to improve the safety and efficacy of ablation procedures. The TactiFlex Ablation Catheter Sensor Enabled (Abbott, Minneapolis, MN) is a novel open-irrigation radiofrequency ablation catheter that has contact force-sensing technology and flexible tip, allowing real-time contact force assessment with directionality. This case report reported a loss of contact force vector and directionality with the TactiFlex SE ablation catheter during de novo atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.

Heart failure alters diagnostic yield for pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing computed tomography pulmonary angiogram.

INTRODUCTION: There is limited evidence regarding the effects of a pre-existing heart failure (HF) on the diagnostic yield of pulmonary embolism (PE) evaluation in the Emergency Department (ED). METHODS: Electronic medical record of consecutive adults who underwent a computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) in the ED at Loma Linda University Medical Center between June 1, 2019 and March 25, 2022 were reviewed. Repeat studies for the same patient and patients with unspecified HF diagnoses or isolated right ventricular HF were excluded. Key demographics, lab values and vital signs, relevant medications were collected. Primary outcome was the incidence of PE on CTPA compared between patients with and without pre-existing HF. RESULTS: A total of 2846 patients were included in the study (602 patients with HF and 2244 without). In total cohort, 11.7% (n = 334) of patients had PE found on CTPA. The incidence of PE on CTPA was lower among patients with a history of HF than patients without a history of HF (12.5% vs 9%). A history of pre-existing HF was associated with a lower odds ratio for a positive PE study (OR 0.13, 95%CI: 0.03-0.57) in multivariable analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed that the incidence of PE among patients who undergo CTPA was lower among patients with pre-existing HF compared to those without. Further studies should determine if HF is an important mitigating factor when risk stratifying patients for PE.

Quelling the Storm: A Review of the Management of Electrical Storm.

Heightened sympathetic input to the myocardium potentiates cardiac electrical instability and may herald an electrical storm. An electrical storm is characterized by 3 or more episodes of ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or appropriate internal cardiac defibrillator shocks within 24 hours. Management of electrical storms is resource-intensive and inevitably requires careful coordination between multiple subspecialties. Anesthesiologists have an important role in acute, subacute, and long-term management. Identifying the phase of an electrical storm and understanding the characteristics of each morphology may help the anesthesiologist anticipate the management approach. In the acute phase, management of an electrical storm is aimed at providing advanced cardiac life support and identifying reversible causes. After initial stabilization, subacute management focuses on dampening the sympathetic surge with sedation, thoracic epidural, or stellate ganglion blockade. Definitive long-term management with surgical sympathectomy or catheter ablation also may be warranted. Our objective is to provide an overview of electrical storms and the anesthesiologist's role in management.

Intracardiac echocardiography from coronary sinus.

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has become an essential tool and is an integral part of percutaneous interventional and electrophysiology (EP) procedures. Intracardiac echocardiography offers real-time, high-quality, near-field evaluation of cardiac anatomy. Standard ICE imaging includes placing the catheter in the right atrium (RA), right ventricle (RV), or left atrium (LA, via the transeptal approach). Coronary sinus echocardiography (CSE) is another alternative, where the ICE catheter is positioned in the coronary sinus (CS). This approach offers better catheter stability and allows operators to visualize cardiac structure with particularly excellent views of the LA, LAA, left ventricle (LV), and mitral annulus. Additionally, CSE is an attractive alternative in cases with unfavorable interatrial septum or fossa ovalis anatomical features that could lead to difficulty advancing ICE catheter in left atrium. In this article focusing on CSE, we provide illustration-based guidance to help operators identify critical cardiac structures from CSE.

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in the elderly >75 years old: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is increasingly performed worldwide. As comfort with AF ablation increases, the procedure is increasingly used in patients that are older and in those with more comorbidities. However, it is not well established whether AF ablation in the elderly, especially those >75 years old, has comparable safety and efficacy to younger populations. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety profiles in patients older than 75 years undergoing AF ablation with younger patients. METHODS: Databases from EMBASE, Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane, were searched from inception through September 2021. Studies that compared the success rates in AF catheter ablation and all complications rates between patients who were older vs under 75 years were included. Effect estimates from the individual studies were extracted and combined using random effect, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird. RESULTS: Twenty-seven observational studies were included in the analysis consisting of 363,542 patients who underwent AF ablation. Comparing patients older than 75 years old to younger patients, there was no difference in the success of ablation rates between elderly and younger patients (pooled OR 0.85: 95% CI:0.69-1.05, p = .131). On the other hand, AF ablation in the elderly was associated with higher complication rates (pooled OR 1.42: 95% CI:1.21-1.68, p < .001). CONCLUSION: As AF ablation is expanded to elderly populations, our study found that AF ablation success rates were similar in both elderly and younger patients. However, older patients experience higher rates of complications that should be considered when offering the procedure and as a means to improve outcomes with future innovations.

Surgical versus catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia with a high stroke and mortality rate. The video-assisted thoracoscopic radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation is a treatment option for patients who fail catheter ablation. Randomized data comparing surgical versus catheter ablation are limited. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized control trials to explore the outcome efficacy between surgical and catheter radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation in patients with AF. METHODS: We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to December 2020. Included studies were published randomized control trials that compared video-assisted thoracoscopic and catheter radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation. Data from each study were combined using the fixed-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian, and Laird to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Six studies from November 2013 to 2020 were included in this meta-analysis involving 511 AF patients (79% paroxysmal) with 263 catheter ablation (mean age 56 ± 3 years) and 248 surgical ablations (mean age 52 ± 4 years). Catheter ablation was associated with increased atrial arrhythmias recurrence when compared to surgical ablation (pooled relative risk = 1.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.44-2.39, p < .001, I2 = 0.0%) but associated with less total major adverse events (pooled relative risk = 0.29, 95% confidence interval: 0.16-0.53, p < .001, I2 = 0.0%). In subgroup analysis, catheter ablation was associated with increased AF recurrence in refractory paroxysmal AF when compared to surgical ablation (pooled relative risk = 2.47, 95% confidence interval: 1.31-4.65, p = .005, I2 = 0.0%) but not in persistent AF (relative risk = 1.09, 95% confidence interval: 0.60-2.0, p = .773). CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation was associated with higher atrial arrhythmia recurrence when compared with surgical ablation. However, our study suggests that the benefit of surgical ablation in patients with persistent AF is unclear. More studies and alternative ablation strategies investigation in persistent AF are warranted.

Periprocedural outcomes of protamine administration after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative anticoagulation management with uninterrupted or minimally interrupted anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is thought to be critical to minimize thromboembolic complications. Protamine is often administered to neutralize the effects of heparin and expedite vascular hemostasis post-procedure. OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of protamine to expedite vascular hemostasis and ambulation in patients undergoing AF ablation. METHODS: Electronic searches on PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, EBSCO, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases from the inception through August 7, 2021, were performed. The primary outcomes included-time to hemostasis (minutes) and time to ambulation (minutes). The secondary outcomes included - any vascular complications (excluding minor hematoma), minor hematoma, or cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). RESULTS: A total of 5 eligible studies (3 retrospective cohort studies and two randomized trials) consisting of 1012 patients (515 patients received protamine group and 497 patients did not receive protamine group) were included in the meta-analysis. There was a significant reduction in time to ambulation [weighted mean difference (WMD) -176.6 minutes, 95% Confidence interval (CI) -266.9 to -86.3; p < 0.01] and time to hemostasis (WMD -13.72 minutes, 95% CI -22 to -5.4, p < 0.01) in the protamine group compared to the contrary. At a follow-up up to 3 months, there was no statistical difference between the two groups with regards to vascular complications (2.9% vs. 7.4%; Risk ratio (RR) 0.46 95% CI 0.17 to 1.24; p = 0.12), minor hematoma (2.1% vs. 5.8%; RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.2; p = 0.11) or CVA (0 vs. 0.3%; RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.08 to 4.98; p = 0.65). CONCLUSION: Protamine administration was associated with reduced time to ambulation (176 minutes reduction) and time to hemostasis (13 minutes reduction) without an increase in any adverse events.

Initiation of noninvasive surveillance for allograft rejection in heart transplant patients > 1 year after transplant.

BACKGROUND: Gene expression profiling (GEP) and donor-derived, cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) measurement are alternative methods to endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) to monitor for rejection following heart transplantation. We aim to describe our use of GEP and dd-cfDNA in heart transplant recipients > 1-year post-transplantation. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective study in post-transplant recipients. For patients who were > 1-year post-transplantation and deemed to be at elevated clinical risk for rejection, we collected both GEP and dd-cfDNA every 3 months. Baseline characteristics including GEP, dd-cfDNA levels, rejection episodes, and number of biopsies were obtained. RESULTS: Since July 2019, there were 18 patients being followed with GEP and dd-cfDNA who were > 1-year post-transplantation. Nine EMBs had been performed in seven patients due to as follows; three due to elevated GEP ({greater than or equal to} 34), one due to elevated dd-cfDNA ({greater than or equal to} .20%), two due to elevations of both GEP and dd-cfDNA, two due to clinical rejection and one to follow up a post rejection episode. One of the two biopsies due to elevations of both GEP and dd-cfDNA showed acute cellular rejection grade 2R. None of the biopsies due to either an elevation in the GEP or dd-cfDNA revealed any significant rejection. CONCLUSION: In this study, the use of both GEP and dd-cfDNA led to an increased number of EMB in patients > 1-year post-transplantation. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and evaluate long-term consequences of these diagnostic tests in this population.

Surgical left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with left ventricular assist device.

BACKGROUND: Thromboembolic (TE) events are among the most common and devastating adverse events in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (cf-LVAD). Given the high burden of AF among cf-LVAD patients, we sought to evaluate the effect of concomitant surgical LAAO in patients receiving cf-LVAD. METHODS: A systematic search using electronic databases was performed using the keywords: "left atrial appendage occlusion" and "left ventricular assist device." Statistical analysis was performed using metapackage for R version 4.0 and Rstudio version 1.2. Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio (RR) random-effects model was used to summarize data between two groups. The primary outcomes included: (a) stroke; (b) LVAD pump thrombosis; (c) all-cause mortality RESULTS: Three studies with a total of 305 patients (LAAO = 68 and No-LAAO = 237) were included in the analysis. HeartMate II (39%) and Heartware (27.5%) were the two most common cf-LVADs utilized, while only 5% received HeartMate III. At a mean follow up of 1.47 years, LAAO group had a lower risk of stroke (8.8% vs. 15.2%, RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.28-1.49), LVAD pump thrombosis (1.5% vs. 3.8%, RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.05-1.55) and all-cause mortality (5.9% vs. 20.2%, RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.19-2.52) when compared with no-LAAO group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Concomitant surgical LAAO at the time of cf-LVAD implantation demonstrated a trend toward positive outcomes and was not associated with adverse outcomes during the follow-up period, though the results were not statistically significant.

High-power short duration and low-power long duration in atrial fibrillation ablation: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple strategies have advocation for power titration and catheter movement during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Comparative favoring evidence regarding the efficacy, logistics, and safety of a higher-power, shorter duration (HPSD) ablation strategy compared to a lower-power, longer duration (LPLD) ablation strategy is insubstantial. We performed a meta-analysis to compare arrhythmia-free survival, procedure times, and complication rates between the two strategies. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from inception to September 2020. We included studies comparing patients who underwent HPSD and LPLD strategies for AF ablation and reporting either of the following outcomes: Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) including AF and atrial flutter, procedure time, or periprocedural complications. We combined data using the random-effects model to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and weight mean difference (WMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Ten studies from 2006 to 2020 involving 2274 patients were included (1393 patients underwent HPSD strategy and 881 patients underwent LPLD strategy). HPSD strategy was not associated with increased freedom from AT at 12-month follow-up (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 0.99 to 2.40, p = .054). In the subgroup analysis of the randomized controlled trial, the HPSD strategy was associated with increased freedom from AT compared to the LPLD strategy (OR = 3.12, 95% CI: 1.18 to 8.20, p = .02). There was a significant reduction in the HPSD group for the total procedure (WMD = 49.60, 95% CI: 29.76 to 69.44) and ablation (WMD = 17.92, 95% CI: 13.63 to 22.22) times, but not for fluoroscopy time (WMD = 1.15, 95% CI: -0.67 to 2.97). HPSD was not associated with a reduction in esophageal ulcer/atrioesophageal fistula (OR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.12 to 1.06) or pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade rates (OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.35 to 3.81). CONCLUSIONS: When compared to the LPLD strategy, the HPSD strategy does not improve recurrent AT nor reduce periprocedural complication risks. However, subgroup analysis of the randomized controlled trial showed that HPSD significantly reduces AT recurrence. An HPSD strategy can significantly reduce total procedure and ablation times.

Zero fluoroscopy approach versus fluoroscopy approach for cardiac arrhythmia ablations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency catheter ablation for cardiac arrhythmias has traditionally been guided by fluoroscopy. Fluoroscopy exposes the patient, operator, and staff to ionizing radiation which has no safe dose void of stochastic and deterministic biologic risks. Zero fluoroscopy (ZF) approaches for catheter ablation have been advocated to eliminate these risks. We conducted a meta-analysis comparing acute procedure success, recurrence-free survival, complications, and procedure times between the approaches. METHODS: We conducted a literature search from inception through December 2020 in the databases of EMBASE and MEDLINE. We included randomized controlled trials and cohorts that compared the outcomes of interest in ZF and conventional/low fluoroscopy (CF/LF) approaches. The outcomes sought were acute procedure success, recurrence-free survival, complications, and procedure times. Effect estimates were combined, using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird. RESULTS: Sixteen studies from 2013 to 2020, including 6052 patients (2219 ZF, 3833 CF/LF) were included. There were no significant differences in acute procedure success rate (odds ratio [OR]: 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-1.59), recurrence-free survival (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.78-1.49), periprocedural complication rate (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.45-1.16), or total procedure time (weighted mean difference 2.32 min, 95% CI: -2.85-7.50) between ZF and CF/LF approaches, respectively. Overall, only 1.26% of patients crossed over from ZF to CF/LF arm. CONCLUSIONS: Periprocedural and postprocedural outcomes with a ZF approach compared favorably with traditional fluoroscopic guidance without increasing procedural times. As comfort with ZF grows, coupled with evolving mapping technologies, this method has potential to become the standard approach for catheter ablation.

Risk factors and outcomes of post-transplant erythrocytosis among adult kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Post-transplant erythrocytosis (PTE) can occur in up to 10-16% after kidney transplant (KT). However, the post-transplant outcomes of recipients with PTE in the literature were conflicting. We performed systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to evaluate risk factors of PTE as well as outcomes of recipients who developed PTE compared with controls. A literature search was conducted evaluating all literature from existence through February 2, 2021, using MEDLINE and EMBASE. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects model. (PROSPERO: CRD42021230377). Thirty-nine studies from July 1982 to January 2021 were included (7,099 KT recipients). The following factors were associated with PTE development: male gender (pooled RR = 1.62 [1.38, 1.91], I2 = 39%), deceased-donor KT (pooled RR = 1.18 [1.03, 1.35], I2 = 32%), history of smoking (pooled RR = 1.36 [1.11, 1.67], I2 = 13%), underlying polycystic kidney disease (PKD) (pooled RR=1.56 [1.21, 2.01], I2 =44%), and pretransplant dialysis (pooled RR=1.6 [1.02, 2.51], I2 =46%). However, PTE was not associated with outcomes of interest, including overall mortality, death-censored graft failure, and thromboembolism. Our meta-analysis demonstrates that male gender, deceased-donor KT, history of smoking, underlying PKD, and pretransplant dialysis were significantly associated with developing PTE. However, with proper management, PTE has no impact on prognosis of KT patients.

Same-day discharge after implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Due to an increasing need for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) placement, the cost of healthcare has been rising including the cost of hospital stay after the procedure. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and feasibility of same-day discharge (SDD) after cardiac device implantations. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, and Embase databases from inception to March 2021 to identify studies that compared clinical outcomes between SDD group and hospital overnight stay (HO) group after cardiac device implantations. Outcomes included complications after the procedure, mortality, and re-hospitalization. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects model to calculate pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Eight studies (one randomized control trial, three prospective cohort and four retrospective cohort studies) with a total of 61,602 patients (4153 in SDD group and 57,449 in HO group) were included. SDD was not associated with more procedure-related complications. The rates of wound problems (0.94% vs 1.84%, pooled OR = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.2-3.68, p = .834), pneumothorax (1.15% vs 0.73%, pooled OR = 1.36, 95%CI: 0.26-7.12, p = .718), hematoma (0.59% vs 2.32%, pooled OR = 0.35, 95%CI:0.01-9.85, p = .534), lead/device dislodgement (4% vs 2.48%, pooled OR = 1.71, 95%CI: 0.64-4.54, p = .281), readmission rate (17.6% vs 17.5%, pooled OR = 0.95, 95%CI: 0.74-1.21, p = .667), and mortality rate (1.66% vs 1.44%, pooled OR = 0.77, 95%CI: 0.58-1.01, p = .059) were similar between in SDD and HO groups respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggested that SDD after cardiac device implantations might be a safe and feasible alternative to HO without differences in procedure-related complications, readmission rates, or mortality rates.

Comparison between same-day discharge and overnight stay after atrial fibrillation ablation: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: In the modern era, atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation trend has been shifted toward same-day discharge (SDD), from a traditional overnight stay. Yet, recent studies have not well stated the safety profiles which remained poor-understood and dispersed. We hence performed systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the adverse outcomes of SDD in comparison with an overnight stay. METHODS: Databases were searched through January 2021. Effect estimates from the individual studies were extracted and combined using random-effects, generic inverse variance method of der Simonian and Laird. The primary outcomes included total cumulative complications and immediate complications following AF ablation. RESULTS: Ten observational studies were met our inclusion criteria, comprising of total population of 11,660 patients, with SDD 51.3%. For total cumulative complications, there were no differences observed between SDD and overnight stay (5.2% vs. 6.2%: pooled OR 0.77: 95% CI 0.55-1.08, p = .13 with I2  = 27.1%). In addition, comparable immediate complications were also demonstrated (5.2 % vs. 4.3: pooled OR 1.08: 95% CI 0.72-1.62, p = .718, with I2  = 37.3 %). CONCLUSION: Our study suggested that SDD had similar complication rates, both total cumulative and immediate outcomes, compared with overnight stay in selected patients following AF ablation. Nevertheless, randomized control trials are warranted to validate the findings.

The utility of drug challenge testing in Brugada syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is associated with ventricular arrhythmia leading to sudden cardiac death. Risk stratification is challenging, as major arrhythmic events (MAEs) are rare. We assessed the utility of drug challenge testing in BrS by a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to May 2019. Included studies compared the incidence of MAE between spontaneous and drug challenge-induced Type 1. Mixed-effects Poisson regression was used to calculate the incidence rate ratio (IRR). Eighteen studies from 2006 to 2018 were included (4099 patients, mean follow-up: 4.5 years). Pooled annual incidences of MAE in spontaneous, drug challenge induced (regardless of symptoms), asymptomatic drug challenge induced, and symptomatic drug challenge-induced Type 1 were 23.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.8-27.8), 6.5 (95% CI: 3.9-9.1), 2.1 (95% CI: -0.3 to 4.4), and 19.6 (95% CI: 9.9-29.3) per 1000 person-years, respectively. The incidence of MAE between symptomatic drug challenge induced and asymptomatic spontaneous Type 1 was not statistically different (IRR = 1.0; 95% CI: 0.6-1.7). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of MAE in drug challenge-induced Type 1 in asymptomatic patients is low. The incidence of MAE between symptomatic drug challenge induced and asymptomatic spontaneous Type 1 was similar.