RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship of supraspinatus fat fraction and Goutallier grade to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score in cohorts of older adults with painful full-thickness supraspinatus tendon (SST) tear and control subjects. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Seventeen control subjects and 15 study participants with painful full-thickness SST tear were prospectively recruited (mean age ± SD, 63.0 ± 10.1 years and 62.6 ± 9.0 years, respectively). Study participants received shoulder MRI and completed ASES questionnaires at one time. Goutallier grade was assessed on T1-weighted MRI. Fat fraction was measured on 6-point Dixon MRI. Body mass index (BMI) was determined. Descriptive, correlation, reliability, and regression analyses were performed. RESULTS. The control and painful full-thickness SST tear cohorts differed in mean supraspinatus fat fraction (3.3% ± 1.4% and 7.3 ± 5.9%, respectively; p = 0.024) and Goutallier grade (0.4 ± 0.5 and 0.9 ± 0.7, respectively; p = 0.022). Fat fraction (p = 0.014) and Goutallier grade (p = 0.017) showed a significant inverse association with ASES score only in the SST tear cohort. The association of BMI to ASES score was significant only in the control group (p = 0.036). The correlation between BMI and fat fraction were different for the two groups (control cohort, r = 0.676 and p = 0.003; SST tear cohort, r = 0.124 and p = 0.687). Fat fraction showed strong interobserver reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.903); Goutallier grade showed poor interobserver reliability (κ = 0.178). CONCLUSION. The association of ASES score and supraspinatus fat fraction or Goutallier grade differs between patients with painful full-thickness SST tear and control subjects without symptoms. Although fat fraction shows strong reliability, Goutallier grade should be regarded cautiously because of suboptimal reproducibility. Our results also suggest that painful full-thickness SST tear alters the correlation between supraspinatus fat fraction and BMI as compared with control subjects.