RESUMEN
Background and Aims The prevalence and extent of liver damage in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients remain poorly understood, primarily due to small-sized epidemiological studies with varying definitions of "liver injury". We conducted a meta-analysis to derive generalizable, well-powered estimates of liver injury prevalence in COVID-19 patients. We also aimed to assess whether liver injury prevalence is significantly greater than the baseline prevalence of chronic liver disease (CLD). Our secondary aim was to study whether the degree of liver injury was associated with the severity of COVID-19. Materials and Methods Electronic databases (PubMed and Scopus) were systematically searched in June 2020 for studies reporting the prevalence of baseline CLD and current liver injury in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Liver injury was defined as an elevation in transaminases >3 times above the upper limit of normal. For the secondary analysis, all studies reporting mean liver enzyme levels in severe versus non-severe COVID-19 patients were included. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. Proportions were subjected to arcsine transformation and pooled to derive pooled proportions and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup differences were tested for using the chi-square test and associated p-value. Means and their standard errors were pooled to derive weighted mean differences (WMDs) and corresponding 95% CIs. Results Electronic search yielded a total of 521 articles. After removal of duplicates and reviewing the full-texts of potential studies, a total of 27 studies met the inclusion criteria. Among a cohort of 8,817 patients, the prevalence of current liver injury was 15.7% (9.5%-23.0%), and this was significantly higher than the proportion of patients with a history of CLD (4.9% [2.2%-8.6%]; p < 0.001). A total of 2,900 patients in our population had severe COVID-19, and 7,184 patients had non-severe COVID-19. Serum ALT (WMD: 7.19 [4.90, 9.48]; p < 0.001; I2 = 69%), AST (WMD: 9.02 [6.89, 11.15]; p < 0.001; I2 = 73%) and bilirubin levels (WMD: 1.78 [0.86, 2.70]; p < 0.001; I2 = 82%) were significantly higher in patients with severe COVID-19 when compared to patients with non-severe disease. Albumin levels were significantly lower in patients with severe COVID-19 (WMD: -4.16 [-5.97, -2.35]; p < 0.001; I2 = 95%). Conclusions Patients with COVID-19 have a higher than expected prevalence of liver injury, and the extent of the injury is associated with the severity of the disease. Further studies are required to assess whether hepatic damage is caused by the virus, medications, or both.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a rare but severe complication in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). We aimed to examine the incidence and outcomes of ICH among ITP hospitalizations and factors associated with it. Additionally, we studied resource utilization for these hospitalizations. METHODS: Using National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM/ICD-10-CM) codes, we studied ITP hospitalizations with occurrence of ICH between 2007 and 2016. RESULT: Out of 348,906 weighted ITP hospitalizations, ICH occurred in 3,408 encounters (incidence 1.1 ± 0.04%). The incidence remained stable over time (2007-2008: 1.01%, 2015-2016: 1.20%; P = 0.3). People with age ≥25 years, especially those aged ≥65 years (odds ratio [OR] 3.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.34-5.84), or those with gastrointestinal bleed (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.18-2.16) were significantly more likely to develop ICH. Female gender (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.97) had lower odds for developing ICH. Overall mortality in ITP hospitalizations with ICH was 26.7%. Length of stay (LOS) was longer (4.8 vs. 2.6 days) and costs of hospitalization (COH) were higher ($20,081 vs. $8,355) in ICH hospitalizations compared to non-ICH ITP hospitalizations. Increasing age and comorbidities such as gastrointestinal bleed, hematuria, and other bleeding were also associated with longer LOS and higher COH. CONCLUSION: Although rare, ICH in ITP was associated with a high mortality and increased resource utilization. Clinicians should be cognizant of factors associated with risk of ICH in ITP, and future studies should reassess the ICH trends to study the impact of novel therapeutic options such as thrombopoietin receptor agonists.